Afterlife realities are erroneously idealised.

We would like to expand upon our previous statement that you have the naïve impression that all other realities are somehow perfect.

Yet when you look at your own reality you are fully aware that it is far from perfect. So how would you come to the conclusion that other realities would be perfect? Surely everything you do in your own reality doesn’t end up perfect? Whatever you do you start these things off, you continue and then you change. Nothing that you ever do, do you say “there it is, done, finished never to change again”. It simply doesn’t work like that. Everything, you might say, the ideas decay, the event decays, the object decays and requires refurbishment, refreshing, given a new image, given a new impetus, “so let’s go and see that again, let’s go and do this again, let’s change the whole ethos of this experience”.

You are in a constant change. Everything, even around physical reality, is in a state of forever becoming. As we have stated, this applies through the whole of conscious awareness, conscious experience. All realities are in this same fashion. Now it may be, and it is of course, that realities are created in much the same way that you create your own. In certain areas only certain experiences can be enjoyed. So you have, let us say, your cities, your country towns, your safari parks and lodges, your Disneylands, your cruise ships and so you go on and on and on, your hospitals whatever it happens to be. Different experiences can be had in all of these. Some are trying experiences whereas others are, to a very high percentage, purely enjoyable experiences. Which do you choose? That depends on your circumstances that you have created prior to that.

Other realities are exactly the same. It will be quite easy really if you stand back and take a look. Now let us take one of your realities, one of your creations, we are talking about one of your consensus creations, take one of those creations and make it the total reality. We will refer back to the business of only picking that which is enjoyable rather than that which is not enjoyable. Let us take, for example, a Disneyworld. Imagine the whole of the earth as a Disneyworld, in that everything is neat and clean, there is no violence going on, you go from one ride, one show, one enjoyable experience, one restaurant, whatever it is, to the other and all you have to do is pay your entry fee when you come in.

Now, would you say, what would be the entry fee for entering physical reality? So let us say your entry fee for entering physical reality is simply that you must agree to block out all your prior knowledge while you are in physical reality, much as which when you come in through the doors of Disney world you forget all about the outside world.

Now if you found yourself in Disney and instead of having to go to bed, let us assume you still needed some kind of recharge, you suddenly just sat down, shut your eyes, woke up again, didn’t realise you had been asleep and then just continued to enjoy yourself. How long could this go on for? Especially if the range of attractions was seen to be never ending and you moved from one segment to the other. You went from the beach Disney to the mountain Disney to the forest Disney to the animal Disney to all sorts of different Disney’s that you could possibly imagine and then go one step further. Not only could you go in there and observe and experience but you could also be a part of it. So you could go in and say “we are in Seaworld, look at that, well now I wish to experience actually being the dolphin, actually being the killer whale, and you can.

Even in the confines of the earth alone and physical experience and the parameters within which you experience physicality, for example, gravity, seasonal changes, hot and cold, the senses you have created in order to enjoy things, your sight, your sound, your taste, your hearing, your touch, look at all the possible variations you could have on those alone. So let us look at changing the degree of gravity. Try to imagine what different gravitational levels would feel like and then imagine again how you would change your body to experience things differently. You can look back at the old films where you could reduce yourself to the size of Tom Thumb or some even smaller being and travel through the physical body seeing things from the inside and why not? This can be done. You can do this to a certain degree now by putting a camera inside a body to see what it looks like from the inside. Not too difficult to imagine then putting on your virtual reality visor, press the appropriate buttons and you will see exactly as you would as if you were inside.

You can just let the mind run riot on this but then you have to come back to the fact that this is actually what you do, what all consciousness does, everything is possible. You will realise you can have your perfect realities as we have just described as if the whole world is a Disney, but would you at some stage say “Yes, I have done that before, how many variations on this theme?” So let’s face it, the holiday Disney representation may be one thing, now what if we had the ‘Challenge Disney’ or the ‘Survival Disney’ to draw a comparison with your survival programs? So you say you will participate with a certain amount of others and “could I hack it in amongst this lot with all these various challenges that keep coming up?” You would agree that there are many people who would wish to put themselves to the test. So you could have a whole earth, for example, a whole reality, which is just challenges and you move from one challenge to another until you tire of it and decide that you need a break and so you switch back to a Disney reality.

Now what do you actually do in the physical? You work and you go on holiday, don’t you? You are doing the same thing. It is so difficult for you to stand back and say, “as above, so below”. “If I am the consciousness that is doing this and all my fellow consciousnesses are the same and we are all interconnected then we are capable of doing all these different things. It just depends on what we want to focus on”.

And so to answer the question on that one, yes, all things are possible. You can be naive and say “I hope it is all perfection” but you will find that perfection ends up being rather boring and so sooner or later you will choose to do something else. It may take you, in your terms, time terms, whatever length of time you are capable of comprehending, but in no-time terms you simply carry on doing things until something else catches your eye and because you are not all fully focused on just what you are doing. At the moment you have your thinkers, you have your visionaries, you have those whose seek alternatives, “why not do something this way”? There are those who rather than go on yet another super cruise choose to go to a poverty stricken village and build some toilet blocks and dig a well etc., and see what satisfaction that gives them. So you go and do this and find that “that was really enjoyable, we all worked together, there was a wonderful sense of companionship, we watched the smiles and the laughter on people’s faces and the hugs they gave us and we agreed that it was a far better experience, even though we had to live in tents and rough it, than being on a cruise with all the entertainment. If we had to rate them for satisfaction and feeling of self worth I think that helping other people and experiencing that joy of connectedness far surpasses a cruise.” Yes?

Yes.

And so you can see why people choose what seems to be hardship instead of a life of comparative or even luxurious comfort because, once more, the feeling will come up as you see the idea and if you have done something like that before, it will attract. Everything requires diversity and anything taken to the extreme eventually becomes, what you would term as, same old and you just fancy a change and you do it. And the more you stand away and look at what happens in your life in physical reality, the way you are leading your life at the moment, you will easily be able to transfer that to all realities if you stand back and say “what do people create”, because what you call people are simply consciousnesses.

Yes.

Simply awarenesses which are at any moment in a state of having forever become and are continuing to forever become but constantly being changed by that which they experience. What they experience creates feeling, we would rather not use the word ‘belief’ although while you are in the focus, lost in the drama, you can call them beliefs but they result in feelings and so when you have, as we have discussed before, memories which are pretty much meaningless and simply discarded, then all you have is a feeling about something, whether you want to do it or not. You will retain those feelings of ‘warmth’ towards the idea, or, we won’t say repulsion or revulsion, rather “maybe not”. “Don’t know why but it’s not really attractive”. But another says “now I quite like that” but doesn’t know why they quite like that. It is because you have done it before and enjoyed it, as simple as that and in many cases isn’t it better that you don’t know why you are attracted or why you are repulsed. It is better just to accept it and then go with your feelings, go with how you feel. Because just as you feel you are doing this in the physical it is your conscious awarenesses (the gestalt) that is giving you the feeling and decides to go one way or the other. The only difference is that you have constructed your constricted reality around you which then puts you in the position of “well I can’t do this because that will upset so and so and that would upset so and so.” Whereas when you are not lost in the drama then everybody knows that everything that is happening is simply imagination anyway so you never have this business of “I can’t do this because of etc.”

Because you can all do whatever you want at the same time. There is total freedom in what you wish to do.

You create your own reality, you create your own restrictions, you create your own beliefs in what you can and can’t do and yet once you step away from that you realise that all can do whatever they want to do and nobody will get upset about anything because they all realise what is going on. The total interconnection is such that you are all there anyway at any time the thought wants to go out and be responded to.

Have we hopefully clarified the situation somewhat with regard to the realities that you can create and experience?

Yes, thank you.

Taken from previously unpublished archives.

What is your opinion regarding genetically modified crops?

Another experiment. Who is doing the modification? The instruments. Who controls the instruments? The consciousness. Therefore, would you consider this genetic modification to be an exercise in creativity? Yes. And does the organism, any organism, and consider the fact that one of the fastest mutating, and mutating means the ability to handle a new situation, organisms are viruses and bacteria and what is a main component of the physical instrument? Viruses and bacteria, I wouldn’t say viruses, whatever, bacteria.  Infinitesimal manifestations of consciousness.

So do you think that the human race and many other species, have over the period of their existence, changed their ability to deal with different environments and different foods. And yet have managed to live, what you would say to be, ever longer lives. Would you think that that adaptation has been relatively successful in the face of changed circumstance? And would also, you not say that that ability has every reason to continue to be successful in that adaptation? In its adaptation to all new circumstance that it is presented with? So GMO foods are part of creativity and you can either believe they are good or they are bad. Either of which are purely in your perception. Whichever perception you apply to them that belief will influence, will have a result in the way that you deal with that new organism. If you believe that it is perfectly safe, nutritious, worthwhile, then why would it not be? If you believe negatively then the converse will be true for you.

So what about all the chemicals that are being used on the crops and the ensuing destruction of the insects particularly the bees and the butterflies?

The pendulum has to swing to the extreme before it can return to the centre.

But by swinging to the extreme is that likely to cause dire food shortages?

The pendulum swung to the extreme many, many times over the course of, what you would say, the existence of the earth. Whole species have been wiped out by climatic changes. Whole species have been wiped out by other species and yet the world goes on albeit in a changed fashion. You never know, although you may try to predict, what the next situation is going to be and how you will deal with it. You always try to extrapolate the past while at the same time welcoming the advances that come from the future. So instead of thinking that you are heading toward disaster then do you not feel that there are many out there who are aware, because after all, come back to the main precept, which is that consciousness is creating all that is in the first place. So, if you wish to use the word purpose, surely there is some form of purpose in what consciousness is presently co-creating? It is always co-creating.

Quite possibly it is a means to reduce the world population.

We shall see.

Bearing in mind that everybody and everything is having an experience then really we should not criticise anything that anyone else does. Is that right?

You can observe. You co-exist in an environment where you not only co-exist but you are co-dependent, you are interdependent and each consciousness is involved in manipulating it’s instrument. It is like driving your car on the road. When someone else makes a move that you don’t expect you have to take the appropriate action of slowing down, moving out of the way, speeding up whatever it is. Basically, once you have decided to enter the game, then the whole point of the game is that you do not know the result and therefore you will take actions within the game. You would not bother to have two teams of people play a game of football if you knew all the moves and the result. Because what would be the point. It would be like you had seen the whole thing before and you could remember every single minute move and therefore you would know effectively ahead of time exactly what was going to happen. So where would be the satisfaction or the thrill or the excitement or the entertainment in doing it? You must have…. the whole point of organising your entertainment is to find out “who dun it”.

Didn’t quite answer the question but never mind.

Ask the question again.

Should we criticise others?

The question was answered.

I will have to listen again.

Because you have a perception. When you are in the game you create perceptions. If you knew everything that was going on then you wouldn’t criticise anybody would you? Because you would know what was going to happen. But when you don’t know what is going to happen and you want something to happen and it isn’t going your way then you will criticise others, if they do not behave the way you expect them to behave. But if you knew every single movement and knew the result and you knew how they were going to behave and you also knew that didn’t mean anything anyway, because it is all basically a play act, then you wouldn’t be criticising them would you? So, what is criticism but a construction of your own perception? Does that answer you?

Yes, thank you.

All enquirers are looking for something deep and profound and yet when you look into, as the scientists do, the basis of everything, what do you find but a total homogeneity and simplicity of, so far as you have got at the moment, vibrations, vibrating strings or small particles, whichever level you decided to adapt? Tiny little things where when they come together form different patterns and therefore form the universe as you know it. Isn’t that simple? You take complexity and reduce it to simplicity, and yet, when it comes to trying to understand what is going on, and why, you refuse to accept the simple. And the simple is, that you do it. Everything is created simply because you wish to create it, that includes all your attitudes and beliefs, as well as those things that you consider to be objects.

Yes, everything.

But, once more the whole reason for being in the physical is to not know. Therefore, this is why it is so difficult to accept that you do know. Only a few can accept, “Yes, I do know but let me play the game, let me enjoy the game, and I will forget every now and then, that I do know, and just say, let me enjoy what I created, because I have created it to enjoy it.” What is the point of saying, “Look I know that this is all my creation and is not worth thinking about.” Because you would simply need to create something else. So why not enjoy what you have created and look at what else you can create. Give your consciousness full rein.

What about genetic diseases?

Design, exploration, experiment and even an oversight.

So why the need for a family to have a genetic thing which goes from generation to generation?

We are again back to your idea of an idealised world, which we covered previously. We also discussed the nature of time and past, present and future. Do you question the need for various insects or do you accept?

Accept.

That even though those insects may be repulsive to you, they may be essential food for another creature. Do you also accept that various species become non-essential and disappear although it may take ten thousand generations? You wish for things, simply because they do not suit your beliefs or emotions, to change in the instant. You consider that you might have thousands of lives over millions of years and you continually think in terms of time but if you care to look back only a hundred years or fifty years let alone a thousand life times, have you seen different diseases being eliminated?

Yes, one or two.

Even then you have to qualify. Simply because of your limited knowledge but does it answer your question? If you went back to a hundred lives ago, what would you find to be the difference between the illnesses, species, all the other so-called ills of that existence to your present existence?

There would be vast differences.

And would you call those improvements?

I’m sure that the majority are improvements but there are probably some that aren’t.

With regard to your question re genetic diseases has the average health and life span of the human being improved immeasurably even in the short term let alone over hundreds of thousands of years then why do you demand that design must be perfected to your will?

I was just interested that’s all, no demand at all.

Why do diseases, why do genetic modifications continue? Why not make everything perfect right away and therefore source would have everything perfect right away and nothing could ever change or have any interest? And there would be no worlds for you to experience.

If you wish to understand, to expand your consciousness, as we said previously, move your mind, move your focus to that of the source. Look at all your questions first. Examine them from that viewpoint and you will have your own answers to asked questions.

The Silver Cord, the Etheric Body and learning from the Game of Physical Life.

We often hear about the silver cord. Now, I am assuming that this would be an energy. Am I right in that assumption?

If you consider radiation to be energy, yes, a wave transmission. However, you can once more say, that between the physical body, we have an electromagnetic transmission, if you wish, in order for the brain to receive, and yet, in order for the non-physical brain to receive, that will receive on a different form of wave energy. In other words, there will be a form of transformer, obviously for any connection between dimensions there has to be a transformation of energy. Different energy systems exist in different realities. Therefore, just as you have to transform 240 volts into 12 volts for the purpose of using a battery. Yes? The same thing applies but in a different nature, not purely voltage, but an actual change in, you could say wave fre…. The simplest way to look at it, in the point of view of the moment, is that the brain physical works on so many cycles per second, but just as you talk about raising vibrations then that has to be speeded up substantially in order to carry the same information to the other bodies. However, the attention has not been placed where this transformation occurs, because otherwise one has to postulate that the consciousness, or the mind, that is interfacing between the observer and the observed, must be capable of raising the frequency, and lowering the frequency, commensurate with which part of the overall organism it is communicating with, and the information encompassed must stay the same of course. But as is communication between the deceased and a medium, the medium is not aware of what is going on. He has an intention and belief that this can happen, but he is not able to modulate the frequency movement sufficiently to enable a totally clear communication to be obtained.

When I was talking about the silver cord I was really talking about when somebody astral travels at night.

Again here, we are talking about a radio transmission, we actually did answer, because you are talking about a radio transmission. Now, just as you can believe that your beliefs create your reality, we go back to that one again. Therefore, if you are aware of a silver cord and you, from whatever you may have heard this, remember most descriptions are assumed to have been obtained in the physical world and yet, one attains information in the dream world, one attains information in the astral whatever, yes? And so the beliefs run through to the entity. And so, if one believes that there is a silver cord, if you wish, this ghostly plasma or light connection, this marvellously elastic connection, which if you think about it, the easiest elastic connection is the radio wave. So, if it is believed that this is connected to the back of the astral body, back of the head of the astral body, which is connected to the head of the physical body, then, you will manifest it. Accordingly, on the other hand, the person with the clairvoyant ability can, depending on their beliefs again,  see the image of a radio wave as a silver cord. The difficulty with all these descriptions is that people expect definitive descriptions and for them to match. But, just as those who have NDE’s see different vistas, no different to you travelling to different countries here, or even different organisations, different plays you might say, there are so many variations that one cannot be definitive. Plus everything is created by the minds, the belief systems of those who see.

So again, just like the recollection of an event, many people will have different recollections. In the same way they will create different images. What is a different recollection but a different image memory? Whether it be a sight image, a sound image or a word image or a feeling image? One can only give answers worthy of an economist, on one hand and on the other hand. Variety is infinite. Suffice it to say that consciousness exists.

Too much attention is paid to pseudo-physical conceptions of what is essentially wave or field interactions. You cannot see a radio wave, you cannot see an electromagnetic field and so how can one see a silver cord, except that which you create for yourself? Which is why some people feel, or see, a silver cord, and others do not.

With regard to large or small people what is the etheric body like? Does it mirror the size or is it a standard size?

If we talk in terms of the observed and we equate the observed with personality and we equate the observer with the intelligence that is forming the personality, the entity; then, as you are aware, the personality is not under full control. It is allowed its own degree of free will so that the actions which lead to experiences can be seen with an experience, observed that is, but observed to the point that the experiences flow to the other bodies. Therefore all experience what is going on. The whole point of coming to the physical is to experience things that you do not expect to experience.

So you are saying that the etheric body will mirror the physical body?

Yes, but that is due to the…      the etheric body is that pattern around which the consciousnesses swarm. Therefore there has to be a field pattern that will be the basis for the physical, the manifest. The unmanifest field pattern is necessary for the manifest but this is a feedback loop so as the personality continues to increase the size of the physical the pattern expands. It is a chicken and egg situation. As energy is added to the form the pattern adjusts and of course the intention is there first so the pattern can adjust before the form. In other words, as there is no past, present or future, the pattern can precognate the intake  of surplus energy and adjust itself to accommodate. Now you can say of course that the entity, via its various bodies being used in the physical, is aware of the need to accommodate the extra energy. You may find that this subject has not been subject to detailed hypothetical examination and so you may take your own logical interpretation of what we have said. The same would apply for small or large. As you can imagine, if someone grows to a certain adult size, and then shrinks back, you can still use the idea that the intention was not to eat. In which case the energy field shrinks to accommodate the intention. As we said, you can argue this as chicken or egg, depending on your concept of the nature of time or no time.

As a mass how do we change our beliefs to improve the world situation?

Intensity. Things do not change. This world is a co-creation like all worlds of consciousness. It is the intensity of the consciousnesses that have an interest in the physical. Those consciousnesses are experimenting. They are trying out different scenarios. Why do wars keep on happening? For the uncertainty and excitement. For the same reason that you play your sports over and over again. For the uncertainty and excitement. Because you see things as real but the consciousnesses that are involved in this know they are not real. They are just a virtual reality.

So really what you are saying is that we are just a game?

Absolutely.

So therefore we might just as well get on with it.

Of course. You are experiencing an adventure into a world of creativity and if you realise that, you will look around you and see the wonderful creations of your fellow consciousnesses and marvel at what the imagination can conceive of, not just the natural world, although that is probably the most fantastic of all, but the productions of the human focused consciousness of which you have chosen to be a part. You are one of the artists that are painting the picture of your reality. So rejoice and take your fill until you feel the desire to explore further.

Earlier when we spoke, Steven said  ”be happy and others will feel your happiness and that will increase their happiness”.  There are many sages who have said “to change the world you must first change yourself”. You cannot wave a wand and you cannot change anyone else’s mind. You can only change yourself but by changing yourself you may find it is contagious. Why be unhappy? That doesn’t mean to say you don’t care, but realise that you have no power to change the situation except to change yourself.  If you wish you can vote. You can get involved depending on the intensity of your desire.

Can you see an alternative to antibiotics on the horizon?

Did anybody see an alternative to bloodletting, leeches? Do you see eventually that they will be able to use a vibration to change the way a cell gives its messages? There is always something new. Always something to be dis-covered. Always another focus, another experiment, always something else to get interested in. Why this compulsion to achieve eternal life on earth, eliminate all disease, achieve eternal life on earth and at the same time say, “There isn’t enough food to feed all these people.” It is paradoxical to argue for both at the same time. Whatever you look at, if it didn’t exist, some consciousnesses would, as you say, invent it.

Previously you talked about learning, would you expand on that please?

Well learning, everything is in a constant state of learning but learning you would define as experiencing. This is not necessarily a cumulative experience, for example, you repeat and repeat and repeat very many actions and very many experiences in your everyday life but you don’t consider this a continual learning experience. As you wash every morning, would you say that you are learning every morning? So, your day to day activities are not considered to be learning but you experience the feeling of water each morning. So, if we substitute the word continuing experience for learning then you can take a different view point. Continual experience is much more easily to fit into the concept of timelessness than learning is, which is seen as progressive movement. Everything that you decide to get involved in is an experience and is basically a variation of experience. It is a previous idea or association moving outwards or inwards from a previous idea. An alternative possibility you wish to explore. You must realise that often you just set the ball in motion and then you follow or ride it, if you wish, in its journey down the hill or in its bouncing between the pillars and you give it volition but you bounce off one and bounce in another direction and bounce back again. If you can see this as continual motion, the bouncing between one and the other, deciding to go this way , go that way, come back, always restricted in a confined space, then effectively you are going nowhere but experiencing the whole time. As we said earlier, these are repeated experiences. At the end of the life you might say “what have I really learned”. Many will say “well, not very much really” but if they had not thought about it, they had gone through life, experiencing, and been quite happy to do so and have little to offer at the end of life as to what they know at the end of life, any different to what they knew before, other than what they have seen happen during that life.

But if they try to understand who they are and what the life has meant to them there will not be too many that will give a coherent and understandable picture of their so-called progression. Possibly this is why the idea of many, many lives has come to be a prevalent consideration by those who think of the mystery of existence.

If you only ‘are’ how can you be aware that you always will be, apart from belief, and how does that belief, if that is the case, arise?

Belief can arise from an absence of knowledge. Now if you do not see anybody leaving, whenever you make a contact they are always there, and everybody else that you contact and ask the same question “Is everybody that you have ever known always appear to be there and do they appear in their general presentation, shall we say, the way you envisage them, the way you perceive them, to be basically the same”? Then if you cannot find instances of “Where did he go, is she still there, does anybody know? Remember, we have no time, or rather, no need to put things in a time based  format, so the belief arises that “well, everything seems to carry on, everything just seems to be”.

We see no evidence of decay, in fact the word ‘decay’ wouldn’t even arise in our consciousness state because it is a non-sequitur. It is just not something which happens unless we create that happening. You must remember in all this that we are creating all these things. So, if you can create one thing, create another, create another then one assumes you can create, what you would term, eternal life.

Because as long as you keep creating and you know that everyone else, or everything else, every unit of consciousness is continually creating, then how can the belief arise in an ‘end’, and also one can’t find a beginning either. So if you cannot find a beginning or an end you must come to the inevitable conclusion that we just are, as we have stated before, so what is the point of worrying about it? We have had a look for a beginning, we have had a look for an end and we can’t find it.

On the physical level you are aware of a beginning and an end of the physical body but many of you are now aware and have been ever since we first appeared in the physical production that although the physical body appears and disappears the, let us put it, operating consciousness seems to carry on. Now you haven’t asked enough questions about where it came from in the first place except for this business of reincarnation. You basically assumed that it was doing something before and it simply wished to do something else in the same physical arena and so you have this concept of reincarnation, moving from one body to the other until you have done enough on the karmic wheel to purify yourself and then you can leave. Whereas we would say “been there, done it, had enough thank you, all those experiences, I’ll try something else”.

If you look back through, what you term as history, you will see that there are all these different experiences to be had as we keep playing around with this ongoing soap opera called physical reality.

You have, of course, to apply that to all the other realities. Just because everything is in potential doesn’t mean to say it’s static. If it was all static there wouldn’t be any creativity would there? As we have said before you can run the same old CD, the same old film and yet you can still enjoy it. You can start at the beginning, the end, halfway through it and it is still there when you come back, so you can finish it, start it again, finish it, start it again and what have you got? You’ve got circular motion haven’t you? So in the end, if you’ve gone through this many, many times, and it doesn’t actually show up as a beginning and an end, then you think “this is endless”.

Let us say that you walked into a football game that was in progress and it just carried on and on and on. You weren’t aware of a beginning and an end because they didn’t take a break. You would be hard put to say “when does the game finish?” You only break it into segments because of the energy limitations of the physical body and also the attention limitations of those who view. Now if you took all the football games of a particular team against another team and put them all together, and didn’t look at the start and the finish so that they all ran into a seamless whole, all you would have is an endless succession of half-times. Would you agree?

Yes.

So where would you enter the process? You would say that this game goes on forever, there is no beginning and no end. You have to wrap your mind around this sort of thing to understand this business of how you generate this word called “Eternity” because you are involved in the same thing, you are seeing the same process of endless birth and death. You are also aware, for those who are philosophers, that consciousness carries on and therefore you get the concept of reincarnation and because most like to come to some form of conclusion then the prospect of eternal bliss was put forward, sitting on the right hand of God.

Same thing with this business of the ocean and the waves, you are a wave on the ocean and then you return to the ocean, but do you ever return to the ocean forever? If you were going to become a wave and try another wave and another wave, and remember that these are equivalent to reincarnational lives, why would you want to return to just being the ocean? Whatever spurred you to being a wave in the first place surely hasn’t died? The ocean is still there, you are still part of the ocean and you still at some stage wish to be active again. So the whole thing starts again doesn’t it?

Yes.

And how would you feel as part of the ocean? You would feel “well, this goes on forever doesn’t it?

Yes.

And so we will end the conversation with “what’s in a word”?

Right. Now something that you said there…Can you elaborate on how we choose this life on the physical?

We have been over this before haven’t we? Several times. Basically you are watching the ideas going by and as others watch the ideas going by then effectively, look at it this way, we haven’t used this one before, as you ‘light upon’ the thought going by you have made a connection with that thought, you are shining your light upon it, let us put it that way. Your attention on that thought gives it some energy so it brightens a little. Others latch on to it, “what’s this? that one is a little brighter”. And the more and more that latch on the brighter and brighter it gets until somebody says “hey, this is a damn good idea, I’d like to do this”. Instantaneous thought, instantaneous agreement and off we go. Yes?

Right.

And so you are choosing what you want to do aren’t you?

Yes.

So don’t let us bother to expand it all the way. You’ve simply looked at whatever idea it is, whatever experience, whatever life, whatever it happens to be and when the intensity reaches a certain amount you realise that “this is a goer, do I want to join it or not”? Well you wouldn’t have looked at it in the first place if it didn’t attract your attention would you?

No.

So, simple.

Miscarriages.

Hands across the Veil.

I had the sudden urge to hold a session this afternoon and was prompted to tell Jean to ask a question about our miscarriages. After a lengthy setting of the scene for the purposes of understanding I had the most intense, loving greeting from the two children who never made it to us. So, so wonderful. They appeared to me as grown up, as they would be, and I just know that they have been part of our family all along, whether here or there. To all those of you who have suffered the loss of an unborn listen to this and see what emotions come over you. Your loved ones may take this as an opportunity to make themselves known.

(Find in Session Audio Files)

Would you please explain the phenomenon of xenoglossy given that thoughts are normally given in the normal language of the speaker? What is the process by which the higher consciousness can translate thought into the native language of the sender (and the receiver of the communication) even if the speaker has never spoken the language before?

A conundrum which has been cogitated upon by many with very few able to put forward a credible and acceptable theory but again the answer is relatively simple once you start to reason out the source of the information and the purpose for why it is being transmitted.

Now why would one wish to do this? We speak as the one, maybe, who would be capable of instigating such an exercise. It would seem to be of relatively little use unless of course you could say that the communicator may have been, let us say, Ethiopian and wishes to communicate with a fellow Ethiopian who was known to him or her but the only available medium had never spoken Ethiopian and had no knowledge of the language whatsoever.

So we say, “How can we do this, how can one get this done, what do we really need here, we need a totally clear channel? An instrument who is basically completely open, has no blockage whatsoever.”

Now this is not possible on a permanent basis of course otherwise you enter the realms of mental illness as you care to term it or various other mental conditions. But it is possible on a temporary basis and so you see these examples of xenoglossy in very deep trance mediums where basically they have completely stood aside and temporarily abrogated their, let us say, right to block any incoming transmission that they do not understand. An element of trust is involved here on behalf of, what you might call now, the instrument and also on a very large degree of cooperation between the gestalt consciousness of that particular medium and the transmitting consciousness.

So, it happens and everybody says, “Now how can this be”? Now imagine that you have a television (instrument) tuned to channel 1, channel 2 cannot get through, but if you switch channels to channel 2 then channel 2 can get through. So take your instrument that is only generally tuned to channel 1 (your personal identity frequency we could call it) but then it steps aside and says “Ok, we’ll leave the tuner dial to you, we will widen the waveband possibility for you”. The transmission then comes through on a different frequency and that then operates the vocal cords because it comes through the brain but the brain is only doing the translation into sounds.

Do not confuse sounds with language. All language is sound and the brain knows how to operate the vocal cords to produce the sound. So when the thoughts are sent, again this isn’t how it is but let us say couched in Ethiopian, then the sounds produced are Ethiopian and that would give you the sounds of the words of course, and that is language. It is simply that the medium and the gestalt consciousness of the medium have stepped aside and have allowed the whole mechanism, you might say, to operate on behalf of the transmitting consciousness and when it is finished it simply reverts to normal. The brain no longer receives on channel 2 but reverts to channel 1 once more.

Now this is a very simplistic explanation but it is basically the process that is followed. All thoughts are able to be translated into the language of the recipient no matter which language they speak. You will easily admit that thought can arise from a sight, sound or sensation. Now sit down every person speaking any language whatsoever, subject them to the same sensation, panorama and then ask them to describe that. They will each describe that in their own language but when you translate from one language to the other they will in general, apart from observer bias, colour for example, be comparable and in consensus. Would you agree with that?

Yes.

So your Chinese person, your Dutch person, your American person etc. will all say “There is a man riding a bike there”. They will say it in their own language but what they saw they will describe.

What has happened? They have taken the sensation or the sight, which you may say is converted into thought and that thought is converted into language.  Of course you will say that is because they have learned that language and programmed that language. Now refer back to what we have just said and you will see that it can be done.

That is as good an explanation of xenoglossy as you are likely to get from us at least. You will get many other explanations but whether they will stand up to Occam’s razor is moot.

Now can we address the second part of your question please?

Yes.

The process by which it is translated into the native language of the receiver is quite easy in that the brain is programmed to become a labour saving instrument so that one does not have to be bothered with going through the full process of everyday action. It learns how to walk, eat, speak and it will learn how to speak in such a way that it is able to be understood and it is able to understand the words that come back?

Yes. So that is the speaker?

Yes. This is the instrument and the brain.

We are talking about the instrument changing the language that he has never, ever heard before into the language of the listener?

The receiver of the communication rather than the receiver of the thought?

Yes.

I think we covered that in our prior explanation. That is quite simple.

Yes, you did.

It is an interesting point isn’t it? You can understand why other languages are blocked off because you couldn’t have, what you might call, as some in the spiritualist movement would say, your Chinese guide trying to jabber away in Chinese. You wouldn’t understand a word. This is why these sorts of things are few and far between, they simply don’t make sense and upset the apple cart. It is allowed here and now in just the way that photographic memory is and hyperthymesia. It gives you a few signposts in working out how reality is created and how the whole process works.

Another little signpost on the way to, what you term, enlightenment. Although we do not really approve of that terminology.

We are enjoying being able to take you further down the rabbit hole as you are aware of and before we go, as our instrument is busily reminding us here, we gave him the term of ‘morphic library’ this morning which he found rather neat and if you compare that to ‘morphogenetic fields’ or the Akashic records or Einstein’s ‘higher plane of knowledge’ then ‘morphic library has quite a ring to it, doesn’t it? So I do believe we will have to use this more in future transmissions.

Thank you.

This can also be found in Session Audio Files.  We wanted to know how the other side would explain it as apparently no-one has an explanation here that they want to put forward. See article below.

Reincarnation buffs will probably have an opinion. Our teachers explanation seems eminently sensible. Whether you look at it from here or there it bolsters the case for the body being merely an instrument or vehicle for the expression of a conscious personality.

The Phenomenon of Xenoglossy taken from actforlibraries.org 

The phenomenon of xenoglossy (knowledge of a language one has never learned) is almost always associated with severe head injuries, recovery from comas or hypnotic “experiments.”

Two types of xenoglossy are recognized: recitative and responsive. Recitative is the most common and people exhibiting it will utter words or phrases of an alien language without understanding their meaning.

Responsive is a much rarer form of xenoglossy: an individual is abruptly endowed with the capability of fluently speaking and conversing in a language completely (or virtually) previously unknown to them.

The latest case making world headlines is the rarer form of the phenomenon. According to doctors in Croatia, a 13-year old girl from Knin—a southern town—’mysteriously’ fell into a coma. When she responded to questions put to her with fluent German! [1]

Her parents claim that while she had just started studying the German language at school, was reading German books and watching some German TV, she was far from being fluent in the language and just had a rudimentary grasp.

Dujomir Marasovic, the hospital director stated the staff were still in the process of determining what precipitated the coma and why it is the girl has forgotten her native language.

The director has called in other doctors to examine the girl—including German speaking doctors-in an attempt to unravel the oddity.

“You never know when recovering from such a trauma how the brain will react. Obviously we have some theories although at the moment we are limited in what we can say because we have to respect the privacy of the patient,” Marasovic explained. [2]

Hospital staff psychologist, Dr. Mijo Milas observed, “In earlier times this would have been referred to as a miracle, we prefer to think that there must be a logical explanation—it’s just that we haven’t found it yet.” [3]

Unfortunately, Dr. Milas may be looking for that explanation the rest of his life. What happened to the young Croation girl is nothing new. The phenomenon has been observed for hundreds of years.

Although anecdotal tales exist going back hundreds of years, one of the first well-documented occurrences of this phenomenon took place in 1862. During a demonstration of “mesmerizing” (hypnosis), a Prince Galtizin had a German woman who had no ability to speak any language other than her native tongue suddenly conversing in fluent French. Galtizin explained it as regression, claiming the woman had mentally reverted to a past life in France.

In the year 1977 an amazing xenoglossy case was documented. A Mr. Billy Mulligan, an Ohio State penitentiary inmate, was discovered by prison psychiatrists to have two distinct personalities. The first identity called himself “Abdul” and spoke flawless Arabic; the second, “Rugen” conversed in perfect Serbo-Croation. Yet according to the prison officials, Mulligan—who was a natural born citizen of the United States and had never left the country—was unaware of these other two personalities and had never studied either language!

Researcher and biologist, Lyall Watson recalls the case of a 10-year old Filipino boy who, when under a trance, spoke the Zulu language. He spoke it perfectly although he’d never even heard of it!

And back in 2007, a famous case involving Czech race car driver, Matej Kus, occurred after a near fatal accident on the racecourse. After regaining consciousness from his injuries, Kus-who previously had struggled to speak broken English-suddenly found himself speaking perfect English … with a British accent!

His new found talent didn’t last long, however, and he had to continue struggling with his English courses after a few days of glory. [4]

Some scientists have proposed that such cases might stem from a genetic legacy, while fringe science links it with the paranormal. [5]

Whatever the phenomenon proves to be, as Milas so succinctly sums it up: “There are references to cases where people who have been seriously ill and perhaps in a coma have woken up being able to speak other languages—sometimes even the Biblical languages such as that spoken in old Babylon or Egypt—at the moment though any speculation would remain just that—speculation—so it’s better to continue tests until we actually know something.”

Footnotes

[1] “Croatian teenager wakes from coma speaking fluent German,” UK Telegraph, April 12, 2010

[2] “Croatian teenager wakes up from a coma speaking fluent German,” Daily Mail, April 12, 2010

[3] “Croatian teenager wakes from coma speaking fluent German,” UK Telegraph, ibbid.

[4] Czech speedway rider knocked out in crash wakes up speaking perfect English,” Daily Mail

[5] “Xenoglossy: Evidence of Past Lives?” Leonardo Vintini, Epoch Times staff writer

Links to other cases of xenoglossy

Stroke gives woman British accent

Brain injury gives woman a foreign accent

My stroke left me with foreign accent

British charity worker recovers from car crash in Romania … to speak with ROMANIAN accent

Man awoke from coma to find he had a foreign accent

Polish girl begins speaking Gaelic

                              SOUL-MATES

        We love and are loved by so many more than we are presently aware of.

When we pass over are we also met by those we know in simultaneous lives?

So when you take a cruise do you bump into people that you have met on another cruise?

Yes, sometimes.

And, of course you have no interaction with those people in any other situation other than the cruise?

No.

But you know them and they are leading an entirely separate life of which you have no knowledge and vice versa. Yes?

Yes.

Now let us assume that they have passed over and are now back in the totally interconnected state and then you pass over and because you have had a resonance and you have knowledge, you have had an interaction before, then you are, as is said, entangled. So the connection forever exists. Therefore if firm friends you had met once or twice or more on a cruise and then had no connection other than that but whose company you thoroughly enjoyed and even grown to like very much and upon returning to the situation where you know full well that they are aware that you are coming to that, let us say, particular location then you would be quite pleased if they were there to meet you. Yes?

Yes.

And what would you do? Always put yourself in the same position. If you knew that your friend, H, was coming over would you not go along to give her a welcoming smile? Now run yourself through other people that you haven’t seen for years and would you go and welcome them?

Yes.

Now look at all the neighbours that have passed over, you would be more than happy to welcome them, wouldn’t you?

Yes, personally I would but I can imagine that some people with horrendous neighbours would certainly not want to welcome them.

So let us transfer this to another activity. You have your friends here, you have the friends you left in England, you have the friends you meet on the cruise ships and you can extend that to school friends and all others you have been connected with. Now look upon that as separate lives which, in terms of partial aspects, you could easily see as such. Would you agree?

To a certain extent, obviously they are still physical lives….

Yes, but are they segments of a physical life?

Segments, yes.

Now do you think that you experience all your lives and are part of all of those lives?

Ermm.

When you experience another life, you experience that life. Yes?

Yes.

So you experience life No.1, life No.2, life No.3?

Yes.

Are those lives all part of your experience?

Yes, they are all part….

Of your experience?

Yes.

So all the people that you meet and get to know and love in those lives, then just the same, they are part of your life?

Yes.

So you could look at your overall life and break it into its individual lives, its individual segments, even though lived simultaneously?

Yes.

There is no difference between living these lives simultaneously, if you look upon them as spread out before you, and all the segments of your physical life spread out before you. They all exist, all the connections exist. So as you look at them you say “I know them, I really enjoyed their company, I hope to get to enjoy their company again now in a different situation”. And would you not say, “Let’s meet up and go over old times”. You might even say “Let’s do something together again shall we”? Now spread this across all and you will see you have many, many connections. Everybody has many, many connections but, as we have said before, there are preferences, not so much preferences as against one person or another but activities, ideas that float by and then “I think I’ll join in with this one” and that depends on who you are connected with elsewhere. They may see the same idea, see that “ah, you are in it” and that spurs them to join also. Likewise for you if you see that a good friend is focusing on a particular idea a thought may flash between you “Well I’ll do it if you’ll do it, we could have fun in this one, we touched base in that other one, let’s do this one”.

Now where do you think the idea of soul-mate came from?

Well, I think it comes from, the other side, from those you resonate with, those who you do want to do different lives with.

So if we had mentioned ‘soul-mate’ at the beginning of this little discourse, would you have then sat there, thought your way through it and been able to come up with exactly the same words that we have?

I may have been able to reach some similar conclusions that like attracts like and one may search out others who you know have similar interests.

So yes, there will be lots of people that you will meet. It will be the usual surprise party, if you wish, there is so and so and there’s so and so else and “I didn’t expect to see you here”. At the moment you are expecting the relatives from this life and when you go over they will be the first in the queue but then as you wander through the throng you will come across the others by which time you are quite used to the fact that you are back so the next things that come flooding back are your other lives and your other participations.

That is not to say that you are immersed in all those other lives. Remember, when you get back you may as well say for the purposes of this little talk that you are at the back of the theatre or outside the theatre mingling with all the fellow actors. Yes?

Understood.

But if you went back inside the theatre, as we gave you before, you were sitting in the round, you had your six theatres around you and you could focus onto six stages, if you were able to put two and two together you would be able to see the actor on the stage, recognise who it is, go outside the theatre and immediately recognise the player. Can you see the idea?

The question was “Will we meet up with everyone we ever knew” basically, and yes, if you have the strong enough connection they will be there to say hello. I think we once said before that maybe the ones who are a little bit more on the fringe wish to tip their hat but may wish to stay on the outer edges until you have finished meeting up with all those ones with which you were truly connected.

Continuation of above session theme, question not recorded.

You return to the other side, I return to the other side. We both become aware, if we wish to, of all lives that we have ever been involved in or are involved in. Now in those lives we are aware of all the connections we have in each one of those lives. Are they all separate?

Yes, each life is separate.

So each ‘photo album’ is separate? (The record of the life)

Yes.

So when something comes up on ‘life 43’e.g. you suddenly receive the thought re life 43, Fred has come over, then you are immediately aware of what Fred looked like (as the record/ photo album is instantly connected ) and as soon as you are aware of what Fred looked like, you are linked with Fred , aren’t you?

Yes.

So are you then in a position to send a thought to Fred “Hi Fred, glad you have come over”?

Yes.

Now, you must eliminate the time aspect. All those involved in that life, in that gestalt of ‘Fred’ are alerted but are focused through the image of ‘Fred’, because the image of ‘Fred’ then becomes reactivated, we might say, in all those awarenesses. (The memory of living a life as ‘Fred’). Are you aware of what we are saying?

Not 100% but carry on.

Each awareness remembers being ‘Joe’( You will need to go to the index and read ‘Entangled Minds’ to understand the following), each awareness remembers being ‘Joanna’. Therefore if a message comes to Joe or a message comes to Joanna, each awareness that ever was Joe or Joanna is aware of the message, but it only thinks of Joe, or Joanna, it does not think of itself. Because it did not have an identity, its identity was experienced through Joe or Joanna. Do you understand that? (To simplify, when a ‘Joe awareness thinks, or sends a thought to Joanna, an image of Joe or thought of Joe arises in the ‘mind’ of each awareness that was ever a part of the Joanna gestalt i.e. experienced being Joanna. Once connected always connected, quantum entanglement or interconnectedness if you like)

Yes.

So you still have the same, confluence of minds, and you still have a majority coming through because you have reactivated (re-commenced) the data stream of the gestalt. Yes?

Yes.

So you going over are in the same position.

Yes. So the people that have passed before you, that are coming to meet you, who have experienced many other lives are also entangled with those that they have experienced in those other lives therefore…….

You are entangled with all your daily activities, are you able to focus on G.. and the golf club?

Yes, but I thought you just said that many others from many other lives, when somebody passes over, I don’t want to use the word ‘comes’……

Use the word ‘actor’. Let us take for example a name you know. Let us take ‘Richard Burton’, he has played in many films, many plays, many productions.

Yes.

In each one of those productions he made connections, each one of those went off and did their many productions. Now, let us say that Richard Burton is coming to town. Everybody knows that Richard Burton is coming to town.

I enjoyed working with Richard Burton, Richard Burton is going to be at the Kings Head (pub) at 7pm on Saturday. I think I’ll go along and meet him. Now does that explain it to you?

Yes. That is a better explanation.

‘Entangled’ just means you know them, OK, and if we go one further of course we get into the fact that the total interconnection is there, you know each other’s thoughts etc. etc., but only if you wish to focus upon them. All knowledge is always available but you do not focus on all knowledge all of the time. You only focus on that which you wish to focus upon. That which is of interest to you. All else you will ignore although you know it is available.

And when you do focus upon another you are aware of each other’s feelings once more, in the same way as you make a phone call, you recognise the voice and you instantly recognise the feeling that is in that voice. You listen to the tone of the voice and what arises in you, a nice feeling, laughter, it’s not strange is it? So what do you call that but entanglement? The word ‘entanglement’ is not a good word to use, ‘emotionally connected’ we might say, and of course most will say ‘love’. But that word has its own connotations and you can take that from acquaintance to like to love and reverse. Feelings will be aroused by your previous connections, emotional connections, with that person, good or bad.

In general however, all that were ever Joe, all that were ever Joanna etc. etc. always remember if the message comes through, and what happens, you get a good feeling, there’s your emotional entanglement.  “I get a good feeling, I’d love to meet up with them again”. Remember you are aware of the feelings of the other person the minute you focus so you know full well if they will welcome seeing you unless they deliberately shield which most do not bother. So have we answered you?

Yes thank you.

Now the thought will carry the intensity of the expression of their warmth of welcome which you will feel with the accompanying picture. Let us say you are known to be on television on channel 1, the screen is split into however many images you care to countenance, all your connections can send their image and depending on the intensity of the image, we will talk in terms of pictures, their particular picture on the screen will grab your attention, others will not grab your attention. Now can you understand that?

Yes.

So mental pictures go backwards and forwards, you receive all the mental pictures and you can focus on an awful lot at once of course, but some will be more intense than others. Now when that mental picture comes through, of Joe say, that will be all those awarenesses that were involved with (part of) Joe that knew and loved you, but they will come through the Joe picture because they will think of Joe (the Joe whose physical life they experienced). Joe will be the image and that image will be on the screen and likewise they will be receiving your image on their screen.

Now it is possibly best to think of all this in terms of your present messaging and just extrapolate that as receiving all this in the mind.

Thank you.

All consciousness creates the desired senses with which to experience its particular species instrument in any specific reality.

In the previous session you referred to senses which are inherent in your location being dropped off when entering physical reality, also where they were not sufficiently blocked off they cause some individuals to display abilities far beyond the average. Would you care to describe the wider possibilities of the senses that we are aware of and any others that may be available to us when not restricted by the “rules’ pertaining in the physical?

With regard to the terminology that we used of ‘drop off’ in the previous post we could also refer to it as ‘bleed through’ as we have used in previous analogies. In other words a sense that was utilised in one reality was not quite ‘blocked off’, or there is a reluctance, maybe, on the part of the consciousness, the gestalt, to fully relinquish that particular sense and, in addition, it could be a deliberate allowance of that ability to be displayed in physical reality in order that a sense of wonder and inquiry was aroused, a sense of seeking, in order to find out the reason why.

Now, David was inspired to preface the last post with the words “this will make the penny drop for some” and so your question has obviously been stimulated by that post and maybe the penny is on its way down.

Let me give you a new thought. David, some years ago, was giving a demonstration of clairvoyance at a local church and between messages he looked down and saw his right hand in an unusual position with four fingers spread as if on a gear stick, which was the first thing that came to mind. But the fingers wouldn’t be spread out like that, this was something else. He then realised this was a plane cockpit and that he had his hand on the throttle. So he then spoke to the audience “I have a pilot here”. The next second he sensed himself rocketing skywards with the attendant enhanced G forces and exclaimed “This is a military plane”. He went on to describe the person who transmitted his image and the communication was duly taken as being from the deceased brother who had met his end as a test pilot.

Now, let us analyse what has happened here. The deceased personage has transmitted a thought. That thought being a memory of piloting his plane at very high speed at a very steep angle resulting in some G forces. That was his memory. That memory, whichever way you wish to look at it, was transferred to the instrument’s consciousness, and let us use your terminology here, which went through to the mind and onward to the brain. But the brain had never experienced being in a military plane, had never experienced rocketing skywards and never experienced enhanced G forces yet somehow the instrument was able to physically experience them. What conclusion would you draw from that? That the brain had created the necessary sense perceptions. Yes?

Yes.

Now extend that to all your senses you will see that it is quite possible that all that you sense is being created by the brain. This is an ongoing discussion, argument, theoretical projection amongst the neurological fraternity as to how the brain mediates the sensory inputs to give you the sensations that you enjoy.

You say that the brain is creating this. Would you not say that everything is there, as you say, in potential and the brain is selecting it rather than creating it?

Yes. It is just a question of terminology of course but the brain is only able to receive the information from the consciousness and that selection has to be made by the consciousness. We are trying to make it simple from your point of view. At present you can only examine the brain, you can’t examine the consciousness. You can make assertions but you cannot utilise your measuring instruments or your observations, let us say, to fully evaluate the abilities of consciousness and yet to some extent you can see by experiment what parts of the brain are activated and what other attributes are capable of stimulation. So, yes, you could say that you select these senses, but where did those senses come from in the first place. They were not just there you know. We say, you say, you create your own reality, you co-create your own reality. Well, when you create your reality, your senses are part of your reality. You create your senses. Hence our use of the phrase “The brain created the sense”. Yes?

OK.

It depends on where you want to start with this. You can place your element of creation in the area of consciousness, in the area of mind, whichever suits you at your present level of understanding. Do you understand?

Yes.

When it comes to finally having the penny drop to where you not only create your senses, create your reality, but you create the senses with which to experience that reality, then you enter into a whole new field of understanding.

Let us look at your dreams for example, you say “It’s only a dream” and yet others will say “but you are creating that dream, the brain is creating that dream or mind is creating the dream”. Yet in some of these dreams you have unusual abilities. You have flying dreams, you have dreams where you take vast strides or run at super speeds. You have various abilities that you do not possess in waking reality. You are creating senses commensurate with the abilities.

So when it comes to your various experiences, your NDE’s, your OBE’s and your seers etc. then once more the argument can start, “ but is all this simply imagination, can we believe that these people  have actually seen these places, experienced these realities”?

Well, everything is possible in the imagination and provided that you admit to the possibility that the reality that you presently enjoy is simply a co-created reality produced by consensus imagination of cooperating consciousness then surely every reality is the same.

One thing here that we feel you might enjoy as a little party game, say is to sit with friends and maybe even some children, as their sense of imagination often knows no bounds compared to your own, and imagine what the human form could do if it had the abilities inherent in other species e. g. the ability to jump like a flea, many times your own height, to be able to see with the sight of an eagle, to be able to fly as a housefly does, to instantly take off in any direction and to change flight at right angles or instantly go from forwards to backwards etc. You cannot replicate this with your flying machines of course as the sheer mass of the flying instruments that you create cannot withstand the G forces occasioned by such manoeuvres whereas the composition of the fly’s body enables it to do so. We are simply giving you examples here so that you can then play with these and then apply them to the sort of realities that you could create.

You have constantly asked about what other lives can be led in the non-physical. Well, we have laid the groundwork for you here. You can easily see that should you all wish to be Superman or Spiderman or whatever other ‘man’ you create in your media, or woman we should say, then you are perfectly able to do so should you be able to get enough other consciousnesses to agree to create that reality with you and you make the rules to suit. It would be of interest for you, rather than us do your thinking for you, to sit down with others and say “let us look at the abilities of these other species, let us look at what instruments we could create be they of human form or some hybrid form maybe, let us just let our imagination run riot, let us brainstorm and see what kind of beings we could design and the sort of things they could do”. Then you could decide upon what would be the rules of the game and what senses the beings would enjoy.

So say that you want to create a large bird with the eyesight of an eagle but with the flight capabilities of a housefly. So you would ask yourselves “how would this be possible”? You may say “why don’t we just reduce the gravitational forces in our proposed reality”? “Look what the men on the moon could do in a reduced gravity environment and the astronauts in a spacecraft. We could set gravity at whatever level suits and now it is possible”.

This is expanding your mind, expanding your consciousness, which we stated at the beginning of our transmissions was our intention.

Now, if you are going to expand your consciousness, expand your mind, then part of this is up to you to do so and you can do this by flights of the imagination, because, you create with your imagination if you believe that this is possible. So by going through the process outlined above you are on your way to setting the rules for a reality. Yes?

Yes.

So you could say that water is going to be part of that reality but it would no longer be wet and as you have read many times before in your researches, you can bathe in another reality, the water is sparkling etc., but it doesn’t make you wet.

Soooh, you have seen what is possible. You can also see that you could be impervious to heat and cold, so you could be Icarus. Only, as now you are impervious to heat, the wax holding your feathers isn’t going to melt and you are not going to fall out of the sky. So you can fly off towards the sun and as you are impervious to heat you can reach an appropriate position, watch the fireworks and marvel at the creations of other consciousness.

You can go on from there. You can have wonderful exercises in imaginative creativity. We now come back to the fact that you create ‘everything’, everything. You create your senses and you choose the senses for the particular environment.

When you ask us what senses are available in our location or other realities, other locations if you wish the word, then it can be any sense that you wish. You can have the sense of being instantly wherever you wish to be, in terms of bi-location, or non-locality as you might call it now in which case where you want to be comes to where you are. So if you think that you imagine in your mind then everything is coming to you in your mind, you don’t have to go anywhere.

Then arises the concept of no need for space and then of course time travel.  You can be back with the Roman centurions or forward into the year 4000, if you can create an imaginative scenario for that as your filmmakers do, then you can do that. So no time and we are back to the unimaginable, shall we say, from your point of view. But you can certainly see that you can put together all kinds of  lives. So don’t hang your hat on a particular form of life. It is quite obvious, as we have described before, that when you first move over it will be momentarily quite strange to you and to make you feel at home everything will be portrayed to you to be familiar so you can feel safe and secure and then you can open up from there. That particular sort of reality for some will be their ideal and they will focus into that reality for as long as it is of satisfaction to them but they will also find that they are dipping their toes into other realities simultaneously. Gradually you settle into, let us say, what you might call a favourite home reality that you might retreat to. You could also ally this to your feelings of bliss. Once I focus on my home reality I feel wonderfully at peace. Now I know that I can focus in this other one, this other one and this other one, for excitement, for fear, for challenge, for whatever.

But I can always return to my blissful home reality.

So, we have entered a new area of, let us say, imagination.

Thank you.

We recently discovered that we could put audio files on the website and have created a new heading “Session Audio Files”. We have added audio files of two sessions, one from May 2015 and the audio file of our latest post.

The initial monologue of the 2015 session you will find at the beginning of “The Nature of Individuality and Personality” in Volume 2 in the Index.

Having not listened to this recording since  it was transcribed in 2015 it is interesting to compare my observations on the website with my comments in the recording.

More information about the subjects covered in the recording is in the preamble to the file in ‘Session Audio Files’ on the website.

We are pleased to announce that we have now published the material on the website in the form of two books. They are available through Amazon.

Book 1        Which is basically volume 1 of the site is titled:-

Conversations with Higher Consciousness

Available as a kindle version or a 272 page paper back.

Book 2       Which is basically volume 2 is titled:-

Reality and You. The Philosophy and Science of Consciousness.

Also available as a kindle version or a 374 page paper back.

Having typed and printed all the material on the site over the last few years we can tell you that it is far easier to absorb and understand when reading it from the printed page.  It is far easier to reference backwards and forwards for those of you who like to do so and you can dog-ear the pages and underline, annotate and comment to your hearts content. As you are all no doubt aware this material is intellectually challenging  and so makes a statement about you when friends pick it up from the coffee table and glance at the content. Seriously though it needs to be read several times before the conviction takes hold that consciousness is the ground of all being and that the life we are experiencing is simply one amongst many.

We chose to have this physical life experience so let us choose to concentrate on the wonderful expressions of consciousness  that surround us in all their diversity and remembering always  that any traumatic events and periods of sadness and grief will be recognised for what they truly are when we pass over. As was said in the concluding remarks in our last post:- “because you know that when the show is over everything is restored to as it was before and the experience is simply put aside. Nobody is left with the trauma of that experience. It is just transitory, you might say, in the moment. It is purely a transitory feeling.”