Reality and You now available in Book Form.

We are pleased to announce that we have now published the material on the website in the form of two books. They are available through Amazon.

Book 1        Which is basically volume 1 of the site is titled:-

Conversations with Higher Consciousness

Available as a kindle version or a 272 page paper back.

Book 2       Which is basically volume 2 is titled:-

Reality and You. The Philosophy and Science of Consciousness.

Also available as a kindle version or a 374 page paper back.

Having typed and printed all the material on the site over the last few years we can tell you that it is far easier to absorb and understand when reading it from the printed page.  It is far easier to reference backwards and forwards for those of you who like to do so and you can dog-ear the pages and underline, annotate and comment to your hearts content. As you are all no doubt aware this material is intellectually challenging  and so makes a statement about you when friends pick it up from the coffee table and glance at the content. Seriously though it needs to be read several times before the conviction takes hold that consciousness is the ground of all being and that the life we are experiencing is simply one amongst many.

We chose to have this physical life experience so let us choose to concentrate on the wonderful expressions of consciousness  that surround us in all their diversity and remembering always  that any traumatic events and periods of sadness and grief will be recognised for what they truly are when we pass over. As was said in the concluding remarks in our last post:- “because you know that when the show is over everything is restored to as it was before and the experience is simply put aside. Nobody is left with the trauma of that experience. It is just transitory, you might say, in the moment. It is purely a transitory feeling.”

 

 

How We Experience Lives Without a Physical Body. What Life is Like in No Space, No Time. January 25th 2019

How we experience lives without a physical body. What life is like in no space, no time. January 25th 2019

It has been three years since you launched the website. Who would have thought it would have taken three years before you decided to convert the material on the website into a book, let alone go to print. As we have said before, you weren’t given the thought. So now you have and you have. You have your electronic books published and within a week or so you will have your print versions published. (Amazon Kindle Books, 1. Conversations with Higher Consciousness. 2. Reality and You.)

Now, needless to say, considering the size and scope of these books, that is quite an achievement. It is not so much an achievement for us as it is for you. You have had to put the hard work into this book whereas it is quite easy for us to see the whole as, we have laid out so elaborately, everything happens at once. So we see the whole picture and therefore it is easy for us to make sure that everything we pass through the instrument is compatible with the overall thrust of the actuality being portrayed.

So yes, of course, we are quite pleased with it. It’s been quite an enjoyable ride really and as you can see from the spread of the website (has been accessed in 119 countries at the last count) the work will spread even more as the books become read and recommended to others. So yes we can all now sit back and watch the progress.

Reality may not only be stranger than we conceive, it may be stranger than we can conceive.                                                                                                  J.B.S. Haldane

Some time ago, you mentioned that you may be able to further expand on the realities that exist and the possibility of accessing those realities without getting lost in those particular domains, dramas. Have we reached that position?

As we have said before, using the language of the physical, it will be quite difficult to describe realities that are far divorced from the physical. It would be quite easy to describe semi- physical realities with different conditions as experienced in those realities. We have alluded to some possible examples before.

When we get further away from those realities you must be in a position to be able to, let us say, observe or understand from the point of view of a bodiless or instrumentless perspective and a far more interconnected perspective. It is difficult to provide analogies because there are no exact physical analogies to which we can allude that you can actually experience from the point of view of a body. We have to get into mind and into imagination. Probably the nearest sort of reality we can compare with would be these virtual realities that you can experience through your electronic media because effectively you will be able to, at that stage, stand off, shall we say, look into the reality, experience the exhilaration, the fear and, should you be engrossed in it sufficiently, even the emergence of love and desire as you identify with the image and feeling that comes across to you.

In some of those realities it will be a matter of you projecting an image of yourself that may not be of a physical image as you have at the present time because that reality will not have physical bodies within it. So let us say e.g. that you have an image such as that on a computer screensaver. Now there are some beautiful images on there with wonderful motion and quite attention holding capabilities. If you project some such image and another enjoys that image and feels drawn to it and remember you will not just be projecting images you will be projecting feelings. As we have said before, when you send a thought to someone else that thought comes complete with the qualities, attributes, of the information pertaining to the sender of that thought. Once you make the connection then you are, unless you wish to hide away, allowing the one you connect with to view your thought net, we might say. To understand who you are. Do you understand?

Yes.

Therefore the connections you make, you are immediately aware whether the other, we can term it consciousness, is of like mind and whether you feel comfortable with that like mind. When you feel comfortable with that like mind the thoughts will, let us say, move backwards and forwards between you with rapidity and so you can then join together in discussing, imaging or, as we have said before, having your coffee overlooking Capri. You will feel a sense of comfort, companionship and warmth. We won’t say love because we don’t wish you to give the connotation of the physical love that you experience at the moment, it will be that sense of soul mate, shall we say, which may give you a better idea of the feeling.

You will have these connections all over the place. You will have so many people where you will say “Ah, that feels good, this feels good, this feels good” and you will be embarking on all these different little experiences with them, not necessarily just with one but in groups. Now this is exactly what you are doing at the present moment only you are focused in physical reality but can you imagine being able to do this without having to see a body? As in a telephone conversation you cannot see a body but you can be completely comfortable with the person on the other end even if you haven’t met them before. Something in their voice, something in the way they talk, you feel “that person I think I could get on with”. Yes?

Now expand that to where you know you can get on with that person, you haven’t just heard the voice, you know all about how they think, what interests them because you are entangled. You have made the connection and you are both entangled. If you are happy with that then you can go enjoy things but of course we are coming into this area where basically your two information banks, shall we say, are now effectively merged in that you know your own feelings and you know the other’s feelings. This is the same as those who have an NDE experience, they are aware of the feelings of the other person.

Once you move away from the physical bodies you will know the other’s feelings and you will know whether you wish to have further consort with those gestalts or not. We are trying to point out to you that the bodily image necessity will be dispensed with because you will simply know. It will not matter, you can change if you wish to say ‘let’s both have a new image and let’s both see’ but in general it is unnecessary because you don’t need any images. But you may wish to create a joint image of a wonderful view. Now we had to put this over before because you wouldn’t be able to understand if we said right now, join me in a joint imagination, this wonderful screen image, computer screen image of a rainbow, swooping up and down rainbows, to refer to a previous analogy. So, we both imagine these wonderful rollercoasters of colour and then we both get on, let us say, we both place ourselves in the position of being able to experience the drops and the rise and the turns and the accompanying music with that. So in much the same way as you dance to music then you can do that which we have just described and the same feeling will come and of course you can add in singing, if you want the sound of your own voices, if you wish to have voices.  You will hear the sound but you won’t need ears to hear with. You convert the thoughts to your language at the moment, but then again you will not need to convert the thought to language. You may do so for a while after leaving the physical body but you soon realise that is unnecessary because no matter what language is spoken it will be the thought that you receive and that thought will be as a, we can only say, feeling rather than expressed in language, but the import of that thought will be exactly the same. Yes?

Now, have we given you some idea?

Yes thank you.

Right, now so…….. as you are aware you can create any form of experience that you desire, so, you may decide, as we have said before, let us have a sword fight, I’ll be a centurion, or whatever and you be a gladiator, you have a sword and a shield and I will have a pike and a club let us say, and we will see what we can do and see who comes out the victor but of course you and I will both be fully aware that this is only make believe and yet we haven’t given ourselves any particular strength or advantage in the particular instrument that we are using to conduct the battle, so we can still have our uncertainty and excitement. So, that is one area, but there again we are looking at a pastiche of the physical.

Now, you have to work with us when envisaging these things so that you can endeavor to think of yourself as having left the body and now you have unlimited potential and then try to access the ideas that are floating by and open up to where you allow in ideas of a non-physical nature and see whether you can comprehend those ideas. You have a problem in that you have to remove yourself from the analytical judgement of the physical but it can be done. You can say that this is somewhat like a crazy dream and yet you can look at this and say “but I know that it isn’t a crazy dream, it is simply the creation of my own imagination”. Yes?

Yes.

It is possible. It may be crazy from the point of view of the physical but it is certainly not crazy once you leave the physical. Whether that gives you any particular satisfaction in indulging in these flights of fancy is moot but you have to do this in order to maybe come across those areas that surprise you because until you open your mind nothing can get in. Do you understand?

Now switching over to the business of trying to analyze the non-physical in terms of the physical is something that is virtually impossible. You can go down to your Planck lengths, you can go down to your superstrings, and of course once you get there, as you posted the other day, you have to imbue those strings with intelligence and consciousness and then you start all over again from the, we won’t say the Big Bang, but from the background, the coalescing consciousness and its desires (formed?) into an objective reality which you can understand in a physical reality. Now try to imagine that the intelligent strings are quite happy communicating with each other in, let us say, informational imagination. Can you understand what we are saying? In other words you would have what you would call pictures going backwards and forwards but occupying no space and yet, to those intelligences, they are enjoying a reality that those pictures portray.

You would call that a virtual reality because you have yet to realise that your own reality, is, a virtual reality. Although many now have realized this, and that existence is merely experiencing infinite realities.

The next question is, through reductionism but still looking at it from a Newtonian perspective we are down to this tiny amount, because that is what, let us say, the marriage of Newtonian and quantum theory is, that, although everything is entangled and connected, you still have to envisage it in terms of a string, whatever that may be, a tiny little wave. You keep imagining it in terms of something that you can actually behold in one form or another even though it is still, for you, something that you cannot see, you cannot measure, you can only imagine, but your mathematics will say, this is possible.

Now 100 or 200 years ago, wherever you want to start, you didn’t have this theory and you didn’t have these tiny little strings, the theories weren’t out there. So what is the next theory that is going to come along? We are having to talk at the present moment in terms of your theories because we can’t take you to an area of which you have absolutely no comprehension of whatsoever. So we take you down to the limit of your present theoretical projection and say this little superstring, for your purposes at the moment, is a unit of awareness. You can apply that to the material that we have transmitted so far, but as we have just said, imagine these pictures going backwards and forwards and the reality being experienced by these tiny little strings.

You asked if we could go further, well we have gone further. Previously we have been saying that you need a gestalt consciousness, you need many (awarenesses). We also said that the awareness can access the memory bank, it can tune in to anyone who is still in the body, or out for that matter, and experience what is going on because it actually isn’t having to manifest anything. It is just tuning in to an information stream.  We have said before that your gestalt consciousness and all the ones in it are broadcasting all the time, because they can’t but do so. As they see and hear etc. it (that information) is entering their thought net and therefore it is there for all to see. You could call that a broadcast. Yes?

Yes.

In effect you are saying that my site is open for everyone to visit and of course your site is connected to all others but the connection is such that it has to be activated. Once we get down into this area then it leads you to the logical conclusion that none of these realities exist in any objective form whatsoever. Would you agree?

It certainly is possible that all realities are virtual realities and we simply get lost in the drama and believe that what we are experiencing is a material reality.

The actuality of all realities is simply just an exchange of images. Purely an exchange of images between, let us come back again to your strings, and so, how many strings do you want? Do these strings require space, or don’t they require space? Now, we are using the word ‘strings’, but of course once you get to consciousness, we cannot describe consciousness any more than you can. We simply know that we are. We know that we can imagine, we know, what you might call ‘see and hear’. We know that we can receive communication from another, join in that communication and converse, communicate, experience everything that your own sensory perceptions are aware of and other sensory perceptions that you are not at present capable of experiencing. But just the same we do not have this impression of space because we know that the space that we do appear to inhabit is simply imagination. So we are not aware of space in the same way as we are not aware of time, as you see it. Because you look out and think that it is ‘out there’, and you cannot really come to terms with the fact that it may be ‘in here’. There is not only nothing out there but there is no ‘there’ to be out.

That leads us all back to the same thing, “well, there appears to be a lot of us but are we all, we can only use your language again, in the same space”? But if there is no space what does this mean? Therein lies the rub. We are not meant, at the moment, to understand and so, as we have said before, we simply know that we are, we understand what we can do, we know that we continue to exist, and therefore, we watch the ideas that come by and then we decide “we’ll have a look at this, we’ll have a look at that”.

In the same way we will come back to your light and dark. Sometimes it is “well, let’s try this” because by now when you are away from the physical you realise wholeheartedly that this is all simply, imagination. It is simply a play act. One can just say “you do this, I will scream and yell, my puppet will try to fight back but die and then we’ll try something else”. Once more we will refer you back (to the analogy of) to the puppets and the puppet masters. You would have no problem, as you have seen before with your beach side Punch and Judy, in playing out some relatively horrific scenarios because you know that when the show is over everything is restored to as it was before and the experience is simply put aside. Nobody is left with the trauma of that experience. It is just transitory, you might say, in the moment. It is purely a transitory feeling.

Now we may go further down this route but it is really going to be a repetitive area and so further information will come forward as we go along now and questions and connections start to come in from those outside. You may have the odd query that arises from reading into other people’s speculations but in the main it will be further expansion or explanation, shall we say, of the material already transmitted.

Holographic Universe

This article was in the Daily Express today 14th January 2019.

https://www.express.co.uk/news/science/1072080/universe-hologram-holograph-science-news-leonard-susskind

So now we are realising that time is not fundamental it is a construct. The interior surface of a balloon is 2 dimensional. Other scientists, including those at Fermi-lab, I believe, hypothesise and are trying to prove that the 3D Universe we perceive arises from a 2D background. You may remember stereo gram pictures which look like white noise until you focus at a certain distance and then you perceive a 3D image therein.

So, is the hologram being projected onto the 2D interior of the balloon and if so what is creating the projection? We must assume some form of intelligence. The same applies to  simply focusing  with intention or using the appropriate senses to explicate the 3D image from the infinite potential of the implicate as contained in the 2D background.

The next step is to question the notion of space once more.

No time, hologram ok. No space, new theory needed!

A last thought, could each tiny string be conscious and intelligent? If so then the unit of awareness as described by realityandyou  could explain the creation of the 3D if we hold to the notion of space but if it is all imagination then we would probably all agree that imagination does not require space.

Now apply a Big Bang Theory analogue and imagine all the superstrings compressed into an infinitesimally small point, which appeared from where, The Void? So, no space, no time just intelligence using imagination and how has that been classified through the ages.

Comments pleeeeeeease.

Another conversation with our son Steven Jan 2019

Conversation  with our son Steven who passed in 1994.  Jan 2019

Thanks for that personal advice. Is there anything else?

Life is good both for you and for me and for all of us. No matter where you are there are things that take your interest and so all the time an idea catches your eye, takes your fancy, even if it is a small thing or a day to day occurrence just like making the chocolates. They didn’t have to be made but there was the enthusiasm “Yes, let’s make those because they are enjoyable”. Same thing with the raspberry cake. There are things all the time that are enjoyable. Now you must parallel that with what’s happening here, we do the same sort of thing. We look and see what so and so is doing and “I’ll go over and see what’s happening there and join in with that”. So you go over, obviously that just means looking, focusing in.

Activities, as you can imagine are not greatly different to those in the physical when you first leave the physical. You tend to mix with those on a certain level who, because they enjoyed it in the physical, then go back to enjoying it in the non-physical. Because they now have the feeling, the memory, the experience, of what it is like to be on the stage in that particular activity and although you can now enjoy the activity again you know that you are creating the props and everything else whereas in the physical you were not aware of that. That doesn’t mean to say that you can’t enjoy it just as well.

Now when you put your CD on you are creating the music. The act of putting the CD on, you create the music that you enjoy. You are not actively producing the music, what is the difference? The only difference is that here you can actually produce the notes you wish to hear, but why do that when somebody else can produce the notes even better than you can? They understand the ins and outs of music and therefore they can produce sounds that you wouldn’t even think of producing because most of the sounds that you produce come from memory and are the product of other minds that composed that particular piece of music. So you will still listen to others, but there again you may challenge your own capability to think up the variations on a piece of music.

Just as you allow yourself to move to the music on the dance floor then you, if you try to understand how notes fit together, can vary the tunes that you whistle or sing and the notes that go there. This is an area that requires just as much practise where we are as it does where you are. You have to understand music and how it fits together.

Life is continuous and when you move from one to the other you hardly notice the difference and when it comes to understanding that then of course there will be this “Well, why stay here, why not go”? On the other hand, you think to yourself “I’d rather stick around for this, I’d rather stick around for that”. But of course it is no good saying “Let’s start speaking and let’s get the majority to say what is going to happen”, because you are the majority, you are part of the whole. The majority thought is your thought. Don’t think that you are separate from the majority because most of the time you are agreeing wholeheartedly with the majority. You are not a single person outside. When you think, the thoughts are being produced by the majority. You cannot set yourself apart and still be part of it, you are either with it or you are not with it at all. As we have said before you may feel that when something is not going to work out that well it is of course easy to say, from the point of view of trying to explain, that you are taking a decision that you are not really comfortable with but once more that is still the majority. The majority is taking the decision that it is not very comfortable with otherwise you wouldn’t be experiencing the feelings of the majority.

It is very difficult for us to put over to you that you are only experiencing the majority because whichever way we look at it, while you are in the physical you still think of yourself as a singular and it is extremely difficult to see yourself as a [product of a] multiple.

So when we are explaining things, if we keep coming back and say to you “this is all you are at the moment” then we have taken away your sense of “I” completely and yet that is not true because you are living all these “I”s and you are still yourself but as we have stressed before, you cannot stand outside yourself. So you just say, in the end, “This is how I feel, this is what I want to do, this is a life or activity that I wish to join at the present time” and you just let it carry on.

“Mum”?…   Hi.

How are you Steve?

Always, always, always happy. Always good, no problems, no challenges, avoid the challenges, as I said before, just have a good time. No need to ask how I am because there is no doubt. Are you enjoying yourself, are you happy and the answer will come back “Well of course I am”, because what is there to be unhappy about? No problems, do whatever you like. Contact, be with, look in, see what is going on and yes maybe “I wonder what is going to happen there”? You can see to a certain degree what is happening in the immediate future but you are also, again it is sooo difficult for anyone to explain to you that you are all together all the time. How difficult it is for me to say that you are here anyway, mm? Yes. Because you feel the sense of separation, but I don’t feel the sense of separation so what have I got to be unhappy about? Yes.

People I have loved in this particular life are with me anyway and we are doing one or two other things but once more I am not aware that I am doing those until I focus in them even though I do know that I am doing several things because I know other people and I know that if I know them and that I have feelings towards them that we are both focussed into some other activity. Therefore that is where we retain the feelings of connection from. As you can imagine, “I know you from somewhere, where I don’t know I’ve forgotten”. Mm? Yes. I know that face, I remember that voice. It is a long time ago maybe but there’s no time, but it’s a long distance ago if you take frequency and the lives of different frequency.

So, once more, nothing to be unhappy about. Perfectly happy.

You have just had all your advice for living and as far as I can tell you from here your particular little soap opera is going to go on for quite a while yet. There will be the usual ups and downs along the road but there is no ending in sight at the moment and so we haven’t got any party preparations going on. And it’s a question we are all highly interested in what’s still happening. It may seem mundane to you but even watching the changes in the weather is different if we care to look in.

It’s a… it’s a show! Mm? Yes. We don’t have to deal with things we don’t want to deal with here and so to pop in and see how you are contending with things you have no, or you think you have no control over, then it’s nice to just view these things now and again. No different to you viewing on the television, we view in much the same manner.

So you have been viewing what’s been going on in the family?

Of course and elsewhere and other things. Whatever took our interest when we were in the physical, you still retain an interest if it floats by. Especially if you had thoughts as to how it should be or you found certain aspects of the physical quite exhilarating, amazing, awesome then it is quite interesting to see. Volcanoes going off for example are still something that are still “well look at this”. Mm? Yes. You get an email or a message on your phone, whatever, a small video and you look at it in passing and then you discard it. Yes? For the memory. Well we are the same here. The ideas, it’s not just ideas; the ideas, the events, the happenings are all over and when one resonates you take a look, but that’s all.

So how would you decide whether to have a physical life if you didn’t know what is was about at all? You wouldn’t just say “Ah, I’ll just jump in over there” because the idea wouldn’t have grabbed you. You had to have a feeling about the idea in the first place? Yes. And the feeling had to come from either prior experience or from something where you absorbed all the multitudinous aspects of the proposed life and say “that was overall a pretty good feeling, yes, I’ll do that”. Another one would be “ooh, that wasn’t a very good feeling, I’ll think I’ll give that one a miss”. But it comes not as a detailed review and a weighing up but just an overall feeling because you can see everything that is going to happen in a blur, let us say, all coming to you at once, not sequential, it all comes to you at once like taking in a large jigsaw. Instead of being able to look at each little bit and piece you get the general impression. Yes? Uh huh. So, “that’s a nice picture, or, there is something about that picture that jars”. That is more what it is like so this is why you will take a life that overall has a pretty good feeling because the overall intensity, the overall resonance fit with you. Whereas there are one or two bits in there that were pretty nasty but they simply didn’t have the volume, shall we say, to detract from the sound as a whole. There is a discordant note here and there, but in terms of the overall production it was let go.

So anyway, my turn to be able to put over some, you might say, knowledge and I’m in a good position to do that now of course and so quite happy at times to sort of sit in on Dad’s chats because I can add bits in here and there. Like we did things together in the physical we can still do things from this end together as well.

You’ve got no need to worry about “Tine” either. “Tine” is in decent condition and she will look back on her life at the end of it all and say, “well it may not have been everybody’s cup of tea but I basically pleased myself, I had very little to worry about and although there were times when I would have liked a bit more companionship on the other hand there were no downsides. There was only some, let us put it, elevated moments and some flat moments. There were no moments of plumbing the depths except for when I went over. But overall she will look back and say “that was quite a pleasant life, it didn’t cause me terrific amounts of angst and anxiety”. Of course that was what was chosen in the first place any way.

As for me, well, as has been told to you, someone has to go sometimes to shape the whole thing up so that routes are followed which wouldn’t have been followed if these things hadn’t happened. The play has to be organised in such a way that others, you might say, craftily engineered the events so that the outcome is to their satisfaction. You can say that we acquiesced to all these things and your books will mark the passage of time.

“Chucky” is having a happy life. She has got her child and that is something she has treasured above all else and she is living her life to the maximum love experience, you might say, rather than the material experience and in many ways if you look at it then all of us didn’t have much in the way of material ambition and yet you, Dad, were driven from an early age to remove yourself from the living with restricted means and be able to do what you wanted to do. To do that you had to get yourself into certain positions and the money was necessary. But we didn’t have to drive ourselves for money and we were able to turn ourselves to looking at other aspects. Once more we come back to the fact that this is what is chosen. Now just as “Tine” is able to do roughly what she wants to do, eschew certain relationships so that she doesn’t have the downside then you must say the same thing with “Chucky”. Chucky” is not bothering to match her peers in terms of houses and cars and I am sure you would agree that she is leading the life that she enjoys and she is doing what she wants to do, she is not doing what doesn’t give her pleasure. Would you agree?

Yes I would agree.

And so what is wrong with that? Then, hard for dad to understand but there you go, and it’s one of those things that are part of what you might say the learning experience and when you have been of a certain motivation then it is hard to see the lack of motivation in others because you think that motivation should be there and you can’t understand that there is no need to be motivated in that fashion. If you are motivated to sit under a palm tree all day and just nod off and just eat when you need to eat and then socialise when you need to socialise, then how would you feel [about] that, as a life wasted or a life chosen? You talk about retreating into bliss, bliss is whatever you care to think of as suiting you.

That’s right.

Bliss can be just feeling the warmth of the sun and letting yourself relax, forgetting the bodily feelings, not worrying about this needs doing, or that needs doing and letting go. That is difficult to do if you surround yourself with an environment that requires constant maintenance for you to keep it in the manner in which it gives you pleasure. Mm?

Yes.

So once more the bliss must…. still difficult to explain because you have joined… you are part of a consciousness grouping that is highly motivated. Mm?

Yes.

And so it is hard to…  in fact all the time you wish to stay with it you are part of that highly motivated group. The only way to leave it will be to leave it. Mm?

Yes.

Change focus and so you just have to say to yourself, well yep, I am in this bus and this bus is driven at quite a pace. Mm? I see that other bus over there and it is stopping here and stopping there and admiring the view and having a convivial time whereas this bus is still rushing from place to place. Unfortunately, you can’t change buses. Mm?

Yes.

You can’t be in both buses at once. So to leave your present bus you have got to get off and ask to join the other bus and then of course you will lose all contact with the bus you have just got off. Yes?

Yes.

And so all those that are in the original bus will then miss you and so that is a pretty good parallel for what this is all about.

Love you.

Love you Steve, lovely talking to you.

 

 

Consciousness and It’s Sense of Self. 3rd July 2018

Can one unit of consciousness, having been part of a billions of units co- production, recreate the physical body or its image?

Does one atom exist on its own? Does one electron, one quark?

I’m assuming yes.

You know that an atom is composed of multiple electrical charges?

Yes.

How far do you wish to go before you decide that anything smaller cannot be aware? Yet it is in motion and it is communicating with others?

I have no idea.

If photons are communicating with each other can they be units of awareness?

They can be a unit of awareness but could that unit of awareness e.g. recreate me?

In what fashion?

I am not talking about the physical body, I am talking about in another reality.

In its imagination. If the photon is aware, is in communication with another photon, which is able to be demonstrated in a laboratory, then you have your quantum entanglement. Let us say that entanglement assumes that the observer can no longer distinguish the individuals within, so let us put it that they become like identical twins in all respects because they are sharing the same knowledge, the same information bank. One’s knowledge is the others knowledge. Alternatively you could say that they have merged, become as one.  Yes?

I am finding it very difficult. For example we spoke about remote viewing and how the remote viewer can be aware of information and images not locally present but when I asked if I could mentally send something to you the answer was no.

We are in the physical.

Well surely the remote viewers are in the physical or one part of them is in the physical.

Let us go back to the telepathy experiment. There is a belief and the belief is that you can get some information but you cannot get the full clarity picture (as seen through the other persons eyes).

Yes.

When you are in the non-physical you know, you do believe and therefore you can say “I am sitting in a café in Capri overlooking the Mediterranean”. Yes?

Yes.

You entangle, both are sharing the same image. Now do you understand?

Yes.

When it comes down to you somehow needing to see an objective unit of awareness, being able to visualise or understand in some fashion “This is a unit of awareness”, can you understand this wave, particle, electrically charged unit going in and out of existence called an electron?

Sort of. We are told about it.

We are told about it? So let us go further down the scale, all the way down to the supposed limit of the Planck scale and would you agree that there may be orders of magnitude smaller than that theoretical limit?

Yes.

Then imagine that these energy pulses, let us say, are all capable of communicating with each other. When you are a unit of awareness you will join whatever group that you wish to feel you are. You will adopt an identity. At the present moment you sit there feeling that you are “I”, (Jean) but you are also aware that you are part of billions of awarenesses all thinking the same?

Yes.

Does each cell in your body understand that it is partaking in the physical instrument called Jean?

I presume they do.

Exactly. So if we assume that the consciousness that is focusing on the cell is a unit of consciousness, then you can say that unit of consciousness is entangled and is receiving all the same impressions that you are. Yes?

Yes.

So as the cells split and you breathe molecules in and out and likewise eat and excrete, then you can say that your composition is constantly changing?

Yes.

But each time as they join they pick up, they have access to, everything that you already know, have ever experienced and they immediately assume the “I”. Because they are connected to your memory store. They say “This is me, I am Jean”. Now you could turn around and say “But you have just joined.” And they will reply “No I haven’t, I have been here as long as you have”.

Now talk about time as regards this last statement.

“I have been here as long as you have”? Because there is no time, as you can access all the memories?

It is not a question of “I can access all the memories” it is “I have all the memories”. The minute you join, you focus in, you are totally connected, you are entangled, you become as one.

So then the minute you leave you still retain all those memories? (See Entangled Minds)  

Yes. But do you, as we said before, even though you remember something from June 12th can you then recollect June 11th?

No. Going on from that, say a unit of awareness has just left me and has gone to the next life. Can that unit of awareness, that is now in the next life and knows that is has been me, can that recreate me to those people who have left the physical before I leave the physical?

The awareness leaves the physical?

Yes.

It then is able to be in knowing contact with others in the non-physical, in other words both know they are non-physical. The consciousness (awareness) that leaves you then is able to talk to your mother and father on an equal footing, they are aware of each other.  You have the memory store. Can that unit of consciousness, that considers itself “I”, access the memory store?

Yes.

And can it see what it was like?

Presumably the answer is yes.

So as it brings that into its mind, it is communicating with your mother and father, they entangle, they become as one, they see the picture and the picture is completely clear. (We must remember that all parties to the encounter are recreating their appropriate image as in remembering, returning to acting, parts played in a play. In other words you become that person again)

Now you have to realise that this is a plane of separation. When you leave here there is no separation of anything, everything is interconnected. It is merely where you wish to be.  (What you wish to focus upon.)

You can be with anyone, what you call anyone, any imaginative representation, whenever you wish.

But in order to share that representation you have to activate the entanglement. Do you understand?

I know what you are saying.

If one side does not want to respond it turns its focus away and you no longer both share the image, but if you both wish to share the image then (automatically) you are both sharing the same image. (The intention is the key – to the reality of Capri; and to all other realities you care to focus on)

Such is the imagination that when one says “I am sitting in this chair” “Well I’ll sit in this chair then”, you just simply adjust the images accordingly.

Yes.

You create your reality.

Now you have to assimilate all these different things and think them through. Then you will see that once you get away from this separateness you will realise quite quickly that there is no (intrinsic) you. There is only who you want to be.

Yes.

“I am this, now I think I’ll be that, and that, and that”. So you are always speaking from the position of an adopted or created “I”, of an adopted or created identity. Do you understand?

I can understand what you are saying. It is just that because I now consider myself to be composed of billions of entities the mind boggles especially when they may all be thinking of different things.

You are concerned about losing what you consider is your identity.

No, I am not concerned about that, I just find the whole thing confusing.

Do you consider that there must be utter confusion in the ocean with all these untold molecules of water?

All these molecules of water have come together and are now called an ocean of water…….

Where is their individual identity?

It isn’t all the time they are part of the ocean, it isn’t, they are just part of the ocean.

Have you got an individual identity amongst the 7 billion humans?

Yes. So they should all have their individual identity. I take that back.

Exactly.

I take that back. They all retain their individual identity and when the wind blows or the sun shines they go off to be something different. (To experience being part of something different)

And your billions of awarenesses? Comprising your particular “I”.

They can do the same thing, they can go off and be whatever.

But do they still retain the access to that particular sense of “I”?

I suppose so via their memory store, by focusing on the memory store of that “I”.

Now you have already established that you have your identity amongst 7 billion others and so if we take 7 billion molecules of water, say a couple of drops, you would accord them their individual identity within those drops of water?

Yes.

If we now reduce those molecules to their component parts and keep on dissembling until we get to the limits of our comprehension then can we determine the state of the primary unit of consciousness? The consensus of opinion amongst the scientific community is that consciousness arises  at a certain point, but can that be demonstrated, what can they be certain of, or is it just speculation? Does it arise at some point during conception, after birth? The jury is still out. How many scientists would agree that consciousness is present before conception?

Probably not very many.

Exactly. It is the old business about when does the soul join but if you say that the soul exists before and actually plans all this then you won’t get much of a hearing from science will you?

No.

Soooh. You have to just be happy with what you feel and decide if it really matters to you if you know what a unit of awareness is because “what have I got at the moment? I have a sense of identity” and from all that you have learned you will have a sense of identity when you pass over as do the NDEr’s. Can they see themselves? Have you ever read or heard of a near death experiencer saying “I could see myself” and describe their non-physical appearance?

No one has ever been able to see their ”Self”, as how can you stand outside yourself without being a separate “Self”?

You cannot.

So you can only be the “Self” that other “Selves” tell you, you are. What they reflect back to you from your own thoughts and their interpretation of same. Those selves can only tell you what you are by what you project. Now you either project your imagination to another “Self” in which case you are entangled and they will have your knowledge of what you think you are, how you see yourself. They can then pass that information back to you. At that stage they can tell you what they think you are. From all this information you will derive a sense of what you are like.

But what are you getting? You are getting what is termed “reflection”. So you don’t have a mirror, you have a thought reflection.

Yes.

Your sense of awareness of “Self” comes from the reflection of your own thoughts back to you. As you send thoughts out regarding your belief, your attitude, your opinions……Let us assume that you have this thought-form of a physical body as you pass over. (Think of yourself as one unit of awareness amongst many.) You contact another unit of awareness, you are entangled. You, in your imagination, have this picture of yourself, from a photograph, say. That immediately becomes the knowledge of the entangled party so then they can send a thought back to you “This is what you look like” but they may have their own attitudes and beliefs so whereas you may see yourself as beautiful they may see you as not so beautiful and they send that back.

What has happened? You have sent a picture and they have sent it back and that is where the term reflection comes from. We talk “reflection” but we don’t think about, how is this promulgated? When we say reflection, and when I say “we” I mean from the physical, it involves the receiving of varied responses from those you interact with from which you gradually build up a conception of how you are in other people’s eyes.

Yes.

You then decide or not to amend the way you present and conduct yourself to achieve the effect you desire. To be seen as loving, caring, humorous, impartial or maybe strong, dictatorial, an achiever or whatever mix you think is comfortable for you. You do this in response to data being received from other units of awareness. Of course in order for them to be aware of you, you had to make a presentation.

Now when you haven’t got a physical body and you have only got thoughts, and thoughts being imagination, you are broadcasting all kinds of images and information and it is reflected back to you. So consider that the other units of awareness are various distorting mirrors and all the sensory perceptions you put out there are then reflected back to you. So they come to you as thoughts. You attribute those thoughts to others and then you accord them whatever you wish to accord them in terms of importance to yourself. Can you see that?

Yes. Much the same as we respond to the opinions of others here. We either take notice or not depending on the source of the opinion and if we think it is valid we may change our behaviour.

Exactly. The process of forever becoming is continual, you exist, you are forever becoming.

Do you see that each time you make an adjustment you are creating your own sense of “I”?

Yes. I can see that I create my own identity continually, at every moment actually, every time I change my mind or amend my opinion or attitude. Who I think I am is who I think I am.

And it is whether you create that in a singular or a multiple capacity depending on the experience you are involved in, your current focus. You are merely joining in and accepting a sense of ”I” derived from the co- production of whatever reality you are involved in but at the same time you can happily imagine your own sense of ”I”. Now think of where you got that sense of “I” from in the first place. From something you experienced. Yes?

Yes.

There isn’t a start, but let us start from the birth, let us say, of a unit of awareness. At that point it has no memories, it starts to acquire memories. Now you may equate this to a child, it cannot remember before it was born. So what does it do? It starts to accumulate experiences and memories.  You can compare this to a unit of consciousness. What we don’t know is, was it ever born and we won’t know, will we?

So we simply enjoy the fact that “I AM”.

When you consider the philosophies of millennia most thinkers arrive at the same conclusion, because that is all that matters.

It does not matter “I am what” it merely matters “What I am”, how I think of myself at the moment.

So arises the “I”.

Comment: You cannot find or lose your “self” because you are continually creating that “self”, that sense of self. 

Perhaps this explains how a “grandma” appears in dreams or to NDE’rs as she was at a much earlier age. Simple really isn’t it.

Gives a new meaning to “I think therefore I am.”   i.e. My thoughts regarding my “self” form the representation of who I think I am.

 

12th June 2018 Growth and Evolution by Design in a Time based Reality.

Perhaps you would like to comment on this: All growth arises from focusing on sequential blueprints. All motion equally so.

When the idea comes for a life in the physical reality, then as we have said before you have to search for a suitable instrument compatible with the overall environment you intend to inject yourself into. As we have discussed before you cannot suddenly be a kangaroo in Iceland, it would upset the established consensus understanding of reality. Questions would be asked.

Therefore you take a look around and of course once you see something that fits in then almost certainly it has been done before or but maybe you wish to change it. You will start however with something that has already existed. So will it have a pattern history? (Perhaps a.k.a. the morphogenetic field?)

Yes.

So you will (be able to) see all the patterns, won’t you? The pattern will arise in your awareness, you will see where to start and you will move in and enter the process along with the mass of the gestalt and the easiest way to grow is to focus upon the next pattern.  As we have discussed before if you wish to run a little faster, jump a little higher, then you will make changes to the pattern as you go along. It takes more effort, more intensity of focus but as you know from both the point of view of the physical and from the point of view of the back of the theatre, shall we say, support comes in. You could call this inspiration, encouragement from the crowd to go higher. The ones focusing on the purely physical, on the stage, hear that exhortation and put in that bit more effort and sometimes it happens (and creates a new pattern segment, which we may term as evolution). It all depends on the motivation, intention etc.

Now if we say that all growth comes from that, then yes, growth comes from focus on the existing patterns and then endeavouring to improve. You have two definitions of growth there, you have growth as regards the passage from birth to death and the growth as regards to what you would term as evolution in the perfection of design, or an improvement upon the previous product.

Does that answer the question or is there another part?

There isn’t another part but I would like you to comment on “time” as regards to all of this.

Once more, time is a construct of the physical reality. Now if you look at the pattern we could start hallway through couldn’t we?

Yes.

And you would suddenly appear in reality?

Yes.

So what have we said so many times before about this?……. Your child is born at the age of five….

Well it would be a little odd wouldn’t it?

Or you are sitting there, the wife isn’t pregnant and a five year old suddenly appears in the living room. What questions would be asked?

Many.

Many. Exactly. So you don’t disturb the established order. In fact if you wish to try then you won’t be allowed to, be able to, because you will not be able to garner sufficient support and therefore intensity to achieve manifestation. “We have a good thing going here in this physical reality, many experiences, many opportunities for entertainment and enjoyment so don’t let’s spoil it all. Please stay away, go to another reality if you wish to be switching ages all the time”.  There are realities that have the capacity to do that and all those participating will recognize the ability to come and go at will just as you have the capacity to come and go at your various activities in the physical. Yes?

Yes.

They will come into your life and go out of your life and you will know that is not a problem at all and at the same time of course in those realities you are still connected. You come back for selected activities or events, so reunion after reunion after reunion, if you wish.

Yes.

No different from the focuses. You choose the focuses. In some you will spend more time on the stage, sometimes a bit more at the back of the theatre.

You will wax and wane in the various focuses just as you spend more time on the golf course than you do, say, in the garden. It all depends on where your desires take you. All these realities are made in different fashions. This reality is constructed to provide uncertainty and excitement, the experience of the highs and the lows. It is to live in the moment, to travel through and to also understand that you can’t go backwards in the physical reality. You cannot undo what you have done.

When you are out of physical reality you can create whatever you wish. You merely focus with intention and you create it. If you don’t like it you create something else. You can go forwards, backwards, inwards, outwards, up and down, sideways because everything is available to be created. In non-physical reality you have to be mindful of what you are doing, you have to remember to control your focuses because your focuses result in creation. You do not want your focus to continuously create disparate realities by focusing upon thoughts in a haphazard manner because you will find yourself in various experiences some of which you sincerely do not want to be in. Others may sometimes have to rescue you from them and that can be tiresome and they can threaten to leave you in them. If you are responsible you will carefully weigh up the ideas as they come by and not dive in too quickly.

 

You will learn. This may be where this idea of coming to the physical to learn stems from, learn to be a creator. It is learn, if you wish, to be in control of that which you wish to participate in. Now before we bring in the question of time on this one you can always slip away from one thing to another, you can go one step forward and two steps back and then get a grip and decide that you had better control your focus. “I got myself into this before and I don’t want to do it again”. Because whichever way you want to look at it you are forever becoming. You have got your memory store, you can go backwards and forwards to that instantaneously and so certain ideas will resonate with you or not. That is because in the process of forever becoming you will develop certain attitudes, beliefs and emotions so some ideas will appeal, some won’t and sometimes you won’t know why. You will know “I don’t think I want to do that”. Remember that when you look at an idea that others lock onto the idea at the same time. It maybe not manifest until sufficient interest is generated but there are others looking at this and you will be linked with those others so you get an idea of what the majority at the time are thinking and that will, to you, be your thought. So if lots do not like the idea you will think the same way because you are part of the “I”.

We mentioned before about the dual control car. You sit in the driver’s seat and the instructor sits in the passenger seat with access to the dual controls. If he sees that you are going to come too close to the car you are intending to pass, he may just move the wheel slightly to the right whereupon you will feel the movement and as you look forward recognize the danger and change direction. Where did the initial thought come from?

From the instructor.

Yes.

The same thing happens with the majority. You will feel the movement and respond accordingly or decline. Depending on what you looked at in the first place you will have ideas that you will simply not contemplate at all, they will horrify you. You will only look at ideas that resonate with who you are. Any gestalt that forms is comprised of those who are of like bent, you might say, like minds. It is all resonance. You have, effectively, fellow travelers when you are considering an idea. You will not get ones to whom that idea is anathema wasting time looking at it. So you are always in the company of somewhat like thinkers and that will colour your attitude.

Which is why we said before, you will never know who you really are because you can only be aware of what you are aware of and you will be aware of intensities. Those intensities are created by thoughts and you will think that is your thought. What you think you are is always the product of the many.

Yes. So are you saying that applies in the non-physical as well as in the physical? That you don’t know who you are?

We have been speaking as regards the non- physical. You are a unit of awareness. You are only aware of what you are aware of. You are aware of the thoughts, the ideas, passing by. Once you try to block everything out then it is possible to keep shutting yourself down, but eventually you will not be able to do it, and when you are fully shut down there are no thoughts so effectively you are not aware. But of course you cannot extinguish yourself, you cannot just shut your eyes and not see the thoughts that are coming by. You can only ignore, ignore, ignore. Sooner or later however you will forget to ignore.

20th June 2018 The Sense of Being Stared At.

I know that you have already spoken about this but would you like to enlarge on the sense of being stared at?

Let us say we have been in the connected mode whilst cogitating on the term “quantum entanglement”. The thoughts going from, you might say, David to David. Yes?

Yes.

Then the answers are being accessed. Entanglement means connection, as simple as that. What have we said so many times before about universal interconnectedness? Everything is connected to everything else but what activates, let us say, the awareness? It is that connection being focused upon. If the connection isn’t focused upon there is no intensity. We will use the word intensity because it is an easy one to understand. As soon as you, through the physical eyes, look at another person you have activated the intensity on that link and so the intensity is felt. The person being stared at realises “somebody is contacting me”. We have used the word contact but they are aware that “there is an interest in me”. You understand that?

Yes.

Therefore they look around, just like any curious person, to find out who it is that is interested in me. On another level of course they know immediately. But, once more on another level, from stranger to stranger, would you answer?

Probably not.

No. Or the answer could be “yes, can I help you”. “oh no, not really , I am just sort of looking”. Now take that as being the conversation that goes on at the back of the theatre level, shall we say. Does that explain what happens?

Yes, thank you.

Imagine the perceived neural network, and the flashes of light going across it. You look at the person, the flash of light goes through the entanglement and the person notes the light. It is quite simple really. The same applies to the business of the dogs knowing when their owners are coming home. They keep the line open, you might say, waiting for the desired thought. It is all about interconnection. You have your social media. As above so below.

Once you let your mind run through the process of interconnection and the interaction that activates the recognition then it is quite simple really for you to think these things through for yourself. So you might say if you didn’t have any knowledge of the situation that David was able to think this thing through for himself, but of course there is always the little eureka moments coming in “Ah, I understand, this is what happens”.

Now, did you discover it for yourself or did somebody just give you a little helping hand?

Yes.

So the lesson is, if you wish to derive a lesson from this;  let your mind move in the silence, shall we say, and silence meaning the one- pointed focus upon the particular question that you are trying to find an answer to, excluding the other myriad thoughts that may intervene, and you will find your way through the labyrinth. If you do attempt this then just stay with it and gradually the resonance will pick up and you will tune in. All knowledge is available. Which is why, to repeat again, “Ask and it shall be given to you; Seek and ye shall find. You may work hard in your efforts to obtain it but sometimes it is better to just sit back and allow.

 

 

11th June 2018 Consciousness and Memory

Does the unit of consciousness have a memory, how does it hold its memories and does it hold its memories in the order of experience given the absence of time?

Would you agree that memories are thoughts?

Yes.

We have spoken before about thoughts being held in a repository, shall we say, where they eternally exist, and so would you think that memories being thoughts could also be held in that fashion? (Morphogenetic fields come to mind.)

Yes.

On that basis therefore would you agree that the thought store can always be accessed?

Yes.

So memories can always be accessed. Now would you also agree that the memory would be entangled (connected) with the unit of awareness that had the experience?

Yes.

Therefore if the unit of consciousness wishes to access its memory store it can do so merely by focusing?

Yes.

With regard to the sequentiality would the thought that is wished to be remembered as a memory be that of a particular instance?

Yes.

That particular instance would commence at a certain point and successive thoughts would follow, much as we said before when focusing upon the sequential patterns. The history of your life is there in, we must say for your purposes, is there in all its sequentiality and that it runs from birth to death, so wherever you start your focus running it will then go on in that established pattern. Yes? So if you wish to go back in that pattern you can of course do so.

Now when in the physical you find it difficult to remember in reverse order. You may remember something that happened on June 4th when you were 12 years old because it stands out in your mind but what likelihood is there of you being able to remember what happened on June 3rd?

Little.

Exactly. Why?

Because it needs to be something that made an impact, that made a difference.

It does not stand out in your memory as it was not of any importance to you, of any particular note?

Yes.

So would you be bothering to try to try to remember it, for no reason?

No.

We think we have answered that particular question.

Comment:  Now consider the NDE’rs accounts of experiencing their life review. Additionally if we give credence to the doctrine of quantum entanglement then it becomes apparent why one also experiences the feelings of those who you interacted with.

Another question. Can a unit of consciousness re- experience a gestalt which it was previously part of but has since dispersed e.g. a human physical instrument?

Once more we go back to the store. Everything that has occurred in the experience of that particular gestalt during its passage from birth to death has been recorded. If you, as a unit of consciousness, wish to recover that memory then you can insert yourself into the pattern sequence. You can focus once more upon the pattern sequence. It is simply that you will be more in the position of an observer because you only have the sensations, the emotions portrayed, received. You will be able to re- experience those stored memories but at the same time you will not be able to experience them from the unknowing state (the state of uncertainty as to what will happen in the next moment) you will experience them from the knowing state. Do you understand?

From having been there before?

Because when you were focused in the physical instrument you had blotted out all information as regards your provenance, let us say, you were focused entirely on the stage. Now when you access the store you are no longer on the stage, are you?

No.

So although you can watch the action, perhaps recognize the action, recognize the feeling, you cannot not but be aware of the fact that you are following a process of recall. Do you understand?

I think so.

You have accessed the memory. The intention was to access the memory in a bid to relive the moment, but in that bid to relive the moment you are aware that moment is not, to use your words, of this present time. So how can it have the same impact because you are effectively in the same position as being in the back of the theatre? Do you understand?

I’m getting there.

It is as if you are reading your autobiography. You can remember, maybe, the shock or the pleasure as set out in the particular paragraph within the autobiography and yet you are fully aware that this is not happening in your present moment.

Yes.

It will no longer have the impact. In other words you see it from a point of detachment.  (not involvement) You can “experience”, relive the moment but from a different point of view. Can you understand what we have said?

I think so.

It is like watching a film of your life. Much the same way as the NDE’rs will speak of their life review but it doesn’t have the same impact as the NDE’r is still seeing it from a, let us say, semi-detached point of view. Once you are fully in the next focus shall we say, or in the elevated focus above all your subsidiary focuses, then you are seeing it from the detached or interested or academic point of view. Now do you understand?

Yes, thank you.

Comment: It makes you realise how precious each moment is. You will never pass this way again, each moment is unique in its perspective. This life is precious, it is our only chance to experience it in this fashion so make the most of it, treasure it, give it your full attention. Consign yesterday to your personal history and live in the now.

June 2018 Inter-dimensional Communication.

Inter-dimensional Communication

Would you be able to inform us as to the process involved in communication between dimensions?

You can easily imagine for yourself the ability to communicate between various places and what you might refer to as dimensions. You will simply picture a group of humans in one reality or dimension, as you call it, speaking into some science fiction device and then you will create the conception of a group of “aliens” listening to such transmissions and communicating amongst themselves.

Now of course this can be extrapolated to multiple dimensions or even to an infinite number should you wish to speculate. But what is it that you are actually saying? You are merely saying that there is a possibility of communication between dissimilar species inhabiting different planets, galaxies, universes, shall we say, and there is the thought that information can be exchanged.

Now, you are aware of your physical reality and you have the belief that others inhabiting other realities are aware of their realities and yet as we have said before so many times, consciousness creates its realities and consciousness creates different realities. So what is the factor that is common to all these realities?

It is the consciousness that creates them.

So do you not think that consciousness can communicate with other consciousness and to continue with what we have laid out so many times “other gestalts”?

(See:   https://realityandyou.com/2018/02/06/quantum-entanglement-non-locality-and-interconnected-consciousness-6th-february-2018/

So we have this basic underlying consciousness which, for the purposes of explanation, we have set out as units of consciousness, units of awareness, watching the ideas floating by, focusing on one. Others focus on it as well until a sufficient consensus is formed about the idea that a level of intensity is reached whereupon the reality of the idea that is being focused upon is manifested. All those involved in the focus then experience that reality. Now it may be that the majority are needed to create the reality but even those who do not agree with the particular aspect of the particular idea that is being manifested can still experience it if they wish to stay with the program, shall we say.

So, yes, there is interdimensional communication but instead of thinking about it as from one reality to another think about it as going back to, what you have termed as “the source” which is the originating consciousness. Now you can look at that phrase “originating consciousness” as being singular or a multiple but of course if you have absorbed by now our previous information then you will understand that all communication is possible through the originating consciousnesses. Generally once you have come to considering communication between realities you realise that it is actually communication between the gestalt consciousnesses that are creating those realities. The awarenesses behind those gestalts can of course communicate with each other even though they are involved in separate gestalts. They do have, which you will agree with, the ability to think their thoughts and those thoughts are then able to be seen.

Have we answered the question to your satisfaction?

Yes, I think so. Thank you.

Now, there is another aspect.

You have the “intrusion” into your reality of such things you term as “unidentified flying objects” and various other inexplicable things as well. You may say that the consciousnesses involved in a certain reality are curious as to the existence of other realities, other dimensions, in much the same way as your own scientists are and those who we will term as “travellers in consciousness”. You have this suspicion that these other realities do indeed exist.

Now if you manage to discover certain parameters as you probe around these ideas and you connect with other gestalts you can see that in some instances there are realities which are almost a hybrid of two other realities, (as sometimes in dreams where you find yourself moving or flying in a gravity free seemingly physical reality) in other words a connecting bridge. You might also say that bridge has the ability to, let us say, “transform” the idea, the object, however you wish to focus upon this particular subject, into a form that can be fleetingly apparent or, let us say, holographically apparent in another reality, for perhaps a limited period of time. All you have to do when you want to envisage this is to think of a group of consciousness focusing on another reality that they suspect is there and they come across certain parameters that they feel may be endemic in this reality such as your looking into black holes and how they function, what happens in a black hole?

If you focus enough and you understand a little bit there is a possibility that your thought will be able to manifest in a certain manner in that other reality but you will probably be unaware of it. It is unlikely that you will be aware that you have appeared in that other reality (look at examples of bi- location where the subject is unaware of the appearance of their “doppelganger” in another location). This is much the same as in the talk that we had about accessing other attributes, other abilities from other lives that you are currently carrying on, experiencing. We have spoken before about the gestalt, let us say, that is wishing to experience several different lives at once and the data flow, the thought flow, the intention flow, the emotion flow between the “on the stage” focus and the “back of the theatre” focus (between the observer and the observed) in all those different lives and yet all the information flow comes back to the central gestalt and thereby to each awareness within that gestalt.

So as each emotion, event is perceived and experienced then it changes you a little which is the process of forever becoming. Let us call it the centre (and thereby each awareness focused into said centre, gestalt) is being changed by all the events in all the realities at the periphery. So a certain, say, traumatic event in one reality may colour your reaction to a similar event in another reality. You will not know why you take this particular attitude, but you do. There will be some aspects, as we have mentioned before with taste, for example, where you will try something and say “I don’t like that” and yet logic says “Why don’t I like that”?

Taste is a simple analogy but let us take emotions where you are mildly surprised at your reaction or lack of to certain information or events. You may feel that your reaction was not empathetic, rather callous and you wonder why, a little guiltily maybe. Well put that down to one of your, let us say, “bleed-throughs”. It could be that you experienced the same thing in another reality but at the same time, at the centre, the back of the theatre, you are fully aware that it is unreal. It is only the illusion of reality produced by the imagination. You may have had the shock of the initial experience, as we showed in our analogy of opening a door for example, and seeing the man rushing towards you firing a gun, you slam the door shut and then realise there are no bullet holes whereupon you tentatively open the door again and the same procedure is repeated. Open many doors and soon there will no longer be any effect.

So you could have this traumatic event in one reality, it will have an effect and yet you see it again in another reality and it does not have quite the effect. You won’t know why, “I should feel absolutely shocked at this, but these things happen.” Some part of you is saying “Don’t worry, it’s all just imagination, you don’t have to get upset about it.”

You have this interdimensional activity, you have the bleed-through from various lives, all information is available to all. Every endeavour is made to keep things separated so that the full experience, enjoyment and otherwise can be had in all the different focuses but inevitably some things slip through. A little bit of carelessness here, a little bit of “well it doesn’t matter any way” and sometimes as you have found with David you can actually seek and look for that particular talent, that singing voice, that style of speech as others look for how to play the violin like Yehudi Menuhin or how to paint like a great master. If you focus long and hard enough you will be able to tap in to that, as previously referred to, morphogenetic field and pick up the information but you have to have that total intent bordering on belief that it will happen and indeed it will.

You create your own reality.

Let us just comment on what is happening in physical reality today.

You will agree that it is full of uncertainty. Yes?

Yes.

What have we said before so many times? You come here for the uncertainty and the excitement. Now, the world has got faster, you might say. Everything seems to speed up as each decade passes by.  There is more activity, communication is quicker and consequently you are more aware of what is going on. You are far more aware of interconnectivity and interdependence and as each event occurs you are aware of the possibility of knock-on effects and so uncertainty increases by leaps and bounds. As fast as one thing happens in one place something else happens in another and it is almost impossible to follow any particular predetermined path leading to a probabilistic outcome. Near chaos is becoming the order of the day and rarely does anything settle.

On the other hand the reality has got its compensations in the sheer interest. You are never short of interest. Whenever you look at what is going on in the world there is something happening whereas 200 years ago things happened very slowly, communication was slow and therefore new decisions took time but now communication is fast and decisions are made quickly. So you can look at what is going on here and see that it has become a far more exciting playground and as we have said before you wonder why the human population is increasing rapidly and yet you look at the amount of activity in the human centric part of reality and you can see there is a lot of excitement in anticipating outcomes and deciding on your own way of navigating through the minefield.

Whereas in some other species lifestyle does not seemed to have changed in several thousand years. Many of those species are dying out. Is there a reason for this? Could it be that as a consciousness looking at physical reality which existence looks more interesting? Same thing applies here. This of course depends on your looking at that part of physical reality that involves, let us say, mobile creatures of which humans are a part. If you look at other areas of physical reality say the Earth itself, the trees, the oceans, those areas are in, you might say, another dimension almost. They are experiencing their own reality, they are not experiencing human reality and their reality appears to be relatively changeless in terms of our own timescale, the human timescale.

So you may wonder about the possibility of inter-dimensional activity between the oceans and the humans. (given that all are productions of consciousness). Is there any communication?

I wouldn’t know.

You have very few explorers in this area. One explorer was the Japanese researcher Masuru Emoto who studied the effect of emotions on water crystals. Would you consider that to be an example of inter-dimensional communication if you considered that water was inhabiting its own version of physical reality as humans inhabit their version?  (Remembering that we all create our own reality within the confines of a larger reality.) The thought of one influenced the activity, the creation, of another.

Yes.

So you have inter-dimensional communication. You are using the word “inter-dimensional”. Now what do you understand by dimension? Do you mean a different frequency, parameters, realities, you name it? It is something that you are not aware of and you are not aware of how the consciousnesses that manifest water, think. They are obviously aware of your thoughts but are humans aware of their thoughts?

Not that we know of.

The same has been found with plants, dogs and other living organisms. We are surprised to learn that these “species”, those inhabiting a different “perception’ of reality, shall we say, are able to pick up our thoughts and understand them. So why is it that we do not seem to pick up their thoughts? Or is it that there is so much to do in our own particular human-centric reality that we do not feel the need to communicate and simply block out the thoughts from others?

That is quite a possibility.

Maybe it needs our undivided attention to the rapidly changing panoply arrayed before us whereas say a molecule of water may describe its existence as same old, same old.

 (see Primary Perception: Biocommunication with Plants, Living Foods and Human Cells. Cleve Backster 2003

Science Discovers Consciousness.

Further evidence that our Universe may be a ‘cosmic hologram’

(Taken from SMN Newsletter May – June 2018)

Just over a year ago, a joint research study by a coalition of teams from four universities in Canada, Italy and the UK revealed the first observational and cosmological scale evidence to support the premise of our Universe being a cosmic hologram.

hologram

They did so by analysing irregularities in an energetic relic of the early Universe known as the cosmic microwave background (CMB) whose radiation was emitted around 380,000 years after our Universe came into being.

Publishing their findings in the prestigious journal Physical Review Letters1 they were able to show significant evidence to support the view of our Universe being innately informed and holographically manifested. In their view as substantiated as the traditional hypothesis of cosmic inflation for the basis for these irregularities.

The idea of a holographic Universe which was first proposed in the 1990s, posits that all the information that makes up our apparently 3D spatial reality is encoded on its 2D boundary with the information pixelated at the so-called Planck scale.

Professor Kostas Skenderis a Professor of Mathematical Sciences at the University of Southampton in the UK and one of the lead researchers of the study, commented: “Holography is a huge leap forward in the way we think about the structure and creation of the universe. Einstein’s theory of general relativity explains almost everything large scale in the universe very well, but starts to unravel when examining its origins and mechanisms at quantum level. Scientists have been working for decades to combine Einstein’s theory of gravity and quantum theory. Some believe the concept of a holographic universe has the potential to reconcile the two. I hope our research takes us another step towards this.”

A further paper in Physics Review Letters around the same time, by lead researcher Johannes Handsteiner of the Institute for Quantum Optics and Quantum Information in Vienna2 and his colleagues, used light from distant astronomical sources and entangled with laboratory photons to experimentally show the reality of nonlocal connectivity of our Universe to a distance of at least 600 light years and thus supporting the view that our Universe is fundamentally inter-connected.

Coming around the same time as the publication of my book The Cosmic Hologram: In-formation at the Center of Creation3, these discoveries back up the numerous evidence across many fields and all scales of existence of our Universe existing and evolving as a unified entity; innately informed and holographically manifested. And such realisation does indeed, as Professor Skenderis hopes, point to how, for the first time, quantum and relativity theories can be reconciled by considering energy-matter and space-time as complementary expressions of information.

Even more importantly, the increasingly compelling evidence is revealing that reality is informationally based, that mind and matter are essentially unified and that consciousness isn’t something we have, but fundamentally what we and the whole world are.

  1. Niayesh, A., Corianò, C., Delle Rose, L., Gould, E. and Skenderis, K. From Planck Data to Planck Era: Observational Tests of Holographic Cosmology. Physical Review Letters, 2017; 118.041301
  2. Handsteiner, J. et al. Physics Review Letters, 2017; 118. 060401
  3. Currivan, J. The Cosmic Hologram: In-formation at the Center of Creation (Inner Traditions, 2017)

(See also:- A Point to Ponder. Are we living in a Computer Program? 4th August 2017.)