Monthly Archives: March 2019

Miscarriages:- Hands across the Veil 18th March 2019

Miscarriages.

Hands across the Veil.

I had the sudden urge to hold a session this afternoon and was prompted to tell Jean to ask a question about our miscarriages. After a lengthy setting of the scene for the purposes of understanding I had the most intense, loving greeting from the two children who never made it to us. So, so wonderful. They appeared to me as grown up, as they would be, and I just know that they have been part of our family all along, whether here or there. To all those of you who have suffered the loss of an unborn listen to this and see what emotions come over you. Your loved ones may take this as an opportunity to make themselves known.

(Find in Session Audio Files)

Xenoglossy 11th March 2019

Would you please explain the phenomenon of xenoglossy given that thoughts are normally given in the normal language of the speaker? What is the process by which the higher consciousness can translate thought into the native language of the sender (and the receiver of the communication) even if the speaker has never spoken the language before?

A conundrum which has been cogitated upon by many with very few able to put forward a credible and acceptable theory but again the answer is relatively simple once you start to reason out the source of the information and the purpose for why it is being transmitted.

Now why would one wish to do this? We speak as the one, maybe, who would be capable of instigating such an exercise. It would seem to be of relatively little use unless of course you could say that the communicator may have been, let us say, Ethiopian and wishes to communicate with a fellow Ethiopian who was known to him or her but the only available medium had never spoken Ethiopian and had no knowledge of the language whatsoever.

So we say, “How can we do this, how can one get this done, what do we really need here, we need a totally clear channel? An instrument who is basically completely open, has no blockage whatsoever.”

Now this is not possible on a permanent basis of course otherwise you enter the realms of mental illness as you care to term it or various other mental conditions. But it is possible on a temporary basis and so you see these examples of xenoglossy in very deep trance mediums where basically they have completely stood aside and temporarily abrogated their, let us say, right to block any incoming transmission that they do not understand. An element of trust is involved here on behalf of, what you might call now, the instrument and also on a very large degree of cooperation between the gestalt consciousness of that particular medium and the transmitting consciousness.

So, it happens and everybody says, “Now how can this be”? Now imagine that you have a television (instrument) tuned to channel 1, channel 2 cannot get through, but if you switch channels to channel 2 then channel 2 can get through. So take your instrument that is only generally tuned to channel 1 (your personal identity frequency we could call it) but then it steps aside and says “Ok, we’ll leave the tuner dial to you, we will widen the waveband possibility for you”. The transmission then comes through on a different frequency and that then operates the vocal cords because it comes through the brain but the brain is only doing the translation into sounds.

Do not confuse sounds with language. All language is sound and the brain knows how to operate the vocal cords to produce the sound. So when the thoughts are sent, again this isn’t how it is but let us say couched in Ethiopian, then the sounds produced are Ethiopian and that would give you the sounds of the words of course, and that is language. It is simply that the medium and the gestalt consciousness of the medium have stepped aside and have allowed the whole mechanism, you might say, to operate on behalf of the transmitting consciousness and when it is finished it simply reverts to normal. The brain no longer receives on channel 2 but reverts to channel 1 once more.

Now this is a very simplistic explanation but it is basically the process that is followed. All thoughts are able to be translated into the language of the recipient no matter which language they speak. You will easily admit that thought can arise from a sight, sound or sensation. Now sit down every person speaking any language whatsoever, subject them to the same sensation, panorama and then ask them to describe that. They will each describe that in their own language but when you translate from one language to the other they will in general, apart from observer bias, colour for example, be comparable and in consensus. Would you agree with that?

Yes.

So your Chinese person, your Dutch person, your American person etc. will all say “There is a man riding a bike there”. They will say it in their own language but what they saw they will describe.

What has happened? They have taken the sensation or the sight, which you may say is converted into thought and that thought is converted into language.  Of course you will say that is because they have learned that language and programmed that language. Now refer back to what we have just said and you will see that it can be done.

That is as good an explanation of xenoglossy as you are likely to get from us at least. You will get many other explanations but whether they will stand up to Occam’s razor is moot.

Now can we address the second part of your question please?

Yes.

The process by which it is translated into the native language of the receiver is quite easy in that the brain is programmed to become a labour saving instrument so that one does not have to be bothered with going through the full process of everyday action. It learns how to walk, eat, speak and it will learn how to speak in such a way that it is able to be understood and it is able to understand the words that come back?

Yes. So that is the speaker?

Yes. This is the instrument and the brain.

We are talking about the instrument changing the language that he has never, ever heard before into the language of the listener?

The receiver of the communication rather than the receiver of the thought?

Yes.

I think we covered that in our prior explanation. That is quite simple.

Yes, you did.

It is an interesting point isn’t it? You can understand why other languages are blocked off because you couldn’t have, what you might call, as some in the spiritualist movement would say, your Chinese guide trying to jabber away in Chinese. You wouldn’t understand a word. This is why these sorts of things are few and far between, they simply don’t make sense and upset the apple cart. It is allowed here and now in just the way that photographic memory is and hyperthymesia. It gives you a few signposts in working out how reality is created and how the whole process works.

Another little signpost on the way to, what you term, enlightenment. Although we do not really approve of that terminology.

We are enjoying being able to take you further down the rabbit hole as you are aware of and before we go, as our instrument is busily reminding us here, we gave him the term of ‘morphic library’ this morning which he found rather neat and if you compare that to ‘morphogenetic fields’ or the Akashic records or Einstein’s ‘higher plane of knowledge’ then ‘morphic library has quite a ring to it, doesn’t it? So I do believe we will have to use this more in future transmissions.

Thank you.

This can also be found in Session Audio Files.  We wanted to know how the other side would explain it as apparently no-one has an explanation here that they want to put forward. See article below.

Reincarnation buffs will probably have an opinion. Our teachers explanation seems eminently sensible. Whether you look at it from here or there it bolsters the case for the body being merely an instrument or vehicle for the expression of a conscious personality.

The Phenomenon of Xenoglossy taken from actforlibraries.org 

The phenomenon of xenoglossy (knowledge of a language one has never learned) is almost always associated with severe head injuries, recovery from comas or hypnotic “experiments.”

Two types of xenoglossy are recognized: recitative and responsive. Recitative is the most common and people exhibiting it will utter words or phrases of an alien language without understanding their meaning.

Responsive is a much rarer form of xenoglossy: an individual is abruptly endowed with the capability of fluently speaking and conversing in a language completely (or virtually) previously unknown to them.

The latest case making world headlines is the rarer form of the phenomenon. According to doctors in Croatia, a 13-year old girl from Knin—a southern town—’mysteriously’ fell into a coma. When she responded to questions put to her with fluent German! [1]

Her parents claim that while she had just started studying the German language at school, was reading German books and watching some German TV, she was far from being fluent in the language and just had a rudimentary grasp.

Dujomir Marasovic, the hospital director stated the staff were still in the process of determining what precipitated the coma and why it is the girl has forgotten her native language.

The director has called in other doctors to examine the girl—including German speaking doctors-in an attempt to unravel the oddity.

“You never know when recovering from such a trauma how the brain will react. Obviously we have some theories although at the moment we are limited in what we can say because we have to respect the privacy of the patient,” Marasovic explained. [2]

Hospital staff psychologist, Dr. Mijo Milas observed, “In earlier times this would have been referred to as a miracle, we prefer to think that there must be a logical explanation—it’s just that we haven’t found it yet.” [3]

Unfortunately, Dr. Milas may be looking for that explanation the rest of his life. What happened to the young Croation girl is nothing new. The phenomenon has been observed for hundreds of years.

Although anecdotal tales exist going back hundreds of years, one of the first well-documented occurrences of this phenomenon took place in 1862. During a demonstration of “mesmerizing” (hypnosis), a Prince Galtizin had a German woman who had no ability to speak any language other than her native tongue suddenly conversing in fluent French. Galtizin explained it as regression, claiming the woman had mentally reverted to a past life in France.

In the year 1977 an amazing xenoglossy case was documented. A Mr. Billy Mulligan, an Ohio State penitentiary inmate, was discovered by prison psychiatrists to have two distinct personalities. The first identity called himself “Abdul” and spoke flawless Arabic; the second, “Rugen” conversed in perfect Serbo-Croation. Yet according to the prison officials, Mulligan—who was a natural born citizen of the United States and had never left the country—was unaware of these other two personalities and had never studied either language!

Researcher and biologist, Lyall Watson recalls the case of a 10-year old Filipino boy who, when under a trance, spoke the Zulu language. He spoke it perfectly although he’d never even heard of it!

And back in 2007, a famous case involving Czech race car driver, Matej Kus, occurred after a near fatal accident on the racecourse. After regaining consciousness from his injuries, Kus-who previously had struggled to speak broken English-suddenly found himself speaking perfect English … with a British accent!

His new found talent didn’t last long, however, and he had to continue struggling with his English courses after a few days of glory. [4]

Some scientists have proposed that such cases might stem from a genetic legacy, while fringe science links it with the paranormal. [5]

Whatever the phenomenon proves to be, as Milas so succinctly sums it up: “There are references to cases where people who have been seriously ill and perhaps in a coma have woken up being able to speak other languages—sometimes even the Biblical languages such as that spoken in old Babylon or Egypt—at the moment though any speculation would remain just that—speculation—so it’s better to continue tests until we actually know something.”

Footnotes

[1] “Croatian teenager wakes from coma speaking fluent German,” UK Telegraph, April 12, 2010

[2] “Croatian teenager wakes up from a coma speaking fluent German,” Daily Mail, April 12, 2010

[3] “Croatian teenager wakes from coma speaking fluent German,” UK Telegraph, ibbid.

[4] Czech speedway rider knocked out in crash wakes up speaking perfect English,” Daily Mail

[5] “Xenoglossy: Evidence of Past Lives?” Leonardo Vintini, Epoch Times staff writer

Links to other cases of xenoglossy

Stroke gives woman British accent

Brain injury gives woman a foreign accent

My stroke left me with foreign accent

British charity worker recovers from car crash in Romania … to speak with ROMANIAN accent

Man awoke from coma to find he had a foreign accent

Polish girl begins speaking Gaelic

Soul-Mates We love and are loved by so many more than we are presently aware of. 9th March 2019


                              SOUL-MATES

        We love and are loved by so many more than we are presently aware of.

When we pass over are we also met by those we know in simultaneous lives?

So when you take a cruise do you bump into people that you have met on another cruise?

Yes, sometimes.

And, of course you have no interaction with those people in any other situation other than the cruise?

No.

But you know them and they are leading an entirely separate life of which you have no knowledge and vice versa. Yes?

Yes.

Now let us assume that they have passed over and are now back in the totally interconnected state and then you pass over and because you have had a resonance and you have knowledge, you have had an interaction before, then you are, as is said, entangled. So the connection forever exists. Therefore if firm friends you had met once or twice or more on a cruise and then had no connection other than that but whose company you thoroughly enjoyed and even grown to like very much and upon returning to the situation where you know full well that they are aware that you are coming to that, let us say, particular location then you would be quite pleased if they were there to meet you. Yes?

Yes.

And what would you do? Always put yourself in the same position. If you knew that your friend, H, was coming over would you not go along to give her a welcoming smile? Now run yourself through other people that you haven’t seen for years and would you go and welcome them?

Yes.

Now look at all the neighbours that have passed over, you would be more than happy to welcome them, wouldn’t you?

Yes, personally I would but I can imagine that some people with horrendous neighbours would certainly not want to welcome them.

So let us transfer this to another activity. You have your friends here, you have the friends you left in England, you have the friends you meet on the cruise ships and you can extend that to school friends and all others you have been connected with. Now look upon that as separate lives which, in terms of partial aspects, you could easily see as such. Would you agree?

To a certain extent, obviously they are still physical lives….

Yes, but are they segments of a physical life?

Segments, yes.

Now do you think that you experience all your lives and are part of all of those lives?

Ermm.

When you experience another life, you experience that life. Yes?

Yes.

So you experience life No.1, life No.2, life No.3?

Yes.

Are those lives all part of your experience?

Yes, they are all part….

Of your experience?

Yes.

So all the people that you meet and get to know and love in those lives, then just the same, they are part of your life?

Yes.

So you could look at your overall life and break it into its individual lives, its individual segments, even though lived simultaneously?

Yes.

There is no difference between living these lives simultaneously, if you look upon them as spread out before you, and all the segments of your physical life spread out before you. They all exist, all the connections exist. So as you look at them you say “I know them, I really enjoyed their company, I hope to get to enjoy their company again now in a different situation”. And would you not say, “Let’s meet up and go over old times”. You might even say “Let’s do something together again shall we”? Now spread this across all and you will see you have many, many connections. Everybody has many, many connections but, as we have said before, there are preferences, not so much preferences as against one person or another but activities, ideas that float by and then “I think I’ll join in with this one” and that depends on who you are connected with elsewhere. They may see the same idea, see that “ah, you are in it” and that spurs them to join also. Likewise for you if you see that a good friend is focusing on a particular idea a thought may flash between you “Well I’ll do it if you’ll do it, we could have fun in this one, we touched base in that other one, let’s do this one”.

Now where do you think the idea of soul-mate came from?

Well, I think it comes from, the other side, from those you resonate with, those who you do want to do different lives with.

So if we had mentioned ‘soul-mate’ at the beginning of this little discourse, would you have then sat there, thought your way through it and been able to come up with exactly the same words that we have?

I may have been able to reach some similar conclusions that like attracts like and one may search out others who you know have similar interests.

So yes, there will be lots of people that you will meet. It will be the usual surprise party, if you wish, there is so and so and there’s so and so else and “I didn’t expect to see you here”. At the moment you are expecting the relatives from this life and when you go over they will be the first in the queue but then as you wander through the throng you will come across the others by which time you are quite used to the fact that you are back so the next things that come flooding back are your other lives and your other participations.

That is not to say that you are immersed in all those other lives. Remember, when you get back you may as well say for the purposes of this little talk that you are at the back of the theatre or outside the theatre mingling with all the fellow actors. Yes?

Understood.

But if you went back inside the theatre, as we gave you before, you were sitting in the round, you had your six theatres around you and you could focus onto six stages, if you were able to put two and two together you would be able to see the actor on the stage, recognise who it is, go outside the theatre and immediately recognise the player. Can you see the idea?

The question was “Will we meet up with everyone we ever knew” basically, and yes, if you have the strong enough connection they will be there to say hello. I think we once said before that maybe the ones who are a little bit more on the fringe wish to tip their hat but may wish to stay on the outer edges until you have finished meeting up with all those ones with which you were truly connected.

 

Continuation of above session theme, question not recorded.

 

You return to the other side, I return to the other side. We both become aware, if we wish to, of all lives that we have ever been involved in or are involved in. Now in those lives we are aware of all the connections we have in each one of those lives. Are they all separate?

Yes, each life is separate.

So each ‘photo album’ is separate? (The record of the life)

Yes.

So when something comes up on ‘life 43’e.g. you suddenly receive the thought re life 43, Fred has come over, then you are immediately aware of what Fred looked like (as the record/ photo album is instantly connected ) and as soon as you are aware of what Fred looked like, you are linked with Fred , aren’t you?

Yes.

So are you then in a position to send a thought to Fred “Hi Fred, glad you have come over”?

Yes.

Now, you must eliminate the time aspect. All those involved in that life, in that gestalt of ‘Fred’ are alerted but are focused through the image of ‘Fred’, because the image of ‘Fred’ then becomes reactivated, we might say, in all those awarenesses. (The memory of living a life as ‘Fred’). Are you aware of what we are saying?

Not 100% but carry on.

Each awareness remembers being ‘Joe’( You will need to go to the index and read ‘Entangled Minds’ to understand the following), each awareness remembers being ‘Joanna’. Therefore if a message comes to Joe or a message comes to Joanna, each awareness that ever was Joe or Joanna is aware of the message, but it only thinks of Joe, or Joanna, it does not think of itself. Because it did not have an identity, its identity was experienced through Joe or Joanna. Do you understand that? (To simplify, when a ‘Joe awareness thinks, or sends a thought to Joanna, an image of Joe or thought of Joe arises in the ‘mind’ of each awareness that was ever a part of the Joanna gestalt i.e. experienced being Joanna. Once connected always connected, quantum entanglement or interconnectedness if you like)

Yes.

So you still have the same, confluence of minds, and you still have a majority coming through because you have reactivated (re-commenced) the data stream of the gestalt. Yes?

Yes.

So you going over are in the same position.

Yes. So the people that have passed before you, that are coming to meet you, who have experienced many other lives are also entangled with those that they have experienced in those other lives therefore…….

You are entangled with all your daily activities, are you able to focus on G.. and the golf club?

Yes, but I thought you just said that many others from many other lives, when somebody passes over, I don’t want to use the word ‘comes’……

Use the word ‘actor’. Let us take for example a name you know. Let us take ‘Richard Burton’, he has played in many films, many plays, many productions.

Yes.

In each one of those productions he made connections, each one of those went off and did their many productions. Now, let us say that Richard Burton is coming to town. Everybody knows that Richard Burton is coming to town.

I enjoyed working with Richard Burton, Richard Burton is going to be at the Kings Head (pub) at 7pm on Saturday. I think I’ll go along and meet him. Now does that explain it to you?

Yes. That is a better explanation.

‘Entangled’ just means you know them, OK, and if we go one further of course we get into the fact that the total interconnection is there, you know each other’s thoughts etc. etc., but only if you wish to focus upon them. All knowledge is always available but you do not focus on all knowledge all of the time. You only focus on that which you wish to focus upon. That which is of interest to you. All else you will ignore although you know it is available.

And when you do focus upon another you are aware of each other’s feelings once more, in the same way as you make a phone call, you recognise the voice and you instantly recognise the feeling that is in that voice. You listen to the tone of the voice and what arises in you, a nice feeling, laughter, it’s not strange is it? So what do you call that but entanglement? The word ‘entanglement’ is not a good word to use, ‘emotionally connected’ we might say, and of course most will say ‘love’. But that word has its own connotations and you can take that from acquaintance to like to love and reverse. Feelings will be aroused by your previous connections, emotional connections, with that person, good or bad.

In general however, all that were ever Joe, all that were ever Joanna etc. etc. always remember if the message comes through, and what happens, you get a good feeling, there’s your emotional entanglement.  “I get a good feeling, I’d love to meet up with them again”. Remember you are aware of the feelings of the other person the minute you focus so you know full well if they will welcome seeing you unless they deliberately shield which most do not bother. So have we answered you?

Yes thank you.

Now the thought will carry the intensity of the expression of their warmth of welcome which you will feel with the accompanying picture. Let us say you are known to be on television on channel 1, the screen is split into however many images you care to countenance, all your connections can send their image and depending on the intensity of the image, we will talk in terms of pictures, their particular picture on the screen will grab your attention, others will not grab your attention. Now can you understand that?

Yes.

So mental pictures go backwards and forwards, you receive all the mental pictures and you can focus on an awful lot at once of course, but some will be more intense than others. Now when that mental picture comes through, of Joe say, that will be all those awarenesses that were involved with (part of) Joe that knew and loved you, but they will come through the Joe picture because they will think of Joe (the Joe whose physical life they experienced). Joe will be the image and that image will be on the screen and likewise they will be receiving your image on their screen.

Now it is possibly best to think of all this in terms of your present messaging and just extrapolate that as receiving all this in the mind.

Thank you.