We love and are loved by so many more than we are presently aware of.
When we pass over are we also met by those we know in simultaneous lives?
So when you take a cruise do you bump into people that you have met on another cruise?
And, of course you have no interaction with those people in any other situation other than the cruise?
But you know them and they are leading an entirely separate life of which you have no knowledge and vice versa. Yes?
Now let us assume that they have passed over and are now back in the totally interconnected state and then you pass over and because you have had a resonance and you have knowledge, you have had an interaction before, then you are, as is said, entangled. So the connection forever exists. Therefore if firm friends you had met once or twice or more on a cruise and then had no connection other than that but whose company you thoroughly enjoyed and even grown to like very much and upon returning to the situation where you know full well that they are aware that you are coming to that, let us say, particular location then you would be quite pleased if they were there to meet you. Yes?
And what would you do? Always put yourself in the same position. If you knew that your friend, H, was coming over would you not go along to give her a welcoming smile? Now run yourself through other people that you haven’t seen for years and would you go and welcome them?
Now look at all the neighbours that have passed over, you would be more than happy to welcome them, wouldn’t you?
Yes, personally I would but I can imagine that some people with horrendous neighbours would certainly not want to welcome them.
So let us transfer this to another activity. You have your friends here, you have the friends you left in England, you have the friends you meet on the cruise ships and you can extend that to school friends and all others you have been connected with. Now look upon that as separate lives which, in terms of partial aspects, you could easily see as such. Would you agree?
To a certain extent, obviously they are still physical lives….
Yes, but are they segments of a physical life?
Now do you think that you experience all your lives and are part of all of those lives?
When you experience another life, you experience that life. Yes?
So you experience life No.1, life No.2, life No.3?
Are those lives all part of your experience?
Yes, they are all part….
Of your experience?
So all the people that you meet and get to know and love in those lives, then just the same, they are part of your life?
So you could look at your overall life and break it into its individual lives, its individual segments, even though lived simultaneously?
There is no difference between living these lives simultaneously, if you look upon them as spread out before you, and all the segments of your physical life spread out before you. They all exist, all the connections exist. So as you look at them you say “I know them, I really enjoyed their company, I hope to get to enjoy their company again now in a different situation”. And would you not say, “Let’s meet up and go over old times”. You might even say “Let’s do something together again shall we”? Now spread this across all and you will see you have many, many connections. Everybody has many, many connections but, as we have said before, there are preferences, not so much preferences as against one person or another but activities, ideas that float by and then “I think I’ll join in with this one” and that depends on who you are connected with elsewhere. They may see the same idea, see that “ah, you are in it” and that spurs them to join also. Likewise for you if you see that a good friend is focusing on a particular idea a thought may flash between you “Well I’ll do it if you’ll do it, we could have fun in this one, we touched base in that other one, let’s do this one”.
Now where do you think the idea of soul-mate came from?
Well, I think it comes from, the other side, from those you resonate with, those who you do want to do different lives with.
So if we had mentioned ‘soul-mate’ at the beginning of this little discourse, would you have then sat there, thought your way through it and been able to come up with exactly the same words that we have?
I may have been able to reach some similar conclusions that like attracts like and one may search out others who you know have similar interests.
So yes, there will be lots of people that you will meet. It will be the usual surprise party, if you wish, there is so and so and there’s so and so else and “I didn’t expect to see you here”. At the moment you are expecting the relatives from this life and when you go over they will be the first in the queue but then as you wander through the throng you will come across the others by which time you are quite used to the fact that you are back so the next things that come flooding back are your other lives and your other participations.
That is not to say that you are immersed in all those other lives. Remember, when you get back you may as well say for the purposes of this little talk that you are at the back of the theatre or outside the theatre mingling with all the fellow actors. Yes?
But if you went back inside the theatre, as we gave you before, you were sitting in the round, you had your six theatres around you and you could focus onto six stages, if you were able to put two and two together you would be able to see the actor on the stage, recognise who it is, go outside the theatre and immediately recognise the player. Can you see the idea?
The question was “Will we meet up with everyone we ever knew” basically, and yes, if you have the strong enough connection they will be there to say hello. I think we once said before that maybe the ones who are a little bit more on the fringe wish to tip their hat but may wish to stay on the outer edges until you have finished meeting up with all those ones with which you were truly connected.
Continuation of above session theme, question not recorded.
You return to the other side, I return to the other side. We both become aware, if we wish to, of all lives that we have ever been involved in or are involved in. Now in those lives we are aware of all the connections we have in each one of those lives. Are they all separate?
Yes, each life is separate.
So each ‘photo album’ is separate? (The record of the life)
So when something comes up on ‘life 43’e.g. you suddenly receive the thought re life 43, Fred has come over, then you are immediately aware of what Fred looked like (as the record/ photo album is instantly connected ) and as soon as you are aware of what Fred looked like, you are linked with Fred , aren’t you?
So are you then in a position to send a thought to Fred “Hi Fred, glad you have come over”?
Now, you must eliminate the time aspect. All those involved in that life, in that gestalt of ‘Fred’ are alerted but are focused through the image of ‘Fred’, because the image of ‘Fred’ then becomes reactivated, we might say, in all those awarenesses. (The memory of living a life as ‘Fred’). Are you aware of what we are saying?
Not 100% but carry on.
Each awareness remembers being ‘Joe’( You will need to go to the index and read ‘Entangled Minds’ to understand the following), each awareness remembers being ‘Joanna’. Therefore if a message comes to Joe or a message comes to Joanna, each awareness that ever was Joe or Joanna is aware of the message, but it only thinks of Joe, or Joanna, it does not think of itself. Because it did not have an identity, its identity was experienced through Joe or Joanna. Do you understand that? (To simplify, when a ‘Joe awareness thinks, or sends a thought to Joanna, an image of Joe or thought of Joe arises in the ‘mind’ of each awareness that was ever a part of the Joanna gestalt i.e. experienced being Joanna. Once connected always connected, quantum entanglement or interconnectedness if you like)
So you still have the same, confluence of minds, and you still have a majority coming through because you have reactivated (re-commenced) the data stream of the gestalt. Yes?
So you going over are in the same position.
Yes. So the people that have passed before you, that are coming to meet you, who have experienced many other lives are also entangled with those that they have experienced in those other lives therefore…….
You are entangled with all your daily activities, are you able to focus on G.. and the golf club?
Yes, but I thought you just said that many others from many other lives, when somebody passes over, I don’t want to use the word ‘comes’……
Use the word ‘actor’. Let us take for example a name you know. Let us take ‘Richard Burton’, he has played in many films, many plays, many productions.
In each one of those productions he made connections, each one of those went off and did their many productions. Now, let us say that Richard Burton is coming to town. Everybody knows that Richard Burton is coming to town.
I enjoyed working with Richard Burton, Richard Burton is going to be at the Kings Head (pub) at 7pm on Saturday. I think I’ll go along and meet him. Now does that explain it to you?
Yes. That is a better explanation.
‘Entangled’ just means you know them, OK, and if we go one further of course we get into the fact that the total interconnection is there, you know each other’s thoughts etc. etc., but only if you wish to focus upon them. All knowledge is always available but you do not focus on all knowledge all of the time. You only focus on that which you wish to focus upon. That which is of interest to you. All else you will ignore although you know it is available.
And when you do focus upon another you are aware of each other’s feelings once more, in the same way as you make a phone call, you recognise the voice and you instantly recognise the feeling that is in that voice. You listen to the tone of the voice and what arises in you, a nice feeling, laughter, it’s not strange is it? So what do you call that but entanglement? The word ‘entanglement’ is not a good word to use, ‘emotionally connected’ we might say, and of course most will say ‘love’. But that word has its own connotations and you can take that from acquaintance to like to love and reverse. Feelings will be aroused by your previous connections, emotional connections, with that person, good or bad.
In general however, all that were ever Joe, all that were ever Joanna etc. etc. always remember if the message comes through, and what happens, you get a good feeling, there’s your emotional entanglement. “I get a good feeling, I’d love to meet up with them again”. Remember you are aware of the feelings of the other person the minute you focus so you know full well if they will welcome seeing you unless they deliberately shield which most do not bother. So have we answered you?
Yes thank you.
Now the thought will carry the intensity of the expression of their warmth of welcome which you will feel with the accompanying picture. Let us say you are known to be on television on channel 1, the screen is split into however many images you care to countenance, all your connections can send their image and depending on the intensity of the image, we will talk in terms of pictures, their particular picture on the screen will grab your attention, others will not grab your attention. Now can you understand that?
So mental pictures go backwards and forwards, you receive all the mental pictures and you can focus on an awful lot at once of course, but some will be more intense than others. Now when that mental picture comes through, of Joe say, that will be all those awarenesses that were involved with (part of) Joe that knew and loved you, but they will come through the Joe picture because they will think of Joe (the Joe whose physical life they experienced). Joe will be the image and that image will be on the screen and likewise they will be receiving your image on their screen.
Now it is possibly best to think of all this in terms of your present messaging and just extrapolate that as receiving all this in the mind.