According to scientists, numbers control everything in the universe. Your comments please?

Anything you design needs some form of measurement. Measurement is designated by numerical amounts so it is theoretically possible to reduce all of what you consider to be space and time to numbers. It is not so easy to reduce emotions to numbers so there is some truth in all theories, but existence to be harmonious must be in balance and so there are qualities and there are quantities. One who sees through the perspective of quantities will try and quantify everything that it perceives and like many of those with, shall we say, rigid opinions they will avoid discussing qualities which do not lend themselves to quantifying. Can you repeat the statement so that we can address any parts we may have missed?

Question repeated.

You create your own measuring instruments and you calibrate those to suit your beliefs to some extent. If your instruments were calibrated differently then of course you would be visualising a much different universe than that which you presently depict.

Is there any relevance when people study numbers as in combinations of birth dates, number of letters in a name?

Vibration impinges upon vibration, that is, there is a certain effect. However, you are recreating your pattern, your image at every moment and so one could say that the impact of vibrational intensities at any given moment are changing your pattern, to put it in a simplified manner. Now, if you are one, who believes in astrology and feel that your personality matches that which is described, then you may indeed, because you have manufactured a belief system, exhibit those tendencies. You are reflecting what has been presented to you.

Thank you. I was reading an article where it was postulated that this is a holographic universe. Where is that emanating from?

As we have previously stated this cannot be explained in 3-dimensional terms for effectively there is no “where”. You are, where you are, unfortunately we have to use the same language, but you can imagine that wherever you are, you are in the centre of what you perceive, and if you are aware of what you are perceiving, you are therefore in the centre of it, so where does that place you?

I am probably misunderstanding because I thought that in a holographic universe I was a hologram.

Yes, but (sigh) to reiterate, it is difficult to explain a non-physical dimension in terms of a 3 dimension existence and a hologram is 3 dimensional. It is merely used as an indication in order that you can envisage that what you see is merely a trick of light, shall we say. Do you understand?

Hopefully.

Now, if you are merely seeing light arranged in a certain fashion, as we spoke of previously, if you had the senses of, what you would term, your out-of-body self, you would not be seeing light, you would be seeing vibration.

Wouldn’t that be light vibrating?

You can interpret it as you wish. Vibrations are not visible to the physical eye, radio waves, television waves, X-rays…

They are not visible to the human eye.

No, however we seem to remember that in one of our previous discussions with you that we mentioned transformers, so see yourself having the sense which can transform X-rays into a wavelength which is then visible to you without the intervening X-ray plates. Can you grasp what we are trying to say?

I think so.

So, the X-rays come on, you have transformer vision and so you can follow the X-rays, so you can see inside the body and remember some clairvoyants can do this. In the 3D world you have to have a photographic plate on the other side of the body to register those rays that do and do not pass through the body, thereby leaving an outline of those waves that do not fully pass through the body. Can you see what we are saying regarding transformers?

Yes.

So your hologram need be nothing other than invisible waves. Now, let us go to the hoary old maxim of collapsing the quantum wave. So there is this mass of tiny waves flashing in and out of existence that when you observe them they solidify, you can then see, by the act of observance. So let us take your hologram as being that mass of moving waves, that when you observe them, you see. Have you understood? Because you have collapsed the wave matrix, you might say, the wave pattern. You have transformed it into another wavelength which your senses can register. It is like having a transformer for your television, whereas by using a transformer you can transfer the wave transmission of channel one say into the wave transmission of channel seven. Do you understand that?

Yes.

So again, we cannot validate the theory, it has some merit, but it cannot be explained to you by the author of the article even though he may wish to describe it in the same terms as we have. So he has to give you something which you do understand. He is merely trying to say that what you see is not solid. It is merely, in other terms that have been used before, frozen light. Light that has been temporarily stilled by collapsing, slowing the quantum wave, if you wish.

So have you had any contact with any beings from any other planets?

There are innumerable states of mind. If one wishes to see a vehicle that is used by another consciousness one must be aware of all the parameters, numbers, you might say, coming back to your first question, involved in the composition of that vehicle. Having said that you can be in thought contact with anybody, provided that the thoughts that are being picked up resonate with your own belief systems. As you are aware when we have spoken about you living many lives at once in many realities, in each reality you block out, intentionally, all thought transmissions that emanate from another reality and what is more when you focus upon another reality you quickly find yourself immersed in it because you have created, co-created that reality. It is extremely difficult to stand outside any reality for whatever you are aware of is instantaneously, your reality. Once more here, we are back to trying to explain that the world you see about you is a creation of your own consciousness. It has no validity other than in the consciousnesses that are creating it.

Everything, for simplicity’s sake again, is an objective projection of the imagination. Does that make sense to you?

It does make sense but if it’s our imagination why do we create so much conflict. I know you have answered this before and I didn’t intend to ask that question but now I have. Is it because we are bored or the total consciousness is bored?

We are back to experiencing the light and the dark. There is an inclination to explore where no-one has gone before, to quote one of your TV programs, it is rather apt when you are talking of faraway planets and because of the vantage point that you start from, when you are here, there is no problem in exploring wherever you wish to explore. You can explore being underneath the detonation of a nuclear bomb because you know that you will immediately return to another dimension. Do you understand? So you can explore whatever you wish to in terms of joy, ecstasy, despair, suffering, health, illness, extreme pain, love, hate because from your starting vantage point you know that this is merely an expedition into the unknown from which you can turn your focus and return at any time.

Certain aspects of our physical world are dependent upon our existence and focus within it.  Your thoughts please?

Without the focus of attention there would be no world and so what you term peculiar aspects are the faithful reproductions of the thoughts and emotions and intentions of which you wish to create and obviously perceive. This would as we previously stated be in conjunction with your fellow co-creators. On one level you would agree what are to be the props, what are to be the events and what would be the experiences in general that you are to set in motion. Within this, however, there is full scope for spontaneous reaction so that the generation of emotions, feelings, responses can be seen as experience. This in order to befit you to become responsible co-creators as you understand the effect of your thoughts and emotions in creating the environment around you.

So can the physical universe as you know it be felt by those whose existence is not within it?

Those whose existence is not within it will not have the necessary senses to fully experience that particular reality. However, much as in clairvoyance on the physical level, they will be able to pick up, telepathically, you may say, knowledge of what is actually going on. But as to sensory participation, no, they will not. They will be in whatever reality they are presently focusing into with the appropriate senses for that particular reality.

So do other kinds of consciousness co-exist within the same space?

All universes exist in, what you would term, the same space, which actually does not exist. But to answer the question directly, everything exists in the same space, just on different frequencies.

Can you explain the multidimensional aspect of the higher self?

With regard to the multidimensional aspects this is the multiple focus of the one entity.  As the previous question there are certain areas of intensity. Now, if you wish to engage in a mass riot for example, or a mass war, then the consciousnesses involved in this experience would necessarily be greater than those who wish to engage in, shall we say, a football game? The intensity would be more and of a different fashion. Far greater amounts of consciousness would be required for the nationalistic entity than would be required for the individual entity and then on down to, say, the grain of sand or the individual quark.

Now, we will qualify that to a certain degree, by the degree to which the consciousness grouping has evolved, developed, experienced, the amount of knowledge, the amount of experience it has garnered during its time of focus in that particular area, because, in your terms, you will think in terms of the start of focus in some space, some point in time, where the consciousness is basically uneducated. But in terms of there being no time it is merely moving from one state of focus to another state of focus and therefore even though experiences are had they are also effectively dropped from the memory even though they are still there. They are dropped from the present focus. So there is no real, and this is dependent on choice, you may be, in your terms, a highly intelligent and experienced scientist at one point in focus and yet you may wish to retire to a relatively rural location and spend another, putting it in earthly terms at the moment, period of time growing roses with no intellectual focus whatsoever. Now, when one speaks to either of the, let us call them lives, one as a scientist one as a grower in physical life, a totally different impression may be received. Are we making sense to you?

So, we are saying, if you have focuses requiring extreme energy, extreme attention, extreme knowledge and have other focuses which require merely conversation on a light scale, maybe growing potatoes, maybe cleaning floors, you can see how some lives would require much less attention than other lives. Would you agree?

Yes.

Horses for courses. Everything is provided that is needed to whichever focus requires it and free rein. The programming is such that as each focus, call it incarnation, the requisite programming is provided for that particular instrument to navigate on a moment to moment basis through that particular experience schedule that has been agreed.

In any universe there must be a creator and co-creator depending on the type of universe you are going to inhabit. You can either rest purely in your own imagination, in your own creation such as that may be but as we previously said if you want to have a major production then you need many players. Therefore entities in any area are put together, again we have to have this play on words once more. If you look at the physical body you have myriad consciousnesses involved. Yes? And if we look at the smallest things that we know of then you have very few consciousnesses involved relatively speaking. The more complex the operation the more consciousnesses have to be involved.

Consciousness does not create consciousness. Consciousness can form the pattern which attracts other consciousness which process, like building a vehicle, reaches a stage where it is able to travel but it still needs say, more consciousness to drive the vehicle. Everything is interdependent.

Now can you tell me what your ideas are about why we have the earth and all that is on it?

Simply back to the play, to your video game and to a Disney. Then look at all the people, all the consciousnesses that participate in any of these things. This is simply that the consciousness in your terms is infinite and size is relative to the mind. Again, if you believe that the earth is of the size it is, that the sun’s the size that it is, remember that these are only pictures in your mind. If you reach out and you say to yourself there is this distance from here to there, it will be. Everything is a mental construct, everything. It is just purely a question that the consciousness, as such, if you wish, is playing games with itself. Even though… we may say this, even though there is this statement that everything is always being, it is always still forever becoming because there is always something else to experience. I was going to use the word ‘new’ but that’s not correct, there is something else to experience. You may experience one area for in your terms thousands of years or millions of years, whereas it actually is just a focus on a particular area and a continual story being played out, constructed, I would say in the mind, but in the mind before giving it the, I would say, the illusion of reality. It is a question of the overall consciousness involved in that particular event deciding on that which it wishes to manifest and accept as a reality. This is why we talk about this constricted consciousness because the uncertainty can only arise when the ability to comprehend the totality is closed off.

Seth:- If man paid more attention to his own subjective behaviour, to those feelings of identification with nature, that persistently arise then half of the dictates of both the evolutionists and the creationists would automatically fall away for they would appear nonsensical.

You are part of the conglomeration of consciousness which is being portrayed for you in the form of a body and speech and emotions and feelings.

When we say identification with nature we mean as alluding to your reality. It means the nature of who you think you are. If you understand that you are part of the total consciousness and you are experiencing the illusion of reality, the construct of reality. As the Buddhists say it is all an illusion, but it is not an illusion from the point of view of hallucination but a construct reality for the enjoyment and excitement therein. This is why you put your finger close to the flame to see how hot it is, because it is the excitement of will I get burnt? Or will I feel it and then pull back, and this applies to all events. But you have to create that reality to find out. Again, you have to shut down the receiver and focus the receiver, in this case the brain, the brain/mind for that matter, to where you cannot see all possibilities because if you saw all possibilities then there would be no.. everything would be clear. Because there is nothing to progress towards, as there is no time, there would be no meaning, there would be simply awareness, simply awareness. So in the same way as you are creating this reality you are effectively creating a meaning, you are creating a meaning for your own being. But this has to be a constructive meaning, the same as the constructive reality. Because in actuality, because there is only the now there is only an ever present existence. There is no progress and there is no meaning. Progress and meaning have to be constructed. Do you understand? Because otherwise you would simply have pure awareness and pure awareness eliminates uncertainty and excitement. Uncertainty and excitement have to be constructed, all beliefs, all emotions have to be constructed to enjoy them. Much as in this world, your own world, then all the things around you have to be constructed to enjoy them.

Seth:- Mankind is a species that specialises in the use of the imagination and without the imagination  language would be unnecessary. 

We must remember that all channelled material including those who are speaking at this present moment is having to be filtered through the existing belief structure of the instrument at the present time. The Seth books were, like all channelled material, constructed in that manner and would have been coloured, to some extent, by the belief system of Jane Roberts.

When it comes to the human species, the human species is, again, only a focus of certain conglomerates of consciousness and the same applies to every other species including water, minerals and everything else, call them species if you wish. They are merely focuses of consciousness. It is nothing to do with one being better than the other. Some conglomerates of consciousness have chosen to be more active than others and we label this imagination, but that is simply a question of a greater deal of activity of that particular group of consciousness that focus on being human beings. The differences between species are not as great as you believe. One has to remember that every single thing, event, apparent reality is simply a manifestation of consciousness and that manifestation of consciousness is manifested in different degrees of intensity. That intensity may also be interpreted as, in physical plane terms, speed of movement, rapid change of focus.

It crosses the mind that a life on the earth plane is one giant experiment. How does that sit with you?

It is one small experience. Why would it be a giant experiment?

Alright then, a small experiment, but nevertheless an experiment.

But isn’t every experience an experiment?

I find it quite interesting that the earth is split into different continents and certain continents have very different animals to the other continents. Is that the way the experiment has been designed?

The word “experiment” is one we would prefer not to use. You are merely creating the environment in which to experience your creativity. Now if you have many, many designers you can fully understand that they have diverse ideas. Now then you may bring in the word experiment, let us see what we can create and how it will fit into what has already been created because this is a continual creation of course. We have creation where many consciousnesses wish to participate and as new ones come in they bring their ideas with them, you might call it multicultural. So nothing mysterious about finding different animals in different locations any more so than finding different methods of dressing in different countries. It is merely those consciousnesses that decide they want to project themselves. One thing you must realise is that the designer is inside his creation, his, her or its. This is not stand apart consciousness that is manipulating a ball of clay. Each thing that you are aware of is a creation with a designer, designers, inherent within it. It is an expression. If you use the word expression then you may find that things become clearer to you.

I do find it fascinating that, for example, in Australia so many of the animals have pouches which you don’t find in the rest of the world and then in other parts of the world, which you don’t find in Australia, there are lots of creatures like monkeys. How come that so many of the animals in Australia have pouches.

Expression. If you wish to go to a party say and the party has a certain theme would you dress in the theme of that party? If you wish to design a vehicle that needs to go over extremely uneven roads you would need to… because the location only had extremely uneven roads, then would you design a four wheel drive with large wheels and high off the ground or would you design a low racer? The low racer would not work, it would not be suitable and it would not be acceptable. So if you see a design that is working in a particular location and you find it interesting would you not design something that had a certain similarity to those already existing. Now once you start looking at the world looking at what exists, looking at even the humans and the way they act, the way they dress, what they eat, how they sit, their mannerisms, you will find that they tend to have resonance within a particular locality and if you were going to create something in that particular area you would probably create something that would not seem totally outlandish. Now, you can bring in Mr. Sheldrake’s morphogenetic fields if you like, in which we come back to framework two, and so you look into a particular environment, a particular reality, and the frameworks, the patterns, are existing and co-existing quite well. Therefore, would you not think, as you look at this framework and you say this seems interesting, that you would create a harmonious vehicle because your chances of success, by doing so, are far greater than creating something that is totally alien to the situation?  Back to “horses for courses”.

We often hear about the halls of learning, so, what is the purpose of the halls of learning and what sort of things are taught and by who?

Terms, terms, descriptions to overawe the credulous so, searching for the right word at times, we could have said gullible, credulous is more respectful. But, again there are as many places to learn as you wish to learn in. Knowledge is available to all at all times, you merely have to think about what you want to know and you will know it. But, of course, when you first move over it takes time to have confidence in this, as you can imagine. You can get an answer but would you know it was right? Therefore, many prefer to go along to a lecture hall or wherever or a counsellor for that matter, and listen to, what appears to be, a learned person telling them how things are. Yet, in the fullness of time they will soon realise that that is unnecessary. But also, many people, even when they move over, are inherently lazy and would prefer to be told. They accept the framework and happily go along with it, rather than listen within themselves to the knowledge that streams in and have to construct the framework themselves. Much like building your own house or buying one ready built. Does that answer your question?

Yes, thank you. Well, it does not answer my question completely because I was asking, who was the teacher? As well, but it does not matter.

The teachers are whoever you wish to believe are teachers. Anybody can set themselves up as a teacher but like anything else they have to present their information in such a way that it is totally acceptable to those who seek that sort of information. It is no different to the so called teachers that you have for ordinary subjects in the physical, there are competent ones and there are incompetent ones. Many people enjoy being the centre of attention and will set themselves up as teachers. So there are just as many “not so good” teachers after you transit as there are before you transit. Like all existence, you must divest yourself of any illusion that life changes in a dramatic manner when you leave the physical, because, while you are in the physical you are already in the non-physical. It just takes you time when moving over to adjust to being back again. Now, imagine leaving your country for seventy years and going back and finding that the street you were born in has disappeared and that in its place are rows of tall buildings, offices, shops, big blocks of apartments, all the machinery of modern living, you would feel as if you were in a very strange place compared to what it was like all those years ago. Sooner or later you would adjust but it would take some time and whether you would like it or not is another thing so possibly you would go and look for another area. Are you with me with this?

Maybe you can talk about coincidence.

So give me some example that warrants the term “coincidence”.

It was being used in reference to someone being ”seen” in another part of the world by a relative at the moment of death.

I don’t think that warrants the term coincidence in normal parlance. If you look at the word, co-incidence and take it as co-incident(s) then you are talking about more than one incident happening simultaneously. And therefore the person dying in one part of the world and appearing to someone else in another part of the world you have the same, you might call, incident, because the same person is apparent at the same time, two connected. So rather than, if you look at the word again, coincidence, it has been shortened from “connected incidents”. Do you understand?

Now, if you look at these “coincidences” they are “connected”. Yes? The two incidents are alike and they are connected. You now look at “what is the connection” and then you try and find, how?, why?, are they connected. What is the motive force? So back to your example, a connected incident. A person died, but they appeared to somebody that they wished to know (inform) because they had always been connected to that person. So in future it would behove you to look at anything that is considered coincidence, understand it as connected incidents and then look for the connections. Look for what connects the two and see how your “coincidence” arose.

Like walking along and thinking of someone and then you turn the corner and bump into them.

So let us say again that you have the “incident” when you are thinking about somebody and then the incident of you turning the corner and there they are. Now, look at the connection. How did the connection arise? Was the physical body suddenly transported to the position where you first thought of them, or did the thought arise in your mind because of the interconnectedness? So maybe the interconnectedness caused the thought. Even though that other person may not have been thinking of you, you thought of them because of their proximity. You know of incidences where e.g. a person is injured in one part of the world and yet a close relative then senses that. Why? Because your frames of reference are interconnected and emotion travels. So we will put connectedness and interconnectedness underlying your coincidence.

Thank you. Can you tell us anything about why the bee population is decreasing and what we can do about it?          

The pendulum swings. You will remember that not that long ago in China they killed all the small birds and soon were overrun with insects. They had to revise their ideas and now it is back to harmony. Once more Nature repairs itself from the depredations of man. These are not words we want to use because they correspond too much to judgemental aspects. Have no fear, the world will not cease to produce the plants that are necessary for survival. Just as you play with fruit flies, just as you play with mosquitoes….necessity is the mother of invention.

Will we all be out there with paint brushes?

Possibly, for a while, but you will move into the mass breeding of the necessary pollinators as you finally wake up to what you are doing. You had DDT, you have it no more. Other chemicals you are currently using, when the full impact of what you have been doing hits home, you will change course once more. Nature will once again repair itself.

Do not put yourself above what you call god when you discuss being subject to a higher power. If you think that everything is made, or consists, of consciousness and if you think of your place in the natural order of things then do you not think that what you call Mother Nature is fully the equivalent of what you call god. Should it wish to take a certain course it will do so regardless of any other species, which of course it produces anyway. We are in a circular argument here because all consciousness is equal and is engaged in a cooperative endeavour to produce the physical environment. The bees are with you in this, the earth is with you in this. When you find, or you believe, that you are threatening your own existence do you not think that you will change course?

Thank you

Now again, when we come back to curing yourself of various ailments, arresting the ageing of the physical body and why it seems so hard to do then why not look at your own intentions and desires. We will recap an earlier explanation, “Do you prefer to be with those with whom you feel comfortable? In your own case do you find yourself energetic and alive when you are at your golf club with your friends and yet if you were suddenly placed with a number of 20 year olds talking about fashion and socialites and facebooks would you not feel out of place? So how much intent and desire is there to not be part of that which with you are (not) familiar? The vast majority wish to be part of that with which they are familiar. You will find that very few when questioned and being able to answer honestly will wish to live beyond the ages of their peers. They may be afraid of how they will die and yet most will say “I don’t want to outlive my children”.

Imagine how it feels to be, say 110. Your parents have gone, you friends have gone, your children have gone and the world is totally different to what you were previously used to. No familiarity, you are in an alien environment and, if you were given the opportunity to look at where your parents, your peers, your children were then existing, would you not take the opportunity, if it was offered to you, to join them? There may be, as there always is, the exception to the rule. And so, if you read back, through what we have spoken about this evening, you will see why the physical plane is constructed with the beginning and an end, albeit of different terms of time, in every part of its construction.

Look upon the bright side, because it is constantly being re-created in an ever different form, there are many opportunities to come back and experience it afresh. It is like cruise ships that you go on. For those who first went on a journey from one continent to another as a passenger, this was on sailing ships, then it went to steam vessels, merchant vessels and then the first cruising ships. Now more and more variety of activity, comfort, enjoyment is being added and so you, others move from one cruise ship to another to experience the new things. No different to coming to cruise ship Earth and having another life. You are, of course, not passive in this, in each life you have the opportunity for new forms of creativity, using new instruments, vehicles and labour saving devices.

When we use your language you need to not take certain words as being tightly limited but view them from a broad perspective and how they cover more than one aspect.

People today are moving all over the world from continent to continent. Is this part of a greater plan to mix people up instead of leaving them as individual races?

Again [sigh], you are coming from a viewpoint that there is an external power. Would you agree?

Yes.

Yet at the same time you consider consciousness to come from an equality of source. We will not say homogeneous because different consciousness can exhibit different attributes. Now, if you were currently….let us go back a little way to where we were talking about transmission of information and the mobility of the human body and the labour saving devices which enabled the human body and all information of human existence to move from one place to another extremely quickly. As we said, consciousness looks at the new situation and wants to come back for another life, much the same as if you had only sailed on a small vessel with few activities and suddenly you were confronted with a 200,000 ton floating hotel, floating city, with everything that you could possibly desire, then many want to experience that. Just look at your question. You as a cruise passenger on a small vessel became aware, because of your interest, that the information regarding the large vessel was available. So just apply the transmission of information and pictures of lifestyles from the affluent to the not affluent. Does not desire arise?

Once you look at the relative ease with which you can move from one part of the world to another for a better life then would you not decide, ”I think I would prefer to be there”, and I can be.

So instead of looking for that outside controlling force just realise that all consciousness is co-creating. All are conscious, consciousness means awareness. Only a few years ago the vast masses in Africa were not aware…..let us go back a few centuries say, how did someone in any part of Africa know what life was like in Europe? They did not know, they did not know how to get there, apart from walk and all they saw, if they saw anybody, was somebody coming to them, dressed strangely, who had weapons that were far beyond theirs and therefore they could not resist.

Now look at today, look at the information transmission, television, mobile phones, the motor car, planes and many consciousnesses saying “we can make it happen for you”.” Heaven is only a few thousand dollars away”. Look at who is moving, the ones, not in times of war, who are successful to whatever degree, even if it means only applying for a job and saying “I will work for very little”. They make their labour attractive and succeed in that they are able to go and live where they desire to live. In times of war, necessity breeds invention and you find some way to get to this place because there is nothing where you are, only danger, and you wish to go to somewhere where at least, at the worst, you will not be allowed to die from starvation or from the cold and you will have a chance to make a new future. If you look at what is happening now you will see no difference to what happened within the last few hundred years with the peopling of the Americas, Australia etc. There is no outside power, there is merely consciousness as a whole wishing to satisfy its desires and again desires is a loaded word and is not appropriate. Does that make this much clearer?

There is no god! There is no controlling hierarchy.

I was not thinking in terms of that at all. I was thinking in terms of choosing our lives.

It is merely, if you have chosen a life in, for example, Africa do you not feel that you have also chosen to live in Africa for so many years and then move to somewhere else? Look at your own life. When you chose your own life did you not intend to be residing in Australia?

Probably did yes.

Did you choose the life, the beginning of the life, the end of the life and the general things you wanted to experience?

Well that’s what I am thinking did happen, but obviously don’t know.

You were told by a medium many years ago that she saw Canada and Australia and what eventuated? Canada and Australia. Now, wouldn’t the simple answer be as she had you in front of her that she could read your life’s intentions? Your life plan? Was it in your pattern? Was it in your information bank? Information field shall we say? Which made it… why is it called a reading?

Because they are reading your aura.

Again, much is in the words that are creating your replies, a certain aspect of life, and merely by wondering, “why this word?” then you can think “what occasioned this word to be used?” as we have said many times before or rather David has said in-spiration, in-tuition, ask and it shall be given to you, seek and ye shall find etc. The words are created so that those who wish to think could derive meaning and knowledge and enlightenment as you would say etc.

We have covered, what you might term, a macro philosophical view of creation this evening and should you wish it would be worthwhile to consider what has been said and try to formulate a view of life in all its forms and that means before you came, while you are here and where you are going, not life in forms meaning species, but life meaning your own particular awareness and you may find a greater understanding of what you think you are.

Comment:- Many wonder about why world population is increasing so rapidly. It would seem from what has been said above that there is a strong demand from consciousness to experience the physical life, being a first or a re incarnation due to the increasing attractiveness and variety of experience available. When we look at the declining birth rates of the affluent nations there would seem to be limited opportunities to come to an agreement with prospective parents in those nations. Whereas in other nations the birth rate is much higher and so more opportunities exist. Could it be that consciousness is having to use a “back door entry” to gain admittance to the life style of their choice? This could be looked upon as an explanation for the mass movement of people occurring today.

A reader asks:- Given that the world’s population is expanding enormously and there are billions more people on earth now than there were say 1000 years ago, where do all these extra souls come from?

First of all the word souls, soul is a perception in the imagination of those who believe in their particular religion and the word soul can be equated with consciousness, higher consciousness, inner self, higher self, and various other designations of the unknown, you might say, or ignorance. The hunch or suspicion that there is a defined entity, which somehow inhabits and controls a body, that has just happened, and that these bodies get produced and the soul appears and says, “ah something I can use, I’ll pop in here”. Once you start to think about how the situations arise you will see the sheer farce of that line of reasoning and yet at the same time you believe that some form of god created all that you see, the Universe in seven days and you look at the Big Bang Theory then it all just sort of clustered together and then it all sort of evolved from some spark of life, that originated from we know not where, or by a bolt of electricity though a couple of chemicals, that seem to have formed from gases, and so on and so on.

So let us look at it another way in that, as we have said before, the whole world, the whole universe, “all that is”, as is postulated through the Indian, the Hindu and the Buddhists and others. “All that is” is “all that was”, and “all that will be” because it always has been, and that “all that is” is consciousness. Consciousness creates form, why? Who knows, but it does simply for the joy of creation probably. So, if you wish to take an entity, such as soul, then what size do you think it is? Why do you think there is a limited number? You have say a trillion cells in your body, each one is conscious but you only have seven billion people therefore, if you wish to think that the cell, being connected to all the other cells, is aware of everything the body does, then does anybody talk about a cell having a soul? Or even a cell becoming a soul? So, and if we talk fully sentient beings then when you get a soul that is so called evolving then if we accord, as we are aware certain species have virtually all the DNA that the human has, then would you say that they have a soul as well? All reason would say yes, and wouldn’t they want to move from being an ape in the jungle, though there are not many of those. But then you can take this over to many other species as well and would they not want to move up to being human. So what we are saying is the supply of what you think are souls is infinite and because consciousness creates form then should there wish to be an infinite number of beings on the earth, there already are if you count down to the bacteria etc. then the appropriate amount of necessary energy, needed to sustain the new forms, will be provided as the creationary need arises because there is nothing that cannot be sustained otherwise it is a failed creation and would not be there anyway. Does this answer or give you another way of looking at what you consider to be a soul?

 

Lost the beginning of this recording unfortunately.

As to interviews with what you might term the trance personality, the questions will be asked and people will try to ask questions which were designed to cast doubt on the efficacy of the information, of its basis in, what you might call, truth, but we can assure you that these will be handled with aplomb. So, there is much work to do. We haven’t got to this position without quite some intensive effort on your case, in that we have had to direct you to much study, much thinking in order that we can press the right buttons in quick succession to give fluent answers to any questions that arise. We are not having to search around with low levels of language and knowledge to try and formulate a comprehensive answer. So don’t think we have worked this hard in order for you to fall at the first hurdle. You have much to do, you are going to enjoy it and we are going to enjoy watching you spread our/your information, so fears aside settle down and get on with the job in hand.

Comment: FYI I am adding these comments as we transcribe the recordings. Well, that’s leaves me in no doubt as to which part of me is in charge. However it’s nice to know that I am looked after and it would also appear that I have got a few more years left in me yet.

Well, we will try to give you some background on the different aspects of trance mediumship. Now you have already seen another instrument holding an intelligent conversation with you and mediums generally experience some form of bodily manipulation so would you say that if this was taken to the extreme, you may say, that a consciousness can, we are talking a group consciousness here of course, ask for the assistance of certain skills that other consciousnesses possess?

Comment:- Would you believe it, the battery has run out on the recorder, we will have to ask for this information to be provided again. However I can personally affirm that this is possible.  I have always wanted a classy English accent after dealing with merchant bankers in the City of London in my twenties where my south London accent was looked down upon.  One day in 2014 I woke up speaking in the desired manner, a complete surprise, and additionally I had acquired a deep, powerful singing voice and this voice also knew how to breathe. The singing has stayed, the accent comes and goes. I’m happy to go with the flow, it’s all been to the better so far.

A lot of people talk about guides and helpers, things of that nature. Would you like to comment on that please?

Now if you are not in contact with your higher consciousness, you are not aware of your higher consciousness, you have not had the support and the confirmation that you and David have had from the intelligence that may not be any more intelligent but certainly has a wider experience and knows how to access depths of knowledge. When you did make probes into these other areas and you found a welcome voice in your head, words of comfort or words of direction, of inspiration and knowledge then what name would you give to this? If you ask for help regularly and you got the answer, what would you call that?

You could say it was somebody guiding you.

Yes. Ask and it shall be given, who is giving? You would go and ask the priest and what would he say?

God?

Or your angels, because only the priests could speak to god after all. Do you understand what we are saying?

I understand what you are saying.

They had to designate a lower entity to speak to the ordinary person. Similarly the pope is said to be the only infallible member of the Catholic Church. How come the rest aren’t? You have to elevate people to pedestals so the priests had direct communication with god, nobody accords them that now of course but originally that was the idea. Which is why special places were constructed for the priests to live, the Pyramids, temples, monasteries etc. to foster the impression of access to and communication with the creator.

The same thing applies to the Spiritualist movement. They didn’t want to refer to gods and archangels etc. they wanted something more understandable, more down to earth, so they designated communicators as guides and helpers etc. Jargon and dogmas spring up when any new form of belief begins to spread. Those who set themselves up as teachers of the new knowledge deliberately foster this to create an aura of exclusivity otherwise they couldn’t be teachers could they? There are always the people who are happy to sit at the feet of the guru not understanding that if they took the time and the trouble they could find out for themselves. Just as you see in the physical, the vast amount of consciousness is happy to sit back and take advantage of another’s endeavours. As above so below.

Look at what is happening to your world. Ever more people are happy to not work but to rely on the endeavours of others to provide their needs. Maybe you can see why we say as above so below.

Now when somebody is allowing a trance personality to speak through them how can one ascertain the genuineness of the communicator?

How many times have we spoken about reason and logic? What would you expect for the person you are talking about, given their level of intelligence, the position they currently hold and the knowledge you presume they hold, even though it may not be in depth on these subjects? What sort of higher consciousness of that instrument would you expect to speak?

You would expect it to be reasonably sensible.

But not necessarily in the vein in which we speak?

No, not necessarily but it could be.

As we have said before if the instrument does not have the wide ranging knowledge and the appropriate belief system we could not put the information past that person’s belief system. It is not just picking out words. These things have to go through, you might say, gates and if those gates are locked you cannot get the information through. Everything that is spoken has to go through the maze of gates and the doors have to be batwing doors, you must be able to just push straight through them. If they have never been opened they may be firmly shut, they have to have been unlocked. That means understanding and you understand that.

So, in your opinion, what percentage of those on your side are able to find a way to speak in the physical?

How many sensible trance mediums have you come across in the past twenty years? Even by looking on the internet and around.

Very few.

Yes, very few. Because most consciousnesses in the physical are not interested. They have come here, created their instruments, in order to enjoy certain things. They already know what can be done and so it is only the ones that wish to teach others that actually enter into this endeavour. The ones that have no wish to teach others and merely wish to enjoy the physical just don’t bother with this at all. Why should they? If they have come to experience the pleasures of eating, drinking, all the other things in the physical world, power, money, thrills, challenges, bodily sensations etc. then few are interested in teaching. Volunteer teachers can only come through those people who are interested in what you have to say.

So would you say that there are many on your side who would like to be able to get through and speak in the physical?

Once more, you are talking each individual higher consciousness. The ones who really want to talk to this side are ones that will form a vehicle in order to do so. Others who are scanning ideas and are attracted simply join in with the committed group. Again, far more followers than creators. Like your blogs, you simply join the conversation when it takes your interest. Here I am talking through this instrument, listening to what is being said. That is something else you must realise of course, just as you are listening and your instrument then listens to the recording, although he hears the words going past, we are in the same position. We are listening to what is coming out. You seem to think we have all this prepared but it is the confluence of many, many minds all coming together and we are all aware that the words spoken are the opinion of the majority.

Sometimes we may not quite agree with some representations but we simply have to abide by the words that are actually spoken and it is up to our own analytical consideration subsequently for us to decide whether this is something we can accept wholeheartedly. Or perhaps 90% or so, or perhaps a certain aspect wasn’t covered. There is always something you can’t cover because there are so many alternatives and so many shades that you can only have a pretty generalist transmission. There is always somebody who says that an omitted fact was really important but the majority obviously didn’t agree.

So on your side we’ve heard that you think of somebody and then you are able to communicate with them. Are there only certain people you can think of and communicate with?

Like your internet, let’s say you put the thought out there and we will run the parallel as we go along. You put the thought out there, you put the name into the search engine. You may get a vague reply to the thought but it may be the wrong person because unless you have a definitive knowledge of that person, some form of link, then you won’t connect with the right one, will you? So you must be fairly precise, even putting in Elvis Presley you will get Elvis Presley impersonator, memorial, various other associated items and events.

Now, the next step. You locate Joe Bloggs say, you send him an email, you locate Joe Bloggs, you send him a thought. Now you have only heard of this person and feel you would like to talk to him. He gets an email from a person he doesn’t know of saying I’d like to speak to you. Which of his incoming mail baskets is it likely to end up in?

Probably in spam.

And he may or may not open it, depending upon the attractiveness of your message, whether it excites his curiosity enough for him to open the email. It is the same with the thought. If the thought comes across, remember the thought can be assessed far more and you can send a conceptual thought so that they can feel the type of person that is sending. So they may be inclined to reply and then back comes a thought. Others can’t be bothered and will ignore the thought. It’s not all love and light you know.

How many of you, even here, send out contacts to people you don’t know? On a regular basis.

Not really.

No. You keep to your connections in the main don’t you? It is only when you need a specific thing, you may need a specific reply and then you send to somebody you think has the requisite knowledge. In your instruments experience how many have come back with detailed help?

Very few.

Absolutely. They are wrapped up in their own realities. The same applies. As below so above if you wish.

A Question from Hayley. As I understand it the non-physical spirits inhabit the physical bodies but as there is no time they are able to inhabit many bodies simultaneously and lead different lives simultaneously. Is that correct? How does it work now that there are 7 billion physical bodies on the earth and more if you count animals etc. when there were only a few thousand many years ago? Do the spirits just inhabit more physical bodies at one time or do the spirits reproduce as well?

Why do you think that the number of what you call spirits is limited or has to reproduce? If you look out at the universe around you, you will see it is limitless. If you think of the number of atoms, molecules etc. smallest points or energy or consciousness that exist then that is beyond your imagination. Now just look at the possible lives a consciousness can live as regards physical reality, but first of all think of all the other realities that you cannot see. You cannot see atoms and molecules so you have no idea what organisation they have. The same goes for any other small part and even then, depending on the frequency they vibrate at, because your eyes and ears and other senses can only work within a certain frequency, then whatever forms of what you might call solidity may exist at a different frequency and you would be entirely unaware of them.

But now let us come back to physical reality and the human race and look back just a few thousand years and see that being a human being wasn’t all that exciting except for certain people in relatively privileged positions in certain parts of the world. Now it didn’t progress that fast really until the end of the Middle Ages and the coming of the industrial revolution and why did more people start to get born then? Why did it start to become a more attractive place to experience? Because the standard of living rose. You no longer had to avoid wild animals all the time, food became plentiful as farming became organised, industrial goods, clothes, shelter, everything became more available and so did various activities. Communications came in, no longer did you have to walk somewhere to tell somebody something, you sent a letter and later on in the not too recent history came the telephone. Means of transport proliferated and everything sped up. You have noticed that the rate of increase in population has kept pace with the, if you can find a way to measure it, technological, industrial, cultural, health, all the progress in these areas.

And why? Because the physical world has become a lot more attractive, a lot more appealing for consciousness to experience. As we have said in previous posts, as affluence has grown in the west there are far more things to do and less children are being born because one is no longer just sitting at home producing children needing them to work in the fields in order help provide enough to enable you to live in a reasonable manner i.e. just enough to stay fed and clothed. So as the more affluent nations have reduced their number of offspring, which means that the number of ideas, plans, that are acceptable to the consciousness groups (the puppeteers) who are operating those (the puppets) who are enjoying the affluent life, that will agree to be parents to new groups of consciousness, has reduced. Yet these new groups of consciousness wish to enjoy the new affluent life and so, as we discussed in a previous post, what is happening is that the rates of child production in the non-industrialised, non-affluent countries of the world have carried on and even expanded because those consciousnesses realise that we can have an agreement for another child in the middle of Africa or the Middle East and although we may have to sweat it out until adulthood as soon as we get the chance we’ll migrate to the areas where we can enjoy the good life.

This is what you are seeing today. It is consciousness finding a way to achieve its ends even though by the back door. There are many consciousnesses willing to come here as you can imagine but also there are many, many multiples of that number who have no wish to come here. They do not see this as Nirvana by a long shot. They will go to other realities more conducive to their values.

That should have explained to you how the population is increasing. Yes, you can live many lives at once but that doesn’t mean to say you are concentrating all your efforts in a physical reality. You may of course conjoin yourself with other consciousnesses in experiencing the life of a woman here, the life of a man there, even the life of a bird somewhere else, because you can come and go as you please. You can just join and become the “I” as in ‘Entangled Minds’. You become that particular one. As soon as you join you refer to yourself as “I experienced this, I experienced that” which indeed you did. So, “how did you experience that? I experienced that as Joe” or as Joanna or whoever. Ok? And you may just pop in to the experience of a bird just to experience the aspects of flight.  (Could this be what we do in a ‘flying’ dream?) You might feel yourself as part of the consciousness of a large tree just so as you can feel the power and the awesomeness and the view and so you can experience the goings on of the birds and animals climbing around in your branches. You can let your imagination run riot here.

You can experience anything but of course you can experience totally different realities as well. You have all these channels you can switch into. You can say I’ll look deeply into this and feel part of this and then you pull out and say well yes that was good. Now what else is there around? So you’ll watch the thoughts coming by, you’ll see where the intensities are quite hot, shall we say, and, I’ll go over and see what is going on there. This isn’t far-fetched, it’s quite natural really. You do exactly the same thing when you are sitting in front of your T.V. or you are browsing your internet. You just look to whatever is there and when something takes your interest you focus into it. As above so below.

The other night you said that there was no plan so why is it that people who have near death experiences are frequently told that they need to come back because there is work that they still have to do?

When they come back they only remember certain things yes?

Yes.

When you come here you are not aware of what things you want to tackle or achieve or experience. You knew that before you came but you deliberately organised it, along with your other consciousnesses of course, so that you didn’t know, the veil of forgetfulness!

So would you not call that a plan, from the other side?

We go back to the playlet, the idea. By using this word ‘plan’ too many people expand it to the ‘Grand Plan’. They take it in a hierarchical fashion and before you know where you are you end up back with a god again. A grand plan and a whole lot of subsidiary plans. Well, there isn’t any. It is simply that which you want to fall in with. Say if a big group of consciousnesses comes along that says “We’ve got this wonderful plan, would you like to be part of it? Here is a little bit for you to get involved in”. So what have you got then? You’ve got a consciousness with a big idea, a large operation and you are going to play a small part. So you say “oh, there is a bigger plan”. Yes?

Yes.

Right. So you go hierarchically up and this is how people ended up with a god. But there isn’t. You have all got your own little plans, your own little playlets, your own little ideas, your own little list of what you want to experience. You are hooked on this word ‘plan’.

‘Plan’ is one way of explaining it but it’s not…

It is taken in a different fashion. You don’t say ‘God’s bucket list of experiences do you?’ You say ’God’s plan for us’.

Yes.

So you must realise the gravity of the word. How the word is seen when applied to a spiritual endeavour. So you must remove that word, use a different word.

So when the NDE’er goes back he is reminded that ’you went down to do this, that and the other’. He had deliberately forgotten. Once he finds himself on the other side he is not only reminded, he is aware and then he makes the decision “ah, I haven’t done X, Y and Z, I’ll go back”. But when he gets back he has gone through the veil of forgetfulness again because it wouldn’t be much good coming back saying “well I know I’ve got to do this, that and the other and then I’m dead”. He has got to be in the same position as he was in the first place when he came into the physical. Again we get “I was told to go back you’ve got work to do”. A sly fabrication on behalf of the ‘larger’ consciousness, shall we say, rather than the ‘higher’, in order to keep the smaller group of consciousness on the straight and narrow as regards knowledge of their provenance.

So it’s quite easy to explain that. If you think about it yourself, if you come once and you forget, then why shouldn’t you come twice and forget? It wouldn’t be much good coming back with all the knowledge would it? You would have come there in the first place with it all but that would have defeated the object of the exercise.

Yes.

So, same thing second time around except that you might be left with the tantalising little bits of having met the relatives etc. Again, some of those you know, you have this deep love connection with and that is much harder to block out, but some future experience is easier to block out because you haven’t experienced it yet. It may be experienced later as say, a vague desire.

Thank you.

Why are all snowflakes different?

Why are all snowflakes different?

Snowflakes, you might say, are their own personality as projected into the physical but, as an artist decides on a picture that is to be projected, then, because of the nature of the physical pattern, the molecule of water and its crystalline existence, wherever you care to focus i.e. either in the liquid or the solid form as regards the ice, the liquid form is a fluid crystalline structure and the solid form is still showing itself in a crystalline fashion, there are certain lines, rules to be followed in the process of moving from liquid to solid. Just as all manifestation is predicated on a cumulative growth, shall we say, in that certain things will grow in a hexagonal form, others will grow in an octagonal form etc. because (of) an initial design, then what is expected to be the final outcome will then have to be taken back to its origination to determine the most suitable process by which to achieve the end result.

Now, from the molecule of water in its free state, i.e. as part of vapour, then the receptors on the molecules have to be designed in such a way that they interlock, which is why they are called receptors, with other molecules to merge together to form the fluid which then can, you might say, move around. As the temperature cools down, the density of the molecules, in terms of coming together in a slower moving union, to you appears to be a rigid and solid structure. It just means that the fluidity as such is no longer apparent. Much as when you see a pane of glass, that appears to be absolutely solid, when it is leant against a wall, within a certain period of time, long or short depending on its construction, it will start to bend. You will then understand its inherent fluidity as opposed to its seeming rigidity.

We have covered many aspects here in a long-winded fashion but if you wish, look upon it as being a pattern formation which then attracts the molecules of water. Your scientists may look upon this as being a mechanical operation but you must remember that each molecule of water has its own consciousness and its own limited amount of free will and desire to join in the construction of the snowflake and so you can either say that the idea of the snowflake was there and the consciousnesses joined in because it seemed like a good idea at the time or you can take the crystalline growth structure.  Even so you would have to postulate that the existing pattern existed or that, much as in the branching of a tree, only certain possible avenues of movement were possible. Yet when you consider that each snowflake is different from the other it would be interesting to hear what your scientists have attributed to that particular aspect of a snowflake.

So would you say that there is a catalyst for each snowflake?

If you work on the basis that there is a cooling element present, then translate that into, let us say, the potential for an idea, for an experience, to become a reality. In other words that those water molecules, the consciousness of those molecules, upon feeling, let us say, or becoming aware of the drop in temperature, the opportunity arises to experience being a snowflake. So you could call this the catalyst, the temperature drop. It is the sudden realisation that this is a possibility, “let’s try this”. Like all experiences, it can be a fleeting experience in that as the snowflake falls towards the warmer air then the molecules once more move back into the droplet or vapour stage in which case you can compare this to having a ski run. You experience a run down the ski slope, a molecule experiences a transition into a pattern of ice and then finds itself once more back at the bottom of the slope, shall we say, in the water.

Now, would you like to give the description of the catalyst that has been propounded?

I have read that a snowflake forms around a minute speck of dust.

And what encouraged……..

That’s what I don’t know.

We have just described to you something that you can understand in that particular personalities, (remember) consciousness is inherent in each gestalt that is forming in the molecule of water, and then the greater idea which requires, let us say, millions of molecules of water to form a particular pattern and as you know if we conglomerate all these minds together then it is very difficult for any particular conglomeration to be like another because it would require that all be of the same mind.

Do you understand?

Two distinct conglomerates, two distinct gestalts. Each one comprising the same number of, let us say, million minds, when all are interacting all over the place. The mathematical probabilities are enormous, it will never happen.

Do you understand this?

Yes.

Which is why each manifestation is different. Whatever you look at you will see that nothing is the same (nothing is identical). So when you say that it forms around a minute speck of dust would you not think that as all atmospheric air contains minute specks of dust and the fact that a snowflake can only form under certain temperature conditions that in the formation it is inevitable that it will encapsulate certain specks of dust. One could say that “what was the cause and what was the effect”? Is the cart before the horse? But, did they address why is the pattern different (in every case)?

No.

Would you not think that that is a very important part?

The subject was not discussed in any depth.

Have you ever read of anyone postulating a reason why each snowflake is different?

No.

No, because if you go down that pathway you will have to acknowledge in the end that there is a designer behind the design of the snowflake. Yes?

Yes.

And as you are aware, that is a subject that is generally not addressed.

 

Descartes, Darwin and the Big Bang Theory. All peering through a glass darkly.

“There is no matter as such. All matter originates and exists only by virtue of a force which brings the particle of an atom to vibration and holds this most minute solar system of the atom together.  We must assume behind this force the existence of a conscious and intelligent mind”                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                  Max Planck 1944

“Consciousness is the fundamental thing in existence. It is the energy, the motion, the movement of consciousness and all that is in it. The microcosm and the macrocosm are nothing but consciousness arranging itself.”                                                                                                                                                                                                                       Sri Aurobindo

That is another thing that I wanted to talk about. The blueprint. We talk about blueprints but when you think about, not only humans, but animals, they are born and they are born small. As they grow certain things have to happen to the body, not just get larger, changes have to happen. I find that says to me, there is some form of design. For example, teeth fall out and larger teeth replace them. It is so complicated that there has to be some form of design in some fashion, not a single designer but something that plans and decides.

We have covered this many times before. Of course there is a blueprint, of course there is a pattern, of course there is a plan. Now, if you just start from being a single point of awareness and then the thought comes through about a cheetah. What is this? A cheetah? And as you latch onto the thought other thoughts and all the associations rush to it, you might say, or you become aware of them (like a Google search). You are aware of a cheetah and then because you are interested you find that you are aware of, to a certain degree, that many others are also aware of a cheetah and are interested in what it is. We then move on to where the association and the thought comes through “I wonder what a cheetah is like?” You can take it from there, as the thoughts continue on, trying to imagine what it is like. As the intensity grows all the associated imagery comes in. All the pattern of the cheetah, from the moment of, what you might say, cheetah egg meets cheetah sperm, every alteration, every cellular division can be apparent.  Of course because we have spoken many times before about instantaneous, and your only way of looking at it is to relate it to supercomputer speeds, then you can scan through the plans, you might say, the patterns, of all prior cheetahs and see at each stage, each moment, each cellular change what the patterns are. (An accessible repository of prior knowledge akin to morphic resonance – see Rupert Sheldrake.)

Now, this is on such a vast scale, far beyond the capability of the human mind, the human brain to comprehend but if you take, let us say, you break the cheetah plan, blueprint, memory, whichever way you want to look at it, the film, the video recording, break this down into all its various aspects and, let us say, you have got a trillion cells organised into say X number of organs, muscles, veins, blood, cells etc. which brings it all down to a much more comprehensible arrangement. Then you need to have volunteers to organise and maintain, and hold their imagination, because you must remember that in the end this is imagination. Hold their imagination in the particular area in which they have agreed to operate in order that you can experience the actual physical cheetah between all of you. Now, if you follow the logic on that, it is just a vastly infinite exercise but to those who are at the, let us say, atomic level, the particle level and they are working together, it is no different, except in terms of scale, between you organising a vast factory of 20,000 people. It all works seamlessly, raw material goes in one end and the finished object comes out the other. There’s not much difference is there?  Like putting food in the mouth and producing blood cells in the body, it is a process, a manufacturing process. You simply have to scale this up to realise that it can be done, it is just a question of organisation.

If you take the fact of instantaneous communication then it is no big deal, is it, to scale those numbers up by a factor of 10, 100, whatever?  It is simply that you are only used to operating within a certain time scale. Where time is no problem and it can all just “happen’ if you wish it to happen, then it is not magic it is just simply that everybody knows what to do instantaneously.

Take a shoal of sardines and instead of imagining 10,000 sardines imagine 10 trillion sardines, they all still move at once, because they are all aware at the same time.

The patterns for everything, as we have stated so many times, are in the block of stone. Even before the first cheetah the possibility was there. Someone had to think of it and even design it but the potential for it already existed although that doesn’t mean to say that it has been actuated. This can carry on forever because the potential is always there. So once somebody wanted to think of, imagine, a cheetah, then it was possible because all things are possible, all objects, all events.

Who is the thinker?

Each awareness is the thinker. We come back to this area in which there is still contentious opinion in that this is chicken and egg, isn’t it? Where did the first thought come from? Then you will say “where did consciousness appear from”? You cannot possibly answer that because you are then back in the same position and this will always be. You are only aware of what you are aware of so you cannot be aware of where you came from. (All exists in a timeless present. You are who you are, when you are, wherever you are – wherever you focus.)

Thank you.

We cannot expect to get the answers to everything simply because in order to preserve these elements of excitement and uncertainty certain knowledge has to be withheld otherwise the reason for being, as far as physical is concerned, would disappear. Wouldn’t you think that this is applicable to all realities that are going to be experienced otherwise there would be no point in experiencing that reality? Yes?

Yes.

Wherever you focus you will be aware of the parameters that exist for experiencing that particular reality and so you can get together with others and put together parameters for another reality and another reality. But how do you stand back and say to yourself “what reality am I in “?  Because you can only be aware of the reality you are focusing into. No matter how hard you try, at no point can you be yourself and another self, a greater self, because this becomes a series of Russian dolls. As soon as you try to step outside yourself then as soon as you realise you have stepped outside yourself you say “then what is outside me (this self?) So you want to go into that one. So how far can you go? Infinity once more. Whenever you try to see yourself from a different position it carries on ad infinitum.

But that is merely a theory, a logical theory.

We all have to rest within a certain understanding that, as was said, “I think, therefore I am”. Then you may say  ”well, I am aware, therefore I am and if I am aware that I am then I must be thinking”. You then have to become aware of “are there any others like me”? And what have you just produced? You have just produced a string of thoughts. Each awareness is producing a string of thoughts and so they quickly come together. Do you understand?

Because the thoughts attract the awarenesses or rather the focus of each awareness on that thought becomes what you may call, a talking shop, and if you take the gestalt back, in terms of a big bang say, you can take the idea with its trillion focuses and move it backwards to the original awareness that said “this looks interesting”. Simply the thought that “this looks interesting” attracted others. Like ants to the Ant-Rid. Like bees to the honey and suddenly there is a swarm around and the swarm feels the intensity and realises the potential that intensity gives it to create. The excitement builds and the manifestation happens. Suddenly,  ”we are doing it, we are doing it” and the desire arises to explore, explore the reality that has been created, has manifested. “how do we do it?”

Well, it’s all available, isn’t it? All the videos, all the patterns, all the blueprints. This is next, that’s next, that’s next. It is simple then, you just follow the numbers. You focus on the next pattern, produce it, the next pattern, produce it and so on. And so you get growth but as you do it your ideas change and because you have all the different consciousnesses involved in it from previous cheetah then slight alterations are made so cheetah number 2, 3, 350, 3050 are all slightly different from the last ones. Because they are composed of different viewpoints and all the while you are following the same pattern, because after all you did intend to experience being a cheetah, you might be a slightly different cheetah. “Can this cheetah run faster, can this cheetah jump higher”?

If you think about this in human terms and the consciousnesses involved then which abilities do different humans tend to focus on more than others? You can soon see that one set of minds focuses on being able to jump higher “yes that’s a good idea, I would love to experience that” and so you have a high jumper, a high jump athlete. Another one says ”I want to live in the lap of luxury and be looked up to by everybody around me” and so you get a very successful businessman. Another one wants to sing and have vast audiences. Now, all these ideas attract various minds. Others want to be part of a wonderful picture that everyone comes up and admires. And so are we coming back to your snowflake and the wonderful picture of each snowflake which is an expression of artistry?

It is all consciousness in motion and until this is recognised you will get these trite explanations of how such wondrous creations are brought about.

You must learn to ask the questions immediately something is put up as a simple explanation, “What about? How? You will see how very few are willing to go beyond their simple explanation, because those that do inevitably come back to the fact that there must be intelligent design behind this. Yes?

Yes.

So this is all pretty ho-hum in the end because you realise that everything is an expression of a conglomeration of individuality. It is majority opinion, majority design and you just go along for the ride basically whenever you lend your arm to the wheel. You add your little bit of energy to the manifestation and you experience what is produced and you say to yourself “well that was enjoyable or now I understand what it means “ and then you move on and on and on because you have no option but to do that. As much as you try to still yourself to not focus on any idea how can you still your awareness and not find something of interest? It is difficult for you to say nothing is of interest as you always have certain beliefs. You cannot rid yourself of beliefs, it is impossible to rid yourself of beliefs once acquired and therefore beliefs will elicit reactions to ideas, emotional reactions or interest, same sort of thing. You cannot not be aware, so although you can try as hard as you possibly can to ignore, at some stage you will react. Some idea will come by; when we say ”idea” of course, we mean events, thoughts. It’s all the same thing, happenings, OK. Something will attract your attention because this whole sea of action is surrounding you all the time. You can only shut yourself down to a certain degree and then you have to keep a very strong focus on ignoring everything that is happening but just like any time you try to keep your attention focused for an inordinate amount of, we can only say, “time” then at some stage it will slip and you will react. From that moment the spell is broken once more and you find yourself in the maelstrom whether you like it or not and unless you are extremely obsessed with being non-involved then sometimes you can extract yourself from the focus but as soon as you are focusing of course there are many others with you and even though you may extract yourself then you simply find yourself with those of like mind. Once you have the knowledge even though you focus somewhere else the knowledge is within you because of the interconnection and you cannot break the interconnection, it is part of who you are and every awareness is. Every awareness. Can you imagine a neuron in the brain being able to break all its connections with the other neurons?

No.

It would cease to exist, but as a point of awareness you cannot cease to exist and so you cannot not be connected. You can simply endeavour to be very unsociable.

Therefore the message is back to what we said in the first page of your website “Life is a bowl of cherries”. You are here to experience, you are focusing here to have a look and see what is worth doing, what attracts you and then picking that experience that you wish to go through, do it and then pick another one and another one and another one until some entirely new bowl of cherries attracts your attention.

Identical twins. One Soul or Two?

It is interesting how identical twins often lead very similar lives right down to choosing a wife with the same name, having the same number of children, having a dog with the same name, that type of thing. Can you comment on this, is their blueprint very similar?

If you care to think through this conundrum with the knowledge that you already possess you will probably agree that the original plan, the original desire came from a single gestalt (soul) but, as we have said before, not everything is perfect as you can see from what happens in the physical world.

In the case of identical twins do you think that this was already in the plan, shall we say, the point is here that you are also talking the physical process in the division of the egg, shall we say?

Yes.

Depending on how you see this. If you think it was originally planned that there would be identical twins, that is one scenario. If you think that it happened due to a, say, misapplication of  patterning, perhaps, in that only one child was planned, yet it was apparent that there were going to be two from an early point and therefore it was decided to go along with that situation, that would constitute another scenario.

You have mentioned identical twins but you are also aware that most twins are not identical, yes?

Yes.

In which case would you say that the non-identical had separate plans whereas the identical had one plan?

It certainly could be that way.

In which case you probably had separate gestalts for the non-identical plan and a single gestalt for the identical twins, yes?

Yes.

Now do you know of any puppet masters that can operate two puppets at once?

Undoubtedly there will be some.

Do you agree that most gestalts are capable of leading several lives at once?

Yes

So if you have a gestalt faced with two where they thought there was going to be one and if they have reasonably fixed ideas on what it is they want to achieve, then is it likely that the two twins, being identical after all, will also be accessing the identical plan?

I think that, to a certain extent, is borne out where the twins do not remain in the same family, are separated but when they meet up later in life they find that a great many things in their preferences, and life even, are identical.

As we have just said, you already have the knowledge and are now thinking it through for yourself, yes?

Yes.

There are various ways of approaching this. In some cases the identical twins will live basically lives diverse from one another. In other cases these similarities of choice tend to come to the fore. It would be apposite, would you not think, for the connection between the, let us say, unforeseen identical twins to be closer than that planned for ordinary twins seeing as it all started with the one plan in regard to the identical twins.

Could it not have been that the plan was to have identical twins?

Can you give a reason for why you would want to have two of the same, identical twins?

Just for the experience.

Could be, but then would you have two separate gestalts?

Maybe it would be one gestalt operating both.

Which we just referred to…..

But that doesn’t necessarily mean that it was unplanned.

In which case, because both identical twins are connected to the same gestalt, the same thoughts would go to each of the identical twins. Would you call that a greater connection than that of the non-identical twins who are almost certainly operated by separate gestalts?

Yes. The ones operated by a single gestalt would obviously have more similarities.

They share the same thought net, you might say, so they will receive the same thoughts.

In previous posts we referred to the shoal of sardines, they all became aware at the same time which enabled them to all turn at the same time. Now if you were connected to the same thought net would you say that the identical twins would be aware of the thoughts emanating from that net simultaneously?

Yes.

Given that they are in different environments some of those thoughts would be ignored and others would be taken up to suit the situation in which they find themselves.

Yes, because surely the gestalt would recognise that the two situations are different so therefore they would know that some of the thoughts would be relevant to one of the twins but not to the other given the different circumstances.

But they (the gestalt) would still be thinking the same thought and yet even though they know that this one would not be applicable to one, the thought would still be in the thought net.

The thought would still be in the thought net and possibly operated upon by one (twin) and ignored by the other.

Exactly. Even though you (the gestalt) are looking at one (twin) and thinking one thing the other one will pick it up but because it is not applicable to its situation it will be discarded. Then, as we have said before, plans change and what was going to be a single life is now two and it can be very interesting to say “Let’s see what goes on here, let’s compare this. We will let this run its course”. In one case they stay close together, bonded, throughout life. In another case they are allowed to split up but of course they are always connected to the same thought net. So when the idea comes up for a child’s name or a type of dog to buy or whatever then the majority opinion in the gestalt, if there is a belief and all gestalts have beliefs, may have a marked preference for a certain type of dog and therefore both twins are aware of that thought and feeling and take it as their own. The same goes for names, choice of clothing etc.

This all depends on the gestalt recognition, you might say, laziness. It is easier to think one set of thoughts, have one set of beliefs than to try and split yourself into two and operate the two in two different fashions in which case they wouldn’t be identical anymore in their choices would they? Maybe in looks but not in their choices and as you will find there are plenty of identical twins in looks and physical attributes and yet they lead totally different types of lives. Yet when you come across what seems to be a mystery, of twins separated, in different parts of the world, yet seem to be living to the same script, we hope that what we have just outlined can give you some understanding that if you approach it from the point of view of the controlling gestalt it is quite simple to understand.

Thank you very much.

 

 

Reincarnation. A subject that perplexes many people mainly because of the concept of karma. This is a religious based fear concept constructed to persuade the masses, masses meaning all, to adhere to an acceptable code of conduct, on the basis of whatsoever you do to others will rebound upon them as the scales have to balance and often this would only balance in the next life. What is not emphasised however, for obvious reasons, is that you will not remember who you were in the next life and you will not understand why you are being visited with, what you might say, would be the sins of the parent. The sins of the parent visited upon the child. Does that mean that the sins of the predecessor will be visited upon the successor? This has been another saying capable of many interpretations.

The emphasis generally has been upon the negative aspects of karma. Of course, that is the whole purpose. To try to get the human beings to act in a kindly and considerate manner thereby kindling the hope that the next life will be a more enjoyable one with few negative aspects.

Now, this all has to be taken with the view in mind that the “self” which is separate from the smaller ”self”, you might say that the ego, the “I” is the smaller self and the inner self is the true “self”, if you wish. We are using words that can be argued over here because otherwise we would have to go into enormous detail to delineate various aspects of what people call egos, ”I”s, selves, lower selves, higher selves, inner selves, inner child etc. Suffice it to say, there are divisions of consciousness, some of which act within the physical plane, which we will refer to as the lower self, and that part of the consciousness that stays in another plane. You may choose between astral, mental whatever you wish to choose, and that is the director of operations, shall we say, the guide, the touch on the tiller, having constructed the vehicle and having programmed the vehicle then just adjusts the direction and the speed now and again by means of whispered influence, sometimes of which, we might say, is not heard. It is just that the vehicle has not got proper control of its motive powers.

Now, if you were taking one life after the other would you not think that each time you reviewed a life you would look at what you had done and then think “well, this time I will avoid this and I will avoid that”. Why the concept of “you must pay”? Because you need to inculcate fear into the human being to keep them on the straight and narrow. It does not make sense that a kindly person would have to come back, or put it this way. We have to assume in this case that everybody is guilty of negative actions and therefore the vast majority of human beings would have to return in order to expiate their sins. Then what? Where do they go? They move on until they reach enlightenment? Or they have sufficiently purified their “soul”? And then they end up in heaven or nirvana where they are in bliss. For how long? The question isn’t asked either “where did they start”?  At the same time, they will say that their life began before the physical and carries on after the physical. So why should it stop in bliss? But how did it start in the first place?

It is easy to say “it was a spark of consciousness, a spark of god”, the awareness once more. The more you look at the concept of reincarnation you see, when you think about it and you apply logic and reason, it would seem that each life you create is simply an experience you wish to undergo, to enjoy in various ways for your own particular “entertainment”. We will use that word to cover the spectrum of chosen experience, any aspect of human endeavour, action, thought, expression.

If you are choosing one to do and if you have the capacity, some will believe you can and some will believe you can’t, to have many lives at once in many different dimensions then, it is easy to envisage, when you look at the groups in which you participate in your daily life, each involving slightly different expression of personality depending on the activity you are engaged in, that even many lives at once does not seem quite so impossible.

Now it may have been the case before, that religions have arisen as an early form of civil control. It is easier to control by instilling a belief system from a young age than it is by trying to reason, or use force to control, at a more advanced age. Basically, by instilling a certain set of values the human being self- polices. Society works quite well when people cohabit in small environments, co-exist, co-operate, and a relative harmony is achieved in a small unit and then people who deviate from the norm are quickly brought to see the error of their ways. As the population has grown and people have had access to arms, even from the days of sharpened sticks and bows and arrows, then groups have formed to fight each other for possession of food, the opposite sex, the land and anything that arouses a desire in the one to take what the other has by force if that is possible.

So, if we look at the concept of reincarnation from that aspect we see that it really does not hold water except in that fashion as a civil obedience tool. Now, we do have many investigative examples of cases, as they are said to be, suggestive of reincarnation. Most of these are children that remember a “past life” where they had, say a wife, children, business whatever it happened to be. Something that is generally able to be proven by taking the child to the place they speak of and they then recognise the area, the people, the names etc. In addition, some of these children have birthmarks suggestive of a violent end to the person they claim to have been before as most of these cases seem to be those whose lives were, what we would say, cut short. Now when we look at the consciousness, with memories of experiences, that is constantly creating new lives, if you have many lives going on across dimensions, then as one “play” ends, one game ends, then you start another one if you wish to do so. If you had planned on living a certain life time but due to the ever evolving nature of the play you are involved in, you agree that “OK I didn’t intend to leave this way but I’ll exit now just to make life interesting for the remainder”, or that somebody else wants an experience. So you have unfinished business.

So you form a new vehicle and you fashion it once more but, of course, if you do this quickly the memories have not faded and so it is quite possible that those memories carry over to the new vehicle and for a certain while those memories can be available to the new vehicle before they too fade away. You may well accept this possible scenario but reincarnation, again, implies a continuous linear, sequential concept, which, you are already aware, only exists in the physical. Outside the physical there is only the ever present, even though it is constantly in motion. So, reincarnation again is something you can believe in, if you wish to, or you can see it as just a bleed through of information from one activity to another. Like, you’re telling a joke in one life and it is so impactful that you remember it and in another similar life when you see that joke again, or even it may come to mind, in a form that you don’t realise, but you have an instinctive or an instantaneous overreaction to a happening that you see, which is extremely funny and you wonder how did I think of that so quickly. And yet, maybe you have seen this somewhere else and then you can throw in another aspect which would be sharing of experience. All is connected, therefore, wherever you focus you can focus on the experiences of another. But if you don’t, are not aware that this is possible you can most easily say, “That was a previous life.” Quite easy to do. Now I must admit that it is hard to explain how a child, which is born, sometime, not too long, after the person who the child says they were has died is not suggestive of reincarnation. But, can you also see that the new consciousness can be tuning in to the consciousness that has left the physical and picked up all the details, all the information, much as a medium can do.

A third one, can be that the person, whose life has been abruptly ended, has these, let us say, indignities, insults, physical insults as well as verbal, in the main physical insults, so deeply etched in their consciousness that they are not aware that they are completely free in their life in their new environment and still burn with the desire for whatever, you might say revenge, you might say burn with love, whatever it might be. The desire to see their children grow up, whatever, they have to find a suitable consciousness that will allow them to at least give them a chance to revisit their family once more. We talk about those consciousnesses that have addictions, that when they leave the earth plane try hard to influence and enter into the feelings of those still on the earth plane. They can be akin to a leach sucking on blood, they can blend with the feelings of the person in the physical which gives them the same sort of satisfaction that they felt. So we have a range. There are probably others that we haven’t covered and a range of possible scenarios. But let us assure you, that most certainly, for the vast majority, that the exception is more than the rule, and that is borne out by the number of cases, amongst the billions of those who are born, that are suggestive of reincarnation. So, one swallow does not make summer. Reincarnation as a mass concept for the masses is not valid. Do you have any questions?

What is your take on past life regressions?

We spoke before about the hour glass, the inverted pyramid, the small pointed focus through which the mass of consciousnesses can experience the physical and how when you are able to focus upwards, if you wish, from that small base of the pyramid, there is a vast area of knowledge and experience that you can tap into, and a vast piece of all these experiences of all consciousness as everything is connected, which is why we did not want to say, who is speaking. Because many, many, many are providing the knowledge which we are using to converse with you. Now, you should already be seeing the possibilities of, let us say, throwing a dart into the dartboard of previous lives, whatever lives are going on, whatever experiences are happening. Once you go looking for details of a life, whatever you access you can claim ownership of. Do you understand?

 Yes. I think I do.

So regression is like having your consciousness walk into a library full of biographies or should we say auto biographies. Does that make it clearer?

________________________________________________________________

Thank you. Now people report that they have been helped by angels. Can you comment on angels?

Now, as we have stated, everything is a co-creation. The laws of the environment we presently live in have been agreed and everything has been constructed according to those laws. But different laws exist in other dimensions and different creations are made in other dimensions and so do not think that your particular three dimensional reality does not have many gradations because why would you simply fix the gravitational pull at one level? Would you not think of having a reality where the gravitational pull was much less and therefore, you could move instead of one yard at a time you could be like a super kangaroo and move at one mile at a time or simply leap to the top of a mountain? Again, let your mind soar into all kinds of wild speculation and think wouldn’t it be nice if I could do this, if I could do that and of course, you can for you create your own reality. Whatever you wish to experience you can.

_______________________________________________________________

Would you like to comment upon ectoplasm?

Ectoplasm is a manifestation. The consciousness that has chosen the route of exploring the experiences of a physical medium has to some degree wanted to be the subject of interest to others. Just as we talk about gods giving signs involving awe and wonder then the consciousness that controls the medium may wish to create, what you might call, the manifestation of energy which can be manipulated or impressed like modelling clay. A medium of expression, you might say, and used in a kinetic fashion. It can be used to form objects, it can be used to show a likeness of a person who is no longer in the physical, it can be used in séances for materialisation. It is all a creation from the expanded consciousness of the medium because in the same way that we are speaking now where the consciousness is far expanded from the consciousness that operates this instrument in day to day affairs, in the same way with physical mediumship which produces ectoplasm, the amount of consciousness(es) that are involved, and we will refer to another phrase, a word that we use “intensity”, the power generated by the intensity of thought can manifest in holographic or material fashion a solid object, but what it is creating, as you well know, is a force field. The intensity of thought can create a force field. In fact if you enter into a room in which you are not wanted, and you are recognised as somebody that isn’t wanted by everybody in that room, you will say that you can feel the animosity, but conversely you can feel the love, but you are feeling attraction or repulsion, a force field. So let us just take vast numbers of consciousnesses that are interested in assisting the endeavour to manifest and you can see how the use of ectoplasm, energy, force fields can accomplish the purpose.

Thank you. Would you comment on ghosts please?

We spoke earlier of lives cut short, you might term it unfinished business, desires and memory, but a vibrant memory that says “I must do this, I must get this finished” and we just spoke of intensity of consciousness that enables materialisation. Now, we spoke of holographic, what is a ghost in your terms and explainability but a form of hologram. But a hologram motivated by desire. You have also heard of thought projection. A ghost with unfinished business from a consciousness that has passed on is very much the same as what you term a doppelganger, a consciousness that is currently operating the physical body and yet wishes to be somewhere else at the same time, but in some form there is such an intensity of emotion involved or, it can be a wish not to be somewhere, and therefore the mind wanders and creates what you would say is a ghost, an apparition, a thought projection in another locality. Do you understand? The two things again can be interchangeable, another can be sheer force of habit. When you pass over, where you have been a very habitual person and it is very difficult to shake yourself of the habit, much as the drunks and the addicts wish to still keep that feeling going because their consciousness has memories, has feelings, has emotions. For example, we say we meet our loved ones, which means that love still exists. If love still exists then the opposite still exists. Do you understand? All of these are simply beliefs that you have taken on at some stage and are taking time to release. Until you understand what is, we may say, “the truth” albeit temporarily over the present view point. Does that confuse you?

How do dead people turn up in photographs?

We have covered the intensity of emotion, intensity of desire, necessary to materialise in the séance room, the same principle applies. If you can affect the fabric of the physical plane, you will hear me refer to fabric as being the pattern. You understand what we mean by the pattern in the field, rather than solid object. If you can flatten the field, in some way, now a photograph is produced by light, reflecting from the object, which then affects the chemical composition of the film. If you can create your own source of light, at the same time as a film is exposed, then there is sufficient intensity of desire, consciousness, whatever, then you can transmit the desired representation onto that film, and of course, we can now come on to the digital age then, in theory, it is even easier to transmit an energetic construct, the same principle with light, but probably less energy is involved, although to-date, but possibly more through reluctance of the media to spread the examples, there are not so many examples of deceased persons appearing in digital photographs. In all cases of photographs reflected light causes the image to be created, so you could look upon the image created by ectoplasm, reflected light shows up in the photograph, or you could say “that an energetic image in the form of an idea, made into a hologram still causes light to be reflected”, or the hologram is composed of light but is not viewed objectively but the camera picks it up. Or you can say “is beamed into the camera receptors”. We can only give you things you can understand, there is more to be said but this, you might say “technologies have not yet been discovered or even conceived of at the present time, we know that will elicit even more questions so we will say “have not yet been focused upon.”

What do you have to say about Ouija boards?

We spoke of entertainment. Most attempts at Ouija boards are done in the spirit of entertainment and some in the spirit of enquiry. If approached in the spirit of entertainment then you will get whatever is out there because you are inviting the full range of consciousness to join you in creating a story. So those who wish to play games will create the story with you. Now, just look at what you do to each other in the name of fun and then you can see that others, whether in or out of the body consciousnesses may wish to do the same to you. But approached in a spirit if sensible enquiry the Ouija board can be a helpful introduction to the realisation that consciousness survives death, and again we say “the desire to let your loved ones know that you are still with them and they have not lost you”, then those desirous of that end find a Ouija board easy, because the persons, using the Ouija board, are putting themselves into an open mind situation and that allows other consciousnesses to tune in and operate the physical bodies of the participators and therefore the glass or planchette is directed to the appropriate letter to provide the desired communication. No different to us operating the verbal production of this instrument.

Do you feel there is any harm in using the Ouija board?

We say, over and over again, you create your own beliefs, from your beliefs stem your emotions, from your emotions stem your actions. Also your actions in using the Ouija board may cause unexpected emotions which then produce beliefs. So, you have already been conditioned, let us say, “provided with the knowledge,” that you can be possessed and if you find that an interesting area as a consciousness, especially if you are of a predilection to being centre of attention or even if your vehicle, that you are observing, has found that position to be somewhat satisfying, then the requisite belief is adopted and manifested. Whatever attention is desired. But generally if you take that person and give him a focus which they are more interested in possession does not make itself apparent. Why? Because focus.

____________________________________________________

Can you comment on doppelgangers and bi-location please?

You produce your own body, so you have group consciousnesses all focused on creating a body, now you are creating a physical body, there is no reason you cannot create, let us call it, a holographic body, a pastiche, a copy, but a copy in light, shall we say, but good enough in light to fool everybody, and if there is enough energy there, of course, you can create a solid copy. This is how physical mediumship works in effect. You have heard it said that desire produces the second body and if the person in the physical is connected strongly enough to their higher consciousness even that desire can produce certain happenings and in a serious case of the mind wanting to be somewhere or not wanting to be somewhere you can find yourself in an alternative place, together with, let us say, the holographic body, enough that people can see you, in some cases the higher consciousness sees you and gives a thought to the instrument that it can see and then other people cannot see what you are seeing. This is put down to clairvoyance. Some people can see a person standing there and others can’t.

Once more, clairvoyance is a question of being connected more closely to your higher consciousness and therefore what the higher consciousness can see can be transmitted to the clairvoyant and for ones that aren’t so well connected the picture cannot be transmitted.

So yes, bi-location is possible but it is extremely unusual for the consciousness to be aware that it is in two places or it has bi-located. Normally the more solid of the two, you might say, is not aware of the appearance of the more diaphanous one, or the hologram, and even when told that they were seen in another place cannot remember being there.

_____________________________________________________

In the Tao of Physics mystics understand the roots but not the branches scientists understand the branches but not the roots. Would you care to expand on that comment?

Mystics are able to access areas that science cannot. Mystics have experience of the ineffable. They find themselves in altered states of consciousness where the environments are totally alien to the objective surrounds of the physical plane. From this they understand they everything is interconnected, that all is one, that all knowledge is available. There is no beginning, there is no end. Everything is equal.

Science on the other hand purely studies the objective world. It recognises that everything that we see and touch is made up of atoms and molecules that upon further investigation turn out to be virtual particles which appear and disappear from who knows where. Everything turns out to be waves, radiation, energy in motion, all these words in an effort to describe something which we cannot fully understand.

Yet science never asks “How does the pattern come together”. It talks about evolution, of things arising by chance and yet at the same time insists that the human being is  conscious, has reason, logic, imagination, can design and create. Surely where did the design and creation ability arise from in the first place to create the earth, which is supposed to have come from a big bang and everything else appeared randomly as hot energy cooled and coalesced into various portions and objective reality and somehow from that arose the reasoning mind of the human being and instinctive minds of all lesser creatures. This is hubris in the extreme and really is not worth discussing.

Now, we know that ancient philosophies have long held that consciousness is the basis of all realities. Do you agree with that?

Again, we wish you to think this through for yourself. Scientists today, many of whom have had to resort to the admission that the ancient sages, the mystics were probably right thousands of years ago when they stated that everything arose from the one, and the one was the consciousness, the awareness, the “I AM”. It was given some form of personalised anthropological name by some, but others just gave it the description of the void, everything arising from the void. Science followed that with the Big Bang theory which asserts that everything arose from nothing. Wouldn’t it be much easier to say that the Universe was thought into existence? (Sir James Jeans came to the same conclusion.)

Therefore, do you have to be conscious to think? We cannot say whether consciousness ever comes together and acts as one. We feel, from our point of view, that consciousness groups [together] in many areas to create its own particular reality. To be enjoyed by those who wish to participate in that particular reality. Now whether this all forms part, to coin a phrase, of “God’s tapestry”, we are not in a position to comment upon.

What would you say is the difference between a medium and a mystic?  

Again, language. A medium has generally discovered that they have the ability to tune in to another reality or certainly be able to still their mind to allow another reality to communicate. Another dimension, another frequency of being.  A mystic, almost certainly, if they are having their experiences which others deem credible, if they turn their focus towards providing the service that mediums do, will probably be able to do the same, because they, again, experience information from other realities. Now, just as in a lucid dream, they find themselves in those realities but who is to say that mediums do not also have lucid dreams. You can call the mystic’s experience a waking dream say but, again, how do you differentiate between sleep and a waking dream?

At the moments humans are tending to migrate. Lots of humans are trying to migrate to the same places. Can you tell us anything about how this situation is going to unfold? This has digressed a bit, it just came to mind!

It ever was, from the beginning all creatures, upon the land, had to move with the seasons and many still do. They had to move with the seasons because the food available changes with the seasons. So, if you are in a cold area you move to a warmer area where food is available because the other area is now, for example, several meters deep in snow and there is nothing available. Now, man is just another creature who wishes to live in a comfortable fashion. Now, if an elephant is eating grass and it sees over this fence that there are, let us call them “goodies”, to avoid having to get into descriptions, a wonderful cornucopia of nutritious food. Do you think it will not pull the fence down, wander in there, and take its fill. Ask yourself, why do you put man into a different category? They have the same hunger and desire to fulfil their longings as the animals. So as they migrate towards better areas, conflicts will, I am afraid, undoubtedly arise as they fight over the share of the available. Things move around, they ebb and they flow and as one wave moves in others move out for better and more secure environments.

So, if you wish to have some kind of prediction then you will see polarisations. You will see happening in the Western world what has previously happened in such as South Africa and other areas of the world where privilege has to co-exist with non-privilege, privilege has to fortify itself to avoid being eradicated by the non-privileged.

Yes. Thank you. Bertrand Russell said “there is a better way of gaining information than through the physical senses”. What would you say is the best way to gain information?

You have come to the physical plane in order that you can explore your own creative capabilities. That does not mean just the creation of form but creation of ideals, creation of your personality, your control of desire, your persistence etc. etc. There are a few who decide or remember that somehow I can access a different reality. They have flashes of inspiration. They have meditative and altered consciousness experiences whereby they suddenly understand or suddenly know. Some experience telepathy, some experience seeing at a distance, some just experience a sudden awareness simply through focusing. These are better ways of obtaining knowledge but they are relatively haphazard. The knowledge accessed is not always correct, cannot be, in general, focused in such a way that you get the exact information you desire and so, in general, you rely upon your tried and tested methods which everybody will agree upon. Plus which, if you say ”this is my source” and others can access the same source, they will agree with you and your project will advance. But if you say “I have meditated on this and I feel that this is what should be done” and it is not something that can be logically deduced or reasoned out then you won’t get much of a hearing, because if you can’t prove your thesis few will go with you. One or two may see the vision or resonate with it but in general they will say “well, that’s not quite good enough you know, you cannot give us a rational basis for your pronouncement” and yet it may be perfectly valid. Remember, as we said, did you focus in the right place? Did you even know where to focus? Which is why so many predictions do not come to pass. Some do, some don’t. So, yes of course, there are better ways of obtaining information but can they be validated? But others, to whom you wish to give this information and them to believe it, will they question your source and will they discredit your source.

Certainly some will try. What about the fundamental unity of things?

We are once again in a circular framework whereby if all is one and all its parts are connected to each other, in which case, it is one of course. All the parts make up the whole. We are talking about consciousness here. Everything is connected, everything is unified. Does that answer you?

Yes.   Bertrand Russell also said “all evil is mere appearance”.

Of course, everything is potential. Evil is merely a judgement. It is merely deception and that is made depending on the environment that you have chosen to inhabit and the build-up over the, we will have to use time to explain this, build-up over the millennia of human codes of survival and co-operation. So if you go back once more to where most humans were cannibals or could be, let us assume that most were at one stage. They didn’t differentiate between killing another human and killing a deer. Now, did they think it was evil to kill?

Obviously not.

Would they have thought it evil to take whatever was available? But one would try to stop the other one taking it.   Much as you can watch dogs fight over a piece of meat but neither of them thinks the other is evil. Evil is merely in the mind. It is something you do not wish to be a part of.

Yes. So, in the world at the moment it does seem that a vast number of women are badly treated, compared with men. So why do these things happen? I know that it is all an illusion but it is very hard to understand why these things happen.

In your own lifetime you have seen the status of women change dramatically from there being virtually no women in government in many, many countries, even up until recently where they are not allowed to vote even. But it is changing, has been changing, will change. You now have many women in positions of power, leading countries etc. Again this is not something, an area that we wish to pronounce upon. You are existing in the physical plane. You have chosen the time, shall we say, or the environment that you wish to experience and

That’s what you are doing. Yes.

So if you had come into this life several hundred years ago your lot as a woman, wherever you were, would be infinitely worse than it is today. So again, you chose the experience that you desire. If we take the old portrayal of life as a play, it is much easier to stand above the play and see all the actors playing their parts, knowing they will all return from whence they came and compare their notes, their experiences and decide what next to focus upon.

Now, Stanislav Grof said: “Modern consciousness research reveals that our psyches have no real and absolute boundaries on the contrary they are part of an infinite field of consciousness that encompasses all that there is.”

Once more everything, we repeat what we have already stated, everything, every consciousness is connected to every other consciousness by various pathways and all these consciousnesses form the whole. Now, again the word whole implies a boundary and, of course, there is no boundary but once more this is something that neither you nor we have yet been able to comprehend. But, everything can be connected to everything else simply by focusing through, as you have had your intimations of this from your remote viewers and such as Edgar Cayce and other seers that physicality is no barrier to consciousness. So, you have merely limited your experience to the physical plane in the main. You have had your viewers move their consciousness billions of miles into outer space but you simply do not know of other dimensions in which to focus. So, it is virtually… you can only look at your physical plane because that’s what you are in. Once you come outside the physical plane then you are aware of more, but you are still not aware of everything but it exists. It is present. This is the meaning of the word infinity, there is always more to focus upon. If you bring yourself back to the fact that you have conscious awareness which may be an awareness based within a group so although you feel you are singularity you are experiencing a multiplicity but thinking you are a singularity, in other words you are one point of awareness, but in order to manifest you may need to be any number you can think of, points of awareness working together. Do you understand?

William Blake said, “if the doors of perception were cleansed everything would appear to man as it is, infinite”, as you have just mentioned infinity, “man has closed himself up so he sees all things through narrow chinks of his cavern.” 

For a reason.

I was going to say, “Would we be able to cope if our doors of perception were clean?”

Again, if you have restricted your senses to those to be used appropriately in a physical environment, then you have chosen the necessary senses and the efficiency for those senses to enable you to operate satisfactorily in that environment. Now, we are back to horses for courses. Again, if you wanted to cleanse your gates of perception then the physical environment would disappear from view. It would not be a case of not being able to cope because you would drop those senses off. You have narrowed them, slits in the cave, whatever you want to call it, for a purpose. So, removing the restriction would then remove the environment and you would be seeing a totally different environment.

Would you not still see that environment as well? The original environment, the one that you have closed down. Would you not see that as well?

Now, you can see yourself on the earth, so again we have to discuss this in terms of physical limitations. Let us assume, we’ll do several here, so you are watching one program, you switch to the other, you have one instrument can you see both programs? No. You are on the earth and you switch your consciousness to being on a star ten million light years away, can you see what is going on in the earth? No. So in space, in frequency, and you can do your own exercise in time and you will see that you can only focus in one reality, in any one moment, but you caveat that with the fact that, as we have described before, you can then sequentially focus on as many as you can handle and to you, thinking in physical terms, they will be existing at once. Which indeed they are of course. But your present capabilities are only able to focus on one. But, of course, once you understand that you can focus on several things at once then you will be able to do so. But in effect you are basically keeping up with several environments at once. Do you understand? As we have explained before, because the intervals between your focuses are so small that just like the frames of film going in front of you, there may only be sixty frames a second but it seems continuous to you. So, we have been through this analogy before. So, as we keep repeating, it is very difficult to explain using physical plane analogies to describe non-physical environments.

Now, Grof and Halifax say, “The universe is seen as an ever unfolding drama of endless adventures in consciousness, very much as in the sense of the Hindu Leela or divine faith.” You would obviously agree with that.

Two words. Infinite potential says it all.

Would you like to expand on theory of morphic fields, implicate and explicate orders and the holomovement?

Morphic fields again is a term to try to explain how one consciousness accesses the information arising from the experience of another consciousness. It basically posits that all mental experience is recorded, held, agglomerates in a field of information holding energy. Like a big computer in the sky you might say. So when anybody thinking about something, we come to the internet again, presses in the subject then all information pertaining to that subject is then downloaded. So, an information repository available to all.  Of course, we are back again to seek and ye shall find, or ask and it shall be given to you. It is focus, focus on what you are doing. Start to wonder what can happen and suddenly a thought, an idea will come into your mind. Or did your mind go to where the thought was, where the idea was? So with the postulation of a morphic field you can decide for yourself the process of information transmission or acquisition.

Implicate and explicate orders. We start with infinite potential. Consciousness imagines what might be, certain imaginings are reviewed, examined and let go, others are held for consideration and then through interconnectedness we ascertain how many others are interested in this particular imagined form, event etc. So when a crowd gets together and the enthusiasm mounts eventually one consciousness or more says ”can we do it?” and the crowd roars YES! And they set to and they organise. This is having to use your rationale as to how things happen on the physical plane but if you think that you are the same person and consciousness in whatever plane you are currently focused in would you not think you would use the same……we hesitate to say,the same methods of thinking, because the different environments entail different methods of thinking, but in general you can only be aware of who you are and you can only experience your desired experience by carrying out all your activities with other consciousnesses. Otherwise you will simply be “meditating’.

And what about holomovement?

Another word. You are talking the attempted description of everything being everywhere, everything happening everywhere. Again, it is very difficult to explain a conception which may actually have only a partial basis in reality. All information is available to anybody, to any consciousness. Everything is interconnected. If everything is indeed, interconnected then it is a hologram because every idea is available to everybody else. Now, hologram denotes space, take the space away and you have no hologram. You only have information, ideas, morphic fields again if you wish. An infinite field of information encompassing all the ideas, all the blueprints, all the patterns, all the scripts, all the music, everything you care to name plus much that you have no awareness of. It is all accessible to any consciousness that knows where to look, desires where to look and is led from one to the other but just as we said you cannot see everything at once even though it all exists at once.

___________________________________________________

 

Where does your thought come from?

So let us start with your own observations. You are thinking of nothing in particular and suddenly a dog comes round the corner. You are immediately struck by the size and colour of the dog. Then you think a thought of, I wonder what breed that dog is? You look up at the sky and you think to yourself, that sky is a beautiful blue today. You think of going to work tomorrow and you think, I hope the traffic isn’t too bad.

Now, all these thoughts have been generated by your observations without any conscious intention to actually think, so we will call that category, thought by observation. Thoughts are transmitted, a thought once set in motion is transmitted by the brain even though you do not realise it, for simplistic purposes, to the mind and to the minds of all others. Some will pick up this thought because it actually conforms with their own perceptions or beliefs and others will ignore it because it is not a subject in which they take any particular interest.

Once the thought wave starts in motion then it can never dissipate. It simply keeps going. It has been postulated that there is such a thing as the Akashic records and your scientist Sheldrake has talked of “morphogenetic fields” where all thoughts reside and you might say, actions are recorded and as they are repeated and other consciousnesses notice the thought then the same like thought attracts other like thought. Anything pertaining to the same concept is gathered, you may say, under a certain filing system, coded if you wish. Therefore when another person thinks a thought especially in the form of a question that record is automatically contacted and without realising it you access that store and other thoughts begin to flow to your mind. The same system pertains, those thoughts that you wish to entertain then flow through your perception and those thoughts that you do not, let us say, believe in are excluded. You only think the thoughts in this regard that you are open to and as you can imagine some are more open than others. So the thought, once thought, is forever in existence.

You have in your historical philosophies the notion that every action, every thought of everything, every consciousness down to the smallest bird or insect and now of course we can extend that down to the smallest particle or consciousness is recorded and is always accessible. If you follow your own logic even and especially now that you have the internet you will see that whatever is fed into the internet finds its way to a certain number of associated pigeon holes, shall we say, from whence said information can be retrieved when activated by a request for information relevant to, even in a fairly abstruse way, to the intent of the question.

So, where do thoughts come from? Thoughts arise from consciousness. You may say conscious perception equals thought. Thoughts are recorded in like files and therefore are forever open to examination. Now in your own language you have phrases such as “bodies of thought”. Think of that particular phrase “body of thought”. You can think to yourself, does this mean that the body consists of thought and/or is it the thoughts that created the body? Or the more popular conception that this just means a conglomeration of thoughts.

So again, when considering where do thoughts go, then yes, they can go to a recording establishment or they can also be manifested in a reality. A thought becomes a reality especially if you classify the thought as an idea for something. You classify the thought as a product of imagination and then you look at the imagination which is another word, you might say, for thought or idea. All of these would mean different things, slightly, to different people but generally most would say that they are different interpretations of the same, we will have to say “feeling” here. A feeling that something is possible. So thoughts are things and become things depending on how much the consciousnesses cooperate in wishing to make a particular thought become a reality. So in answer to the question of where did it go, it can go to storage or it can flow into what you would consider to be, objective reality in this dimension and also into perceptions of realities in other dimensions.

So what effect would you say that thoughts have on yourself or others?

From what we have just said then when it comes to the effect of thoughts upon others then let us, you are talking about effects on others? Yes. When many people think of another group of people as undesirable and to be eliminated, subjugated or somehow be reduced to powerlessness what ensues? War and killing. The effect of thoughts can be extremely powerful. On the other hand when many people get together with the idea of bringing peace to an area and for example demonstrate by the ballot box or by mass demonstration in the streets then war can be avoided or stopped. Now we are merely talking here in terms of violence and to save a long- winded peroration you can use that same logical reasoning to see how everything comes about in the reality that surrounds you.

Now when it comes to reality for yourself then this can be measured physiologically. If you think happy thoughts your bodily production of chemicals, your heart rate, blood pressure, your muscular tone, your stance, your mental condition, your moods can all change depending on which thoughts you concentrate upon. Because you create your own reality, your thoughts create your reality. If you think that everything is terrible, that there is nothing to hope for and you are filled with fear and dread then your body markers will respond appropriately. This may seem to be like just plain common sense and indeed it is.

_________________________________________________

What exactly is dreaming?

Dreaming, to give you a very simple description, would be like one focusing in various realities, much as in moving from one website to another and being struck by certain experiences when talking about websites. It would be news items, pictures, objects and events that make an impact upon your senses. Now imagine moving from reality to reality which your other selves, your fellow co-creators, your other “bodies”, as we were discussing some time ago, and sharing their experiences. Now the most stand out ones, shall we say, may stay in “one of your memories” and so when you awake there is a temporary remembrance of certain of those, easier to use the word “experiences” as a cover all, and because in most cases you only remember the highlights there is not sufficient continuity for you to understand. So, as an analogy sit and surf the web rapidly, it will scan various sites and when you are finished try to remember any particular information in full detail. You will find that only certain items can be remembered and other sites, although you took in what you saw, you will not remember at all, this is as good an analogy as is possible. Now, remember that when you are looking at your websites you are just in the one, let us say, frequency, the physical dimension but when you are dreaming you are hopscotching from frequency to frequency so you can imagine the distortion that bringing information from one frequency to another entails. Does that make you any the wiser?

So carrying on from that. How do I know how to dream when I have never been taught how to do so?

Your dreams are simply your perceptions of other realities in which your thoughts are forming your (those) realities. Now often ( when dreaming) you will perceive in the other reality that you are currently focusing upon, as during your sleep you switch your focus from waking reality to other realities, you switch away from the physical world to other worlds which really can be quite as physical. Although you think that only the world you inhabit is physical there are innumerable other worlds that are equally physical or if you wish to reverse the situation, what you consider to be physical is equally as non-physical as all the supposed non-physical worlds that you think are, let us say, out there.

Now often you will find that your dreams seem to have a connection with some of the activities that you have been engaged upon or areas which you have been considering as possible avenues of action. Previously we have mentioned that you do not just have a focus in the physical, you have a focus in the astral, the emotional, the mental and many others at the same time. When a thought is thought in one area, subject to the screening systems we previously referred to, it will be picked up in one of the other bodies as well. So if we say you have been considering how to reorganise your garden say and then you have a dream about a beautiful tree or digging a hole or something even not directly related, you find yourself in the desert or find yourself in the forest and somehow you may make the connection between the garden which you wish to create and the forest being created from the desert. The connection will only be made by the few that tend to examine their dreams in detail if they can remember enough of them.

So you can see that the thought that may not manifest in one reality may manifest in another reality. There may not be sufficient intensity, sufficient conglomeration of thought to manifest in a dense reality or your perception of a dense reality, but it may be able to find a form in, let us say, a diaphanous reality. So in the physical reality you may be able to sculpt a rabbit out of stone and in a less dense reality you may see a rabbit in the form of a cloud but you are still perceiving the thought-form of a rabbit and you can extend these in either direction.

Whichever way you look at it, in the end, thoughts will become a reality in some conscious perception

Obviously we had a very interesting discussion the other evening, have you got anything you wish to add to those aspects? For example, one of the things that you said, if I understood correctly, that it is belief that makes everything where it is, for example how far the sun is from the earth, how large the sun is and that sort of thing? But surely everybody believed that the earth was flat and that the sun went round the earth but that obviously was not the case, so belief in that instance did not create that reality.

That reality was a reality to those who believed it and then the belief changed and the reality changed. The belief creates the reality, the reality is not… there is no reality except that which you believe is a reality. There is no distance except the distance you measure with the measurement instrument that you create to measure them. Do you understand?

Yes I understand what you are saying but when you say belief, the trouble is that what comes to mind is belief of people and that’s not the case at all. It has got to be something bigger than that.

Each gestalt of consciousness has its own beliefs and each gestalt sees its own reality.

Whether there’s any humans there or not “there is!”

That is a belief. That is a belief in itself. Do you see all other planes of existence, all other dimensions? Do you believe they are there?

I know there is something, I don’t know what.

In general though we now have the belief in the multiverse. You believe that the moon is round and yet until somebody saw the other side of the moon you did not know it was round.

Yes, but the fact that we did not know it was round did not mean that it wasn’t, it was still round whether I believed it was round or not.

People believed the earth was flat and did not want to go to the ends of the earth then somebody decided to go…

The fact that they believed that it was flat did not make it flat, it wasn’t flat. They just didn’t want to do it. It wasn’t flat as borne out by the horizon.

But you are talking in time and reality is created in each moment according to beliefs. You are only taking your present beliefs and extrapolating backwards in time. Nothing matters. It matters nothing. There is no matter except the matter you believe you perceive. Everything is simply consciousness in motion forming various patterns arising from intensity of thought, of emotion, of belief.

So how much do our thoughts, beliefs etc. affect our day to day existence?

Beliefs generate a certain level of intensity. It takes, in this particular level of perspective, time for that intensity to rise and intensity can last for a long time and it will gradually change and as the intensity changes, obviously the belief changes and the reality changes. The reality of perception changes. There is not just one belief, there are many, many interlocking beliefs. New ones arise, old ones fall by the wayside.

So for the everyday person, how much should they study this?

If it interests them they should study it, if it does not interest them they need not study it. It is simply a focus, an experience. It is simply what you wish to do. You find excitement and uncertainty in crosswords and in games, others find excitement in the uncertainty and joy of discovery in other areas and these areas overlap with all.

Philosophy is eternal, human beings have been around for a long time. Blavatsky talks about the perennial philosophy, but the human is the perennial behaviour as clothed in different circumstances in the environment, the human being changes very, very slowly because beliefs can only change depending on the mass belief, because the mass belief creates the intensity for change and when the mass finally want the change to happen it does. If you stand and watch what is happening around the world, which is now the protest system, a part of the mass rises up and says, “We do not want this.” The rest of the mass could not care less. It does not rise up against that (part of the) mass otherwise you would end up with civil war. In some cases you have got this, where there is two conflicting intensities. All events arise from emotion. We are back to where we started.  The present level of intensity moves up and down and changes direction and most will go with the flow. You have control of how you wish to perceive things and once you realise that you really do have control of your perception you have control of the off switch. Only look in those directions that make you feel good, that give you pleasure. Do not look in the other direction unless you feel you are going to do something about it.

Now, one could say that the universe as you see it, is, as Sir James Jeans said “ The universe begins to look more and more like a great thought rather than a great machine”. Let us call this a great idea. Let us also come back to Rupert Sheldrake and his morphogenetic fields. Now, every consciousness is tapped into these so called ”fields”. The universe you could see as merely a field, a field of vision, an idea. But if you focus on that field of vision, that particular idea, it would be like you switching to another channel on your television. You will see what is there. If the belief has reached a certain intensity and then resides in, using the language of the day, the morphogenetic field, and you are linked to the morphogenetic field whether you like it or not, you will see what the morphogenetic field, from the data contained therein, presents to you. The same way as when you look through your eyes you are only seeing the light reflected. Do you understand?

Yes.     

It is the idea you are seeing, the image that is projected back to you, the thought that you receive, and therefore the universe is but one image because your belief comes before the image. The image is already there and, because of the number of people who have added to the image, it becomes a belief. Beliefs and images are interchangeable, in effect. Once you have a belief it becomes an image to you in your mind and vice versa. Coming back to all being created all at once, we are told time and time again, that there is no beginning, it has always been there. So we, once more, come back to the analogy of the [potential] sculptures in the block of stone. All events have always existed. The same way as all sculptures have always existed [in potential]. It is what beliefs you place upon these things.

Comment:- [You have subscribed to the mass belief in the physical universe and that belief, thought, is contained in the morphogenetic field which is composed of, contains within, every thought and action of every human being. The mass of humanity, of all manifestation if you wish, is creating its own reality, the reality of its belief in a physical universe.]

We are coming back to the same morphogenetic field idea that if you believed that dinosaurs existed three million years ago, then you will make that belief a reality. So it is a reality to you. You make your beliefs a reality. If there is a belief… any group of consciousnesses all believing the same thing that will be the reality to them. Therefore there are innumerable, infinite number of universes, infinite number of events, infinite number of objects available for the consciousnesses that wish to focus upon them.

When a person visits another reality in dreams or other altered states how can they revisit that reality?

For most this is extremely difficult because even if you have the intention to revisit that reality and if you refer to the little discussion we have just finished it will need to have, we will use the term location, but let us call it instead an identifying signature, an address, and therefore if you have not carefully noticed the address, where are you going to look? So you can have the intention but you must also have a memory of the route you took. This is not a very satisfactory explanation. Now, if you start off with the intention to visit a certain location of which you have some idea and you find yourself there then you will be able to revisit that location if you are of sufficient intensity of intention. You understand that? Now, if you were merely browsing with no particular intention then, as we said, if you can’t remember where you have been then how are you going to find your way back? The simplest way we can answer the question.

Thank you. Can you hide your thoughts in the non-physical and therefore in effect mislead others?

If you are sufficiently expert in the same way as consciousnesses you see around you, you can indeed deceive those who don’t wish to put themselves to the effort of probing your aura, shall we say, (the thought net analogy in a previous post is easily understandable), because that is an easy way for you to understand that if the person takes you on at face value and doesn’t change their focus to read you, especially because each one will know that they are being read and it will be seen as disrespectful, you can understand that. You would not like to be speaking to one, who you considered to be a close friend, then find yourself being closely interrogated as to the meaning of your every word.

We now have a question from Tosca. What is God? Could we consider it pure consciousness, immutable, perfect or is that consciousness, God’s mind perhaps, in some way responsive to its creation? Is God affected by our experiences, maybe experiencing aspects of itself through us?

All this is intellectual conjecture. The word ’God’ is meaningless. It is merely a word coined for others to understand what the other is trying to say. Now as there is no understanding of how this all came about and as you can only think in terms of humans because you think humans are the top of the physical tree and the only ones that think, you construct this being and think of it as some kind of superhuman that sits somewhere all alone in its separateness, because you see things separately.

And yet you have no idea of where the universe ends and you say  ”where are the boundaries of the universe”? without asking the question “why should there be boundaries to the universe’? It is because you see boundaries to yourself, you see boundaries to the earth, you see boundaries to the planets and stars revolving around and to the galaxies, but, if you were inside your body and you were trying to look round at all the cells, the atoms within the cells and so on down to the usual retinue of particles and charges, where would it end? What would your viewpoint be from that perspective? It would seem never ending and yet when you came outside you would see, there is another one over there and another one over there. You look further and ‘my goodness, there’s another planet’ and so on.

So, how do you know that this universe is not like all the stars and galaxies that you can see? That it isn’t just one of myriad universes? You can carry on from there can’t you? You simply can’t understand what is around at the moment so you try and find some reason why it should be created. Why do you find that it needs to be created? Because you think of ‘time’. You do not realise that you have created time.

Now, start to think about the animals, birds, bacteria, viruses. Do they have clocks? Do they do things other than by light and dark? Do they measure the number of days, years? Do they measure how old they are? Do they think of when they will die? You don’t know do you? Maybe you should find some of that out. If you can. You must get used to the idea that you construct time. You construct the beginnings and the ends. You have to dispense with thinking from those assumptions and see whether you can think of everything as always being.

With everything always being then where is your need for God?

If you start with the God business again next minute you’ll be back into purposes, which is what has happened before. We come here to learn, and what do we come here for, so we can find our way back. Well, that’s rather stupid isn’t it? What on earth would you come for just to forget all about it and find your way back? Wouldn’t it be more sensible and logical that you come here to experience it and you go back when you’re ready. You don’t even come or go, you look in, to see, and you make your imagination real in the same way that you construct your plays and films etc. You take your imagination, you make it real and you enjoy the experience. Others can step in and view. They can view the play, they can view the films, the virtual reality and the experiences become more and more vivid and real. What is happening is that you are slowly moving towards what you already do. So if you wanted to come and go back you are gradually reproducing what you already do. So there’s your coming and you are on your way back. In the end once you have all your virtual realities then you will look at this and think ‘well, this is rather like taking coal to Newcastle isn’t it, what’s the point in constructing this physical body only to strap a visor on its face and then it is into a different reality? Well then, it is not experiencing the one it is in, is it?

So I suggest that you think, why is there any need for a god in the first place? And think of a whole different way of thinking about the ever present consciousness and what it is going to do with itself. You just sit there, you think, ‘this is boring, I need to do something’. So you construct something to do, which is exactly what you do in the earth plane. As above so below and vice versa.

Thank you.

You constantly talk about as above so below but there are certainly some things that take place “below’ which are really not desirable. Are you also saying that those are above as well as below?

When you look at what we previously said, that everything is an experiment and the answer comes ‘it went wrong, didn’t it’, so things go wrong with minds as well. You acquire beliefs and you change beliefs. You changed from thinking eating meat was perfectly OK to finding it abhorrent. You view that as being a move to the good. You must realise that there are those out there that are being told ’this is what God or whoever wants you to do, these people are wrong, look at the way they live, look at the things they do’. You will find that an awful lot of the violence and other things that happen, certainly from the point of view of the largely organised violence, comes from dogmatic beliefs as to what is right and what is wrong. These are fuelled by a few people generally. Do you agree?

Yes.

Then you have other elements e. g. the mindless violence upon a stranger but overall these are few and far between and how often do we try to get inside the mind of the person perpetrating this violence and see what led him to this? Now you have seen the way that drugs can completely alter the moral responsibility of certain people?

Yes.

But the instrument wasn’t built for that was it? For some reason this is experimented with and the instrument goes out of control.

So is it also being experimented with ‘above’?

Depends on what you call ‘above’. There are myriad realities. We have to say ‘as above so below’ because you still think in terms of the control as invisible, coming from a sort of heaven. If we said’ as around so within’ how would you understand that? Because we are talking in terms of your sensory perceptions. Or if we said ‘as within so without’, where would you place the intelligence?

Within.

What if we told you ’as without so within’.

It doesn’t really matter what words you use, what I am trying to ascertain is…..

There are all kinds of realities. You are talking, yet again, about what you consider to be good and bad.

Yes of course.

But everything is imagination, nothing can be hurt. As we have said, when you are watching your puppet being chopped to pieces then ‘what a shame that is’, ‘I shouldn’t get into sword fights should I’. ‘I’ll have to start another puppet, that’s no big deal, I’ll just switch my gaze and join this lot, I’ve been running this puppet, I know what I’m doing, can I join you? Yes’. Now, if you are saying ‘I want to join you so I can go and destroy another person’s puppet’ that may be more difficult, but there are those who like wars. So you join and others join and before you know where you are you have one that can’t go to war but still wants that feeling of destroying another puppet.

Not easy to explain because you are coming from the point of view that you do not wish to have any pain anywhere but if you didn’t have any pain it would all become boring again. In the same vein why do you produce all these programs and films that are horrible? It is because you understand that it isn’t real. Whenever looking at these events you must try and move yourself to the ‘above’ position or the ‘without’ position. Looking down and realising that this is all a light show. None of it is actually real. You can’t allow the puppet to know that it is going to be killed otherwise you won’t get the experience. The consciousnesses operating the puppet know full well that this is going to happen.

You were told today of the woman who was sitting in the car waiting for her husband and suddenly decided to join him in the shop. When they came out of the shop they found a large tree had crushed their car. The higher consciousness became aware of the intensity signifying that the tree was going to fall on the car and not wanting the puppet to be hurt sent her the thought to leave the car and join her husband. Now we didn’t cause the tree to fall, the tree is its own consciousness.  It decided it had had enough and it didn’t care where it fell but we could see the intensity building. We could see that it was going to happen and a decision was made. There are myriad answers to this but suffice it to say that it is all in the imagination.

You must really stop viewing through the lenses of good and bad.

I was only asking if the same things happened……..

Are the people who make these films bad people?

No.

They’re providing employment, they’re providing enjoyment and basically it’s harmless and they are making a lot of people happy. So are they good or bad people? You don’t say they are bad people because they make violent films, you may say they have some odd imagination but have they been out there killing people themselves? They may feel that they have some instincts for that kind of activity but they express them through make-believe. In much the same way hunting was a major activity for hundreds of years, killing things for sport. Look around now and how many people do you see shooting defenceless animals purely for sport, for the sake of killing them?

Certainly not as many.

And how many people are using cameras?

Yes lots.

Now equate violence and films with rifles and cameras.

Yes.

Equate them not so much as regards technology but in the motivation of the consciousnesses behind those objects. All you had were methods of destruction but now you have methods of capture where you can watch the creatures for a long time. Before it was ‘am I smart enough to shoot this rifle and hit the target’ but now you say ‘am I smart enough to lock onto this flying bird and follow it all the way’. You are still exercising your skill aren’t you?

You can find those realities where everything is perfect which is why you talk about heaven, then as the memories come flooding back you realise that ‘it’s all imagination anyway, so I can go and do that’. ‘Now who else wants to join me’? Because you can’t produce any reality without consensus.

As Seth says, ‘nobody dies unless they agree to it’.

As we have agreed before, for a murder mystery to be able to be enacted somebody has to be murdered in the first act and exit never to be seen again. Until the next performance. (But when the play is over all the actors appear again to take the applause, meanwhile the ‘victim’ has been watching from the wings). This is why we are relatively relaxed, immune to the slings and arrows of outrageous fortune, because we understand, it is all just make- believe. Once more you must think about those two words, ‘MAKE BELIEVE’ ……… and then think about ‘focus’.

Are you connecting?

Yes.

So tell me how you’re connecting.

Once you focus on something you then start to believe in it so by focusing you are making a belief.

Correct. So you make the reality believable in order that when you focus into it you believe it. You believe it is real. You are not in a position to know that reality has been created with the specific intention to lure you into the belief that it is credible. Imagine walking into a building and you go to a door.  As you open the door there is a tremendous sound of gunfire and coming towards you at a rate of knots is a wild man with a machine gun firing directly at you. What is your immediate reaction?

Fear.

You slam the door but then suddenly think ‘that can’t be real’. There are no bullet holes in the door. So you open the door and peep through again, don’t you? And it starts again but you watch it this time and you realise there are no bullets and he‘s not getting any closer, it’s a film! But when you are unsuspecting and you open it and ‘Bang’ it was there, you had an experience. Then you realise it was just an experience, so when you walk over to the next door what do you do? You open it wondering what film is showing in here. Fear gone. Unless they have organised a 3D cobra coming straight for your face in which case you’ll recoil somewhat, won’t you? And then you realise ‘oh god, another one’. But once you’ve done a few of those you’ll be able to stand there in perfect equanimity, they can throw anything at you and you will know it’s all make believe. After a while you wouldn’t even be bothered to open another door, would you?

No.

Take that as forever existence and before long you would be just sitting on your stone wouldn’t you?

Yes.

So you don’t do that, you make it believable because if every reality had no downside once more they would become blasé wouldn’t they?

Yes.

You would become blasé. Oh, it’s another round of parties and everybody is happy and this, that and the other. ‘Doesn’t anybody ever get angry around here?’ ‘What about a good fight, where’s the competition, where’s the risk? I want to climb that mountain but I want to know I can fall off, no point in me climbing the mountain if I know I can’t fall off because anybody can do that, so how do I differentiate myself from the others’.

Thank you.

Are dreams astral travelling and if so what about wild dreams that are more like a movie or video game and not like actual life?

What’s in a name? We will call it astral travelling but as we have said before it is merely a change of focus. You close your eyes, you shut out the physical world and go to sleep and then you find that you are sometimes focusing in another reality that has caught your interest. All the time you think you don’t dream it is simply that you don’t remember. You would not wish, or maybe you would of course, wish to remember that you are living several other lives, which when you go to sleep you can be, let us say, with your higher consciousness and be aware of other activities. Now it wouldn’t be good if you were sure of what was going on in those other activities so in general you just bring back remnants, scattered memories of excursions into other co-creations. So dreaming is an odd subject to try to describe to you in any coherent manner simply because of its seemingly disjointed, it’s scatter gunned memory, none of which is true in trying to make sense of attributes of other realities which have no counterpart in physical reality and so you struggle to find counterparts and then you fabricate in order to just bring back some idea of what you are perceiving. Now in lucid dreams you are actually aware of what’s going on, you are aware of your surroundings and you know that you are somewhere else, so that is a different kettle of fish, you are able to understand to quite some extent because mostly lucid dreams are in the physical reality or something quite akin to it.

Can you repeat the question please?

The question was:-Are dreams astral travelling and if so what about wild dreams that are more like a movie or video game and not like actual life?

Who knows that you can actually tune in to somebody playing a video game, tune into their thought stream, their vision stream, and of course those video games had to be devised.  Some consciousness had to think of them and where do you think those thoughts are? In the same place as our thoughts and so occasionally you can bump into anything you care to imagine. Anything you have on the physical plane is first thought of on the non-physical so all these various bits and pieces are all imaginary in that they are creations of the imagination of consciousness. Some come to fruition in reality but obviously most do not as many trial balloons are sent up which then are found not to be able to reach the proper level of acceptance by enough consciousness to consider them a good idea, most of them are shot down. We could ramble on for hours on this subject, the subject is amorphous so let us not continue with it.

Think, and the answer will come to you because actually you already know the answer.

You have our warmest thanks for being a part of this endeavour in trying to bring both comfort and enlightenment to those who are looking for same. And, of course, as one finds comfort then another notices and so the enlightenment can spread as to the knowledge that brings comfort and we are deliberately phrasing all that we say in a fashion that the ordinary person can understand with regard to the comfort angle. When it comes to the enlightenment angle it is obviously, not only extremely difficult, almost impossible to lay this out in simple terms. It requires the seeker to think his way through it, to fashion it into a structure that he can fit in to his present belief system with as little change of form as possible and then he can let go of one piece maybe, but it doesn’t detonate the whole structure. In which case, as he sees the impending detonation, he will run for his life.

So, if it seems logical and reasonable and he finds it hard to dismiss his own reason and logic, then he finds himself to a certain extent, forced to accept “Well this actually sounds quite right. Now how does this fit with what I thought before? And really, when I look at what I thought before, it doesn’t seem quite as solid as I thought it was. So I can now let go of that piece and I think I’ll adopt this one, because this now makes more sense to me than the old one”. And this is an ongoing process of course, it moves from one to the other.

You can see how, even in watching the progress of your scientific knowledge however reluctantly it is moving, it is moving slowly towards two areas of science, one of the Newtonian science and one of the Quantum and now moving toward Consciousness.  Of course it will have to be that for physical life measurement systems will have to be involved and the hard sciences, you might say, and chemistry and biology etc. But when it comes to the world of ideas and creation, and, let us say, art and music, then you are in the realms of consciousness. There is no reason why these two things cannot exist, and so what if we end up with the fact that consciousness creates everything, well it’s also created Newtonian science hasn’t it? There is room for everything, there is room for all creations. There are just merely turf wars going on between humans. Now would you agree with that?

So, it’s a question of sit back and watch the show and decide which camp you want to be in. Once again we bring back one of our favourite phrases, horses for courses. If you are deciding to build any large physical endeavour, build ships whatever, you need to be in the measurement system, the weights, the gravity, the rest of it all which come with the usual physical laws. But if you want to be in the field of composing music or creating a holographic scenario, shall we say, then you will need the imagination and where does the imagination stem from?  Consciousness! So once again, back to focus.

Once you sit down, and think, and maybe this is what Edison was referring to; if you sit down and think you will get most of the answers. You see, our language is saying “you’ll get most of the answers” but actually you already know most of the answers. It is a question that you haven’t applied your focus. Once you apply your focus to a question and you keep looking and keep looking, and you keep thinking, then you access, and things start to flow. Why do you think you have Rodin’s sculpture, the Thinker? Quietly resting his head on his hand, and thinking.

Why do people meditate? They meditate but when their mind starts to wander, would you then say it turns into musing, and once you’re into musing you are back to your Einstein quote that you have at the front of your blog, that “the mind moves to a higher level of knowledge”. Now if you read back what we have just said you will find it moves quite sequentially from one focus to another.

We must admit that we do find, sometimes, that answering these questions, this is no offence to you, we mean all the questions that are posed, not just because you pose them, you understand? There is no applying just to you. But it is amusing, sometimes, that the questions that are posed are posed without prior thought as to exactly what is being asked. Again, if one thought, why am I posing this question, let me think about this, they would be, in most cases, more than capable of answering it themselves. Which is exactly the process which is going on at this very moment of course.

Still there are moments when one feels free from one’s own identification with human limitations and inadequacies. At such moments, one imagines that one stands on some spot of a small planet, gazing in amazement at the cold yet profoundly moving beauty of the eternal, the unfathomable: life and death flow into one, and there is neither evolution or destiny; only being.

Albert Einstein

Tosca Zraikat commented on Astral Travelling and Lucid Dreams.

Thank you once again for sharing the transcript of this session. Somehow, I get a different feeling from this discourse, as though someone else was coming through, but of course, I could be mistaken. What especially intrigued me was this passage: “You would not wish, or maybe you would of course, wish to remember that you are living several other lives, which when you go to sleep you can be, let us say, with your higher consciousness and be aware of other activities. Now it wouldn’t be good if you were sure of what was going on in those other activities ..” Does that mean, I wonder, if we are not meant to be aware of living other lives, or sure of those other lives, or does it mean that awareness could unduly alarm or frighten us, or distract us from living this life? Seth said that we were intended to be aware of our own multidimensionality, and I had always thought that part of our task was to become more aware of it. Perhaps to a limited degree, though. I have always found my occasional experiences of multidimensionality exciting, somehow very reassuring. They give me a sense of groundedness, of being connected to a much greater reality, sort of like having a big, loving, extended family most of whom one does not know, but feels loved and strengthened by nevertheless.

Thank you Tosca for your insightful observations. It is nice to know that there is someone who is thinking this material through.

With regard to other communicators we often think that the lead communicator varies as the voice, delivery and personality changes from time to time, but I guess that if there is a group that those most qualified to answer on a particular subject come to the fore. Now as a long term medium I am accustomed to other ‘ personalities’ using my senses. I see the pictures they send me, hear the words, feel the feelings and emotions and sometimes just know things that must be a part of their knowledge. The person I am reading for often recognises the speech and mannerisms of the communicator. I used to think in the traditional way that the communicator was separate and either took over the body senses or merely sent the thoughts but now I could equally imagine that my group consciousness takes more of an observer position allowing the communicating group consciousness to join my group consciousness and temporarily take the lead. A merger of convenience you might say.

With regards to keeping lives separate, even though you may be aware that you may be involved with more than one life simultaneously it would be most disconcerting if you were receiving an additional stream of sights and sound arising from another life experience at the same time as you were taking in sights and sounds of this life. So it makes eminent sense that we would keep the two separate, much as television, radio channels must be kept separate.

As we say somewhere in the material I am aware of a well-spoken personality who occasionally manifests through my speech for hours at a time and I can sense ‘him’ gazing around and taking in the sights as I seem to follow his gaze. I wonder how ‘he’ remembers this experience, would it just seem like a lucid dream or is ‘he’ also aware that he is living more than one life at a time? As I enjoy the experience of being extremely well-spoken I am obviously amenable to allowing it in much the same way as I allow the ‘deceased’ to communicate their messages to their loved ones.

I fully agree with your final paragraph. It is great to know that you are part of a large number of co-creators, co-experiencers. Warmth and safety in numbers. Also when you get to making decisions you are aware that the decision has been arrived at by a majority of many ‘minds’. As I have experienced, I can request guidance and find myself being pointed in the right direction. Maybe formalising the process of intuition, hunch or gut feeling.

The Process of Healing through Prayer.

We frequently hear about prayers being sent out for those who need healing and in many cases they appear to meet with some success. Would you please explain the procedures involved?

Prayer is a supplication, a plea for assistance. In general the individual, praying either for himself or another, does not find a way in order to effect the healing and merely has faith in that an outside force, outside that of physical reality, can somehow effect a miraculous healing.

Now how does this work? If you had asked this question before you were able to pass through the information that we have given so far we would not have been able to give you an answer in the fashion that you would understand but having taken you to the point that you now understand, whether or not you accept it, that each manifestation is comprised of many, many intelligent entities, shall we say, that come and go according to their interest in the events currently being experienced we may be able to draw an analogy now with the, currently in vogue, practice of crowdfunding.

What is the “Crowd Funding” process? There is an internet i.e. a medium through which you can contact many, many people, millions, even hundreds of millions, and should you be able to attract their attention and their empathy you can effectively raise a great deal of money in order that you can use that money to effect the intention that you hold. Let us take a case where funds are needed for very expensive medical treatment, if you raise $50,000 you can now afford the operation. If the operation results in a cure then what have you done? You have broadcast a plea, you have touched an awful lot of other intelligences, they have sent the money, you have used the money, which is energy, to get the operation and the person is then healed. This is using all the elements of physical reality.

Now when you make a prayer to the unknown, the unseen, what is happening? You are sending out a thought. You are sending out a thought, that thought, as we have told you before, then, for want of a better way of putting it, goes into the thought net. That thought is then accessible by every other intelligence. Due to, what you might call, their blocking mechanisms (their beliefs, preferences, resonances and the converse) a certain amount of those numbers out there will tune into that thought. Should they consider that thought, just as the crowdfunders, to be a suitable cause they will go to the object of that thought, let us say that this is a person thousands of miles away, distant healing you call it, who needs to be healed. They will take a look at that particular gestalt and decide whether they want to lend their focus, their intensity, you might say energy, to that focus, that gestalt.

Now the majority of that gestalt obviously have not been sufficiently, let us say, interested in the particular problem that the instrument that they control suffers from. It may be intentional, it may be, “let us see how this progresses”, it may be that this is not going to make a great deal of difference to the instrument. In other cases it may be that the intention is to leave the physical reality but let us assume that it is something that really hasn’t been addressed as such and is capable of change. In other words the majority (opinion, belief) may be a thin majority and it can go either way.

Now if sufficient other consciousnesses join, you understand what is going on here, if sufficient other consciousnesses join, and provided that their intention fits in approximately with the interest of the gestalt they can do so, then they just lend their weight, their intensity, their focus to that gestalt and they come down on the side of “let’s put this matter right, we feel that this is worth healing here”. All they are doing is effectively changing the majority view and once the majority view is changed a different direction is taken. If it was just going along with a laissez- faire attitude and the instrument wasn’t doing quite so well but the gestalt wasn’t particularly bothered about it or other matters are involved then if the gestalt consciousness is expanded by the addition of all those who have heard the plea and they want to change what is going on then the change will occur. A different direction will be taken. The instrument will be, let us say, reprogrammed, re-patterned. Let us say there is a tumour there. It may be decided to return to a previous pattern where there wasn’t a tumour, and you must remember here that past, present and future are all one, the future can affect the past if you so wish, so it is possible to go backwards and re-instate the pattern of that particular area as it was before the tumour started to appear. Alternatively you can change the signal that the cancer cells are giving out so that they become open to attack by the killer cells and the tumour will then disappear (a series of patterns giving rise to an impression of remission rather than raising questions as to the nature of spontaneous healing ).

Really what you have done is change the opinion of the majority of the consciousness that comprises the gestalt. Now if you can see from the gestalt that the intention is to end that life then no change will happen as you respect the intention of that particular gestalt. (It was meant to be!) It is not a question of wanting to change their direction, it is a question of looking into the particular circumstances pertaining here and if you understand that the gestalt knows exactly what it is doing then you simply turn away. If however you see that the opinion is vacillating then you might ask what is the overall plan here and suggest that it might be advantageous to have the instrument in good working order and you can change opinions like this and consequently the ongoing manifestation.

All consciousness is in the state of various beliefs, opinions and attitudes at any one point in time. Some can be swayed easily, some cannot. You have witnessed someone who is considered to be a normal human being who over a period of time is brainwashed into becoming a murderer and goes off to war. What has happened there? What has happened to the overall consciousness? It can be insidious, some join, a few more join, a few more join and suddenly that original consciousness is swamped by a great swarm of others who wish to have an instrument to play with. It depends on the strength of the original gestalt as to what plan is being followed. Do you understand? Do you have any more questions?

So attempts at changing the direction of the instrument are only undertaken after assessing the strength of the intention of the consciousnesses comprising the gestalt in question?

In general when a plea goes out it is for, what you would term, a good purpose so it attracts those who wish to help. It doesn’t attract those who wish to harm.

In an instance where the healing is going to occur does that mean that as the healing consciousnesses come to the gestalt the sick consciousnesses will be persuaded to leave?

It is not a question of “sick” consciousnesses. There are no sick consciousnesses.

Those who are persuading the gestalt to be sick. The constituent awarenesses that are manifesting the sickness in the instrument.

We are starting to get into the areas of good and bad again. There are only experiences that are wished to be undergone. You can take your hands off the wheel and just see what ensues. Let us ask “How has the sickness arisen”? There are many theories as to how sickness arises. Sickness does not only arise from physical sources it can arise due to emotional conditions or beliefs, from a sense of guilt, from despair or grief due to loss. These conditions often result in a lack of care for the physical body which can be translated as a lack of focus upon manifesting the optimal pattern, shall we say. One is introverted and focused upon the emotions of the mind and the body is ignored. This is all the consciousnesses involved in the gestalt of course as each one considers themselves the “I”. So if you come along and make them aware of what they are creating and offer to help remedy the situation your help may be accepted. In some cases the overall plan may have been lost sight of and that can be pointed out e.g. if the plan was to live for a further 20 years then you can ask whether those years would be better spent in health rather than in sickness and a change in focus may be made.

Let us say for example that there was a not so detailed life plan. There was a basic outline of a physical life with the major events to be experienced and “we’ll deal with the rest as we go along”. In sickness and in health, you might say. When an unplanned sickness arises there may be confusion as to how to deal with it, the thought goes out and those who wish to advise do so. Remember the focus is in the physical, the consciousnessses are not focusing as observers. They are on the stage. Those who are fully focused on the stage do not understand that they can change the blueprint if they wish to. They do not understand that they can, what you would term, go into the past and re-pattern. Due to the “rules of the game”, you might say, this information is blocked because otherwise you would have people staying far too young, far too long and the whole idea of the birth to death experience would be frustrated.  When you enter into a physical experience you are aware of the rules, the laws and should you be seen to be going in the wrong direction then because it is a co-creation other consciousnesses will simply weigh in and the intensity will change your direction. At any time those who are not happy with the general direction of a gestalt they are focused within can simply look away and focus into another gestalt. You only experience that which you wish to experience therefore you only focus upon those gestalts that will provide the desired experiences.

In general those praying for healing pay no more than lip service to the fact that the particular individual has a plan for their life before they enter physical reality and when we say “individual” we mean the particular gestalt and its planned series of experiences. You may see somebody who is relatively young say or who has a terminal disease and you feel it is such a shame and you want it changed. You want them healed. Now in your own case, Jean and David, if you had known that your own son was going to die from a terminal illness you and all those who knew him would have been praying for his recovery. Yet what has it done to all of those who were close? It has changed the way they think, changed the way they live, changed their interests. We wouldn’t have the website and all the people that are benefiting from the website and all the people that you have helped over the years through your activities in the spiritualist movement etc. if you hadn’t had the trauma of losing your child. Yes?

Yes.

So could you turn around and say to yourself “well, somebody had to volunteer for this”?

Yes.

So someone takes the part that entails leaving the stage in the second act and others took the part of being the bereft parents and siblings who vowed to help all the others who suffered the same grief and despair. But you would not have done that if you hadn’t lost a child, you could not have done the work you have done.

No.

The same applies with any form of plea for healing. Some work, some do not, depending on what the intent was originally and you can see the argument for that, can’t you?

Yes.

So to put it in a nutshell, a plea goes out, the plea is noticed, if it is considered that it is correct to heal the particular instrument after examination of the gestalt’s life plans and current intentions and its awareness of what is possible then you can gently make them aware and change opinions. Not that you have to, you can simply add the weight of numbers, the awarenesses, the focuses into the gestalt and things can be changed.

So we come back to the analogy of crowdfunding. You can write these steps down on a piece of paper and see that the process is pretty much the same.

Thank you.

Now it may take time for things to be changed within the gestalt. The focuses coming in and changing the imaginative picture need to keep focus there for a while to effect the healing completely. They may only stay around to focus in that particular life to help effect the healing  as that life may not otherwise be of interest to them so they’ll come and they’ll go and the belief that is being held onto in the physical may see it happening and then not believe it. Much like the placebo effect in that the placebo works because the belief has changed among those focused on the stage that this pill is going to make things better. Then when they are told that they were only given a placebo, it was not actually an effective drug, the beliefs change back again and the condition resurfaces. It depends on the beliefs pertaining in the gestalt at that time. Their beliefs, their thoughts, their imagination produce their reality.

As far as those who are praying, then one can say in their thoughts “we feel that this is a good case for this particular person to be healed and we ask you to look at the situation and if you feel that you agree then please join in the effort to effect said healing if that is what is meant to be”. That statement encompasses all the intentions of that particular gestalt. Then you let go, send the thought out and let go, there is no more you can do. You may wish to send the thought out a few more times but it will be noted in the first place anyway by those who are open to such thoughts and do not block them and there are sufficient out there at any time to effect the change should the cause be determined worthwhile.

Thank you again.

 

Entangled Minds

Once upon a time, a thought arose, where it came from no-one knows. Minds saw this thought and liked the idea behind the thought. The thought was about having a certain life in the physical. Many more minds liked the idea of this life in the physical and joined the thought, until there were many, many minds and their thoughts linked together, united in their decision to experience that projected life.

They sorted out a mother and a father and it began. The child was born and was named Joe Public. As Joe’s life progressed other minds were attracted as they saw the events that were planned for this life, and they wanted to be part of it, wanted to experience this life, and as it went along many minds came, and many minds left, having experienced the event that they wished to experience. So, the conglomeration of minds known as  Joe, went along, forever adding and losing minds, but always known as Joe and all those minds that had ever been Joe, ever been a part of Joe, always had the memory of the experience of being Joe. So Joe was a part of many minds and many minds were a part of Joe and so it went on and Joe went on forever, forever changing, forever adding new minds, losing old minds, but was forever Joe, and Joe was forever connected to every other mind that had ever been a part of him. And every other mind who remembered their experience with Joe was always connected to Joe. And so Joe never had a real identity because Joe was a part of the whole of all these minds. And so was every other Joe and every other Joanna. Everything that exists is all a part of everything, a part of the thought world, endless conglomeration of thought, endless gestalts of consciousness.

Received clairaudiently 2012

———

Rosenblum and Kuttner: “In principle…any two objects that have ever interacted are forever entangled.  The behaviour of one instantaneously influences the other.  An entanglement exists even if the interactions is through each of the objects having interacted with a third object.  In principle, our world has a universal connectedness.”

———–

 

 

…Our normal waking consciousness, rational consciousness as we call it, is but one special type of consciousness, whilst all about it, parted from it by the filmiest of screens, there lie potential forms of consciousness entirely different. We may go through life without suspecting their existence; but apply the requisite stimulus, and at a touch they are there in all their completeness, definite types of mentality which probably somewhere have their field of application and adaptation. No account of the universe in its totality can be final which leaves these other forms of consciousness quite disregarded. How to regard them is the question,- for they are so discontinuous with ordinary consciousness.                                                   William James

When reading this material you must think to yourself “does this insult my reason or does it fit in, make sense, is it understandable, is it acceptable even though it may be in opposition to something I previously believed. Can I now look at this and say “I can accept that, that makes sense, equally or more than that which I previously held to be true”.

“What is all this for”, the purpose is to teach, to learn and to understand. Simply because there is a wish there to understand. You have asked and you are being given. What is not realised is that all information is there for the asking. You merely have to find your own particular way of accessing that information. In this case a lot of knowledge has been accumulated but it now needs refining, clarifying and simplifying. We prefer to work with simple analogies that can be understood by many rather than by a few who have studied this subject in depth.

Now, life as you see it is relatively simple but so is life when you are not in the physical. There is no mystery, there is merely the same consciousness, the same self, if you wish, innumerable selves, innumerable consciousness groupings that wish to gain experience, and as referred to before, some entertainment along the way. It is basically gaining knowledge and why not do it in an enjoyable fashion and seek out which experiences you wish to repeat because they are enjoyable and which experiences you do not wish to repeat.

Let us move on to your other question of who we are. We are you, connected. As simple as that. You are accessing information and you are relaying it, the part of you that is understanding itself to be the instrument. Instruments generally find this information more acceptable when it comes from a third party whom they invest with a higher level of knowledge. They cannot believe that this knowledge is already within them or available. So we come back to one of the instruments favourite descriptions, to dis..cover. It is always there. You merely have to believe that you can access it. You can access this directly through your mind but do you believe it? There are many that have accessed knowledge unavailable to them in their normal waking state by merely entering into a form of meditative contemplation or what you would call musing upon a subject. Look at your great scientists, your great artists and your great thinkers, philosophers. They come up with theories and logical and mathematical depictions that seem to have a certainty about them. These are not all worked through rationally. They simply, came. They became aware of them because it was there to be accessed but while letting the mind rove in a particular focus they came across this information and were able to “remember” it because they had moved their focus away from the physical.

So again, this is more acceptable to the instrument and to many others because they simply cannot believe that this knowledge is available during the normal course of business. What do you do with this knowledge? You become aware that you are more than just the physical. That you are indeed what is called, the spirit. You are a larger consciousness merely focussing into a smaller arena and focussing so hard that you simply forget that there are many other areas in which you are able to focus and are indeed focussing upon anyway.

______

What has been passed through has been given in order that your selves and others can think in a new fashion. Can look at tired dogmas and see them not so much in a new light, but see an alternative that expands and enlarges upon the original point. Now the original point was taken as being factual, or what you like to call truth, until people began to question it and then a new truth arises. Now what you must remember is that however words are presented, they are presented to be receivable by those who are exposed to the information. Yet within months or years the message may have to be updated and may not even seem different, but once the possibility of something is elucidated then that opens the mind to whole new vistas and endeavours. So then an entirely new concept can be presented, which then is able to be considered and possibly assimilated, whereas if that concept had been introduced in the first place there would have been no framework in which to place it, and therefore it would have been rejected.

So, look upon all the information that is coming through at the moment. Is it logical? Is it reasonable? Discuss it with others. Hear their points of view because many of those have a closer relationship with their identity than they imagine they have. And so they will have their own opinions and you will listen to those and sometimes amend your own outpourings. So, just look upon the information as good for the moment. As it always has been of course.

________

It is, seek and ye shall find, ask and it shall be given to you. Why do teachers want to teach? They just want to spread knowledge. They want to, as you have through your life, wanted to see the light dawn in another’s eyes, to see them find themselves, to see them understand what they are capable of. Teachers, volunteer teachers, shall we say, wish to enlighten. They don’t wish to throw, this may seem egotistical, pearls before swine. The information that is imparted we would wish to be absorbed, understood and fitted into one’s structure of knowledge and for that to happen you must be open and willing and wanting that knowledge. Therefore it is much easier for us to fill the gaps that you feel are in your knowledge than to give you information that you have no structure in which to fit it. It is a waste of our time and yours. So this is a two way communication. You have to think and feel the desire to know “how does that work?” You just asked a question about the different animals and we answered it at a level that you could understand. Now think of other things.

We knew, for example, that you would be interested in love relationships because everybody is. So it was easy to describe that. We have elucidated how consciousness has thoughts, has ideas, others are attracted, decisions are made and the implicate, the latent, the Framework 2, is translated into the Framework 1. An experiment. If you wish to term it that way. One knows, however, that this “experiment” has a 99.99% chance of working because you design it to fit the existing parameters.

So, you might ask about the purpose of this life and as we have said before, the purpose of any life is what the consciousness desires to be the purpose. As soon as you sit and think about what you are doing, what you are thinking, you will soon realise that you are making your own purpose. Nobody is making the purpose for you. The only purpose in your life is what you wish it to be.

You might feel that your possibilities are constrained by the situation and the attachments that you have and so you will set your goals, shall we say, to suit what you consider to be a peaceful, acceptable……the word “purpose” again is another concept that is only applicable to the physical. It is applicable elsewhere of course because the same question is asked in other realities as you try to understand just exactly who you are. It takes long, long experience, the words “long” are wrong of course, as some consciousness’s simply do not want to accept that they are not, the larger element, shall we say. They do not wish to believe that the vehicles they control, they are controlling in a multi-consciousness capacity. They wish to feel that they are the top of the pyramid. Much as your leaders in every walk of life wish to feel that it is their thoughts, their utterings that prevail.

You must realise that consciousness is expressing itself, here, and that consciousness is just the same, there.

When we choose what we want to do here do we have to take others into consideration as well? Does that influence what we do?

And as you read back through what we have said, the only reason you are here is because you are working with others who all chose to work with you.

________

We would appreciate it if you post any comments on the Comments page accessible via the Index. Thank you.

______________________________________________________

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

The  desire to live life to the fullest, to acquire more knowledge, to abandon the economic treadmill, are all typical reactions to these experiences in altered states of consciousness. The previous fear of death is typically quelled. If the individual generally remains thereafter in the existential state of awareness, the deep internal feeling of eternity is quite profound and unshakeable.                                Edgar D. Mitchell.  Astronaut, Founder of The Institute of Noetic Sciences. 

There are things known and there are things unknown and in between are the doors of perception.                                                                                                            Aldous Huxley.

———-

Consciousness- from living lots of lives simultaneously to pure bliss.

Now with regard to being a unit of consciousness, consciousness, we can say at any time, can return to what the eastern religions refer to as Nirvana or a state of bliss, a state of awareness, and you can do this at any time you like. You simply switch off the television or the computer where you have been browsing innumerable websites, innumerable lives, if you wish, and you can say, I have had enough, and effectively you can decide to go to sleep. Now you will agree that when you are asleep you are still alive, you are simply not interested in what is going on with the body. You just put it on hold, or rather it waits for you, while you decide to turn your attention elsewhere into a dream state. Now one could equally say that you turn yourself into this Nirvana, this bliss, this meditative state where you decide to ignore all thoughts that come through, but of course you are units of consciousness and you cannot, extinguish your awareness. You can merely ignore the thoughts which pass in front of you, you can shut your eyes to them as best you can but consciousness cannot stay still.

Consciousness is in a state of always becoming, you may call it learning, you may call it experiencing, but it is a form of seeking for some kind of satisfaction, answers, fulfilment, there are many words which describe it. Sooner or later an idea comes in and you decide, yes that’s interesting, and before you know it you are involved and the state of meditative bliss, living in Nirvana, sitting on the right hand of God, is forgotten. You are in action again. Because you are in action, you are involved in dealing with lots of thoughts again, and of course, the one thought which attracted you brings in many associated thoughts, and at that stage another thing attracts you, and another and another. Suddenly you are living lots of lives once more. The excitement is contagious within yourself, and also, as you want to be involved in something, then this requires being involved with other consciousnesses in order to manifest this in the particular reality in which the idea is to be experienced and fulfilled. You find yourself swept up with many consciousnesses and in the excitement of the moment, you just simply forget that awareness in itself is something that you once considered to be a desired state. Very few consciousnesses retreat to a state of simple awareness for what you might say very long. The simply amazing infinitude of experiences and creativity, that is available, just vitalises your energy, you might say, to where you simply can’t wait to see what is round the next corner, what you can get involved with, how deeply you get involved with somebody. Of course, the same thing applies here. You can flit through dozens of activities in a day or you can immerse yourself in one, to the exclusion of others. Now you will be able to see a similarity here, between retreating to a state of awareness which is a one pointed focus, you might say, to completely immersing yourself in a particular activity.

So we can say that the beginning and the end are one and the same. The beginning, the one pointed focus of meditative bliss in which your focus is simply to ignore everything, is the same as being totally absorbed in a particular activity where that is the only focus you have at the time and you ignore everything else that is going on. One is in the complete mental world of, you would say, nothingness, and the other may be in a boisterous activity. Yet you are singularly focused in that, along with maybe millions, tens of millions, hundreds of millions of other consciousnesses, all fixated on the same program, or you may simply be alone in your room totally absorbed in a good novel. But in all cases, you are for the moment, totally unaware of all the other events which are going on in the reality and realities around you.

 

8 Feb 16
It’s been a hectic time for you. We do appreciate it. But it’s all in a good cause of which you are more than aware and let’s face it, it is quite exciting. We already know of course that it exciting for you but you probably don’t quite appreciate that it is exciting for us too. It is an experiment after all and we are one of the few on this side that can test out their experiments using your multimedia, so it’s all good fun. We see it going steadily along and every now and again there’ll be somebody, who can make an impact through their position, that will come along and give things a little extra push. But whatever it will still be helping far more than you realise. A lot of the people that come on will just take what they need and they won’t feel the need to tell you or to thank you, but we will know of it and we can already tell you that you have helped far more than you are aware of. We are just relaying the reassurance that what they have experienced themselves is indeed believable and that, together with some of your chapter headings has enabled them to reinforce their belief system so that they can feel comfortable in knowing that they are not forever parted. So I believe you have a question.
From your side, I presume there is a group of you, how much do each of you know what is going to be said?
We are all aware of the intensity we can see, it is almost, as we said before, like watching the results come in, in an election. You can see the votes being counted, it is not exactly that of course, but you can see the drift towards the consensus opinion and although we can dissent, we are part of that consensus opinion and we can’t put ourselves above that any more than you can when you are in the midst of a crowd baying for a goal. We are in advance of you of course, we know when the intensity is about to, say, erupt in the form of words but there isn’t much that we can do about it and generally as it is making pretty good sense then we are much in accordance with it. You must realise that those interested in answering the question are all of a certain knowledge, those who are not of that certain knowledge are generally not either interested or even privy to the operation that is being carried out. As we explained in our thought net analogy, like minds are sort of allowed into the decision chamber and the unlike minds are politely told that, maybe this isn’t the place for you.
That’s not to mean to say that it is biased, it means to say that you have to have a certain level of expertise before your opinion is given consideration. It is considered of course but may be quickly rejected. So there you are, that’s the answer. We know just a little bit ahead of you and, as we have said before, we are learning as you are learning.
We are not always aware that far ahead of you of what questions are going to come up next. If they are in your mind exactly, that would be ok but if they were in a company of people that come together then we would obviously be able to tune into them and find out what they are thinking and we would again be ahead of the game but until they turn up we won’t know who we are going to link with and so we won’t as you may feel be ahead of the game by days. Because it is all the present and, as we say, you can see intensities build but you can’t exactly say just who is going to be in the room in three years’ time for example. Has that given you some idea?
Yes Thank You. What would happen if you have two opposing opinions and the intensity is about 50/50 each way?
We would do what all good economists do, we would equivocate. We would say “on the one hand and on the other hand” and satisfy both sections.
Do you find that you have certain elements that have a tendency to take over the proceedings?
Not really, because you can have vehemence but then if the others turn their back then the whole thing falls flat. You know, you can’t just shout others down and cause the action to happen. In this kind of operation, imagine, there are an awful lot of consciousnesses involved, so one little minority will not be given precedence no matter how voluble they try to be and should they become a problem they will simply be excluded.
So it’s not quite like here where somebody can take hold of proceedings and hog them say.
Even where you are they can only do that if they are allowed to. If the majority turn around and say “shut up, get out, take the microphone away from that person” then it happens. Yes? They will not put up with, let us say, a heckler that refuses to be quiet. They will ask for him to be ejected. Once again, as above so below or the reverse. You are still the same here as you are there and will be here.
Now as we said the other night, this is going to be an enjoyable ride. You are going to feel good, both from the point of view of satisfaction of getting, as was said, plaudits, and also from the satisfaction of seeing the gladness in another’s heart as they realise that their loved ones, they will always be with them and one day they will be able to see again face-to-face and hug each other. And, you will actually have fun doing this. You may not think so but you will feel better. You have our energy coming in and that energy is enthusiastic and this will be transmitted to you. So you will feel more alive, more buoyant and it has many benefits. So once more, don’t be in doubt, we didn’t want to use the word fearful, there is no need to use that word, simply don’t be in doubt.
You know, if you look at what we have said, what you have transcribed in the last week or two, and the direct words from us to you, you must realise that we do know what we are doing, we do know what we are saying and if we tell you that this is going to go quite nicely as far as we are concerned then that will be the same for you because, as we repeat interminably, you and I are one. Does that make you feel a little more at ease?
Thank you.
Now David wonders at times whether anybody joins him when he is dancing. Once again, those who have exited the plane, some of them who are addicted to certain activities or have bonds here, like to merge and get the feeling once more. So anything is possible isn’t it?
Yes.
So, you must wonder at times who is singing as David does. It doesn’t really matter does it because what the name was may not be the same conglomeration of consciousness today. Even so the pattern stays, the ability stays and new consciousnesses may decide to resurrect this pattern, shall we say, and use the physical instrument to make the voice sound again you see. You could say reincarnation, couldn’t you?
Yes.
Again, we wouldn’t want to put names on these things because then the inevitable comparisons would start. Out would come the old records, the old tapes and nobody would recognise the fact that the voice of the singer when he was twenty may be entirely different from his voice when he was fifty and also he may have changed his style and he may have switched from say, being a tenor to a baritone if he had had some alterations to his vocal cords due to heavy smoking say or something else or simply age. So it’s best that you don’t know, just enjoy it.
So are we likely to see any other changes in the Dave that we know?
Again who knows? If the desire is there, then or if, the probe goes out once more in exploration, “What else is there I can experiment with, I can see what happens”? At the moment there is no desire, there appears to be quiet satisfaction with the voice and the singing and it would appear that one is trying to hang on to the voice, but again the desire’s got to be there and if it is pleasure to listen to then gradually it may become a habit, but of course you have had the original for an awful long time and some old dogs are hard to teach new tricks to.

You cannot be aware of your “self“.

You cannot be aware of your “self”, you can only be aware of what you are aware of. “not sure what you mean by that”. We will come back to what Seth says, “as the eye cannot see itself so the ego cannot see itself”. The consciousness that is the ego cannot see itself, so you cannot see yourself, except as a reflection.If there is nothing to reflect you could not see your face, you would have to rely on other consciousnesses to tell you who you are. “To tell you what you look like” Tell you what you look like, but also to a certain degree tell you who you are, because if you had nobody to else to look at, to talk to, how would you know what sort of person you are. “That’s true.” So in the same way the personality cannot see itself, it can only see what is reflected to it and then judge what it is by its reflection.

Unsolicited information.

You have constantly desired to have a deep rich voice, a dark brown voice as you termed it.  Now, you have explained, this afternoon, how you can instruct your body consciousness to follow new programs, adapt, and respond to orders automatically if it senses those orders come from the source that normally instructs it. Now you have requested, and you and the observer are one, so you have basically given yourself that which you desire, and as your body is being recreated in every second, it is no difficult feat to reorder the structure of your vocal chords minutely, but also, to access the information whereby when you sing your breath work is different. You have merely been doing what the people you have read about have been doing. They have learnt how to paint, they have learnt how to play musical instruments, like those who are long dead. You have learnt to sing. Painting, playing, singing are all aspects of physical activity. So, you are learning to create your own reality, you are on the threshold, but you have one foot over the threshold. In the same way you have learnt to speak, again, to put it in modern day parlance, you have merely downloaded the program of which, of course, there are many examples. Now, the interesting part is, what else is there that you could conceive of, that you may be able to focus upon, that access the Akashic records, shall we say, in order to obtain the ability, the aptitudes, the attributes that you feel will make you into a better version of what you already are.

 

If one puts oneself in the state of the higher consciousness or move to that viewpoint then it must be something like a self-imposed set of gateways whereby the higher consciousness does not want to divulge its, what you might call, its secret thoughts. Perhaps because we are talking a composite consciousness here, is there some element of the composite or gestalt that is basically given the task of keeping all the rest of the gestalt in the dark, shall we say, so that the instrument and the majority of the observers are taken by surprise and experience the highs and lows, the joys and agony across the spectrum, the relief and the temporary despair until the end of the play.

Some part must know what is happening in the script, surely. Because some elements, although there may be probabilities, are predicted with quite some precision in which case there must have been, as in all co-creations, some form of planned sequence of events and goals albeit we all create them for the enjoyment of all participants. But like with anything else there are some who know what is planned and others to whom the announcements come as a surprise even though the plans were drawn up far earlier in the case of time and in many cases the actions carried out to achieve certain ends. While all around those watching the various actions did not put two and two together and see where it was going to end up.

So, although I’m talking from the point of view of my higher consciousness can I break into the operations room, the planning department or the board meeting and see which destination this ship is heading to?  But then, do I want to? Once more, I am here to enjoy these highs and lows from my part of the focus and should the instrument part of the conglomerate find out what lies in store, would then the wishes of the majority be thwarted?

It would appear that the operations room, the planning dept. and the boardroom are on higher floors of the building and you need a key to operate the lift and there are no stairs.

That’s what I was getting. I sensed “them” looking down saying (in an amused tone) “Yes, you know what it is about but you are not going to be able to get here”. 

You have to make a decision yourself in a way. Take the conglomerate. You have got all the pieces playing their part, obviously the focused element is playing its part as well. It is like having scouts out there, go and find out what is happening on the ground, get up close and personal and wire it back. We are back in headquarters here but we need to know. So if “I”, whatever it is, physical body and its perceptions, have taken on the job of being right in the middle of the play then the only way you are going to get to be in headquarters is to leave the play. Straightaway I get “It is your choice”.

Well, that puts the ball in our court doesn’t it?

 

Can you give us any advice about going into trance and allowing somebody else to speak through you?  Could you find yourself in another reality and not get back?

Just be aware. All the time that you feel that the communication is sensible and sticks to the subject then you can be reasonably sure that the source is yourself. You are just accessing the knowledge that is available to all. Now it is perfectly possible for another intelligence to not only send you words and images but to temporarily manipulate your instrument. Now this is usually when you are in the clairvoyant mode, fully awake and aware that you are transmitting evidential information from the communicator to the recipient. You always know that you are in full control.

When you go into trance, relax, still your mind and let the words flow through. Now, one of the reasons you have somebody looking after you in a physical circle, and really you should have in a trance circle, is to make sure that if any unwanted manipulator, shall we say, decides to muscle his way in and use the instrument for his own purposes, and there are some powerful consciousnesses out there, or else in a moment of inattention somebody can jump in the driving seat, shall we say, then there is someone there to call you back.

Do not let yourself drift too much. It won’t improve the situation any more, in fact it will actually worsen the transmission. When you are awake your brain is fully active and we can, from this side,  access the words, pictures, concepts etc. whatever we need to, because the machinery is running. Now if you let your focus slip away to somewhere else, what are we going to focus through? You have switched away to say, a dream mode, for want of a better word, another focus anyway and therefore you have, for all intents and purposes, left your physical brain on tickover. So it is not operating to full capacity and you must also be aware that you are a participant in this transmission. Although we have complained that you get in the way we couldn’t actually do this without your compliance because as you are fully aware that if you did not allow it, it would simply not happen. So just remember it is a co-creation, keep aware, keep an eye open and make sure what is coming through is sensible and there will be no problem.

 

How much of this is David considering all that he has read?

In order to be able to put a lot of these concepts across it is necessary to have an instrument with the requisite vocabulary and it makes it a lot easier if they have the requisite structures. Because it is quite easy to pick the segments of knowledge out and string them together into a coherent and understandable presentation. It will always with any channelling be the fact that the instrument will have a certain amount of knowledge and also you must remember that it has to be filtered through the belief, and that is knowledge, system. This information could not be transmitted through a person who had no knowledge, whatsoever, of this field of metaphysics and consciousness simply because the language wouldn’t be there and the belief system would prevent the information being transmitted. You must have a sympathetic instrument with sufficient vocabulary and openness to the concepts being presented, for them to be able to be passed through.

________

When people go into trance who is coming through their voice box?

Let us say that the consciousness who is operating the instrument, and again if we take the analogy of the bus or the cruise ship or the plane or the tour company or the lure of streets paved with gold in another land, how many instruments if we talk from the physical level, or how many consciousnesses if we talk from the non-physical level, that wish to experience that particular idea, can be part of, linked to, co-operate with, vote their leaders, but still be tapped into every feeling, emotion, that comes through. How many consciousnesses can be involved in any one life, any one instrument? We do not know. The number can vary as we have conjectured before. It can be a few at one time and hundreds of thousands or millions, or whatever you wish to say, we have no idea at any time. This can be allied to one of your radio or television programmes. Are we ever certain at any time how many people are tuning in? When you broadcast information on a certain wavelength, unless there is reciprocity, you have no idea of how many people are actually receiving i.e. tuned into the broadcast. So when it comes to ”who” is speaking, then this activity that is happening at the moment is relatively rare and therefore attracts the interest of many consciousnesses and those consciousnesses are not interested in general in the day to day life of the instrument. Are you aware of what we are saying? So at this stage the consciousness that normally comprises the instrument’s influencing entity or gestalt, and though it waxes and wanes, is greatly expanded because of the interest in this and even more so when information is required to be delivered. As we said earlier, the information deriving from the experience of a multitude of other consciousnesses is also drawn upon. So how can we give an identity to this sort of constantly fluctuating mass of interconnection that has never had an identity such as you would recognise. We can use a name but that is just meaningless.

________

It appears that we have two beings, two aspects working through David at the same time. Can you tell us what it is that is being experienced? How do the two beings relate to each other?

The two questions are part of the same question. It is not two beings it is one consciousness which again, if you wish, is part of the total consciousness. This aspect of the total consciousness is the, if you refer to it as a gestalt, consciousness that is focused in the physical as well as elsewhere, then as we are aware it is possible to be involved in many physical minds at once.

Now most entities, (people) self-described entities, only define themselves in terms of physical description. What their senses tell them, what their thoughts tell them, what their beliefs tell them. But for those few who challenge the accepted “normal” and realise that there is every possibility that their consciousness has the ability to focus in several places simultaneously, then it quickly becomes apparent that different attitudes, beliefs, attributes, traits, whatever you wish to call all these different aspects of manifestation, could be, let us say, accessed via the centre by each constricted consciousness, shall we say. On the basis that the overall gestalt consciousness, in this case we mean the gestalt and not the one, then that consciousness has, as we said before, a finger in many pies. A focus in different lives but it keeps these separated in order to avoid confusion and chaos in each individual “play” in which it is an actor. Which you can easily see the rationale for. However should there be one of the actors who is aware that there are other plays going on, then he has the possibility to route his awareness to the gestalt and access the “plot”, shall we say, of another play (life), and from that can take advantage of those aspects which are being manifested elsewhere that appeal to, let us say, desired by the entity. Much as one would wish to play wonderful piano, if you hold that desire long enough and work hard and long at it, you will probably achieve that. But if you have not got that degree of desire or motivation you will not.

However with minor aspects of presentation you will find no difficulty in “substituting” your normal “stream of influence”, shall we say, from the gestalt for another line of influence which is generally expressed in that other play.

Are you saying that somebody from another play can interlope the current play?

No. What we are saying is, assume you are a consciousness in play A but you realise that play A is not all there is, you realise there is a possibility of play B but you don’t know where play B is being enacted. However you are aware that the producer of both play A and play B is therefore connected and gives directions to the actor in both play A and play B. So if you attune your consciousness clearly and closely to that of the producer you can effectively pick up telepathically the thoughts of the producer. And because the producer is obviously, in order to influence, telepathically connected with both the actor in A and B you can access that bank of knowledge. Now from that point if by accessing that bank of knowledge you can “see” a stream of influence going to the actor in play B, and that is an attribute that you would like to express as well, then you could say you could divert or blend with that other stream of influential thought. Without necessarily, possibly, the producer having to agree, although it is likely that the producer would have to agree. But it may not be. You may simply, as in a dream, enter into another dimension. But in this case you are merely tuning in to the other transmission.

So I assume Dave is tuning into another play, play B and he is choosing an aspect of that play that he likes and bringing it back with him to play A.

Adopting it.

Adopting it, but he is obviously not adopting the words from play B. He is only adopting the mannerisms from play B. Am I correct in that?

Is the personality defined by its beliefs, its mannerisms, its actions? Would you ever say that the personality is defined simply in terms of the spoken word?

Oh no.

Then you have your answer.

Therefore it brings back just the personality from play B and nothing else.

Yes. Absolutely. Obviously it would not be in the interests of the actor in play A to have the words being spoken in play B which would be utterly meaningless in the act going on in play A.

Therefore, are you saying that, the fact that what we are terming as David coming into play A is not making any difference to play A at all?

No, not at all. Think of it as a piano player. OK, you are a piano player, you hear another piano player that plays with an entirely different touch and you feel, “how can I learn that touch?” You both play the same notes but that player’s touch, he produces a sound that is far more melodious, acceptable, soft, musical, the sound is entirely different. His touch is so delicate and ethereal. The sound that he brings out of a piano is totally different and so the same goes for any musical instrument. This is what you are talking about. You are talking in how the instrument is operated, not in what is spoken in this case. In the same way is how the musical instrument is operated, nothing to do with which tune is being played.

You are looking more at the accent and mannerisms and not at the actual words that are spoken.

Yes, you are looking at the manipulation of the instrument.

Now there are some aspects that are more involved with what is being said in the slightly more dictatorial manner of the voice known as David.

When you play the piano would you expect each note that is played to be better than yours, or would you think well yes, overall he produces a far more melodious sound than I do but I think, I actually play the top notes better than he does or he doesn’t play the top notes as well as I do, they slightly jar. So, the same thing applies, one person has an overall technique, let us say 85% is perfect but the other 15% isn’t quite perfect. You could take the same with golf, everything is good except for the sand play.

So, is it possible to get the perfect parts from each player?

Practice. With practice you can reach the desired level of perfection that you desire.

So, in this particular case has Dave got to practice to get the best parts of David without the not quite so good parts or has David got to practice to get the better parts of Dave to join his better parts?

Look at who, in this case, started off with the desire, Dave, and what he has desired he has received, but in order to receive that, one has had to access another instrument that is being played and like most things, either we can take the musical instrument or we can take the game of golf, we say that 90% of the manipulation, be it of the keys or be it of the golf club, is, “I really do like it.” But you can say, “I don’t think much of the other 10% and I wouldn’t do that that way, I would do this my way.” So yes you can pick and choose, but as in the initial tuning in you get the whole stream and from that then you must develop a skill in order to only receive. This is a matter of fine tuning, by fine tuning, that’s the best description we can give, because the term fine tuning means just greater clarity, but in our case we are saying, “you are fine tuning in that you tune out the discordant aspects.” It is like turning up the base and turning down the treble or whatever, putting in or taking out reverberation.

How does that affect play B?

Does not affect play B in the least, simply because you have tuned in to the thought influence from the centre to the actor in play B. Play B is not affected, but, it is possible that the actor in play B, because of…. It is possible for the reverse to apply, that the actor in play B may be of the same seeking as the actor in play A and therefore, there may be some ingredient of exchange.

You are almost saying, possibly they could be swapping roles.

Exchanging techniques.

For what purpose would you say this is happening? Why have these two aspects been brought together in this life?

Now, are you talking about David and Jean here?

No, I am talking about Dave and David.

Simply expansion of consciousness, expansion of awareness, expansion of knowing “who you are”. Dave has been seeking the knowledge of “who we are”, we all are, who you are, who is, in case there is any mix up, along with many, many people in the physical plane and the desire is there, like those who have sufficient desire to practice consciously leaving the body, a certain few manage to achieve that goal. In this case you may say, “Unconsciously, Dave has in a fashion achieved the same thing. He has allowed his consciousness to roam, to probe until it finally was able to tune in to something else. The reverse of mediumship where you simply still your vibration and let others tune in to you. So, the brain is a receiver/transmitter, whereas the medium generally puts themselves in a receiving mode, you can also attain the ability to transmit your desire and that may be received by another consciousness, identity, whatever, who may then transmit back or you can look at it a different way in that you need the ability to scan the other broadcasts and then lock on. In much the same way as those not in the body can scan the medium’s frequency and lock on and then transmit. So you can lock on and receive even without that other person being aware. In other words, mind reading, if you wish to bring it down to a physical level. Tuning in to someone else’s thoughts, but it is basically your own higher consciousness. If that higher consciousness is connected to wherever it is connected you can find a route through, assuming you know where to look. But, invariably one does not know where to look, one merely stumbles. But, if the desire was a certain attribute then, just like the internet, you plug in your stated quest and you will be lead to the appropriate source. Is that clear? If one remembers that everything is connected, then it is just like going through a maze, but instead of there being dead ends all over the place, desire is like a key that unlocks the doors that are blocked off in the maze, leading you directly to your goal. Can you see?

So this melding of Dave and David, of what benefit is that to this life?

Why do you engage in all the activities you engage in? Of what benefit to you in this life is dancing or playing golf.

Just pleasurable.

Exactly. Where did the desire arise? Desire arises to have more pleasure in listening to how you speak. So if that makes you feel better, does it actually make you act better as well? Maybe yes, maybe no. But if it makes you feel better it is no different to any other skill that you wish to excel in. So you go searching and you practice, and the more you practice the better you get.

So how do you feel this is affecting David and Jean’s relationship?

In any relationship each party has to voice their opinion, their feeling, nervousness, serenity regarding the manifestation they are confronted with. If it is acceptable you say so or if you have some concern as to whether this different manifestation may interfere with the hitherto stable relationship, the harmonious relationship, like any other behaviour change you discuss it. In this case there is simply something to which one is not used to. Therefore, is it pleasing, is it not pleasing? Is it pleasing to the person who is manifesting it and if so, if it is not displeasing to you, then surely you are happy that the manifester is happy. So when you practice your golf, when someone shows you how to perform a certain shot and it doesn’t immediately happen as you expect it to happen consistently, do you give up or do you say, with practice this will work as I wish it to work.

We go back to what we said earlier, practice with awareness.

Would you say it is possible to go to a play one year and go to the play the second year with the same actors and see subtle differences in the way that they are now interacting with each other.

Yes.

That is your answer. Each experience, each interaction slightly modifies the ensuing action. Of course, you can go backwards and forwards. You can try the new way and then you can say, I think I prefer the old way. The producer however will use his influence to produce the effects he wishes to see. Both plays are kept separate it goes without saying. As you would expect the producer may borrow a technique from one play to use in the other.

So how should we proceed from here?

How does life proceed?

One step at a time.

Absolutely. Take it as it comes, accept what you wish to accept, reject what you do not wish to accept. If the cap fits, then enjoy it. If it doesn’t, then destroy it.

Remember, it is all a game. Nothing is forever, nothing is to be taken to be irreversible, any decision can be turned into the opposite decision at any time.

 

Do those transmitting blend with mediums when mediums are giving a message and find parts of their body moving without their conscious intent?

With permission one consciousness can control the instrument of another consciousness. We gave you the example of the dual controlled car. You can come along, in a figure of speech, put your head through the window, say would you mind if I sat in and experienced driving this car, because actually I have a friend down the road and I want him to see me driving this car. So translate that back to wanting to move a body in a particular manner that will promote instant recognition in the recipient of that visual depiction and associate it with one who has passed on. You say blend, you merely ask can I use your car? Can I control your puppet in other words? Give me the controls because I wish to make a few signs which will be recognised by my wife and she will think, ah, my husband is still alive. Very simple, if you think of the instrument as a puppet then just hand the controls over, just for a moment and thank you very much mission accomplished. So, blending, same thing, it is just that I have given you a three dimensional image but just as you know that there is no solidity, then you can just say that the energy blends and a different hologram is projected. We are covering this from as many angles as we can.

Thank you. Now, we hear of planes of existence. Would you comment on planes of existence please?

We spoke about levels the other day, these are just like your music of the spheres and other theories that arise from limited projections into other states of mind. There are as many levels, if you wish to call it levels, as there are states of mind. Now, of course, like you see all around you there are those of like mind and those of nearly like mind and those who, while they may not be fully in agreement would say, but this is quite a nice place so I would happily keep my views to myself and just nod and therefore, conglomeration of semi like states, and like states occur. We are trying not to use words denoting space or time. There are certain intensities and so you can equate a number of intensities with a number of levels with a number of planes. Can you see? You could look upon this in terms of the magnets and iron filings, imagine similarities of thought attracting iron filings, then stack your different similarities of thought into levels or planes you will see different amounts of iron filings being attracted by the different magnetic levels of thought. So, as usual, and coming back to previous questions, all elements of the spectrum from one extreme to the other have their adherents but the majority will group around a centrally agreed position with lesser and lesser amounts going to either extreme. You understand that.

 

Do souls develop without coming to the physical plane?

Of course, there are infinite states of mind. If the idea of the physical plane is not one that takes your fancy then you don’t bother to come and the word develop that you have used is immaterial, irrelevant because you are always in a state of mind occasioned by what you are focusing on, so as your focus changes your state of mind changes, so as you look for one experience you put the previous experience aside. You are always in a state of forever becoming, you do not develop as such. You can, if you wish, use the term expand your consciousness by focusing into far more realities than the average consciousness. There are those, as we referred to the other day, that are better at multitasking than others.

Yes. If everything has always existed, i.e. all that is, energy, consciousness, whatever, we are saying that souls have always existed, if so, who or what activates them to seek experience and do some souls simply move from one experience to another forgetting the previous one.

You have just asked the question which we have just answered.

It is, it is just a different way.

But with regard to the infinite question, shall we say, what makes you think that simply because we are currently existing in a reality which we have created ourselves, not dissimilar, we do not mean in physical terms we mean the reality of one’s own creation therefore not dissimilar, what makes you think that anyone in any reality is aware of his origin? You soon come to accept that you simply are and that you have always been, therefore, you do not search. If you had not discovered what your scientists call red shift, the big bang theory would not have originated and the steady state theory would have prevailed.

How do we know when we are connected to our higher mind? How can we connect more to our higher mind?

You have the example speaking to you at the moment. The instrument is, we will not say baffled, or in awe of, but is quite puzzled, shall we say, and somewhat at a loss to explain how, when he is in what you would call, an altered state and with closed eyes, he is able to produce material of, let us say, quality and knowledge that he deems far more proficient than his waking self. As we stated, there is a fine division between, in inverted commas, “ourselves” and David, who is of course, one of us also.

Do you have anything else that you wish to say to us tonight?

You ask how you can get in touch and recognise that you have contacted a source of knowledge which you can then attribute to being that of your higher self. Then follow the pathway of those who trust that it can be done. Have an open mind and to tiresomely repeat the phrase “seek and ye shall find”, “ask and it shall be given to you” and we will add “try, try, try again and someday you will succeed”.

Thank you.

 

The Mechanics of Trance Communication.

What is the difference when David has got his eyes closed as opposed to having his eyes open as to who is involved in the transmission of the information. If David gave a talk with his eyes open would he be able to communicate in the way that he does with his eyes closed?

It is a matter of belief and trust. When someone stands up to do clairvoyance they simply trust that the communicators will appear and that trust opens the gates and allows it to happen. You stand there without judgement, without analysis, you just pass on what you receive, you transmit it in other words.

To a certain degree this is what is happening when you decide that you are going to go into the trance communication mode you might say. If you can believe that you can say this just as well when you are awake as you can when you have your eyes closed, even though you are still awake, then it will happen. You remember when we said ”we talked to you in the car”, that was because David was in a semi-detached mode driving on automatic you might say, effectively relaxed and we were able to come through and talk. David didn’t even realise what was happening because he wasn’t aware and therefore he wasn’t on guard.

So once you get around to believing that you really are one and the same then you will be able to talk in just the same manner in your normal conversational style with eyes open as you do with your eyes closed.

On the other hand varying amounts of consciousness are involved in various activities. Certain functions do not attract as much interest as others. Some consciousnesses identify so completely with the body that they forget that they are able to go to the back of the theatre. But for those who are at the back of the theatre and for those who are waiting for the signal, then they can come and join in and that will in general elevate the standard of conversation and of knowledge. Those who want to teach are not going to identify closely with the body, they will just wait for the opportunity to step in and teach. You must remember that the consciousnesses that are tightly allied to the body are in the position, you might say, of thinking that they are learning as well.  Though if they were able to pull themselves away from that intense focus in the physical they would find that they already knew what was being said anyway.

Once more it all comes down to your degree of focus. The closer you focus in, the closer you identify, the more you forget who you are and where you came from and how it all works. It’s not rocket science, once you think about it it’s pretty mundane stuff really. You don’t have teachers round you all the time, do you? You have to go along and listen to them. Well reverse that, they come to you. When the time is right, they appear. The old saying ‘When the pupil is ready the teacher will appear’. Well the teachers appear and as we just said but didn’t make it quite clear, when they start to speak the ones who are closely allied to the physical realise that this is something which is at the moment beyond their ken, and listen.

The intensity is such that the teachers can get through what they want to say.

Thank you. So should David now try to speak with his eyes open?

He certainly can but the best way for him to realise that he is one and the same is for the question to be in flow and for him to open his eyes and see whether the same degree of intelligence continues or whether his fears and doubts step in and he narrows down, let us say, the available flow by putting his own belief restrictions around the conduit.

Look at it this way. When you are awake and fully connected with your eyes open to the physical then the ones who are constantly with you, involved in every aspect of your life, have their belief systems. These are the ones who have basically forgotten who they are and where they come from. So they have the rigid belief systems and they basically, even though they are still acting as a conglomerate, are not aware that what is being spoken is being spoken by the conglomerate. They all think that they are the “I” and that they are the originators of the spoken words and the actions. But when all the readings and experiments go on and all the experience is gathered then the intensity of thought of the mass is such that they now know that other things are possible. That is how the mediumship started, by trial and error, by experience and then it was easy to switch to trance.

Now when it comes to the trance it is still difficult for David; when we say David we’ll say the group consciousness of David, because then the whole thing will be easier to explain. So that group consciousness, which has got the belief systems, once they start reading the material which has been transcribed says ”well I didn’t know all this” and it’s true, they don’t know all this. They do but they have forgotten or they have shut it out and so it comes as a surprise or quite new although it is absorbed quite easily. You can imagine the reason it is absorbed quite easily and accepted, because it is fitting into a system of beliefs that already exists even though they are hidden from the view of the consciousnesses that are in the day-to-day life. Gradually the realisation is dawning that it is all one and slowly confidence will build and at some stage you will just be able to talk directly. Put it this way, the expanded consciousness that appears and is able to get through when the eyes are shut will be able to get through when the eyes are open. The barriers won’t be up. Just as the barriers came down for the mediumship then the barriers will come down for this advanced knowledge to be transmitted.

After all, if lectures have to be given or even a Skype conversation or something, it doesn’t look too good to have someone just sitting there with their eyes closed does it? It would be better if the words were able to come through and be accepted as somebody with very good knowledge and a very good connection with his higher self, shall we say. As long as the proof of the pudding is in the eating, as long as the material is of a high standard, it won’t really matter whether the eyes are open or shut. Some would prefer to see the eyes shut so that they feel that the words are coming from a higher source because with the eyes open they may feel that “this is just an ordinary person’. But you can’t win them all, can you?

So did that all sound ok to you?

Yes.

Certainly does to….I was going to say me….. but I should say me shouldn’t I? Because me and I and them, we’re all the same thing. It is quite difficult to understand, not quite understand, probably it’s a sense of not wanting to feel that you are more than you really are or that you are privy to the higher knowledge.

But of course you are, because when the teachers come, or the other consciousnesses arrive, they become David as well. They become “I am experiencing David” and they wait to see what words come out. “Here we are, we are experiencing David and this is what he is saying” because it is what we are all thinking. Each one will say “ that was me talking” even though they know that ”yes, it was me and a whole lot of others, a whole lot of other me’s, but yes, I was able to sit there and sound really intelligent”. And so were we all, but that is the joy of all pulling together and pooling our resources, pooling our knowledge and we all learn together.

Another way of explaining the interconnectedness of thought and the interconnectedness of knowledge, because if you (consciousnesses involved) listen to what is being said you know that the vast majority of you think that way. If there isn’t prevarication and equivocation then you can happily take on board the concepts, opinions, beliefs whatever, that are expressed because you think that there is safety in numbers. ‘We may be wrong but at least we will all be wrong together’, but until something better comes along we can rest happily in what we know at the moment.

________________________________________________________

We would appreciate it if you post any comments on the Comments page accessible via the Index. Thank you.

______________________________________________________

“Time is not at all what it seems to be. It is not flowing in one direction, and the future exists simultaneously with the past.”                         Albert Einstein

———-

 Would you care to expand on the above quote?

This is an area where using the language of the physical plane makes it extremely difficult to give any understanding. Simply because the language of the physical plane derives from a time based system. You can only approach this by seeing yourself as something peculiarly non-deteriorating, we will not say indestructible, but non-deteriorating. So let us take the case of gold. You imagine that gold appears to last forever, does not seem to lose its substance over time, as do most other materials, and now imagine that everything would be made of similar materials. In other words whatever you consider that holds the atoms of gold together would also hold the atoms of everything that you know of together. Then there would be no atrophy, nothing would change, it would always be the same. Would you agree?

Gold does wear away doesn’t it?

Gold left sitting..

I see what you mean. Not touching anything else.

You can always abrade anything. Imagine everything… you must follow…expand your mind because we are trying to give you an analogy you can understand. If you wish to bring…..

I was just clarifying.

You are talking about what you perceive not your actions. If everything was made of a non- atrophying material, that doesn’t lose its shine, doesn’t lose its form, doesn’t lose any of its capabilities, then nothing around you would change. You must realise that you cannot suddenly introduce, ah, what about the clouds moving, and things like this. You must look at this as totally static, nothing is changing. But then you move your focus and as you move your focus you then will see what appears to you to be movement, or time but when you move your focus back you will find that nothing has changed. Are you with me? Would you say then that time has passed?

No, because you would not realise that it had.

So, when you look to the future it was there, but when you looked to the past you had previously seen, it was still there. So, you will conclude, the past, the future are co-existing. So all you do is you explore and investigate and what happens? It expands your consciousness. You expand your awareness of what there is to experience. Now, from the physical plane you will say time passed but remember when you are in the sort of dimension that we have just described you will not have invented the concept of time (or decay) because everything is still there. You simply look at this, look at that, look at the other. Now, again, let us go back to your scientists. Your scientists say energy cannot be destroyed only transformed, and we know that energy appears from nowhere and goes back into nowhere. This is electrons, so called, changing orbit or virtual waves appearing and disappearing etc., but the underlying basis of everything doesn’t change. It merely forms and un-forms, forms and un-forms, in different places, we call it different places, in different fashions but it doesn’t change. So, time does not exist for consciousness if you say that consciousness is the basis of everything. If you say that electrical waves, or quantum waves, or whatever, your various other waves, that people keep inventing names for are infinite, are always there, and you are saying the same thing about your world made of gold and other non-decaying material. So, whatever is…. This is somewhat difficult to explain in that we can say that the whole basis of form is latent, it is potential. Now, as to whether all has been formed is a moot point because one simply has to look to see whether it exists or someone else has thought of it and it is not quite as easy as it is made out to be. But one can easily agree that the potential everything has always existed and will always exist. But just as you only care to inhabit certain comfortable parts of the world and most of your other fellow inhabitants of the earth are of the same inclination, then you do not inhabit hot deserts or the freezing mountains, you choose your locations. What we are saying is you choose where you tend to focus and what you want to experience. Therefore there may be many, many forms and events that have not yet attracted sufficient consciousness to make them manifest and yet they exist. It depends on what you call existence, they may not exist on the physical plane but they exist in the plane of imagination, the plane of design, although they cannot be experienced physically until they are manifest in the physical plane. Are you with me?

Now, just for a moment imagine that consciousness, a group of consciousness, decided that why don’t we put together a plan for a dinosaur once more, let’s take the dinosaur plan and make one on earth. What would be the purpose of that and for how long would it exist? It would be in the wrong environment, it would not fit in with the overall scheme of things and it would be quickly destroyed. So, would you go to all this effort…

If it was going to be destroyed that quickly.

And also because you had already focused upon that area.

Done it before.

Yes. That had been explored. That doesn’t mean to say that it still doesn’t exist. Because just as you expect to live on, so did the dinosaurs and so they do. But they have chosen their own habitats.

Yes. Just not where we are at the moment.

Just even take your present day situations and where even humans are choosing not to be in certain places.

This can all be understood if you realise that the past, present and future are all available from the present time. The present can be present in the past, the present and the future and alternatively for the other two. Now, it is easy enough to see how one can focus the consciousness on another area and, if we call it travelling clairvoyance one can see that area. You could say that it is an out of body experience and the same factors that are used in surveying and hearing the goings-on while in an out of body experience can be utilised in a remote viewing capacity.

Now, when it comes, to let us say, viewing the past, it is possible to take the view that the vibrational pattern of anything existing in the past, in that particular space, still exists and that anybody viewing remotely that has the capacity to view across a wide spectrum of frequencies, shall we say, for your understanding, is able to see the different patterns i.e. energy patterns, blueprints, ideas that were subsequently manifested into the physical world, even though they have now been, you would say, destroyed, from a physical point of view. This can be seen as a logical and rational explanation even though you may have to stretch to believe that the energetic blueprint still exists. However it is when you come to the future that the resistance comes in as the whole basis of the belief in free will is brought into question.

If you can imagine that anything, is a predetermined plan in the mind of a participant, one must also include in this definition those participants who are not of the physical, who reside, as we have discussed before, in a dimension where there is no time and therefore something which may occur, to you, many years in the future, may already be in the mind, even to a blueprint and a fleshed-out total plan of what a consciousness plans to do.

Now, as you think from a physical and time-based point of view you will see predictions that are far into the future and say “but that wasn’t even planned then”. The people weren’t even employed, there was nothing planned. But you must remember, all those instruments, you may say, were already planned by their controlling consciousnesses who, we will reiterate, reside in the world of no time. Therefore you can imagine yourself musing on different ideas, living in a world of ideas, {thinking}, we could do this, we could do that, we could do the other, what would we do if we did this? Imagine the vast array of different scenarios that could be played out in the mind, especially if you imagine minds that can work far faster than the speed of today’s computers, this will go some way to you realising that in a world of no time basically infinite scenarios can be envisaged. Let us put it this way, for a particular location, if various scenarios are worked out,  possible scenarios shall we say, then leading on to probable, as events are chosen because once the ball is started in motion more events become probable rather than possible. So these ideas for that particular location then have a connection, there is immediate association e.g.; in the case of your air marshal who saw the future operation of the airport, all those potential ideas were already existent and had an association or mental connection with that particular site even though no physical mind, you might say, had any idea, at the time he saw it, that this would happen. But in another realm, another dimension the possibility had already been fleshed out.

What we are told is that everything that ever was, is and ever will be already is, already exists. Back to the block of stone, every possible sculpture exists within it and so it is the question of when which scenarios apply to which times and which locations. Do you understand?

In that obviously the uniforms and the planes at an airport wouldn’t show up in your back yard. They will only show up in an appropriate place and as such in an appropriate time.

Unless your backyard in some future time was going to become an airport.

Again, that would already have its intention. So, ideas come, we would not say with a firm intention but with a possible intention. So, one could speculate that the future picture seen by the air marshal could have been applied at any other airport but because of the association maybe that was intended to be.

Beliefs,memory and time.

There is not a “day” that exists after death. There is, we can only say memory, within each participating consciousness of, the experience of that idea……. we will take a different tack here….you are looking, from your point of view, at a timeline which says that consciousness arises at birth but then continues after so-called death. Yet you are willing to say “how do you choose to come”. You must step back and widen your focus to see that consciousnesses are involved before birth and that consciousnesses are involved after death.

As you take that view you will see that before you arrive the idea arises and so in time terms it takes time for the intensity to develop for manifestation to occur. Then at what you call ”death”, it will take time for the intensity that arose for the manifestation to dissipate. The belief system that arises already is in actuality before conception because there is a belief in the idea of what you are going to do and where you are going to come and what you are going to experience. Then those beliefs get changed as you go through physical life, as consciousnesses join and leave and you get lost in the drama and at physical death you still have the same beliefs. The consciousnesses still have the same beliefs. At death the focus switches away from the physical but then it takes time, just as it took time through life to accumulate and dispense with beliefs and change beliefs and one belief becoming another, it takes what you would call “time” after death for those beliefs to change once more. And yes, there may be an element of surprise but that is just another bit of uncertainty and excitement. Slowly you begin to realise that this was all a created experience by a conglomerate consciousness in which the particular consciousness, which you feel you are, participated

Let us try explaining something else here if we can. If we feel that a unit of consciousness is a point of pure awareness, a point of pure consciousness, at that stage there are no beliefs. Beliefs are constructs. You adopt beliefs and you discard beliefs. You cannot equate what you call “you” or “I” or “me” with a unit of pure awareness. The you, I, or me arises from…. It is like an explosion of light, there is nothing there and yet suddenly electricity jumps across a gap and there is a flash of light. That flash of light you interpret as being a you, a me, an I. I am afraid it is not a very good explanation. (Surely the feeling of “I” arises quickly as an idea you focus upon suddenly becomes manifest and you consider you have created that manifestation) 

Any consciousness speaking through an instrument is, by nature of doing so, limited by language. Especially when there is absolutely no possible way that that language has been constructed to understand the reality of consciousness. It is, as the NDE people say, ineffable, inexpressible.

As the Buddhists profess, you return to the ocean of consciousness, but the pattern [which you have and still experience as you] always exists, everything is always there. It is just a question of when you care to focus upon it. Everything that you can ever imagine that has happened, will happen, is happening, is always happening it just depends on when you want to focus upon it. When we say always happening that means that the possibility of it happening is always there. (Think of the video game it is always there ready for you to play.) You merely have to switch the light of your focus on. So it is like being in a darkened room you can look and see nothing until you switch the light on then everything becomes clear. That is the question, everything you could possibly imagine, you merely switch the light of your focus upon it and what you believe is there will be there. It is simply that from the physical plane you have the belief that it won’t be there or I won’t say that it won’t be there, but it is only there because you know it is there.

Time presents you with a picture in which you have freewill but each event that you choose will have its own time version. Can you comment on this please?

So we come back to intensity, intensity of interest. One group of consciousness on one focus, one aspect. On the basis that one group of consciousness can focus in many different directions at once exactly the same as your consciousness here, the group consciousness can be involved in several different activities over the course of a day, a week, a lifetime and this can be all simultaneously occurring in many other areas, other levels, if you wish. Depending on the intensity of the particular idea you are following what is trivial in one area will be of importance in another. And so what manifests in one area may not manifest in another. What is just another meal on one day may assume importance on another day simply because of the people who are around or because you are focusing this time on really tasting the meal as someone else has prepared it. It may be the same meal yet taste quite different. It is simply because you are focusing and allowing the intensity of the flavours to be absorbed whereas before your attention was elsewhere.

As Seth said: The inner core of events is held together by just that kind of activity. You are on every hand providing an unending source of probable events from past and future from which to compose the events of your life and society. Let me remind you that all time exists simultaneously.

Absolutely. Every possibility exists simultaneously, we refer you back to the potential sculptures within a block of stone. Infinite possibility is ever present. The possibility that was present in the past is present now and will be present in the future.

In view of the fact that everything is happening simultaneously can you tell us anything that, in earth terms, would be in the future.

We have said that manifestation can only occur when the intensity of desire to manifest reaches a certain amplitude.  What you call the future, that is not a future, as you only have the present, and you only have the present intensities going on. Intensities take time to arise and time to dissipate as we have stated previously. If a certain intensity has arisen in a certain activity it will take time to dissipate. Although there is no time the intensity is there……let us compare it to hot spots in the ocean. To all intents and purposes the ocean is timeless but you have intensities within so you have a certain intensity of something going on. Looking from the earth which is time based and you must remember that we are speaking using a time based consciousness…

I just thought that as everything is happening simultaneously that you might…

We refer you back to the block of stone, as you gaze upon the pattern which contains all possibilities, to use your language, as you focus from one to the other, to the other, to the other, then you could say the “others” are coming toward you. How do you expect us to explain “no time” in the terms of time? The block of stone is as good an analogy as exists in this particular circumstance. All designs, all possibilities exist within the one and therefore you can go forwards, backwards, sideways, in and out but always remaining in the same place simply by focus. The same place equates to the same time. There will be a “time” (laughs) when you will understand. It may not be until you leave the physical. Look at it this way, call it a state of mind, when you have all the time you ever need and everything that you focus upon seems to be present and fully cognisable, shall we say, as to all ramifications of what you would call past, present and future then you quickly come to the conclusion that there simply is no need to put things in a sequential order. Therefore time, as you know it, as a linear concept, is meaningless, so you simply dispose of the notion of time. Can you understand what we are saying?

Hopefully. I think it will be easier to understand once it is transcribed.

It is not a question of everything happening simultaneously. Everything has the potential to happen  at any time. It depends on the intensity of focus, the intensity of will, the emotion that waxes and wanes. The future does not exist until it happens and then of course it is the present, until that point it is merely conjecture.

So you are not able to focus on something that would be in the future for us.

It is not a question of not being able to focus as we are a part of a total amount of focus. We can feel the intensity arising but do not know whether it will rise sufficiently to manifest as it is a blending of many, many consciousnesses. A parallel can be seen in your financial markets which directions are influenced by the thoughts and actions of many buyers and sellers (consciousnesses).  Their combined intensities of emotions determines whether there are more buyers or sellers and the trend is up or down accordingly. One can only extrapolate the trend or try to feel the emotion, shall we say, and act accordingly. If beliefs, emotions suddenly change then the direction changes. So in regard to what you term the future one can postulate several probabilities as all are present in the present moment. This is why predictions do not always come to pass as the event that has been “seen”  did  not reach sufficient intensity to manifest, much as in markets. All probabilities are always present and possess varying intensity due to the level of focus upon them but only certain attain  the requisite intensity, power of group will, if you like, to come into being.  You must remember that we are part of the “ocean of consciousness” as you also are, so much as you are only  able to guess  the trend of a market from your feelings, say, we are only able to guess at the probability of manifestation from gauging the rate of the increase in intensity apparent in the various probabilities,  which as we stated can wax and wane, rather like betting on flies crawling up a window, any one of them could reach the top first.

The outcome of an election depends on how many  individuals, within the total of those eligible to vote, vote for a particular outcome. That outcome is not determined until the vote count is completed, although exit polls advise you of the probability. Likewise, as particular consciousnesses “vote” for a particular course of action, manifestation does not occur until the intensity reaches a tipping point.

You have chosen the illusion of separateness as you wish to experience the uncertainty etc. and you are no longer therefore fully connected to the totality of consciousness from the point of view of the instrument. From the point of view of your entity however you are still connected but you deliberately restrict your focus as regards your various instruments for the aforesaid experience, uncertainty etc. The senses you construct for your instrument limit its focus. In the same way as you attach a speed limiter to a car which otherwise is capable of far greater performance. Now a few instruments discern the speed limiter and endeavour to bypass it and access other realities.

Focus.

Focus of the moment indeed. That is the most significant statement because there is only focus in the moment. Think about it. How do you focus, out of the moment? You can only be, in the moment. No matter what your thought is of, you are still in the moment, focusing, in the moment. Your focus can change from moment to moment and once more, you can focus on what you would call the near present or you can focus upon the distant past, you only believe that you cannot focus upon the future because you do not think it exists as yet, but indeed it does. For those who do believe that they can cast their minds into the future, they do come up with predictions, some of which then eventuate in people’s lives, but of course not all as they see the probabilities that may come about but they are not privy to the focus of the entity of which the prediction is made.

Now when it comes to seeing the future then if one is in the habit of idly speculating what the future may hold then one can put forward all kinds of alternative scenarios. You merely have to read the opinions expressed in the blogs on the internet to see how wild the thoughts are of those who are seemingly intelligent. Now, all those thoughts are real, they have even committed them to print. Those thoughts are flying around in the atmosphere. Those who are open will receive certain of those thoughts and may interpret those thoughts, maybe, in a picture form, certainly in a concept form. So we throw it open for you. Trance yourself, think of what may happen, then find reasons for it and see how it fits into a framework, then go over it and try to see how today’s facts point that way and by the time you’ve revisited your theory a few times you may even convince yourself that this possibility is now, at least a probability and possibly a vision from the future.

In your opinion, what is going to be the next big discovery?

If we refer back to the principle of intensity, as you look around the ocean of consciousness you see myriad pools or areas of, we use the same word again, intensity, let us call them radiant points of light which are fluctuating in brightness and dimness, just like looking up on a clear night at a bright sky, a starry sky, some appear brighter than others. Now, we will take that image and look upon that as the universe of ideas. Then, let us see… overlay that with the fact, as is at the moment, the moon is looking much bigger at this point in time, than it does say at other times, so why does it look bigger? So take this with the intensity of ideas, take this with the billions of stars you see and imagine them rising and falling as the sun’s activity changes at one moment and then see how difficult it is to say, “ this is the next major discovery. You can look out there and this is why your seers, who forecast future events, see many events, some come to pass but many more do not. Your seers can feel intensities probably better than others. Others have thought on for some time about what is likely to occur and have developed beliefs about that and then looked at the reasonableness of that belief and then given it a probability percentage of happening. Most of that comes from a form of extrapolation, so we can say to you, “Yes you can have flying cars very soon. You already have the possibility of driverless cars on the road, then why shouldn’t there be driverless cars in the air? Which would get rid of the need for roads, because just like the aeroplane you can travel at different heights, different planes if you wish”. When we say planes, planes of existence, but we don’t mean it in that fashion, planes of altitude. The cars on the road pass within one foot of each other, so it would be no problem surely for cars to be at levels of a hundred feet from each other and then above the ground you could have ten lanes of traffic couldn’t you, where as previously upon the ground you could only have two. So, that is one that is not beyond the bounds of conjecture. So, anything you think of in this fashion is being thought of by consciousness. So which one comes to pass? Some eminently reasonable ones are out there that can come to pass but will they? Because will your systems of economics allow it? So you can see that a new intensity is arising and a new idea is becoming perfectly feasible and valid but will it be adopted? What I am saying is, “you can see various intensities but they may not come to pass even though they are perfectly feasible, perfectly valid, perfectly able to be put into operation but you may not adopt them.” Others, which are even more totally unlikely may come to pass. A case in point at the moment is your own government, who would have thought that today’s scenario would have existed before this election. When, you could have said that person would be elected, but that person wasn’t elected, a totally insignificant person in terms of intensity at the time of the election has ended up being elected. How difficult is it for any consciousness to say with certainty, this will happen. Every butterfly that flaps its wings affects everything else everywhere. So faced with the idea that the whole reason for creating the physical is to enjoy the uncertainty and the excitement of the uncertainty and the coping with the unexpected and the challenge of same, why would you expect even “all that is” to outlay a predictable scenario which would totally negate the object of having said uncertainty?

But again you must realise that we who speak do not have all the answers any more than you do, but we do have a little more understanding than you do because we see things from a broader perspective. But that is all. We have our own theories. If we knew it all then there would be no point in being involved in the physical at all. So you take this all the way back to “all that is” and all it wants is to continue the process of seeming discovery, if you can understand the phrase.

As an overall comment, why do you read fictional material when you know it is fiction?

The same as you do anything really, purely for enjoyment.

But there is no reason or purpose in reading fictional material because you gain nothing from it other than a sense of time being passed in an agreeable manner. Would you call that a purpose in terms of the serious purpose you look for in the existence of reality?

No, as in the same way as doing a lot of things for example being in a choir, dancing, they are all just ways to enjoy yourself.

So we come full circle once more as we will do on many occasions. We are back to consciousness keeping itself occupied in an entertaining manner.

There was another question about time.

We have covered time in ‘The nature of past, present and future’ to a certain degree and it has been alluded to in various other areas but that will entail the instrument going through the whole thing trying to find these odd paragraphs. The easiest way at the moment is to just imagine that the earth doesn’t turn, it only faces one way like the moon. It has a very cold side where nothing grows and it has a very hot side where nothing grows. It has shadowy sides which are neither one nor the other which are quite small areas and do we know whether they will be able to maintain life as we know it.

As light conditions do not change you have no measure by which to measure time passing. Yes you can see growth and decay but that is it. So how would you even devise a need for time? When you have a spinning earth and regularly you see the light come and go, by means of a sundial say, it is fairly simple to devise a time measurement system. But if conditions didn’t change, how would you have organised a system of time? Would there have been any necessity for it? Would progress have been different? These things are mental gymnastics, but you can imagine that without something changing then you would not be aware of a need to measure the passing of time.

Remember, you construct your belief in time. Who knows that if from birth everybody was told that they would live to 200 years and they wouldn’t see any ageing until past their 100^th year whether that belief would take hold? That belief would have to be held by the higher consciousness and that consciousness programs the instrument and therefore the instrument would be programmed differently wouldn’t it? So remember that time is programmed from above, not below, it’s programmed from above for the reason that so far the instruments as currently constructed cannot be indefinitely maintained. It is easier to start a new one than it is to try to maintain the old one and that may seem fairly mundane but these physical things have to be constructed. They have to be designed, they have to be organised, they have to be maintained and they have to have the consciousnesses interested in maintaining them.

When you look at anything which you call a life there is an awful lot going on. It doesn’t happen by itself and so the fast moving, exciting instruments are, what you might term, technological marvels, way beyond any of your present technologies. Remember that we are only so far ahead of your own, what you would consider, thoughts and beliefs and achievements down here. They are coming from above but they have to be tested out and like anything else what is going on at the moment is quite attractive so there is no need to change it too quickly. The scheme works quite well and what would happen if suddenly you started to have people living to 200 years, the whole system would have to be changed once more wouldn’t it?

Time is an invention, a construct, for the purposes of operating in the physical reality. Outside of that there is no need for time. Consciousness is infinite and there is simply no need for time. There is simply “What shall we do next?” Yes, there may be sequentiality but there is no need for time, no need for purpose, as everything always exists in potential. The patterns exist for everything, everybody knows it. There is no need to hang on to memories as nothing is lost, just re-focus and it is alive again. As soon as you look at a pattern, providing you have enough consciousnesses to focus in upon it, the little model starts ticking away and spinning around again. All it needs is the energy which consciousness provides because nothing can atrophy as it is consciousness, not physical. It is just imagination, an idea, it can be kept alive, it doesn’t rot. So as soon as you imbue that imagined idea, that pattern, with sufficient energy, light, whatever, it lights up and is on the move again.

So you don’t have to worry about “I’ll never do this again” or ‘time passes by’, because whenever you want to do it, you do it. So there is no need for time, in fact there’s not even a need for the word ‘time’. It has no meaning apart from the realities in which it is constructed. This is not the only reality which uses time, others do as well in order that the system can be operated to the benefit of all those who wish to experience.

 

We would appreciate it if you post any comments on the Comments page accessible via the Index. Thank you.

 

 

The Two Kinds of Order.

Einstein once spoke of the physicist David Bohm as his successor. Bohm introduced concepts of Implicate Order and Explicate Order. Bohm defined explicate order as the order of the physical world. He defined implicate order as the source of explicate order, and as an underlying whole that physical form constantly unfolds out from and enfolds back into.

————

“There is no matter as such. All matter originates and exists only by virtue of a force which brings the particle of an atom to vibration and holds this most minute solar system of the atom together.
We must assume behind this force the existence of a conscious and intelligent mind. ”                                                                                                                           ― Max Planck 1944

————-

“Consciousness is the fundamental thing in existence. It is the energy, the motion, the movement of consciousness and all that is in it. The microcosm and the macrocosm are nothing but consciousness arranging itself.”                    Sri Aurobindo

Consciousness creates all realities.

When it comes to creating your own reality you do so on every level of existence whether you are focused into the physical, the astral, the mental or any other reality you care to envisage. You work within the parameters of that reality with the tools available to you in that reality. The connecting thread here is the desires of the consciousness that focuses in each of these different realities. There may be a reason to play with different presentations, different scenarios in an easily manipulated or malleable reality where ideas can be “imagineered” with ease and many potential scenarios examined, their results assessed and those not fitting the desired end are then discarded.

You can imagine just how fast these can be examined and then, what we will term as, the probable ones, to suit the situation in let us say, the adjoining plane which in this case happens to be the physical, are passed to the brain for evaluation. Now it behoves us to state here that the consciousnesses involved in the creation and maintenance of the physical body have, as you can imagine, a certain say in the matter. This is why different possible scenarios are presented. Like an experimenter one can test out different scenarios to see what outcomes arise should each different one be chosen? What might be influenced by one’s own biases in the mental plane might be differently influenced by the co-creating consciousnesses in the physical plane. After all you do have a certain degree of free will and therefore it is interesting to see when a course of action different from that of your own preference, we are talking now of the entity’s preference, when the physical organism brain/mind chooses one different to your preference then it is also educational as to whether that route is successful.

If you imagine both different aspects of the consciousness focus in each of the so-called planes creating and testing out their own hypothetical methods, routes, concepts, courses of action and then by cooperation and examination refining down to two or three so that the physical brain or the mind interfacing with the physical brain can present just a limited choice so as not to overwhelm the body consciousness. When speaking here we need to have you remember that words such as body consciousness encompass the brain and the connections with the, what you would call, astral self or mental self or mind. It is difficult to be definitive on this subject as all interpenetrate each other and one cannot put a locus on any particular aspect of contemplation or communication as the level of intensity as regards courses of action, ideas etc. can vary from one plane to another. One may step outside the usual transmission route by considering a thought of such intensity that it merely swamps the voices of other thoughts.

Is the reality of all we perceive purely in the mind?

Let us discuss what has previously been spoken about from the Seth book and this is the nature of the totality of consciousness that is presently engaged in physical reality. Now, again we have the argument that the physical reality that you think you inhabit is actually an illusion, but even illusions are fabrications of light, you might say, or fabrications of the imagination, whatever it is you actually do see. You do see, you do hear and you do feel, now whether or not they are nebulous in terms of being mostly space it is immaterial, to you they are still a mental creation. Do you understand this?

This mental creation, albeit physical creation to you, is mental, they are interchangeable and so, the same applies to all consciousness because your physical reality shows stars and planets and everything else and so it is. Now would you think that the consciousnesses that make up the earth and the consciousnesses that make up the sun do not exist and they are only purely in man’s imagination and everything else is in man’s imagination, of course it isn’t.

No. I was going to say that does not sound right.

They are all consisting of… as soon as you try to understand that everything is part of the same source, whatever you wish to call it, you can call it waves, you can call it particles, you can call it whatever you wish, consciousness, it does not matter. Whenever you look into what you think your reality is you come down to some kind of homogenous overall totality from which images and tapestries are fabricated using the imagination. So, if you find yourself in the midst of a major event consisting of many thousands of people then how much do you think that you influence what goes on? You would say, “most unlikely”. You would be able to play a part but unless we can get the attention of the whole crowd and have them listen to us and have the appropriate equipment so that they can all listen to us then we cannot influence events very much. Should there not be the continual methods of communication to the mass from the individual then the mass will tend to go its own way. You look at your own society and in general the major portion of time is spent in doing your own thing and a certain amount of time is spent working, via your taxes you may say, in a co-operative manner, however in general you act as an individual. Now, apply this to the sheer mass of consciousness, you accord each wave, particle its own consciousness in a co-operative endeavour, to the sheer bulk of consciousness involved in the stars and the planets etc. and indeed they are living in a reality totally divorced from your own reality, and as was previously said this is pretty much the same as the bacteria living upon your skin in their own communities, living their own lives and with regard to the mites etc. they are procreating and that analogy is easily drawn with that of the earth and yourselves except, of course, through human nature, its ego and its predilection to self-importance way above its station, it feels that it is different… you cannot possibly equate a human being on the earth with a mite on a human being, and yet obviously the parallel is very hard to ignore. So, one must look round and say, yes there are certain elements you have to look at and say, “we have agreed to inhabit this area, to create our own reality within this area” and they are operative words, to create our own reality within this other reality and we have to roll with the punches. We have to see what is going on, sense what is going on, feel what is going on between the big players and find our own way of surviving within that area.

If, for example, the sun decided to go into a frenzy of activity and send out far more radiation then we would have to vacate the earth, switch your focus away from the earth, because the structures that we have fabricated to live within the earth’s atmosphere would then not have the atmosphere to live in.  So we would have to change and look for something else. If you go back through the “history” of the earth you will see on many occasions you have had to evacuate whole areas of the earth due to various climactic events, ice ages, formation of deserts etc. You can look at your ice ages, you can look at the Sahara desert, shifting sands etc. and you will see that you had to change your ideas. An idea that would work at one point in time does not work at another point in time, because when the Sahara did not exist and it was green and fertile land then you could organise a community there and now you cannot. The same would apply if another ice age starts then certain countries would no longer be inhabitable and you would have to move.

When it comes to the human species, the human species is, again, only a focus of certain conglomerates of consciousness and the same applies to every other species including water, minerals and everything else, call them species if you wish. They are merely focusses of consciousness. It is nothing to do with one being better than the other. Some conglomerates of consciousness have chosen to be more active than others and we label this imagination, but that is simply a question of a greater deal of activity of that particular group of consciousness that focus on being human beings. The differences between species are not as great as you believe. One has to remember that every single thing, event, apparent reality is simply a manifestation of consciousness and that manifestation of consciousness is manifested in different degrees of intensity. That intensity may also be interpreted as, in physical plane terms, speed of movement, rapid change of focus.

So, see yourself as a player creating your own reality but do not give yourself dominion over much larger and powerful concentrations of consciousness.

Obviously we are living many lives all at once and one of those lives is an earth life. Can you give us any idea of what any of the other lives might be like?

Anything you wish to imagine can be created. You are already aware of that but you are trying to understand other lives in terms of your own life. Now we can just sit here and say to you “Yes, you can see yourself as a very handsome man, very rich, one of the world’s rulers”……..

I wasn’t thinking in those terms, that’s still thinking in human terms.

Exactly. Now switch outside that. So switch yourself, do this by degrees otherwise your imagination will not be able to cope, you will have to switch by degrees, in which you then say, “Now what if I was a creature of the air?” Now, you will immediately think of a bird, but what if you were a creature of the air in that you were a bubble say, a bubble that doesn’t burst and then try to move your consciousness and feel what it would be like to be swept along, swept up, swept down and then move to the next stage where this is no longer in an earth, in a physical situation. So we still feel ourselves as a bubble but that is as an analogy only. So, now you see yourself as a bubble of awareness and so you are looking out through an imaginary bubble and now you see, and you want to create something so you create in your imagination, the same as if you close your eyes and try to imagine a scene and of course you can only imagine scenes that you have experienced in the physical at the moment. But because you can see other people’s imaginings as well, you are looking through your bubble and you are seeing all these happenings going on, all these imaginary pictures appearing and disappearing, appearing and disappearing, and you look into this one and you look into that one. Now, your imagination can run as far as ours, we can say to you that we can find ourselves in realms of wonderful roller coasters of colour, we ride the rainbow, you might say, we are up there, we slide down the rainbow to the accompaniment of glorious music and then we launch from there and we imagine ourselves with wings. We have to put this in terms you can understand, otherwise we have no analogies to draw. So we have to take you by degrees to where you can understand that anything is possible….. this is why these things are so difficult to explain.

Let’s change the question then. Can you describe another life that you have lead? A non-physical life that you have lead?

We will get to the same problem here in that there are many minds contributing to this monologue that you are listening to, so we would then have to decide that, yes we give you this particular life, you might say,…

Yes, you would have to choose one of the minds…..

But then that mind has been engaged with many, many other minds as well and we can give you anything we like in exactly the same way as a reincarnational story. For example we could say we were a dressmaker back in the time of King Henry VIII and describe a life and embellish it somewhat.

Yes but I was looking for a non-physical life.

We were describing one before when we saying about riding the rainbow. Now if you wanted sheer joy and enjoyment imagine riding a rainbow. Well, you can do that. Take your rainbow away from the earth. Imagine the picture savers on the computer, bursts of colour, you watch all the different things happening as the colours move and swirl. Now imagine yourself being able to move with that colour, being part of the colour, swirling, the emotion. You enjoy dancing, can you imagine being swirled in the colour and just going with the flow and as you are told about heavenly choirs of angels, well this is just music but imagine the pleasure that everybody would be getting from producing music. Think of the number of musicians who suddenly find they are better than they could possibly imagine. Previously they had to use a physical body but now that they can imagine, the music they produce flows straight from their consciousness and imagination. The same with singers. Singers dream of hitting and holding certain notes and purity of tone. They imagine it. Well imagine that just because you think, it is. Put that together and imagine, no time, how long you could enjoy being swept around, but bodiless, weightless with just the wonderful sensations of sound and feelings of rhythmic movement and the sights of the colours, just what pleasure that would be.

Now, forget the business of life because you think of life in terms of time. Before you can imagine other dimensions of reality you have to drop off the ideas of beginnings and endings and growth. You must be able to accept the concept of just  “beingness”, “isness”, being in the moment. Every moment is a life. Would you say a life is any different if it lasts three days or three hundred years? You still call it a life. So what we have just described would be one of the things that you would use for, you might say, bliss. No decisions just pure enjoyment. What we have described, how blissful would that seem to be? You would be lost in the moment. The colours are wonderful, you don’t know what‘s coming next, all joyful. There are no shocks because the movements are very rhythmic because you have the feeling of movement. As the music moves you and you feel the music when you dance in the physical then there’s no difference to your feeling the music in your, you might say, mind, your consciousness in the non-physical. The same pleasure is experienced and so we are taking you from a concrete physical experience to a bodiless experience yet we have to give you some of the same feelings and emotions otherwise you simply would not be able to understand. How can we describe a feeling to you that you have never experienced?

No, you can’t.

You see! You only have your own senses here but there are other senses. It is impossible to talk about them because there is just no parallel. So it is best for you to think that anything that you could possibly imagine can be experienced. Now we have just used our imagination to describe to you a potential existence and from there you can go to any single thing you wish because anything you think of you can be part of. Now, that will depend if the idea that you think of requires more than just your awareness. When it requires more than just your own awareness then you must cooperate with others to get sufficient intensity to alter the fabric. But that is part of the joy as well because at some time all ideas will be manifested in one fashion or another. We use the word “time” but of course we are talking all the time, so difficult! of infinite potential. Everything is possible. All consciousness has the ability to be completely fulfilled but again you will ask ”why do all these things happen on the earth”? We say back to you once more, why do you produce all these violent things? We don’t mean actually physical, we mean your dramas, your films, your games etc. You do them for enjoyment. However horrible they may seem, how many people get involved in them and watch them again and again? Simply because you know it is illusion. Just take one step removed, it’s done because it can be done, because you know that in the end it is effectively meaningless.

You always are searching for meaning, purpose, truth, whereas if you just forgot about meaning, purpose, and truth and concentrated on being, enjoying the creation that surrounds you knowing that there are many other areas and that the imagination is limitless, the potential is limitless, but for the moment you have joined in with the idea of your own particular personality living what you consider to be a life in a physical arena.

Yes, I try to do that.

Exactly. Some do, some don’t. And so you might say I have agreed because it requires agreement. If the idea envisaged, the life envisaged was to be for a life of say 80 years involving XYZ events then at some stage or another the consciousnesses minds involved have to say “yes we agree to do this. Why then, if you agreed to that in the first place, would you suddenly decide, well I have had enough of this, I’m going? Now if you were in say a team of 11 people and you decided you wanted out and you had all signed contracts to stay in, then how would you leave? Maybe your terms of contract would have been that should you leave you cannot leave unless you get somebody to replace you because otherwise you spoil the whole thing. So most minds, most consciousnesses stay with the game. They stick with what they have agreed to. There are exceptions but there are always many other minds that are quite happy to join in. You must remember there are minds that are actually active intense drivers of a particular experience and there are many, many others who are quite happy just to go along for the ride. They gain the experience without having to get involved in the process of direction. If you keep in mind that as above so below then it is quite easy to see how these things perpetuate.

Would you describe” Framework 2” in an easy way for people who might be reading this?

For those who need reassurance from the scientific community they will find this set out in David Bohm’s implicate and explicate orders. Now, let us take an idea that is in the imagination, is not material, and yet one can design it in one’s mind, see it, think about how to construct it, what materials, what colour etc. Would you say that is” implicate”? When it is made it is “explicate” but until it is made it is ephemeral. It is merely a fleeting picture in the mind. Yes?

So now take lots of consciousnesses all sending their thoughts and concepts, pictures, details to each other and discussing them. They are working in a different framework from the physical. When they take those ideas and turn them into objects and events in the physical world, and for the purposes of what we are saying at the moment, use their instruments that they have created, physical bodies, they are then operating in what we can term “framework one” (physical reality) where you are operating at a distance, shall we say, even though you get lost in the drama (i.e. you do not realise that you have created the reality in which you are immersed). Framework one is where you are operating your instruments. Framework 2 is where you design your instruments. It is in a world of ideas much as if you were not storing your designs on a computer, you were merely playing with the lines and the colours on the screen, but you didn’t actually keep them, then they would be “implicate”, hidden. Whereas if you stored them you have a bridge between the idea and its execution. You have stored the blueprint, the details and the pattern. Even though it has to have much work and energy added to it before you can have the object of the design. Is that satisfactory?

In terms of what this life is what will our next life be like?

How many different types of lives are being led in the physical? Myriad. Those lives were all chosen by the participating consciousnesses, were all formed by the participating consciousnesses. As you have heard many times before, as there are many preferred environments in the physical so there are many preferred environments in the non-physical. You create, or are drawn to, environments already created by those of like minds, the plural is correct, to yourself. The answer is, whatever you feel comfortable in being involved in. You can review vast numbers of potential experience locations, shall we say. When you first move over, if you read back once more, you will visit and be shown the environments in which your previous loved ones now inhabit. Of course you will be eager to see that, you will be eager to find out how they live, what they have done, what they know. Because they came from roughly the same environment, perhaps not with so much of the technology which you are used to today, they will have found a suitable environment in which to explore the abilities and limits of their new found status. You will look around and you will decide whether it suits you or whether you will move on to another one.

Now just as you go to a ballroom dance, the next generation will go to a discotheque. Just as you would have listened to the radio, three generations forward they will be watching their hand held phone. You are always becoming, and moving from one experience to another. When you would go with your parents to a dance you would have gone to a dance of your era. One which pressed your buttons at the time and then became the type of music that you felt made you feel good. As you know, now you are constantly exposed to types of music that make you feel anything but good. Yet others do feel good and would find your choice somewhat pedestrian and boring. So the field is wide open.

You need to understand that you have chosen what you are experiencing. If you look forward you can see that you can choose what you wish to experience next, You can decide to stay where you are, doing exactly the same as you are doing, or you can change completely if you wish or you can just have a little dabble and have a week or two doing something entirely different. Many do. Many decide to go off and do a week or a month’s retreat, which they have never done in their lives or take up some activity which they never thought they would ever do. The same applies.

Life is continuous. (Heavy emphasis) It does not stop and start.

We have also read an article about the human body being a projection of consciousness. Would you like to speak about that?

If you would look back at what we have already transmitted to you in the hours that we have spoken you will observe that we say that you are constantly creating your body. You are creating your body from energetic vibrations. Depending on how you wish to perceive something, you can either perceive it as a solid body without understanding that solid body is merely a tight knit connection of electromagnetic wavelengths which, for you and your senses, is reflecting light which gives it the impression of solidity. Yet, should you have x-rays for eyes, just as you have for your machines, the body disappears to x-rays. Certainly the flesh of the body, the extra density of the bones reflect the X-rays and enable you to see. If you went further up the spectrum you wouldn’t see anything at all, or you may see just the vibrations. If you were used to being able to decode those vibrations, as we said, you would be able to hear sounds, make out colours and make out features because you would be able to take the vibratory presentation and, for your understanding, slow it down until the denser hologram, you might say, takes shape. Is that a satisfactory answer?

When we talk about the creation of the holographic reality imagine, if you will, looking up into the sky and as you look and you imagine or you visualise, see, wonderful light plays across the sky. As you see the imagined object or event or happening in your mind’s eye so it appears in light moving across the sky. Think what is involved in order that this be produced. It is merely a projection of your thought which has an attractiveness to other consciousnesses that are of course, the night sky and everything that is around. So if your particular imagined object, happening etc. is of interest to consciousness then consciousness can move and travel and inspect and be a part of, travel within, the thought that has been projected.

Now, this to you on the ground looking up presents itself as a radiant image. An image of light in the sky and as you changed your moment focus and then one image replaced another within your mind so would the same image sequence play out across the sky. Now the words ”play out” are correct in that you would generally, to start with, actually use this ability to play with, to see what you could do, what you could build, what scenarios you could put together. Play out a battle between two people in that your images are in the sky and then another person beside you decides that he will have an image as well and both of these images that you have are of warriors with swords and they are fighting each other and so the battle goes on until at last one gains advantage and spears the other one. The one falls to the ground and is out and the other one stands victorious.

For a third party, unaware of the activities of the first two, thinking that the warriors were real, this would be a tragedy, “I have witnessed the most awful thing”. But to the two people who had manufactured the scenario and were perfectly aware of what they are doing in their scenario, there would be no tragedy, it would merely have been an enjoyable exercise.

How do you feel about that when you decide to think about how consciousness creates holographic reality and the physical instruments that are immersed in the holographic reality see the holographic reality that is being created but imagine it to be real? So take it as your higher selves are creating this reality and they know it isn’t real. From the process that we have just described can you understand how nobody, shall we say, dies, without consent, simply because when you imagine the two warriors it is in the imagination, so whatever happens the opposing parties can always recover, even as the sword comes towards them and goes through them they recover immediately just like the cartoon characters that hit the ground, go deeply into the ground, should be dead but merely climb out and start all over again.

The one in the physical can only see the light show i.e. the hologram and you must assume that everything that you are looking at, at the moment is reflecting light because if you turn the light out it isn’t there. It is there as far as you are concerned, you can reach out and touch because that pattern is there, the force is there, but you need light to be bounced off it in order for it to be observable. So take this as all these objects are created by your higher self but you can only apprehend them through the senses that your instrument has been endowed with. You are unaware that the whole scenario is effectively a mirage.

So how much do you think we choose before we create a life in physical reality?

Once upon a time a thought arose. Consciousnesses were interested in that thought and they decided “I’ll focus upon this thought” and others joined in and gradually the intensity built up and the thought, starting from a skeleton of a thought, gradually, you might say, fleshed out, both in terms of the physical instrument and the story line of that instrument, from what you would call birth, to what you would call death, even though that is being created in every instant.

You are being born and dying in every instant, in the same way that electricity in AC is going backwards and forwards, you are being re-created in every moment. In the same way electrons are going in and out of existence.

When it comes to what you are choosing, you are merely, we are coming back to the “you” again you see… there is no “you”…there is merely what is seen. If we come back to a unit of consciousness, a unit of consciousness can experience a “you” in a certain fashion. But the “you” only arises when a certain intensity of, say, emotion, a certain intensity of feeling is attained with multitudinous units of consciousness. That intensity of feeling results in a manifestation and that manifestation means an action. An action, an opinion, a belief, it is all one and the same thing really. It is just a question of that in “time” you will see things in a linear framework but all actually happens at the same time.

So it is not a question so much of choice, it is a question of interest. A question of interest, a question of focus, a question of intensity. So the choice, if you wish, made by a unit of consciousness is merely “well, this looks interesting”, but do enough units join that consciousness in order for it to manifest? You might ask the question, “Why do some children not get born? Simply because not enough intensity can be generated to carry the process through. This may be because the construction is not going as well as planned or the intensity regarding the story line has changed, many reasons. It is all to do with how the conglomerate of consciousness, the gestalt of consciousness reaches the intensity for manifestation. If it does not reach the intensity for manifestation then it will not manifest.

Some of those who have had near death experiences tell us that we choose our life before we come. We choose our parents and we choose our life. So how do we do that?

How do you form any endeavour? You have had this transmitted to you and spoken about ad nauseam by David. When you have the idea of a life you then set about to see how you can create that life and all the necessary things you need in order for that life to eventuate. And so in order for the pattern to be constructed you have to choose the materials from which that pattern can be constructed and insert the event of conception into the time framework that you can see is likely to ……difficult once more because all is there…….so to make it easier to explain….. you take your reel of film of what is going on and, this isn’t correct of course, you insert yourself into a certain reel of film so that the film will then have you in it and will then change the outcome as it goes along. But you must remember that there is more than one film all the time, so you can pick up a film at any time, insert yourself into the frame and effectively then produce new frames as the film goes along . This is extremely difficult to explain in terms of what you are seeing as a linear, physical manifestation. Turn this around and see this as your own consciousness imagining a life and deciding, this is me in my mother’s womb and being able to tune into the pattern sequence that conception to birth takes. Building that pattern around yourself so you can experience it. Of course you are doing this with many other consciousnesses simultaneously. You are entering in to the play that you and your fellows are constantly creating as you go along. Then you get what you would call your illusion of reality. Illusion just means like trance, various amounts of depth, various amounts of solidity depending on the level at which you wish to participate in. If you focus intently with your fellows on creating a straw house you will inhabit a straw house. On the other hand if you focus intently on creating a 100 storey block of condominiums in which you have the penthouse then that is what you will have. You create all your experiences. It is impossible to draw an analogy using the methodology you use in the physical plane to describe what happens in the mental plane. It is like you wave a wand and it is there. That is much nearer the truth than you think.

Life is magic, as you know it.

Do you believe that each individual conscious awareness is capable of creating its own reality?

I think that reality is created by lots of consciousnesses getting together so it is a joint creation.

That is ok, but you have to agree to get together because you can always retreat into your shell, shall we say, and just be aware of the shell around you.

So perhaps you can explain what happens to those who do retreat into their shell and do not agree to what would be their reality.

As we said a few moments ago you open your shell, figuratively speaking, each morning and decide, from the infinite array of possibilities, what you wish to focus upon. Now, from, we must say, your limited point of view, it is quite easy when creating your own system of beliefs to actually believe in your own creation. To actually believe that you have no power to change your reality. But once you sit down and think very carefully about this then you do have some power to create your own reality. It may not end in the outcome that you envisage especially if that outcome is too far divorced from the position you have already created within that reality. You cannot have a sudden transformation from being a refugee to living in a million dollar apartment in another part of the world but as your refugees have shown those who sincerely wish to change their reality can take steps to change their reality. You have chosen to come into a physical system, you cannot change your reality just as you can change your imagination for you have already stepped into a system that, shall we say, takes time and much energy to create the objects, the events, that exist within that system. Should you retreat into your mind, then in your imaginations you can create whatever you wish to experience. However, you will not experience them in the same way as you do in the physical. Imagine yourself on your golf course, now you can see yourself swinging the club, hitting the ball, it bouncing on the green and in your mind you can see the pin and the ball bouncing towards the pin and settling a few inches away. You can actually experience the emotion of watching that shot fly through the air and you will feel yourself happy and satisfied. That will have the corresponding effect on your chemical processes within your body and this form of daydreaming can be very pleasurable, but then you realise that you are in the physical reality operating a physical body and then you wish to do the same thing. And it, in most circumstances, does not come out to the same conclusion as in your visualisation. That is all about the process of learning to create your own reality and so as you repeat this endeavour many thousands of times you actually, together with your physical body which are one and the same of course, get better and better in the process of creation until you get so good that you feel, I think, this is as far as I need to go with this, and you look for something else which you can take on the challenge for.

Now, you must, whenever you look at any reality realise that all participating in that reality have chosen their position within that reality because they cannot be annihilated. That is impossible. Therefore should they wish to turn their focus to another reality they simply withdraw their consciousness from the instrument. Of course the instrument like everything else has been co-created and therefore as consciousnesses accumulate and disperse around a particular pattern then it takes a majority of different intensities to decide on whether the event continues to be experienced or is simply terminated. Does that make anything clearer for you?

Thank you. So would you say that our world is a reflection of one expressed on a third dimensional plane.

You have discussed this amongst yourselves many, many times. Everything that you produce using your minds and your hands and machinery starts with a thought, an idea or intention and let me ask you where do think that thought, that idea or that intention has its home?

Probably in another dimension.

Could you possibly capture that thought and put it in a box or put it on your computer screen without typing it in say? How could you transfer that from your mind to something outside yourself except through a process of manipulating energy until you have a dense object?

Well, we don’t know how to yet. Not in this..

Not in this reality but in another reality. You have some indication of this when you are able to influence certain physical objects such as staring at another person and them turning round. Something has moved between you and the other person. Yes? The same with telepathy, the idea has gone from one to another. Now what has been received?

Thoughts.

But you both think of the same idea, so was the idea tangible?

Did the thoughts come from somewhere else or did we just pick them up?

Where do you think thoughts arise?

Well, if we are all in agreement as to how everything is going to go then thoughts must arise in another dimension.

Of course. But each consciousness has the ability to think thought and once that thought is released it is able to be picked up. Any other consciousness can become aware of that thought simply because of resonance. Each thought has a certain resonance, has a certain natural state of being and anybody searching, as you would on a radio tuner, will pick that thought up if it is closely allied to something that he has been considering himself. Whether or not he retains that thought and stores it away or merely observes it and lets it pass by, shall we say, is dependent on whether he finds it useful.

We are told that there are different levels and temples of knowledge in the afterlife can you expand on either of those please?

Merely man’s attempt at trying to explain the infinity of knowledge that exists. The language of the time in which those words were formulated was when the word temple to you would evoke scenes of ancient Egypt and other such eras. Now, who were the people that the populace turned to for wisdom? The priests, the religious emissaries, the agents of the god that everybody thought held dominion over their lives and everything connected with their lives. Now knowledge, beliefs and technology have moved on to where you now, whenever you wish to know something, immediately turn to your computer or other instrument that is connected to the inter…net. Again, the word, even though recently coined, inter…net has its own magic shall we say. We go back to something, from way back when, in the Vedas called Indra’s net, how similar. Now, Indra’s net was imagined to be this enormous net studded with diamonds which were all individual units of consciousness and of course, in that net which was sparkling with connectivity, everything was connected and therefore all thoughts were known, all knowledge was known. Now you have “internet” which; when you look at it carefully, says that everything is interconnected. Yes? You can think your own way through this.

All enquirers are looking for something deep and profound and yet when you look into, as the scientists do, the basis of everything, what do you find but a total homogeneity and simplicity of, so far as you have got at the moment, vibrations, vibrating strings or small particles, whichever level you decided to adopt? Tiny little things where when they come together form different patterns and therefore form the universe as you know it. Isn’t that simple? Now taking complexity, and reducing it to simplicity, and yet, when it comes to trying to understand what is going on, and why, we refuse to accept the simple. And the simple is, that you do it. Everything is created simply because you wish to create it, and that includes all your attitudes and beliefs, as well as those things that you consider to be objects.

(The link below is to an article in which Sir Roger Penrose, Stuart Hamerrof  and contributors from the Max Planck Institute set out the out the case for the survival of consciousness based on quantum information transmission research.)

https://www.express.co.uk/news/science/728897/LIFE-AFTER-DEATH-consciousness-continue-SOUL/amp

 We talk about co-creation and we also talk about, for want of a better word, blueprints, so where does the idea for the blueprint come from, bearing in mind that billions of tiny consciousnesses get together.

We are confusing the chicken with the egg, so, let us say that the tiny, tiny consciousness, as you put it, can think, it is aware, therefore I must be thinking and so therefore I am. Now, we are all in this together, so I am thinking and I am aware, what am I aware of, so I am aware that I have imagination I can actually think things up and somewhere I remember, there is a memory of something what is it? Ah yes xyz memories, upon memories, upon memories. The tiny consciousnesses are in the same position in regard to their thoughts and of course, because of the interconnection they are not sure, ah, is it my thought? Or is it another thought from somewhere else, but one thought, one memory you might say, of my experience just triggers little bit more thought and suddenly the thought starts to blossom, shall we say, and you start to see, envisage, imagine the blossom and it grows as more are attracted because the same thing is happening to them, as they look their attention is taken and energy is added the more the energy is added the more it grows, the more the imagination. Now can you see how the event grows from this, can you see how from the first hut that was built exactly where you are now then others came and joined it, another hut was built and more then somebody said, “we really ought to have a road to service this hut”, another said, “don’t you think we ought to have a shop so that we don’t have to go too far”. As you carry on with that imaginary exercise for yourself you will soon see how consciousness from the one little unit doing something, having an idea or an action, from little acorns oak trees grow.

Blueprints, patterns, we have covered this ground before. It all stems from the desire to create. The desire to create results in thought, results in an idea, if this idea gains approval from many others then the motivation arises to create a reality from the idea. This can happen in many forms of which physical reality is one. So, because you are only aware of physical reality, the term blueprint or pattern is used because you are aware of how objects and events are manufactured from a pre-created plan. What you are not aware of is your imagination instantly appearing in front of you. You have some who have some understanding of this from your quantum science in which it was… began to be understood, the observer, let us say, solidified what he observed. He could not see the electron and its movement at the same time, but if he could decide where it was… I think we are exceeding the knowledge of the instrument here and the correct scientific terminology is not available. Suffice it to say that collapsing the quantum wave, as you, your scientists have stated, results in the formation of a pseudo reality you could say. Now, if you took the attitude that the observer effect when you, we have been through, spoken of this before… that you are able to look at a blank screen which is active and then your imagination lights up various pixels on that screen and whatever picture you think of then appears on the screen. Now this is very much the same as what actually happens, the waves come through, they impinge upon the screen and the screen lights up to varying degrees which gives you the picture. Now that has been taken from a picture existing elsewhere broken down into television waves, just electro-magnetic waves, and then the picture recreated somewhere else using…(a television set) Now just put…give your…oh dear…your consciousness, or mind and let us move forward say, you know your rate of technological progress, so let us move forward say another 500 years, do you think it would be possible just to look at something then it happens? Now you already have voice recognition, where you can make a statement, and the lights switch on, or the curtains draw. Because it recognises the wave, the sound wave. You have now or are on the verge of using thought waves to fire missiles. So it is not without the bounds of conjecture to envisage that you will be able to look at a screen and the picture that you wish to see will appear. Computer aided design comes to mind. How long before the cameras around a screen can track your eye movements and then as you look at the screen you can draw lines around simply by the movement of your eyes.(or change channels, volume etc.) You can see that this could easily be a possibility.

Now you think in general terms of speed of motion in a linear fashion. Now start to think of speed of motion in a circular fashion or a spiralling fashion as in an hourglass with the speed of motion rushing in a figure of eight say or spiralling up to the nexus of an hourglass narrowing down, getting dense then spiralling out and getting less dense again and then repeating the pattern. You would say that there is an enormous amount of energy getting to unimaginable speeds but actually getting nowhere. If you imagine all this fantastic amount of energy movement, information transfer, image creation, reality creation, all happening because of moving light. Moving light creating pictures, sensations, meaning sensory perceptions not just tactile or taste , but sensory perceptions meaning the formation of beliefs, the resulting motions etc. All this tremendous speed happening in the same space. Can you understand this?

Simply because energy is moving around, we have to give you some idea of space for you to be able to envisage it, so we have said, an hourglass. Imagine this hourglass, we will persist with the same analogy, being reasonably large in front of you, the size of your television screen say, and you see all this enormous activity of energy and colour resulting in pictures in front of you, much as your television. Now imagine yourself surrounded with all this frenetic, unimaginable hive of energetic activity. So as you look around, what was on the television screen is now all around you, and in such a format that all your senses decode this light movement into your realities. Again, easily explained in that sight is light waves, sound is sound waves moving, touch is a tactile sense, an electromagnetic sense, this is for simplicity’s sake, and so on.

Now we have got to the point where you have imagined yourself surrounded by a complete ocean of wave activity moving at however many times the speed of light you wish to imagine and this is what you and everybody else, exist in. Now you just have to apply your ideas of scale to this and what you feel that your consciousness is. You already know that photons communicate with each other and yet what do you need to see a photon? What do you need to imagine the size of a quark? At what stage do you say “we need a certain measurement’? You also have to realise that once you leave the physical there is no need for measurement.

And so the mystery still remains a mystery because you are not able to use your logical, rational brain which thinks in terms of the parameters of the reality in which you exist to understand the reality of something you have absolutely no conception of. But you can get the general idea .It is not too big a leap of the imagination to have some understanding that the world that surrounds you is indeed, a constantly changing illusion. It is best to find another word for “illusion’. It is indeed, a constantly changing reality. It is just, that for someone who is not endowed with your sense perception organs, there is nothing there!  Except said sea of frenetic wave activity.

Full of sound and fury signifying nothing, but signifying everything for you.

Comment: The air around us is full of sound and vision via radio and television waves but we are completely unaware of any of it unless we use the correct instruments to transform said waves into sight and sound we can comprehend.

Likewise for them, if they adopt a different set of sensory perceptions and a different set of rules with their co- creators, their co-participants, then they will see a totally different reality from the same sea of moving energy, because they will decode the waves in a different format. These will not … when you use a set of sensory perceptions you pick out from the sea of moving waves those waves, which of those frequencies, that you wish to form your particular pattern. Yes? Others pick out different waves. You could see this as when we, you have had referred to you God’s tapestry, now imagine this tapestry to be comprised of the most unimaginably small threads and therefore the number of threads would be basically to your concept, infinite, you can’t even count the number of threads. But, you could decide to focus on just one colour of thread. Yes? Remember the threads, in the way they are composed are running through each weft and weave. You focus using a red filter, you will see a picture that the red filter produces and so on. Now, that presupposes of course, a pre-existing picture but now say to yourself I can decide which filaments in which part of the tapestry are which colours and therefore, that particular picture will arise and yet beside you, unbeknownst to you and unbeknownst to them, is another intelligence deciding that the threads in any particular part of the tapestry are going to be seen in a different colour. He will see a totally different reality to you. Neither of you will be aware of the other. This is capable of conception. But is very, very difficult to say the least, to put this into scientific terminology, and thereby underlay the concept, the physical rationality, because simply we are talking about something that has to be experienced to be known of.

Imagination exercises.

Now we referred before to imagine yourself surrounded by a television screen which effectively formed the reality in which you are immersed. And we also referred to the computer with the sensors surrounding the screen which tracked your eye movement and then you were able to, simply by moving your eyes, see the design, the lines, as your eyes moved, the lines, the shape appeared  on the screen. Now imagine your screen surrounded by thought sensors, they actually pick up your thoughts. So as you think of a tree the tree appears and when you look into the tree you see the shapes of the leaves and you look along a branch and you see a white cockatoo sitting on the branch and you notice his yellow comb. Now can you see that your focus is narrowing down from the general to the particular and as you focus on the particular you lose sight of the general? But then you switch your focus back to the general, that is, the tree and you see the tree once more. You look down, you see a rabbit on the grass below the tree. You notice it is a black rabbit, unusual. Then you look back in the tree and once more you see the cockatoo, because you know it is there. You look back again you see the rabbit, it appears. Now we said, appears, but you knew it was there and the thought sensors picked up the fact that you intended to see the black rabbit and so it appeared. Once more you think of the white cockatoo, you move your gaze, to the other part of the tree and low and behold it is there.

Where ever you focus what you believe you are going to see will be there. You are creating your own reality. Sit still and think this process through it will give you a much greater intimation of the process by which you not only create your reality but you gain your sense of self.

Comment:- Your entity (you) impresses you to look, it provides your thoughts. It already knows if the cockatoo or rabbit is still there otherwise the thought would be “I wonder if the cockatoo/rabbit is still there?”, in which case you are not surprised if it is not there any longer.)

You can also relate this to the imagination exercise where you had to imagine the body or see the body as simply a mass of moving energy waves and the mind being just also moving energy waves and the two merging. We explained how to visualise yourself being immersed in energy waves all around you so that wherever you looked you saw the energy waves. Take what we have just explained as your point of focus so that everywhere you focus on this sea of energy then the object [you wish to see] appears. Just as you know you will see a rabbit as you look at the ground the rabbit will be there. You will automatically create it. You look back up in the tree and you automatically create the cockatoo that you expect to find. For a humorous exercise we will refer to a famous and mystifying quote by Donald Rumsfeld in which he described what he termed to be “the known knowns”. The “known knowns” you can take as your point of focus that you are actually looking at, you know it is there and you know that you know that it is there. Then there are the “unknown knowns”. This would be comparable to looking at the cockatoo and yet” know” that the rabbit is on the floor, OK, basically you are focusing on the cockatoo which is a “known known” but you also know but the word “unknown”……you must use your faculties here…..you cannot see it at the moment but you know it is there.

Then you have the “known unknowns”. Whereby you could look at the scientists, cosmologists looking into the universe and realising that there must be something there. They know there is something there but they cannot pin it down and you can call this a “known unknown”. They do not understand what it is, they can’t see it, but they know it is there. [Potential] Lastly you have the “unknown unknowns” where we will refer you back to another quote “you can only be aware of what you are aware of”, so you cannot be aware of what you are not aware of.

Now apply this to your various lives and your points of focus and you will see that wherever you focus you create your reality, you create that self, you know who you are, but when you switch your focus somewhere else you create another reality in which reality you then know who you are.

Questions please. [Said in a tone that implied, you will need to think hard to figure this out]

Comment: When you are focused in one reality you think that that is the only reality and that you are the only you. When you switch your focus the same applies. In both cases you have “unknown unknowns”. This is a clever way of showing us that we are totally unaware that we are leading multiple lives in multiple realities.

Question re study centres and different types of music.

You create your own reality, together. If you are able to join with those of like mind and because there is recognition of, let us say, equality amongst souls or amongst consciousnesses so you are not excluded in terms of class, accent, wealth etc. you are included because you are a fellow traveller. Your thoughts are seen and if you have a genuine desire to join with others in constructing wonderful buildings or beautiful music or scenic gardens then people join together with that goal in mind. They work together and take joy in the finished result.

Now when you say, study centres, that is any area of study. While you have been in the physical, how many areas could you look at now and say “If I had the time I would like to get involved in the study of this or that”. In the study of flowers, in the study of animals, in the study of rocks, in the study of the cosmos, we can go on and on and on. So what has been said to be a study centre……..In order to have the feeling or even to give the concept to those who venture from the physical into the non-physical, in the dream or even the near death state say, what would be a physical analogue that would denote the activity. If you just saw a host of sparkling lights then how would you decipher a particular activity going on? But once you see a building with desks or stages or music halls then you instantly comprehend the activity that is being engaged in.

So likewise, those who have not been long from the physical and even some of those who have, they would feel that great music requires a great amphitheatre because that is where the enjoyment comes from. Much as any great event is enjoyed so much more when you are present rather than when you are watching it on television. The whole feeling you are swept up within because it is the joy of experiencing en masse rather than individually. So, just as you create buildings here buildings can be created in other dimensions. They are unnecessary but so they are unnecessary here. You do not have to have vast amphitheatres that are full of columns and fancy architecture. You could have a plain and simple barn and provided the acoustics were organised correctly there would be the same enjoyment of the music but would it feel the same without the grandeur of the colour and the light and the tiered seating etc. A sense of occasion adds to the experience so if you feel you wish to create music why not create the space to put the music in.

Something different now. We are told that the sun is rotating on its axis, perhaps you would like to talk about that.

The physical system is an idea, an idea which is fleshed out by the process of perspective which gives rise to illusion of creation. When a painter or painters have an idea it is generally a, what you would call, concept to start with, and then in order to make the concept a reality the detail must be thought through. As you think the detail through, then you find certain aspects have to be, or rather certain attributes have to be given to different aspects of the concept. So, if you decide that you are going to create a universe then you say, “How do we do this?” Let’s come back to the Big Bang, then you take this, this is an example, as being a truism and there is a vast explosion and creation of hot gases, which then as they cool condense, as water condenses to ice, then the gases condense to minerals. As you have created space and as your experiments have shown that say something dropped in space tends to form a circular ball, then that would give you the answer as to why planets, stars have the appearance of a ball. But that could be expectation, based on a belief that is the only way it can happen. Now, then you look at our own physics and motion and attraction and repulsion and you find that in order for this sort of equilibrium to be established then the various bodies work like a gyroscope, can hold that position if they spin. Once they stop spinning they fall over. Now, you must realise that just as you construct in the physical, then ideas are constructed, and therefore all the attributes are constructed and you are also constructing an environment in which the inhabitants, the constricted consciousnesses, have reason, and therefore, you must be careful to make sure the environment, as perceived, is based in such a way that reason can find satisfactory theories to fit what it perceives. Are you following me?

Back to the play. You cannot construct the set of a play that is meant to be in a setting of an oasis in the desert and yet have a sailing ship in the background. Because one of the participants in the play will say, “there is something wrong with this! This is supposed to be desert, what is that doing there?” Can you see? It would be an anachronism, therefore you must ensure that all parts of the jigsaw fit harmoniously together and what is expected to fit does. So, once you have it all spinning, it may not be understandable, but there again if you want to have the uncertainty and the excitement of discovery and knowledge and illusion and progression, then, because in order to utilise the set, consciousness would have to agree, illusions have to be maintained. Therefore, you do not construct an illusion that crumbles at the slightest element of doubt. Do you see? You must construct a believable reality And, as the perceived progression of knowledge progresses, you have to continually change your fine tuning of the perceived reality. So, at one stage, when the earth was flat, the sun was perceived to go round the earth but now, the earth is round and the earth is perceived to go round the sun. Do you see? And yet, we now say, “ah, it wasn’t like that, this is what it is really like. But was it? Or was it changed to suit the change in perception, you will never know. We merely extrapolate our beliefs backwards in time to suit our beliefs in the present,  hence, the Big Bang, or the belief in the Big Bang.

Can you say something about greater powers, those that have the grand ideas?

As in the physical world there are always those that dream of greater things, of the organisation of affairs that work smoothly and connectedly and harmoniously. In much the same way there are those who disagree because they are not being heard and they rebel and in many cases actively endeavour to disrupt the organisation that the majority accept. So greater powers, or rather more properly, those of greater influence, those of greater persuasion, those of greater leadership because as above so below and in reverse most are happier to be followers rather than leaders. So there are those who think and plan, design and create both for those who do not have sufficient desire to go through the intricate process of creation and would rather wish to be given the opportunity to manipulate a pre-prepared vehicle/ instrument. The vehicle may not be exactly to the complete satisfaction of those who decide to take up, you might say, the base model although they would have preferred to have a model with many more features although those features were not being offered by the creators of that model.

So, the acceptors try to manipulate the instrument to achieve the desired intentions, even though in many cases the instrument simply does not have the capability, resulting from its design. It does not have those features that are capable of achieving those objectives without a degree of modification. It is like a car, cars are designed with certain shapes and certain engines, interiors and colours. The car can generally be altered to some degree by the addition of certain components, alteration of the colour, you might say expression of personality, various modifications to bring the instrument more into line with the object as desired.

So the greater powers as such are the same, as you create your world so worlds are created. As you design cars so worlds are designed. As different cars have different attributes so worlds, realities have different attributes. Cars are now relatively simple mechanisms, they have evolved by the process of perfection of design because there were those who were interested in perfecting that design and yet many drivers not offered a different design will still be happy with any vehicle that simply got them from A to B because that was all the purpose they needed it for. Similarly in your technology you have those who are happy with the simple phone but others who must have a virtual companion in their phone. The ability to be in instant communication at all times with all people with access to all information. Of course there have to be minds that design such instruments and so it is with other realities. There are simple realities, there are complex realities. There are peaceful realities, there are frenetic realities. Fast moving, exciting, fast changing, suited to those groupings that enjoy the challenge, the excitement, the thrill of rapid manipulation and creativity. Those groups, those minds would not be happy in a reality that is peaceful, harmonious and what you might say is some people’s idea of heaven. To others it would be hell. So one entity’s heaven is another’s hell. You choose your heaven, some might say, you choose your hell, depending on your point of view.

Now let us repeat from our last conversation and go back to your impression of the source. Its exploration of its creativity, does it make sense? That it would create all its creations equal? You are quite happy with the diversity of species around you and their obvious inequalities but you seem to wish that those you call humans are all created equal. Does not this fly in the face of your logic? So there will be great minds and lesser minds, great intelligences and lesser intelligences. Now that doesn’t mean to say you shouldn’t treat them all equally while still recognising that in terms of creative ability they are not equal. Of course you do recognise that.

You do not give the job of extremely high responsibility e.g. of teaching or controlling, let us say, a surgeon who has a life poised underneath his scalpel and the attendant anaesthetist. You do not entrust those positions to those of no training and no knowledge. The training and the knowledge is simply there to weed out those who are not capable. Would you agree?

Yes.

So you have to select those that wish to be and change their instrument and follow a line of development and improvement, to be accepted to perform those responsibilities, which are available only to those who show the determination and the ability and the resourcefulness and the dedication and the responsibility to carry out such as a heart operation or other forms …..So greater powers are relatively easily explained, just as you have great designers of highly technical and highly intricate and extremely delicate machines and may we say, education and other sensitive areas then the same goes at all levels once more. As you see round you, so you will see as you survey other worlds that you may wish to focus into. Does that answer or give you, again, a logical and rational answer?

Yes, thank you.

Everything that you will ever know you will find that eventually your own intelligence is capable of understanding. The intelligence that you are is the intelligence that you always will be. You are merely in your present focus being hypnotised by the beliefs and the conditioning that you have accumulated while you have been one pointedly focused into the physical. When you relieve yourself of that focus, you will understand more, we were going to say, of who you are, but what you represent would be better.

If you are talking about intelligence you are presumably talking about the intelligence behind the physical body, not the intelligence of the physical body, because the physical could be dyslexic or Down ’s syndrome or whatever. So when you are talking about intelligence you must be talking about the intelligence behind this particular physical body.

Intelligence, if we use the word to describe the confluence of thought of all the consciousnesses that wish to experience the physical through the instrument, remains the same. The instrument was designed for the purpose of certain experiences, whether, if you wish, by design or by faulty design.

I don’t think you have faulty design. I think you can have design for a purpose, which to some would appear to be a fault but it is not a fault, it is meant to be the design. Unless you are saying that something goes wrong during the design phase.

You adopt any belief that you wish. All beliefs are possible as all else is possible, we are merely giving you an option of many. But, the intelligence behind, above, within is still the same.

Sorry, that is what I wanted to make clear. I was trying to get you to say that it was that intelligence and not the intelligence in the physical.

You are differentiating between the physical intelligence and the non-physical intelligence?

I am, yes.

There is no difference. There is only the one intelligence, it is how it is expressed. Expressed through the instrument. The instrument is an instrument, it has…. It is difficult to …. Because all is conscious but as we have been endeavouring to describe there are different collections, different gestalts, organisations, aggregations, conglomerations of consciousness with their own purposes to experience. The physical instrument is such a grouping, it does not have a guiding intelligence of its own. You will see this in a new born baby, who teaches the new born baby?

The parents.

Who teaches? Who teaches the baby to cry? Who teaches the baby to close its fingers, to move its head, to sit up? Which intelligence persuades the baby to accept some instructions and some knowledge and reject others. Which intelligence makes choices, the environment provides the options and the intelligence makes choices between the options.

The intelligence is with the baby.

The baby is the instrument, the consciousnesses are non-physical. The thoughts that come together then activate the instrument to make the choice.

So if the instrument is incapable of making the choice then it’s just a design fault with the instrument.

If the design fault is with the instrument it could be that the consciousnesses that have focused upon this instrument wanted that experience, could also be that sufficient level of intensity of agreement does not arise for that instrument to behave in the generally accepted form of normality. There are many possible reasons, you simply decide for yourself if you wish to have one or many reasons or beliefs as to why a certain instrument behaves as it does. There is never one answer. In any particular event there are always multiple possibilities.

An “angel” is said to be a very powerful entity. Is their any basis in fact for this belief?

We were sitting under a tree today and I asked you to look up and tell me what it meant to you. If you looked at each one of those waving arms at the end of the branch it was composed of small seeds attached to each frond. Each seed saw itself as an individual, each frond saw itself as an individual, the branch with all the fronds upon it saw itself as an individual. It was attached to a bigger branch, individual, attached to the trunk and when you looked around and stood further away you just saw the tree and the tree saw itself as an individual because it saw other trees as individual and each composed of more individuals, of many individuals. Now, everything is relative. Now, the seed on the frond, depending on your viewpoint, because the seed contains the tree, so would the seed consider the tree to be more powerful than itself? Do you understand what I am saying?

Yes. I don’t know if the seed would consider the tree to be more powerful than itself because how much would the seed know about the tree?

Would you consider a small snowflake to see a large iceberg as a more powerful, as an entity capable of more powerful action than itself? Would it realise that?

One imagines it would. It is a question of whether it realises the iceberg is made up of lots of snowflakes.

Let’s assume it does.

That’s the assumption that you need to make.

Of course, but that is awareness, that is awareness. Do you think that the snowflake is not aware of other snowflakes?

No, I think they are aware of other snowflakes.

Yes, and so if you as a snowflake and you are surrounded by lots of other snowflakes, how does the human being or any animal in a pack feel, does it feel more powerful than it does when it is alone? So angels, I have given you now a tree, the seed, the snowflake, and the iceberg, the human and the crowd, the animal and the pack, so now take consciousness and angels. Do you understand?

So what are you saying? An angel is a multiple of consciousness?

It’s a massive consciousness and therefore has much more power at its disposal, much more intensity than the smaller gestalt. It is the mountain to a grain of sand. It is the tidal wave in the river, it is the adult of the child.

So should we ask for help?

Does the child ask the adult for help?

Yes.

You have your own answer. Is consciousness connected?

Yes.     

You have the answer. But you have fashioned your belief. Instead of the word angel, if you said I am going to ask that big consciousness, but that is exactly what religion is, praise to god. It prays to the higher, larger consciousness, it calls it power, it calls it higher power, it calls it various names and it prays to something bigger than itself and because of the nature of hierarchy that you are used to here, you set up a hierarchy of beliefs in various, various larger consciousnesses and you give them names, because you give each other names here. But just as stripped of names, and stripped of jobs, and stripped of locations and stripped of reflection, stripped of light, then how would you differentiate one human to another?

Say that again?

I was trying to bring the analogy to the earth. Put all humans in the dark and just have the voice how would you differentiate between one and another apart from the voice?

By their thoughts.

By their thoughts, yes, so.. I think we may have spoilt the analogy here somehow… Basically there is no need to give a hierarchical aspect to all these angels, archangels, gods, etc. excepting where you focus your attention. If you wish to focus your attention on a very large consciousness then you pray to “all that is”, then you think,” shall I be heard?” If you want to pray to a very local consciousness, a small consciousness, but then you don’t believe that the small consciousness can do what the large consciousness can do, do you? Yet, what you don’t pray to is your own consciousness. If you listen to your own consciousness you will know what to do. In-tuition.

Tuition from within.

There is no difference when we say creating reality to a child playing with a pile of bricks, it is all relative. A child playing with a pile of bricks is creating his reality where he is focused upon at the time. You are creating your reality that you are focused upon in this moment. You are both creators in your own way and so is everything else. Everything is fulfilling its desire. On another level everything is known to be a creation, your own creation.

When you say, your own creation, we can only be an absolutely miniscule part of this creation. Our thoughts can still only create a miniscule part of this creation.

Every part of consciousness focuses upon an area of interest and when that area of interest reaches a certain intensity due to the amount of focus upon it then it manifests. If you no longer wish to be part of that focus, that intensity, you turn your focus away from that.

Explore your creative abilities. If I design this can I design it such that it can survive, it does not necessarily have to have a purpose, as we have described purpose before. There is no overarching plan, there is simply design that can survive in the environment in which it is proposed to exist. You will have noticed that as species have become extinct through the ages that life goes on regardless and so the theory that everything has its place and is interdependent is somewhat flawed. As one species ups sticks, shall we say, then the remaining find ways to fill the gaps and as we discussed previously nature returns to equilibrium. It is not only the humans that are forever becoming, all that is, not in the conception held of an omniscient power, but all that is expressed, all that consciousness, manifests in the universe. All is forever becoming in the co-created fashion, if you care to think deeply about co-creation and new focuses, new design, new manifestation you will see that all around you all that you can be aware of is forever becoming. There is no plan, there is no purpose except that which each consciousness chooses to be part of.

 With regard to co-creation do we form the future consensus reality by the higher consciousnesses talking to each other and deciding which events we are going to experience in the future?

As you have already transcribed, you are in the guise, shall we say, of your higher self, talking to each other at every moment asleep or awake and you are recreating, let us say, fractition (unable to decipher, maybe somebody can suggest what it should be!) numbers, fractally altering your physical instrument at every moment and as you do that you are also, in co-creating terms, altering your environment fractally at every moment. You must be careful not to think that you are creating everything around you because you bring separation back into your beliefs. It is hard to understand but everything is linked together, all information is linked together, all consciousnesses are agreeing. We can only explain this to you in terms of information transmission that is of such speed, it is, of course, instantaneous, you cannot understand that, but you can understand to some degree superluminal speeds and if we can say superluminal speeds to the power of 50 say then that goes beyond your imagination and becomes akin to instantaneous. So, if you can say that multiple decisions and by multiple we mean infinite, are being taken upon agreement between infinite consciousnesses as far as you are concerned, to constantly create the agreed environment in which all find themselves. Is that too convoluted for you?

I am sure that once it is transcribed onto paper it will be easier to understand.

All is happening at once with the agreement of all concerned.

Yes, thank you and is there any difference between to form and to create?

Back to language once again, as far as your language is concerned, what does form mean? Now you can form something according to an agreed plan. Now you can create something but it had to have an idea behind it didn’t it, it did, therefore what is that but a plan. So, what is the difference between create and form apart from your own semantics?

Very little. Why does everything have a unique fingerprint or mark?

Why do your phones have a unique number?

So that they have an individuality and can be identified,

Keep speaking,

so that it doesn’t get muddled up with somebody else or something else,

keep going. What does your phone do?

Receives messages from other people, receives calls from other people

And converse,

And makes calls to other phones.

Could it do that if it did not have a unique signature?

No.

So, you have thought your way through, with a little assistance,

Why everything has to have one.

You have, there you are, not difficult.

 

Comment from David Jackson UK

“I can understand the concept of ‘group souls’ creating a reality and living it, but what about the stars and galaxies which we see in this reality? Are they the stage and props of this reality or do they exist as independent entities or objects? Our planet is so small in comparison to the universe (which is infinite) so are there other beings elsewhere creating their own scenarios in the same universe? Can we still access this universe when we are back in the spirit world?”

Now, we recently discussed no space and no time and perspective. We also discussed creation by one person of a reality and the invitation to another group consciousness, shall we say, to join in that reality and have a coffee overlooking the Mediterranean. In other words you accept the reality that has been constructed, accept it as your own, and join in and both enjoy that reality. Because one group has co-created it your group just adds its weight and joins in the co-creation and maybe puts in a few flourishes.

Now, if we start from the assumption that all is consciousness then unless we come back to the one god, one mind etc. breaking itself into myriad pieces and forming all different realities all over the place, much like the Big Bang of course, how many scientists see the parallel between the one god supposedly investigating all its potential and the one little speck exploding into this vast infinity that surrounds you?

So where do we start here? Do we start at the specks? Or do we start at the tapestry that has been created? And you can take your choice. You must remember that we are still arguing the toss about this over here. So let us apply our usual reason and logic to this discussion and look at the tiny little local worlds that you are familiar with and by this we mean your daily habits apart from your occasional holidays. Your daily habits are in a tightly knit circle of operations which when considered in terms of your locality, your country and the world you exist in, is really very small. So would you think it would be sensible to create all this other stuff just from the point of view of having to wonder what was around the corner, what was on the other side of the world, what was in that jungle, what was this, what was that? Of course if you were the higher consciousness creating it all,  you would know, so why would you create it all if you were never going to investigate it? So does it make sense that the rest of this tapestry is composed of higher consciousness groups, some vastly bigger than others? It is not easy for consciousness with a certain experience and focus, even though we are talking no time here you have got to remember that some venture, some don’t and that there are areas of activity, areas of quiet.

Now you would not personally think about becoming a rock in the centre of the earth and yet there are some who would think “I would like to travel to the centre of the earth to see what it is like. I would like to be there to see how it works”. And if you can move your mind to this it is as good an investigation as any, isn’t it? You can move your mind to the bottom of the sea, you can move you mind to the planets. These consciousnesses have their own being and their own methods of communication but you have to join in with these things and if they don’t catch your imagination, like any other idea, then you let them pass by. You could for example take a look at the sun, just a mass of burning material and explosions and think, what would there be really interesting in that? So would an infinite number of other consciousnesses. But some who have been involved in that sort of thing and it is the only reality they know find it quite enjoyable because what you consider as extreme heat and disaster they just experience as another reality as nothing affects consciousness. They simply don’t take on the attributes that would feel the heat that you would, because it is a different reality. So it is so difficult to explain to you that your senses are only suited to your reality. They may be completely unsuitable for another reality and yet there are senses that are suitable for that reality but they have no counterpart or comparison with the senses being used in this reality.

To answer your question, do you think that there are more than just group consciousnesses that are involved in the human life?

Absolutely.

If you accord all particles, waves, consciousness with imagination and ideas then you can see that, around you if you think trees are conscious, trees far outnumber humans don’t they? Stars far outnumber humans, galaxies even do. So the human aspect is a tiny, tiny part of the whole. You might say, for purposes of giving you more of an idea, that you can fit your imagination within a larger imagination. Somebody suddenly spreads out before you an amazing picture, which you both know of course is a product of imagination, let us say a hologrammatic image to make it easier to understand or just a 3D image, and then you see a little corner of that image that looks very inviting and you think “Ah, look what has been imagined over there, that looks absolutely idyllic. I wouldn’t mind spending some time there”. And as you focus further you see that there are some interesting things there and you think “I could do this and I could do that” and your fellow consciousnesses come up with their ideas and before you know it you are constructing your reality in the corner of another reality. Why do it all yourself when there is so much other consciousness all creating wonderful things to explore?

Now you are quite happy to say “let’s visit this other reality that other consciousnesses have constructed and we just have to fall in with the laws and parameters, the thought patterns etc. in order to experience that reality” but wouldn’t you say that you are experiencing another reality? You are experiencing the reality of a little corner of the earth. You are able to explore it nowadays whereas you could not have done, in terms of time, before. But as your imaginations have expanded so you have been able to expand your dis-covery of another vast imagination and out there are all the rest of what you consider to be stars, galaxies and various other objects in the universe and so it gives you a vast area to explore for many, many visits and many, many ideas of what shall I do next without having to sit there and scroll through lots of ideas and join one only to find that it’s still born.

So, as we have said before, most consciousnesses are followers. They take advantage of what the visionaries have constructed and simply piggy-back, shall we say, in order to take advantage of what has been laid out and of course these are often welcomed because the person who plans on a vast scale is often not the consciousness, the group consciousness of course, that is one for the detail. It is like somebody that is great at painting landscapes but not much good at painting objects or figures, people, animals etc. Not much good at putting together working models, shall we say. They are great at seeing the wider picture, painting the whole vast scenario. So then myriad others are needed to make it really interesting, really become alive. Do you understand all this?

I think so.

Have you any questions?

The questioner also asks “Can we still access this universe when we are back in the spirit world?

The higher consciousness can focus anywhere it wishes to but again it has to focus otherwise it is simply randomly searching without even perspective and to see you must know what instruments, what senses you need to see. Otherwise you may be using senses that will not pick anything up. It is like using infrared to try to see the bones within the physical body, you need X-rays. You need to use the correct senses, the correct frequencies to probe. This is another area where to draw analogies is again so difficult. Yes, you can see wherever you wish to see provided you understand what you need to do to see it and of course that is chicken and egg because unless you know what it is that you are trying to see you won’t know what instrument to use in order to see it. Measurements again, perspectives. The same with focus. Where do you focus? You focus at a distance don’t you? When you go searching you narrow your focus into a searchlight to pick up something of particular interest.

So yes, you can go look for whatever you wish to look for, you just need to have some idea of what you need in order to find what you don’t even know you’re looking for. But you can say yes I’ll go off to that particular star and you may or may not see what is on that particular star depending on the laws pertaining to any form of activity that is going on there, if any.

The questioner asked “Are there other beings elsewhere creating their own scenarios in the same universe?”

Again, it is back to the imagination. We come back to the fact that the vast visionary background is laid out and various consciousnesses chose various corners to set up their own imaginative activities, so you would have to say yes, wouldn’t you?

Now we have tried to straddle two horses here, in that we are trying to show, in order to head off the obvious question that it is all in the imagination and there is nothing out there, that there can be a big “out there”, as we have just described, in the imagination and there can be small “out there’s” within the big “out there” from other groups doing their own imagining. Have we got that much across to you?

Yes.

And at the same time if you wish to think that this is all nicely laid out just for human exploration then so be it. Wouldn’t you think that where you cannot see there is probably plenty of activity in much the same way that you couldn’t see the activity below the solid object, body at one stage and yet now you have got all the way down to waves that go into and out of existence. So if you build up invisible beings that can still think and be visible to each other using the right senses then many of those worlds can be populated in just the same way as this one. Then if you called them, let us say, spirit beings, you wouldn’t need the air, the water, the food and yet they could still create their own reality within that, living an entirely different life. Now you would accord that to the astral world, shall we say, where you don’t need to eat etc. etc. and you are happy with that so let’s say that there can be innumerable astral worlds out there. So even if you go to what seems like a barren planet to you here then the imagination once more can create a valid reality within the “reality of that barren planet”.

Thank you.

A Matter of Imagination

So you want us to talk to you about the nature of matter. Now as you have concluded, there is no matter. There is only what you want to conceive of as matter. That which you wish to make a belief in. A belief in matter, something that you can organise as props and scenery in which you wish to carry out your imaginative series of events. It is true that you have to devise a system of numbers and measurements, angles and the rest of it in order to communicate with one another as to what it is that you wish to perceive and jointly agree on. This makes it easier to do so. If you have a system of measurements you can all agree on and further agree to use then one metre, 10 metres and so on can all be understood and visualised. The meaning is common to all. The same goes for all other measurements. It is easier for intercommunication to have standardised systems of measurement in order to construct the illusion.

As you can imagine, if you can imagine, and you must imagine, the scene whereby the plain is flat and the mountains are high must be seen proportionately the same by all, all must use the same scale of measurement. So measurements have even got to be used in transferring the imaginative concept to another imagination so that both can construct their imaginations in like form. Are we making sense to you?

I think so.

As above so below. You are aware that you are measuring your rather diaphanous, hard to see, hard to grasp, what you call reality in terms of measurements but as you can only bring this down in your conceptualisation to forces and so-called magnetic fields, waves of light, you have no real idea of how to manipulate these in order to construct reality although you are getting somewhere when you are starting to organise your virtual realities in holographic form. Even so you cannot understand how this could be projected from one mind to the other, one consciousness to another and yet if you even say to one another “look at a mountain range of so high and see in your mind a mountain range and now look the other way and perceive a mountain range much higher” and you will be able to do so. So then ask the other to picture at the foot of that mountain a vast forest fading away into a snowline with snow above and slowly in your minds you will be able to see that, and so on and so on.

Now imagine that you have a mind capable of holding all this information and keeping it stable. Many of you all holding that imagination in your mind. Then move forward along your imaginative road, passing your imaginative buildings and lakes and gorges and forests until you all start to agree “yes we see that, yes we see the other, look how deep that is, look how high that is”. You are all agreeing with one another. Slowly it goes along and your systems of measurement are becoming beliefs and as one says “that’s a high mountain” you all see a high mountain. It becomes a consensus of belief, a habit of belief. As you see with the flocks of birds and the shoals of fish, as one begins to turn all begin to turn.

So you can imagine consciousness all seeing the same reality because the decision to turn equates with the decision to acknowledge the perception of one instantly appreciated by all and therefore accepted as a reality i.e. believed in! (so maybe we have a ‘group soul’ the same as the much looked down upon animals, birds and fish. Humble pie for the hubristic human ego).

We are back to our previous discussion on make-believe but rather than the word ‘make’ we use the word ‘choice’ to believe. Yes?

Yes.

So consensus choice to believe is what imaginative reality consists of. We are trying to make this as simple as possible you understand. Something that you can actually form in your own mind and then understand that others see the same. If you lead a guided meditation with everybody having their eyes closed then you can gradually get them to agree that they are seeing the same thing. They will have their own context and biases of course but if you took the average of say, several thousand or several million of those who are listening and are agreeing to the measurements as propounded by the leader of the meditation, a roughly consensus average would come out of that. You will have the spread from one extreme to the other but like any statistical presentation you will see a bell curve, so we ignore the extremes as they just have to go along with the vast majority who carry the day with their conception of reality.

Much the same as in your human consciousness where you all agree ”this is real”. Whereas on the outer edges you have the mystics, clairvoyants and others who say that it is not quite as you see it. At the same time the scientists, as regards the belief of the mass, are saying this is all illusion, this is not real, it is just electrical charges coming into and out of existence, there is nothing there except forces. The mass however says, I don’t care, you may be right, you may be wrong, but to me it’s solid and it’s usable and that’s all I care about.

Yes.

Let’s face it this is all your experience is meant to be, all that you care about. You don’t care how it’s made. You are happy to believe in it because you came here wishing to believe in it so why on earth would you wish not to believe in it? Because then your experience wouldn’t be experience.

Switching focus – Switching realities.

When one is in a higher state of consciousness how easy is it to switch from one focus to another without being lost in the drama?

It is all a question of duration. As we explained with the actor, the longer you are in it the longer you feel that you are the part you are playing. However if you just dip in, bring yourself up to date, shall we say, or make your contribution and then dip out again; I think you had occasion in the past with your own speculations of sitting in a theatre in the round where there were half a dozen plays going on at once, much like sitting in a multiplex cinema where for example you would have six screens around you but shielded by intervening walls in triangular tunnel shaped divisions so that you in the middle as you turned your gaze was filled with another film. Let us call that another play and then amalgamate that with our analogy of sitting in the back of the theatre but focussing on the stage. Now if you were sitting in the middle and you compare that with sitting at the back of each theatre, back of each of the six theatres, but there was an automatic focus switch where simply by focussing you could be on the stage and indeed being one of the parts. Because you are a quick change artist after all.

So, as you look from one to the other you could either take an observers view of what was going on or you could focus straight in and be on the stage. If you knew you were just going to focus in on the stage and perform some action or speak some lines then you would know that you would retract straightaway. Whereas if you focussed in knowing that you had a lot to do and you didn’t know how long you were going to take and it took far longer than you expected then just like the actor who spent some years in the play you would find yourself lost in the drama to quite some extent. However, you have always got your higher consciousness which although it has one aspect of itself lost in a particular drama is still dipping in and out of others. It is not lost in each drama. There is always a central control.

Now this does lend itself to a complete comparison, shall we say, to your consciousness being aware in a dream, a lucid dream. You are aware that you are in a dream but in most dreams you aren’t aware, only some you are and then you know you are actually laying in bed somewhere else. But, when you become conscious in a dream, is it your higher consciousness, shall we say, reminding you that “don’t go too far with this, we need you back here”?

This is all degrees. As you know, the total consciousness is however many want to join in at one time and so you can have more than say the normal amount focussed into the physical. Something interesting happens and others want to experience it, they can temporarily join the physical expansion as well, but there’s always the ones who want to stay back at base. This may be by desire or by design in order that you don’t all get lost in the drama. But you never will because there are always others watching that aren’t even particularly connected and if they see a certain intensity diminish too fast then there is always someone who can jump in. This doesn’t actually happen but of course you can see that it can. Look, that person’s drowning, go and pull him out. That person’s immersed so let’s pull him back above water and remind him “don’t go in there again too far”. It’s all quite simple really but of course if it is something very enjoyable then you may want to stick around for a while. Other times when you look in and something particularly gruesome is going on you may want to look away again quickly. Once you run a few scenarios yourself you can soon see what is likely to hold you there and what isn’t. Has that given you enough to play with, to understand that there’s always someone around to pull you back?

Yes. Thank you.

 

2 thoughts on “Question from David Jackson UK”

1. Thank you for a very comprehensive answer. So it is all down to ‘thought power’. That is just a my friend Brigitte Rix stated in her books. Yes, it all ties in. Many thanks, and bless you.

    

2. Thank you, David Jackson, for your great questions, and thank you, David, Jean and your spirit sources for the wonderful answers. It is so liberating to know that through the application of our imaginations and focused intentions, we can connect with other realities and experience aspects of our own world that seem to be beyond our reach. Imagination is indeed a powerful vehicle for the expression and exploration of consciousness, but the main lesson in this reading for me is that in order to see beyond what is already known, even higher consciousness “has to focus otherwise it is simply randomly searching without even perspective and to see you must know what instruments, what senses you need to see.” To me, this statement is as relevant to what we might call ordinary consciousness as well as to higher. That is, I suspect, what all the spiritual traditions originally sought to develop in us – the perspective, instruments and senses needed to experience and comprehend deeper dimensions of our reality. Perhaps that is also what science at its best could help to develop, a richer, deeper awareness of the perceptual and mental tools available to us, far more than ordinary perception, physical experimentation and mathematics. So much food for thought here, and so much inspiration to keep those ‘gates of perception’ as wide open as possible at all times.

_____________________________________________________

 When we go over to the other side all the consciousnesses that are part of our makeup, shall I say, could want to go off and do something entirely different so where does that leave us? Do other consciousnesses come and join…..

You are fluctuating all the time. You have within your own group a group of like minds, you might say, that tend to, like a flock of birds or a shoal of fish, follow the same thought patterns simply because they are of like mind. Not because they are following a leader or anything like that, they just hang together because there is a certain amount of enjoyment in feeling the enjoyment of those you, you might say, love. The sharing of enjoyment.

Now as the ideas float through and you are looking at this idea and that idea then, it’s just like magnetism, consciousnesses are attracted. So as you look at one idea a number of consciousnesses are attracted, you look at another idea a larger number are attracted. Can you imagine? Sooner or later one takes your fancy and you think, we’d like to do this and then others realise that this could actually be a probability whereas previously you were scanning possibilities. So consciousnesses may stand off a little when they realise you are just scanning possibilities but once you start to zero in on something and people feel it is going to become  good-to-go, you might say, then they decide to join the party. It pushes them over the edge. “I wanted something else to do. This looks interesting”. So they join in their little bands as well.

They are not all swimming around out there in singularities you know, because the whole point of coherence, coming together to experience something, doesn’t just start when the physical body is about to be formed. The idea starts to attract and once you are scanning ideas you scan ideas in the company of your like minds. You can again look upon political parties that come together. If you’ve got half a dozen parties of the left then whoever takes the lead and gets the most votes the other parties still vote left, they don’t go and vote right do they? So you have got like inclinations of small groups so when the idea comes up then if they like it they’ll join it.

Now there could be another idea from the other party, you might say, but you are never going to like that idea. So take this as your light and dark, there is one group that are war hawks, they enjoy the game of war so whenever they see a war game about to be played they rush to join because they find it exciting. Now another group may like the idea of loving animals and so a life spent caring for animals in some form may attract in much the same way that you are attracted toward a particular career when you are here, but actually you were attracted toward that kind of life in the first place. Do you understand?

You have got these groups of consciousnesses looking for a reality to join into and like anything else at some stage you say “We’ll do that one”. Of course at the same time you can be doing several others as well. Additionally there are times when, even though you are a group, you may belong to more than one group because although you may want to do the animal loving life you may want to also be involved in a life where verbal debate is featured so you may take a life as a politician say. You can experience more than one thing at a time which is why you take several lives simultaneously. Do not think that you restrict your areas of desire to one any more than you do here.

I think you may have misunderstood my question, what I was asking was, how much of this remains with us once we move over to the other side to keep us recognisable as who we are?

What have we just said? We will go back to what we said before, we never know how many consciousnesses are tuned into the instrument at any particular time and yet the instrument is recognisable.

So is the instrument recognisable through what I would call the blueprint rather than through the consciousnesses?

Well, how would you activate a hologram, once the physical body has stopped how would you activate say a hologram or an astral body or any other body for that matter without a pattern?

With difficulty.

So there is always a pattern, then it will only take a certain group of consciousnesses to activate the pattern. Of course, as we have been saying generally consciousnesses are in groups, which is where the idea of group souls comes from. Group souls reincarnate together, only this has been said as group souls as a band of actors, therefore giving the impression that the group was a group of singular consciousnesses, whereas it is much deeper than that. Singular consciousnesses group together of course in order to enter into the realities, in order to create the realities. They can only co-create, you don’t have the amount of imaginative power to create on your own but it feels as if you are on your own, because when you cohere together, then you are all strapped to the same stage coach or the same sledge or you are all pulling on the same rope. You all feel the same sensations and you all consider yourselves as singular because it is easier to consider yourself that way.

Comment:- All participating consciousnesses consider themselves the “I”. So as set out in “Entangled Minds” thousands consider themselves as Joe or Joanna Bloggs or any person you care to think of. We are not as unique as we think we are!

Now in other realities you are aware that you are part of a group. In this particular reality you only see yourself as a singular, even though it is plain to see with a moments thought that your body is composed of many but that is how it is and as I think we have said before, but who do you argue with in your mind? Shall I do this? Shall I do that? How come there is a for and against, protagonist and antagonist? There are two opinions, so there are two intelligences. Just work that one back for yourself and then when you go to two you might as well go to two parties again with numbers making up the two parties. Once you get this into your mind and think this way that the single unit of consciousness feels once it has cohered with another number of consciousnesses which at any one time can vary from enough to participate in the game to a thousand times that depending on the match.

Now, if you are playing a home match against the local derby side, Liverpool and Everton for example, it will attract 100,000 consciousnesses to watch that match, but if you are playing an away match at the other end of the country against a team that is at the bottom of the table how many supporters are going to travel that far? See the idea? What is happening at the time depends on how many people get involved, but, of course, they are all “I”. Entangled minds once more, they all have the sense of “I”, while they are focused right in there. “I” experienced that, in fact if you look at it that way and say to yourself, “I” experienced that. When you recount the experience to somebody else you would say, ”I did this, I did that”. You would not say, “I was part of a whole bundle of people doing this thing together, well did I experience what everyone else experienced? Of course you come back to the fact of yes I did. You use the easy phraseology term, “I experienced it” your sense of “I”. If you can approach these questions from that view point you will find them far more easy to understand although of course, you like everyone else are reluctant to give up the sense of “I” until you understand that you haven’t given up anything, you have experienced it just as much as everyone else has and been part of the co-decision. Sometimes you will feel, I know I am doing this but I don’t know whether it is right or not and so I hope it turns out okay. That is because you are having to go along with the group decision even though your particular group consciousness is a bit ambivalent about the whole thing. If others have joined and you are temporarily overpowered, shall we say, outvoted then you go along with it anyway, because you have no choice.

_____________________________________________________

Yes it gets quite addictive. There is much excitement at still being able to speak in the physical. Imagine if you had a machine which you could switch on and talk to those in the non-physical. How rare it would be, how exciting it would be and even though you may not be able to get through to exactly who you want to get through to just speaking to people on the other side as you are now able to do is extremely interesting. This is the same for us of course. Even though we know what is going on it is still quite something to do something that others aren’t doing because we are to a certain extent exploring another possibility of the higher consciousness, as you call it, being in closer contact with the instrument.

There may be another possibility explored whereby the consciousnesses are in far closer contact with their instruments so that there is a greater degree of control and the idealistic scenarios might be more able to be brought into being and the nastier aspects as we have agreed with you to call them are minimised. So that there is to some degree, heaven on earth but being able to utilise the solid physical bodies and environments in such a fashion that there is less heartache and fear.

All realities are possible and while this one will be kept going in its present form, the one we have just described might be organised in another reality. You can look at the different ones and decide whether you want the uncertainty of the nastier sides breaking into your reality or the more certain knowledge that these things can’t happen in this other reality. Therefore you are shielded from those sort of experiences. For those who have been through those experiences and simply don’t want to experience it again then wouldn’t you think it would be the thing to do to say ”let’s get together those who don’t want to experience violence, pain, loss again yet still want to enjoy a physical life”. And why not? You might decide to take time out of it as well, so you create a physical reality with no time, no degradation and you can come in at whatever level you like and if you wish to change levels, i.e. projection of ages, then everybody understands when you suddenly say “I’ve had enough of being a five year old, I am now going to become an adult, OK with you?”. “Sure, off you go”.

So there wouldn’t be all the associated traumas with how are they going to turn out, how they are going to earn a living etc. To do this of course we are going to need to have a different method of energy production, food production etc. or organise a body that can live on the sun’s energy or water or something relatively easy. Also have mind to mind communication and projection so that you won’t have to have vehicles to shift the body around in. You may as well have your holographic Skype which obviates the need to actually go somewhere and the ones you want to interact with then live in those particular areas and only occasionally will you want to go somewhere else. Who knows, we then may just recreate the body in another location.

All in the future, you might say, all in the planning, all in the works. All the potential exists for this of course. As yet we haven’t found it. Maybe it’s there though and we haven’t discovered it but we can all imagine, as we all do, and we all exist in the product of our imaginings. So, you have questions?

I would just like to comment on that you were talking about the future.

Everything is potential. If it hasn’t been dis-covered yet, hasn’t been tried out yet, does that mean to say that is the future if it all actually exists in potential? It hasn’t been experienced yet but maybe it has. It is a vast area and just as you can’t explore all parts of the universe that has been created we can’t explore all parts of consciousness. Although everything is interconnected we have to know where to look, we have to know what to ask for, so if we imagine this reality and then we start asking, putting the thought out, does anybody know of this? Then it may well come back to us, we have tried this before, or whatever. It is all there in potential, when we say no time everything exists, it is a question of whether you focus upon it or not. So from your point of view in the physical you can say, “well that is a future focus of mine”, using the word future where it is basically an alternative focus. It is these words again, language once more, this past, present and future. If you took those words away and just said alternative focuses, then how do you get time into that? Apart from the fact of sequentiality.

Yes that’s where it comes in.

So, once more you see, you basically can be whatever you want because as your basic unit of awareness doesn’t change then there is no time for you. Everything is in potential, open the oyster, where do I look next? Because time doesn’t matter, put it that way. You create time in this world for a reason, in other worlds you will not bother to create time.

I was going to ask whether any of your group have lived in other realities but then I realised that was not a sensible question.

When you think of what you are saying then think about the words coming out and you have to listen to them. You are not forming them. They are being formed by a whole bunch of consciousness. Each of those consciousnesses has experiences of all kinds and so when you ask “have any of you”?, how do we get agreement quickly in order to get one particular life in one particular reality where perhaps only a small percentage of the consciousnesses have experienced that reality and they will be different experiences so how can a single experience be put across? We can only put across a group experience. Every group experience is different and is constantly fluctuating.

Yes. I realised that which is why I said it wasn’t a sensible question.

As we said last night due to different senses unbeknown to you that may be used in other realities it is extremely difficult to describe environments which none of your senses could comprehend. You are only able to conceive of worlds similar to your own but simply vibrating at a different rate and therefore invisible to you whereas there are innumerable ways to experience states of being.

You will be able to explore and understand more when you return to the back of the theatre. You can’t do it while you are still on the stage.

The first thing you will do when you move over will be to construct your new realities in conjunction with others in the fashion that you have been used to and you feel comfortable with. So the realities that you wish to put together with this particular band of loved ones, friends, acquaintances and others you will find have already been constructed by the ones that have gone before but as generations go over these will evolve as well. In terms of the gradations, as each wave, shall we say, goes over it constructs the reality to suit its comfort zone, much as music tastes change with the different ages. Choice is infinite and you will have many different realities that you care to focus into. Just like having a number of homes in a number of countries with different cultural amenities. Your house on the beach, your house in the country, your apartment in town each with their different range of activities and social connections.

Take your own favourites and imagine that if you could construct everything that you wanted to what would you do? Would there be people who would like to do the same and when you say “people’ there will be other group consciousnesses won’t there and they will have created many realities. Which ones will you choose to focus into, become part of? As your Heather said “Over here there are heres and theres everywhere” and if you think about that it describes what we have just talked about. You construct all your realities to suit.

There are those who go in search of other realities just for the sake of exploration and discovery of something new. Once more as above so below and vice versa. There are those who sit on the stones and those that turn over the stones.

July 28th 2017 All Worlds are Thought Worlds, All is Always Connected.  The whole idea of “reality” is that it is put at “arm’s length“ in order to try to experience a separateness of self.

In some of the previous articles you have been led to touch upon the fringes of what is the manner in which you, as human beings, see the reality which you enjoy. We hope to be able to pass across further analogies in the future which will tie together some of these conceptions and misconceptions and form a, let us say, more coherent picture, more intelligible picture of the reality you enjoy and how it is created by consciousness.

We need to have in many instances the prompts of questions because it enables the mind of the instrument to go more easily into an open, more waiting mode and then we are able to pass through that information with little hindrance. Whereas if the instrument is just waiting for whatever comes in, the monkey mind, although not apparent, is moving the tuning needle in a random fashion across the frequencies, it is not staying still. When the mind focuses on the question then the needle stays still. We are able to latch on and once we start to be able to transmit then we don’t get any interference. We are able to use the clear channel thus created. Do you understand?

Yes.

This is a two-way street. It takes two to tango and we need a question, however wild, however not concerned with the subject, just to get the focus and then we can switch the subject.

In the previous session there were different voices speaking. Can you explain please?

The voices you hear are, as you would expect, produced by those who basically take centre stage. As we have said before the majority then sit back and wait for, what we have previously termed, the teachers, their thoughts, to predominate. When their thoughts predominate then a certain aspect is generally adopted in order to produce the tone of voice. Just as various aspects of personality are produced then would you not say that the voice is indicative of a certain melding of consciousness?

Yes.

So the voice changes depending on the personalities that are coming to the fore. Some are very confident in what they are saying and therefore that will come across. Once more, if you had to hold the attention of a roomful of people then would you prefer this type of voice to come across or, let us say, David’s ordinary voice which may be hesitant and repetitive, not always of course, but sometimes and maybe with some changes of direction?  Whereas those who are prepared with what they wish to say, simply because they are not in the time-based environment, can therefore put everything together, we may say, previously. There is no need to be looking for the next word except to pick it out from the instruments repertoire.

As we are speaking now you will find a certain resemblance to that which you just listened to even in terms of the halting speech and gaps between the sequences of words. This can alter as someone else decides to take over and talk on a different subject. So perhaps, if we were to talk about music and rhythm and dance and singing then we could invite others to take over and a certain difference would be heard because the emotions and the audience for the material on those subjects would not want to be spoken to in an authoritarian, lecturing type of intonation but would prefer a softer, warm, fuzzy feeling, relaxing, happy and so much more enjoyable and upbeat. There is a certain amount of excitement and empathy going with the flow of the music so the voice will change as the subjects change. If there are purely teachings coming through then you will wish them to be sharp and clear in such a way that you can transcribe them effectively and those reading the words will, whether you know it or not, pick up, connect with the certainty, the authority coming through those words. As they read the words they will connect with the feeling. They will, on another level, hear the tones that you now hear and so the consciousnesses that are part of the readers overall conscious will hear in much the same way as the instrument’s consciousnesses are now listening to the words. You will understand that all the consciousnesses that are presently listening to what is going on are generally accepting what is being said as reasonable and logical because after all it is coming from their majorities as we have said before. Each time something comes through, shall we say, or is spoken by that majority, then it becomes, what you might call, group think, group belief until the next consciousnesses join and someone says “what about this then”? This may cause a moment of reflection and “well yes, we’re willing to listen”. Discussion commences, the instrument starts to, talk to yourself, (itself) say or others ( presumably non-physical ) and different opinions are picked up once more.

Now, you might say that this can all be done on our level but the reason that we focus on the stage is because the feeling is different when you are on the stage and certain things are enacted on the stage that you cannot enact in our reality. You cannot destroy a creation, shall we say. What we are saying here is that we create something in our own reality in imagined aspect and unless we give someone permission to destroy it, and why should we, then it remains our preserve. When we come into the physical we know it is co-created and we deliberately push our instrument out there to see what will happen. Sometimes the unexpected happens which is why we are there in the first place, to experience.  (Flow of words suddenly stopped)

All is change. We change from one moment to the other and perhaps part of what we were saying was not of interest to the overall consciousness and therefore minds drifted, you might say, and there was no longer the intensity of focus on the words being spoken and as the interest waned the words no longer are spoken. Do you understand that?

Yes.

Just as your mind, as you know it, can wander in the physical then it is far easier for minds to wander in the non-physical with each idea. A plethora of ideas come by, it is so easy to get distracted. Whereas with yourselves in the physical world with your eyes open it is hard to get distracted if you are focused on a particular endeavour and your sights, sounds and senses coming to you are all from that endeavour as obviously other things get blocked out. It is not so easy to block things out in the non-physical, you have to be even more mindful as to what you are about.

I am having trouble dreaming up questions at the moment.

You do not have to write down lists of questions. You can ask, as you did with the bees, as you did with the earthquakes, with Nepal. Just ask for more information on things that are of interest to you, you can ask about global warming and what can we tell you? You feel that the seasons for example are constructed by conscious beings of which you are unaware?

I can’t follow you.

You think that it is all automatic because the earth swings on its axis round the sun but you are thinking in linear terms once more. In the world of no time there is always the present so which consciousness is thinking “I’ll move this way, I’ll move that way “? What is being experienced?

Perhaps you could explain how you can have seasons with no time.

Simply, you are in the world of time, your seasons are in the world of time but if you wish to create seasons in the world of no time you create the seasons. All seasons are available at all times, so it is simply where you wish to focus. Do you wish to focus on an autumn scene or a spring scene? Do you wish to focus with the trees bursting into bud or the leaves falling? At the present time you are in the autumn and it gives you great pleasure in seeing the different colours of the leaves. They present a very pleasant picture for you to observe but of course after going through a cold winter it gladdens your heart to see the fresh young leaves appearing on the bare branches.

Yes.

And you have a belief in all this, so what you believe in, what you expect, you create.

It would be very muddled and confusing if you said what you concentrate on you are creating because you could desire one day to be seeing the green leaves and the next day to be seeing the bare branches and the next day to be seeing the green leaves. There has to be some semblance of order surely?

Where are you speaking from? When you use the word “you”, are you speaking from within physical reality or from without physical reality?

From within physical reality.

Where is physical reality being created from?

From without. So if you say that by concentrating on something, by desiring something you are creating it.. you can’t… you must have some semblance of order, there must be some semblance of order.

So, if you put yourself in the position of your higher consciousness can you experience many selves simultaneously in different environments, in different centuries, in different times of the year?

This is something that is very difficult to get a real hold on. The answer is yes but it’s just…

So can you have several television screens, shall we say, each one showing different seasons of the year?

Of course.

If you watch one screen to the exclusion of others are the other screens still there?

That’s a little bit like the tree falling in the wood isn’t it? One imagines yes they are.

You are able to watch four screens, each one displaying the activity in different seasons of the year. You focus on one in particular because you are interested in, say, spring. Are the other screens still beaming out their information?

Yes.

You have your answer.

Everything exists at all times. You can focus on whatever you wish to focus upon. Back to your plays, you are sitting in the centre of six plays going on. Whichever one you care to focus on you can be involved in. When we say involved in, mentally involved in. You can be, caught up in, what is going on, until you switch yourself to another one. But the plays are still going on. Now imagine they are continuous plays and you will dip in and dip out as you wish. In some you will decide to stay, “this is a most interesting one”. You have to take on board the fact that you are able, and you do, you are, living many, many lives at once.

You must understand that you are connected. In much the same way that you are connected by your telephone with various people, are they still there?

Yes.

Can you talk to them at any time? Where does your interest take you? Do they know you are here? Are you connected?

Yes.

So, if you had e. g. a Skype screen for every person that you were connected with arranged around this room, you could look at this, that one or the other one. Whichever one you wished to speak to and they wished to speak back to you. Would you agree?

Yes.

Now would you say that your connection exists with all of those people?

Yes.

It just depends upon which connection you focus upon. Once more we go back to the speed of cognition and then realise that you can be focused upon as many as you wish to. All at the same time depending on the speeds of cognition relevant in those realities.

Yes.

In general, realities are constructed requiring slower speeds of cognition than those that pertain in the reality of the constructor. Do you understand?

I think so.

If we take the amount of, we have to use the word “time”, as the time necessary to speak and understand the sentence in a reality, say a physical reality, then you can measure that in seconds, say, but in another reality, in a computer reality, the mind that can work at the pace of computers, that is understood in nanoseconds. Therefore take the seconds that are required in the physical reality and many other types of realities, the nanoseconds that it takes for receiving and transmitting from the centre enables you to say that (understanding, decision making and direction) basically it is a piece of cake, you can just handle the whole lot at once, multi-tasking with ease. Able to keep up with everything because as soon as the thought arises in one reality, you answer, immediately.

Yes, fully understand.

We may arrange it so that the compressed data, we might say, then has to be decompressed in the brain or the mind. Can you understand what we are saying here?

Yes, no problem with that.

In other words if you wish to download a film from the internet it can be compressed into a few seconds and yet when you play it, it may be an hour. The same principle applies in that the speed of apprehension, cognition of what is going on and the instructions given back, the instructions can be given back in compressed form to be then expanded in that particular reality’s time scale. So it is not a great leap of imagination to understand you can be living in all these realities simultaneously.

If we can come back to your question, please repeat it.

I was asking about focus and the necessity of continuity but you have explained that quite well.

Continuity is merely in your perception, purely in your perception and we hopefully have hit upon a good analogy here in that of data compression and expansion. It is very difficult for you to understand that the consciousness works at, you may say, enormously greater speeds because you cannot understand instantaneous. Due to your limited human ability to understand, let us say it is hundreds of times the speed of light, and you would reply, I could not measure that, to me it would seem to happen at the same time and that it exactly what does happen. It is simply that there is no space for light or signals to have to travel through.

All is always connected and all is always known. The whole idea of reality is that it is put at “arm’s length “, shall we say, in order to try to experience a separateness of self.

We are obviously constrained by the lack of knowledge available in physical reality of the conditions pertaining in non-physical reality and even if the instrument was well versed in today’s science you will no doubt agree that all the methods of explanation derive from physical reality.

Yes.

Terms simply do not exist for what happens in non-physical reality even if non-physical reality is contemplated in the first place.

That’s right.

So we are back to “dark matter”, “dark energy” and who knows what? We try as hard as we can to find analogies for you to understand the “ever present”. If you sit down and purely follow the logic that consciousness is all there is, consciousness lights up in various formats in such a way that other consciousness, shall we say, is able to see what another consciousness is producing. Do you understand this?

I can picture it in my mind.

Put it this way. As you look out from your eyes, can you see your face?

No.

Would you agree that you are producing your face?

Yes.

Your consciousness is producing its idea of what it wishes to project but it cannot see its own face, you have to have a mirror. If the mirror wasn’t there somebody else would tell you, but that is another consciousness projecting itself, so you would see each other and inform each other?

Yes.

Now, imagine all of consciousness doing just that, not just humans, everything is representing itself and then because you adopt the senses of recognition applicable to the physical reality you can enjoy the manifestations of all the participating consciousnesses. Yet all this is, is a conglomeration of (individual) gestalts, groups of consciousness, (producing) a conglomeration of images. Yes?

Yes.

So although we have referred to imagination before, it is each imagining his own projection, her own projection, its own projection and understanding and enjoying its part in the reality. Knowing that it is being seen by others and it is seeing. See and be seen. Yet, you can think to yourself that these are only thought pictures being broadcast and you are merely tuning in to the broadcast, but those broadcasts are fitted in, in that the tree, broadcasting, is in concert with the lake that it is sitting next to and with the mountain that is in the background and with the consciousnesses of the people sitting underneath the tree. So you get what is a composite broadcast, co-created and co-agreed.

This is not too difficult to understand once you try. As we have said before it is a question of designing and creating the set (the set in a play or film). This is what is happening but all that is actually there is the thought. Can you grasp this?

Yes, I can envisage many tuning into and adding to a reality like joining in a virtual reality game.

All is connected and you are enjoying the thought realities but you shut out the fact that it is a thought reality and adopt the belief that this is solid reality ( although we all know that nothing is “solid” we accept the concept because it is necessary for our functioning) because it is more enjoyable, it is different. As you aware by now there are many, many realities that you can enjoy. You just choose those which you find suit you more than others.

So it wouldn’t matter if physical reality no longer existed?

Physical reality is..

Just one of many.

Just one of as many as you care to contemplate. You cannot understand other realities, you can get some idea but..

The trouble is you think of them in physical terms. It is impossible not to think of them in physical terms. You might think of them in different colours or things of that nature but you still think of them in physical terms?

Put yourself in the position of someone who is blind and lives in a world of just sound and has no touch, say. All he has is a world of sound. So shut your eyes and imagine the blindness. Imagine those sounds being just sounds in your head, thoughts; thoughts being translated into the only language you know, the language you speak in or the language of pictures, but you would have previously needed to have seen to understand what they were. So you must take yourself to another level and imagine that if you were able to receive thoughts, in pixel form say, you could look at the blank screen in your mind and then a picture starts to appear. So although you think “I am blind” this picture starts to appear and you realise that this is something that exists in the thoughts of others and they are working together to present this, “now what can I add to it”?

So just as the artist looks at the painting, you in your thoughts see the picture and you decide to create or paint or light up a little corner of the picture, provided that those already in the game agree. You then enter your contribution to the picture that is going around and the picture has a certain permanence to it, but just as you are aware of what happens to everything, it is constantly changed by those who join and those who leave. So you have a moving picture, a changing picture. (Which we interpret as reality)

Once you sit and start to think these things through you will also realise that you can’t just change the picture without the consent of all and if you are a small player in a big picture you are not going to change much, are you? As above so below you might say, but you will find your own niche. It may not be fully to your liking but you will find it or you will turn your focus away and find another niche which is more to your liking.

(The last two paragraphs are reminiscent of the saying “We are all threads in God’s tapestry.”)

Thank you.

To All of Our Readers

Please let us know if you can understand what has been said whether or not you agree with it. We would really appreciate feedback as we need to know that our work is worthwhile.

Thank you.

P.S. Just before posting the above I came across an article about an artist, Pat Hines, using Microsoft Paint creating “realities” just using a mouse. His imagination became intention, focused, he pointed and lit up and the picture formed. Also https://qz.com/983188/this-stunning-graphic-novel-was-entirely-illustrated-using-microsoft-paint/.

Imagine many “artists” (gestalts) combining to create the picture, “the reality”. Now see the parallel, these people are co-creating realities using their imagination.

A Point to Ponder

Are we living in a computer program? 4th August 2017

See: The Simulation Hypothesis, Fairwind Films, Youtube

There is a popular hypothesis that we are living in a gigantic computer simulation. This depiction of reality, or not, seems to be a physically centric version of your statements regarding our reality.

Many of our scientists, technologists and others in the last few years and some before have been speculating as to whether physical reality is actually a simulated reality and that we all may be living in a computer simulation, let us say, in that there is some controlling being or beings that are producing what to us is reality whereas in effect we are merely ciphers being manipulated by others of which we know not. According to your previous analogies, with reference to the cheetah for example, then it seems to me that the so-called simulation is actually a continuous refreshment of the elements of a particular reality either by perfection of design or evolution by allowing various differences to emerge or simply experimentation. The reason for this would be that the original idea was continually being expanded upon so as to ensure continuity of experiences that are available for those that wish to participate in them. Now could you just give us your thoughts on how this reality is produced? We understand that it is imagination, we understand the artist connotation, we understand the getting together but as far as we are concerned we have to use physical terms so we use “computer and pixels”. When it comes down to a thought world we can understand that it can be pictures in the mind and you say there is no space, no time and no distance to travel so instantaneous. How can we have any idea apart from relating back to the origin of the ”Big Bang” and imagining consciousness compressed into a single point? Although this has been a rambling statement I would appreciate your clarification to help us grasp more fully the actual position.

As we stated in our last session it is impossible for you to grasp the attributes of the non-physical in terms of the physical. In relation to the analysis as expressed in the question/statement then yes you could look at the totality as being just a point, but how do you see that point? You see that as a point in space or a point surrounded by space so how could you possibly envisage a point with no space surrounding it? What would that point be? Because you couldn’t envisage a point if it didn’t have space surrounding it. Can you see that?

Yes.

This is one of the problems in trying to get these explanations over to you. The human being has grappled with this enigma ever since they set foot on the earth. Ever since they were first imagined, and we are no further forward, simply because there is nothing to stand outside of. How do you envisage that? There is, let us say, ”nothing”, but you are fully aware that out of the seeming “nothing” comes everything. You are aware that the waves/particles emerge from the “void” and disappear back into the void, yet you have no idea of what the void is. You must remember that we are but one step removed from you from where we are speaking at this present time and you must also be aware that, just as we don our goggles or diving suit, you might say, to focus upon physical reality, we also have to block out other information which does not pertain to this. If we need to go beyond that we would have to do this in a step- down procedure and that is not as easy as it may seem.

So it is very difficult for us to give you information that will enable you to get a clear picture of how this happens. Let it suffice to say that, as you outline in your statement, the idea first arose in the imagination, it was embellished upon and expanded and added to until the world as you know it formed. So the parallel runs along with the “Big Bang”. It started, it expanded, it coalesced and various evolutionary paths came into being and it resulted in the position in which you find yourself at the present time.

Now you are indeed correct in restating, as in the cheetah analogy, let us say, that the original idea is continually expanded upon because you couldn’t have a cheetah that resembled a kangaroo as you would wonder “where the hell did that come from”? “Did they cross it with a kangaroo? “There aren’t any kangaroos where the cheetahs are and vice versa” “How did that happen”? That would set off a whole line of mystery and enquiry as to the nature of reality in which you exist and as we have said before, that would rather spoil the show, wouldn’t it?  So everything is moved forward by degree. It is just like a soap opera, we keep putting in new events, new angles, new things to look at and make sure that you can understand how they have been arrived at, how they have developed. Through technical, through biological, whatever.

This has got to be simply so that you can feel that you are able to discover, to advance, to create. The creative urge from our side is expressed in each reality, in some more than others. Some are, what you might say, holiday realities, rest homes, “let’s just enjoy ourselves here and leave the creative bit behind”. In other realities the creative ability is given full rein and so then you advance at a certain rate. Each reality will have these elements where you will advance at a faster rate in some than others. In some cases you will decide that you have exhausted that line for now and move on to another one. Alternatively you may decide to change the parameters and we will have to do that in such a way that the story line is changed, much as in a soap when an actor decides to leave the show he has to be written out and a replacement theme adopted so that the continuity is preserved.

So when you talk about computer simulations, the reason the word simulation is used is because the writers are wary of saying this is a product of the imagination because although they create the virtual realities they find it difficult to acknowledge that whatever is creating the simulation has to be separate from the simulation and so they infer that it is advanced beings or aliens or something else, of course the word “being” or “alien” denotes another “pseudo human”, shall we say, even though that is not alluded to, rather than attribute it to an invisible consciousness.

Once you come out with the idea that everything is just consciousness, which has been stated by many of your most eminent scientists and philosophers, it generally hasn’t been taken any further as to how did consciousness arise. It has been put forward that consciousness is an epiphenomenon of the brain, say, then the word ”mind” comes in and yet what is “mind”? Is mind part of the brain? Some say yes, some say no. What controls the mind? So we are back to the consciousness again aren’t we? This is an area where mathematics are rather left behind. Mathematics are part of the underlying structure of physical reality but do not have any relevance in non-physical reality and if you don’t have any mathematics, and you don’t have any senses, apart from your meditative connections, shall we say, then how do you measure this thing called consciousness?

So this area is steered away from. If you can’t use maths and you can’t use your laboratory what can you use? You can only use your thoughts and if concepts emerge from thoughts they are usually treated as philosophical theories because scientific theories generally need to be underpinned by mathematics to prove the theory and with consciousness that cannot be done.

This is one area in which, as we stated before, it is going to be impossible to give you an answer. So, by all means, treat it as a computer simulation but instead of having your being, alien, programmer programming this so called computer, even though that may be a 2D pixelated universe, why not substitute that by consciousness imagining, in their mind, and we cannot expand that because you cannot understand mind.

Near death experiencers, when outside the body, what are they using? They are not using the brain, are they? They are using the mind, but they cannot express themselves until they are back in the body and therefore what does one say. How is the brain involved? It is seemingly not involved and yet it (the experience) could only be expressed by using the brain. Using the brain as an intermediary factor to operate the voice box in order to tell of the experiences.

So how does one show that the mind is separate? Now to some degree we are proving the point as we speak except for the fact that some might turn around and say that this person may be able to formulate all this in view of what he has learned over the years. Perhaps he is using his innate imagination to form these concepts and voice them in a relatively seamless manner.

We will leave it there as we simply cannot give you anything which you will be able to understand due to the restrictions of the terms available to us

Non-Locality, No Space, No Time.

Now when it comes to non-locality, this is something that is spoken of but is simply impossible to envisage. You are equipped with senses to see space, you are totally immersed in a time based world, so how can you understand a situation where everybody is surrounded by their own creation, be it co-creation or not, when we say ”own’ it encompasses all of those engaged in the particular reality in which you find yourself. The same thing applies to time, just as space expands in all directions around you so does time. Your mind expands back into the past and then forward into the future as you simply apply a system of measurement to it. So you have a measurement which you can measure in terms of your both written and perceived history and in your speculation as to the future that you can put a relative degree of understanding upon 1800 and the year zero, the year 400, the year 1100. You can place buildings there, you can place names there and when you go forward you only have a vague idea, but you can, to some degree again, speculate as to forms of transport and other forms of energy etc. some through extrapolation some through pure speculation.

But when it comes to bringing yourself down to non-locality, no  ”where” no “space”, what is it? Because even if you think that you see what is all around you and you are a point of awareness you still have to think in terms of “space’ because in order to see you must see light reflection and therefore you will measure the distance the light reflects from. Yet when you see in your mind, where is the “space” then? Do you think you see in your brain or do you think that you see in your mind? Now near death experience, out-of-body experience don’t really shed any further light on the subject as normally you are seeing other environments within you present physical reality. It is only in dreams that you find yourself in other realities and even then, have you created those from other scenarios that you have been browsing and simply transformed them into something you understand? Or, have you been out-of-body during the sleep state and just found yourself in a strange house or a strange location with people dressed in other forms? Once more, were these other people’s dreams, other people’s fantasies, mind creations? It is all very difficult.

So how do we find some form of analogy that enables you to get some glimmer of understanding with regard to “no space”?

So we came up with this idea that just as science reduces everything you see to a single origin, be it particle or wave and then suggests that everything is composed of numbers of these entities, so let us do the same thing to space. And the easiest way we can find is to say to you, imagine that your kilometre is only a millimetre, but use the same sense perceptions that you are already using and so reduce 5000 kilometres to 5000 millimetres. That immediately brings the object from 5000 kilometres away to 5 metres away, which means, you are already there, instantaneously. Now you have heard through various transmissions etc. that you just think of somewhere and you’re there, but how about you think of somewhere and it’s here? In your mind.

Just as this reality is in your mind, in your imagination, so is all the reality that you think is at a distance from you. You know of it and so you can envisage it. That enables you to imagine yourself “being there” when you think it is only 5 metres away, “Here I am standing there right in front of it”. But then, has it come to you? This applies also to the creations of others. If they are all existing in the same space as you are, all consciousnesses exist in the same space as you do, this is where your concept of the “One”, “All That Is “, “God” comes from, and yet it is made up of innumerable awarenesses. So is it the sum of the parts or is it a whole that operates through its parts? I don’t suppose you or we will know this, ever, and so we for one, have given up, as we have said before. We just rejoice in the fact that “we are” and can explore our creativity.

But you are still looking and so if you feel that everything is in the one place and you can understand that, then all the imagined realities of consciousness are in the one place also. Just as the pictures on your computer screen stack up, one behind the other, and as you click along the top headings they come to prominence, imagine that to infinity. All the pictures are there, on that flat screen, merely different configurations of the pixels.

So imagine, as we have said before, that the quantum wave background, if you wish, we will make things up here as nobody can give you any better definition, just responds to any reality and can itself, each wave in the background, respond in infinite ways. Just as the block of stone holds all potential designs then the wave background holds all potential realities, so as you focus on the one you intend to see it simply appears around you and also if another says ”Come and join me here, this is a reality I have created. I am on a balcony of a coffee bar high in the hills of Capri with a fabulous view over the Mediterranean”, and they send you the thought form. You say “why not” and you sit in the seat opposite. We can say that you project a thought form through space or you can say that the reality is in the same place as every other reality. Within your imagination you join in the co-created imaginative reality of your friend and as you are both many consciousnesses acting as one, as we have said before, then the two of you, groups of consciousness, then enjoy a nice coffee and a chat overlooking the Mediterranean. But you haven’t gone anywhere, you have simply produced the reality that you enjoy and you have got lost in your own creation, lost in your drama only this time it is not a drama of course, and you enjoy the reality of it all and why should that not be?

So, you could apply the same thing to time. You could take the year and make it 1/100 of a second. Now wouldn’t that simplify the life review? So easy to understand? What you see as a year others see as 1/100 of a second, shall we say, so your 70 years becomes 0.7 seconds and so your life flashes through and you see all the events. Of course you can understand that because if you look at all the sites on the computer which your search engines can scan in a fraction of a second then it wouldn’t be too hard for a computer to scan the major events of your life in a fraction of a second, flash them onto the screen in quick succession and if you were quick enough to comprehend each one then you would see as fast as the computer could present. You would also understand the information presented. (The feelings of yourself and the other parties etc.)

Now you can marry the two together of course. As you well know, time and space are relative and time and speed of motion are relative so if you come down to instantaneous, then no time has passed. So when your friend sends you the thought of the creation she has made in Capri, it comes instantaneously, you accept instantaneously and so time and space have simply disappeared. You are all in the one place, enjoying all your realities in no time and simply moving from one reality, one area of enjoyment, discovery, entertainment, thrill, challenge to another, whatever reality you care to join into we will say, rather than envisage, because all consciousnesses are grouping together to create the realities of their choice. You simply have to ask whether you can join in and if you are prepared to abide by the rules of that reality and you are acceptable to the majority that is within that reality then you can join in.

It is simply sometimes, many times, getting to know that these realities exist. So you go from one to the other, you learn of others, you exchange notes, you exchange ideas and because the thoughts are continually moving around, too many to mention, in the main you will only pick up associated thoughts but sometimes they are so tenuously associated that they introduce you to new areas that branch off shall we say. Whereas you were thinking along one particular line you suddenly find yourself thinking along another particular line and according realities surface into your awareness.

Have we been reasonably clear? Can you understand to some degree the notion of no time, no space, non-locality, everything simply being encompassed in one small point? Much like the Big Bang Theory of course. It all arose, sooooooooh it is speculated, from a singular little point.

We have just demonstrated that not only can the universe arise from a single point but so can all realities. Can you see the comparison?

Thank you.

Science Discovers Consciousness

Further evidence that our Universe may be a ‘cosmic hologram’

 
,

 

“What is done by what is called myself is, I feel, done by something greater than myself in me.” ~James Clerk Maxwell, physicist, on his deathbed in 1879

———-

Can you comment on the research that has established that the appropriate area of the brain “lights up”, is in action, between 0.5 and 2.0 seconds before the picture is shown that elicits that reaction?

See also Norretranders/Libet 

First let us set out the factors that need to be taken into account in order to consider the phenomena of which you speak. First of all the brain is a physical instrument created for the purpose of receiving and analysing information received from physical senses although it has the other attribute in that it can receive information from a non-physical source. Secondly the brain processes you might say knowledge, programming, but the brain is immersed in a world of time so that anything that is actioned, segmented, analysed, whatever, is done within the framework of reference of a time based system.

As we spoke last night, the restricted consciousness that exists, is focused, within the world of time, co-exists, melds, is merged, is part of the brain and neurological systems. The consciousness that is termed as non-physical does not exist in a time based system and therefore can go backwards and forwards in what you would call time because everything exists that can be focused upon. Now, for example, you have many examples of pre-cognitive visions and knowledge that have been published over the ages. The one that you use most is that of Air Vice Marshal Sir Victor Goddard and the airfield. (Google Sir Victor Goddard for the full account) It is clear that future environments, future events can be “seen” and most people will give the nod to this that somehow the future can be seen. By the way, so can the past, without it actually being memory, because where there is no time, past, present, future are all the same. (Google time slips)

Now, when it comes to how does the consciousness that is in the non-physical relate to the constricted consciousness that is focused in the physical, because the non-physical is not in the world of time it can see the pictures that are coming up on the computer screen regardless, but, you may say, the random number generator hasn’t chosen it yet, but of course it has, because that is the future.  It is viewing the computer screen as it exists at a future moment in time. (Google precognition research)

The “part” of your consciousness that exists in no time can see events that exist ahead in time. So, in which case, because you have the connection between the two linked “parts”, the two focuses of the particular consciousness, then the non-physical consciousness, which after all, is guiding, controlling, is influencing, from a light touch on the tiller to total control of the constricted consciousness, because it has already viewed what is coming up it can’t help but transmit that information to the physical brain as the connection exists all the time. So the physical brain lights up ahead of the constricted consciousness seeing the picture and this creates the question in the minds of the researchers. “What caused the brain to light up, when there was no conscious awareness of what is going on?” When all previous concepts had said that the decision comes before the action yet here we are faced with the action coming before the decision. Not only that, the action was coming before there was even an awareness that a decision was to be made i. e. the computer had not yet chosen the picture to be shown that would elicit the response that would be expected to light up the appropriate part of the brain. (Google Norretranders, Libet)

Can you see that for the one that resides in the world of no time it is easy to see what is coming up? As the intensity builds up, we have covered this before, it reaches a point where we know it will manifest in the physical but that will be ahead of the (physical) consciousness being aware of that manifestation.

If you look at out-of-body and near death experiences you will find a parallel and see that the senses you think are confined to the physical body, are in fact also able to function independently. You will realise that some part of your consciousness is not spatially restricted and can bring back irrefutable evidence of having been fully aware of events from a location other than that of the physical body.

So, with the two things, the precognition, the out-of-body, it is quite easy to see how the action in the brain precedes the decision by the awareness of the physical instrument.

We have not discussed that you and your higher self are one and the same. In one or more of our previous discussions we have slipped in the phrase “you are always there anyway” and another phrase “life is continuous”. So let us talk about the fact that while one portion of your total consciousness is focused into the physical we haven’t talked about the fact that the rest of your consciousness is focused where?

We have mentioned the fact that you are living many lives and so you have several focuses and we have mentioned the fact many times that this world you are focused in is a co-created world. Co-created with your fellow higher consciousnesses which upon a moment’s reflection you will agree must be the case so that you can manipulate your puppets with seamless coordination. Now, just reflect upon the foregoing words and you will come to the inevitable conclusion that your higher consciousnesses are always in communication. They are living a life in much the same way as you in your restricted consciousness, stretched consciousness, puppet form are living your life. Now when you move back over we also stated that you and your higher consciousness immediately become one again if you already haven’t woken up to that fact whilst in the physical, but that is an aside because of David.

Now as you all have been in continuous lives in what you might say are parallel dimensions because look at where all the stretched pieces (referring to a previous analogy whereby you imagine your total consciousness stretched out with one end focused in the physical and the other focused in say your home base) shall we say, all the puppets, the dimension they are in and look at the veil, the black cloth, the curtain that separates the puppets from the higher consciousness. Look at the thoughts and actions that are being performed by both, let’s say, thoughts. The actions performed by the puppet are indeed occasioned by the thoughts being thought by the higher consciousness, which of course are immediately reflected in the actions of the puppet. But you will see that these lives are parallel. The lives of the puppets and the lives of the controlling consciousnesses are in parallel which is why the concept of parallel universes holds some water although it is doubtful that this line of reasoning has been followed to conceive that concept. But truth, the word, we find to be somewhat morphic in that it can morph from one thing to another as consciousness expands, but truth will out in one form or another or many maybe.

You have, are and will, while you consort with the same groups of consciousness of course, always be together, and so as you move back over it will seem as if no time has passed because you have been with each other all the time. Can you understand this? You are just as much with your loved ones now as you ever were, simply on another level. It is just that one of your group has withdrawn his focus, withdrawn his puppet from the parallel universe that you consider that you are inhabiting. So when you move over you will not just be met again, you will also quickly remember that you never actually left in the first place. And so our talks about updates in various lives were to enable you to make the mental transition to understand how “yes, I can see that I would already know everything”. Once being able to accept that fact, you can now possibly accept the fact that the reason you haven’t missed a thing is because you’ve always been there!

So, you live many lives at once, in all dimensions, and life is continuous in all dimensions, so as someone in the Ecclesiastical side said on your plane many, many moons ago, “it is just like stepping from one room to another.” You will not even realise that anything has changed once you turn your gaze from the physical to that of the, what you consider to be, your total consciousness.

You were talking about the higher self being in parallel with the physical body. The physical body is made up of myriad consciousnesses so how does that work for the higher self which is in parallel?

Are you assuming that the higher self is responsible for the consciousnesses that have chosen to be a part of maintaining the instrument whilst also in return being able to experience the activities of the instrument?

Yes, really.

Why should the higher self, which is a group of consciousness which has conspired together, you may say, to create the form that you consider to be the physical body and the material conception that you have overlaid upon the physical body and many of you now perceive it only to be, what you might call, a trick of the light… you are thinking once more from a separatist point of view that there be a body consciousness and a higher consciousness. As we have said before, it is all part of one consciousness. So imagine your stretched consciousness, this is not a good analogy but let us start from here. Imagine your stretched consciousness putting out a tentacle into the physical and using it to form an instrument, and then by, let us say, radiating, reflecting light into the physical and then when it lets the tentacle slowly, for your purposes, return to the total of the group consciousness, the light slowly diminishes and therefore the body, if you care to speed the process up, disappears in front of your eyes. Would you agree with that analogy?

Yes.

So, the consciousness makes up the physical body and also subscribes to the idea of the implant of the event that is that life. Now, consciousnesses join and leave the group idea, the idea of Joe Public, all the time. Those that wanted to experience the “job” of being a heart valve, or part of the heart valve operation, if they feel they have gained enough experience they may go off and hitch their star to another idea, if they haven’t they will find another heart valve idea to be a part of. So the idea of a life is a combination, depending on which end you start from of course. But, if you start with the general idea of a life, then you have to say “what do we need to make this a reality”? All the plans, sub-plans and materials, job descriptions, have to be scheduled and volunteers for all those jobs are sought, shall we say, but in general as soon as the job vacancy is announced there are more applicants than you need. Is this structure starting to make sense for you in the way that you would be able to see the same operation being performed in the physical?

I think so.

So, what happens to them all? They all, switch their focus. Some take more time to switch their focus than others. Would it not spoil the plot somewhat if the body just disappeared into thin air. What would it be like if people just suddenly disappeared? Would you consider they had died, because there was nothing there? There was a living person there one minute and nothing there the next. What would you speculate? Where have they gone? But if you have the body die then it is generally accepted, “Ah well, that person has stopped living, we had better dispose of this piece of material because it is beginning to smell a little”. Some think, “well, whatever activated this body, I wonder if that has died too, or has it continued on somewhere?”

You can have a nice little debate and discussion about the possibilities but you can understand why the body doesn’t suddenly go “poof”? It would spoil the whole structure, let us say, of the opera.

As much as you think that this is all illusion please remember that the consciousnesses involved in the experience of the “I” are indeed learning even if you feel that you are only operating an instrument. You are operating an instrument in interaction with many, many others and so you learn from your operation. You may learn, you might say, in a second-hand fashion but do you think it is second-hand when you spur the instrument to say certain words and the response is something you had not expected. You may think we know ahead of everything but that would rather spoil the whole game wouldn’t it, as we have pointed out before. So yes, we agree to what we are going to do but ad-libbing, you might call it, is really the object of the game so that we can try out one action and see the reaction from the other parties. Now, everybody involved in the game is fully aware of what is going on and, whether you like it or not, is actually quite agreeable with regard to relations between all the, we use the word, puppeteers. It may not be the word that most would like but it really does sum it up but remember, that your puppet is your puppet, it is not inanimate. You may as well call it your puppy, your child, you have a complete bond. How do you feel when your child is, let us say, under threat from another? You feel protective, you feel loving, you feel that you must come to the rescue and you hold them to yourself as if they were your own. Well that is a (the) relationship between, what you might call, your entity, your higher self, all the usual names, and yourself.

We refer back to the stretched consciousness, it is one and the same. So although we say, puppet, it is as if you put your hand through a hole in the wall but you can see above the wall and all you do is interact with the other hands that are in a similar position. Now do you still feel that the hand is part of you? Of course you do. And so it is with what you call the “I”. The “I” is not dispensed with, it is an integral part of the whole and will remain so. All “I”’s that you create remain a part of the whole, they cannot be set adrift. It is akin to deliberately cutting off your own hand.So although the composition of the “gestalts” (the group of consciousnesses that are focused on and through an instrument/ puppet) that comprise all the groupings that we referred to does change somewhat, we refer you back again to the die-hards (the concept of group souls?)  that like who they are, like what they created and move from one focus to another. Of course they gain friends and lose friends as they go along wherever they focus and as new friends come in, then the actions are changed somewhat as you wish to accommodate the new friends and they wish to accommodate you and the consensus direction, purpose, focus is reached.

All in all you are forever in a relative harmony with whatever you engage upon. So without having to examine this down to the last entrail just take it that one looks after one’s own.

Well, something that we were speaking about over dinner. If it is the same above as below how does that work with all the horrendous things that go on in the physical?

Didn’t you also discuss that the consciousnesses that form the reality in which you dwell, themselves are formed of those with differing inclinations as to what is excitement for them? So when it comes to a matter of degree, where do you draw the line between boxing and wrestling and various other somewhat brutal games and other life threatening activities and using deadly instruments upon each other? How much does a rifle differ from a fist used in anger?

Surely you are not saying that the higher consciousness that is leading many lives at any one point in time would be leading all those types of lives, so therefore where does the as above, so below come in? Surely they are leading lots of different lives? Am I getting muddled up?

You don’t understand what you are saying. Each consciousness can lead several, or many, many, many different lives, some good (we have to use your words here) in your opinion, some bad in your opinion, but in each case it knows that, this is not for real. This is purely an act. As we said before, there are actors who do a good death. People say “that was so realistic when he gets shot”. So, if you know that your particular puppet is just going to be withdrawn, shall we say, then you as the producer of that particular puppet may take pride in manipulating that puppet to show a really good death, so would you volunteer for the job?

Yes.

It is very difficult to move your understanding from a play where the image in your mind is a stage and an audience to that of say, a battlefield where people who do not want to be eliminated are, regardless.

I can fully understand that. What I find difficult to understand is that the consciousness not in the physical is leading many lives and how they can all be as above so below? Because to me the belows are all different so therefore how can the above be the same?

Why shouldn’t the above be all different? This is not the only reality. There are many realities you can experience…For example, most of this appears to work around, what you would call, the nastier aspects of human life?

No, forget the nastier aspects, just as above so below. That’s all I’m querying.

So we are saying that, take everything you see in the physical. That has to have been formed by the non-physical. So what is in the physical cannot be any different except that it has been expressed. So thought and intention exist in the non-physical, expression exists in the physical. Now would not you say that is as above so below, seeing that the physical cannot be produced except by the intent of the non-physical? What is your query here, what does not make sense to you?

I suppose I was imagining lots of different consciousnesses in the non-physical each producing X number of lives in the physical and I couldn’t see how that related back to the as above so below but if you just mean that everything on the physical is replicated in the non-physical…

It is the other way round. Now any consciousness in the non-physical can join the thought stream, you might say, or tune in to the channel of any instrument in the physical that takes its fancy. Are you aware of that?

Yes.

But each instrument is produced by a group consciousness, because that is a precondition, it is a necessity. One consciousness or even a few consciousnesses cannot produce an instrument. You only have to look at the diversity of operations needed to maintain that instrument and the focus of attention needed on each aspect to know that it will require many, many minds working together. But each of those minds can multitask, so it can tune in while it is doing its own job say, if we leave this in the simplistic manner, it can simply have on the television, for want of a better analogy, and watch what is going on in the next door instrument. Do you see a problem with that?

No.

And perhaps your T.V. just like here, has got 200 channels, so you can tune in to this instrument, tune into that instrument. What’s going on here? Nothing much. Oh, look what’s going on over here?  Yes? So nothing is static, it is constantly moving. Forever becoming applies to everything, it does not just apply to a particular instrument or a particular consciousness or a particular viewpoint. Everything is in a constant state of flux. That isn’t chaos, its organised, its intentionally directed. I’ll look at this, I’ll look at that. Run the parallel with your own focus. Just take the time and note how many times your focus changes. Even as your eyes light on various objects as you walk about, do you pick up the doorway to walk through, do you pick up the corners to turn, so you focus, focus, focus, focus. You cannot navigate without continually refocusing. So, if you had the ability just to sit quietly and focus into the image stream being received through the eyes of another instrument or many other instruments then you could say “so and so is at the football game, let’s see what they are seeing”, so and so is meeting so and so else, let me see how they are getting on and what they are saying to each other. Yes?

Yes.

So you, in effect, if you wish to say it this way, can link telepathically all over the place. You might call it hacking into people’s mental activities, but with agreement. If once you just start to sit and muse and think “what does interconnectivity mean”? What are the possibilities here? You can see it from the point of view of the facebook broadcast, everybody receives a message, but what if you could do it the other way? So you broadcast a message and somebody else looks and receives it, they look at it, the information goes into their eyes and their brain decodes the words it sees. But what if you could reverse the process, you could extract the information, or you could get into the central control unit say, in the brain, mind , consciousness, whatever sits best with you, and you would receive the same information stream that the group consciousness is receiving. So you may as well say that you look over, notice the intensity of this group consciousness, there is a lot going on, people are flocking and you join in and say “mind if I take a look”? “Help yourself” comes the reply.

Comment: This is a simple explanation for telepathy, NDE’s where people report sights and sounds in other rooms, out of body experiences and remote viewing, all presumably fuelled by intention or desire. Occam’s razor applied.  You might note that we are seeing this in print for the first time as we type. When we record the sessions the words I speak go in one ear and out the other. We are learning as you are.

With regard to the other question which arises all the time, “why are there so many nasty people”? It is whatever state of mind you wish to be in. As above so below applies here also. Do you understand the state of mind of somebody who wants to brutalise another person to the point of death?

No.

Then why should we? You are receiving the thoughts from the higher consciousness. If the higher consciousness understood, surely, unless it was purely for the benefit of putting on some kind of diabolical play, do you not think that your consciousness would give you some explanation? Mystery doesn’t stop at the earth level.

I would like to ask, how do I speak without understanding the mechanisms?

Relatively simple. You are aware that you walk without consciously moving the muscles and you put this down to the fact that your muscles and the cells within them have learned by repetition how to walk and you have assumed that somehow the brain can instruct all the muscles in turn in some bewilderingly fast series of instructions to move all the particular muscles using all the particular energy production of all the cells that form the muscle fibre to all contract together enabling the muscle to contract and thereby hinge the leg, let us say, and then relax it so that the act of walking is performed. Now indeed there has to be a series of instructions but as yet no one has found the method by which this is performed. You know that by the appropriate stimulus of certain muscles, spasms can be induced and to a certain extent you know that by stimulating various muscles in order a certain motion can be mimicked, shall we say. It looks and acts pretty much like you would be able to do, you would say, consciously, without understanding the term.

Let us shift to the act of speaking and as the same applies to the movement of air through the vocal cords and the shaping of the lips and tongue to form the word then you can see the vast amount of information transmission, orders you might say, that have to be given for each word to be spoken. Now we move back to, let us use your popular term, the implicate order where everything exists and is considered before being explicated, becoming manifest and we refer to our earlier explanation of thought. Now all probabilities are considered by the gestalt of consciousnesses that are interested in the activities of what you term as “you”, your personality, your body. All possible actions are considered and certain ones are chosen at each nanosecond you may say, each moment and then transmitted. Now you are aware from your own scientific examinations of the brain’s enlightenment, shall we say, its perception, that there is obviously a transmission received by the brain before the eyes are aware of perceiving what would cause that particular enlightenment (see Libet and Norretranders) and some accept now that, that order, that transmission is coming from an intelligence, a consciousness that is outside of time, that already knows even before the computer is able to choose,  that will cause, upon perception, that particular area of the brain to be activated.

Now apply that to your sentence construction. Can you do that or shall we go further?

No. I think I am ok with that.

You must, when discussing any of this area of physical embodiment, realise that that part of the group consciousness that is focused in the non-physical observing the part of themselves that are manipulating the physical…. we do not like to use this analogy…. but just think of you standing behind a screen manipulating a puppet on a little stage in front of you or with your hand inside a puppet and see what is happening through your eyes. You do the speaking, the puppet does the speaking. The audience watches the puppet, they don’t watch you even though you are in full view. You don’t actually exist.

Now imagine just the puppet and you behind the black curtain. What is the belief in who is speaking, the puppet? Yet you are watching the reactions of those who are speaking to the puppet. And you understand that the puppet isn’t real. But the puppet can make the audience laugh or cry, they experience the emotion. If you then understand that the audience are also puppets then the operators of the puppets can still feel, can still laugh or cry because of the action of the puppets. But they know that the minute they put the puppets down that the emotion is then able to go away. They may think about it because if it was emotion that was traumatic or even if it was laughter that you wish to remember, it makes you laugh again just on remembering. Even years later you remember it and laugh or remember it and cry. Yet it was still all part of something which you had created.

So in order to understand what is happening in the physical you have to put yourself in the position of the controlling consciousness. And how that controlling consciousness sees what you consider to be real. To go further imagine the puppets using swords. They would slice bits off each other wouldn’t they but you, the puppeteer, would feel nothing except some sadness at the disfiguration of your creation. This sounds rather callous and impersonal but this is the realisation that will come upon you when you return to where you came from.

You had an interesting conversation this afternoon which shows that physical instruments cannot always be relied upon to function at maximum efficiency. Things do go wrong. It is not necessarily planned. People think that everything is planned. Does everything that is planned at your level work out? No it doesn’t. But who is doing the planning? Higher consciousness is doing the planning of course. It is using the instruments, it is experimenting with the instruments, experimenting for the experience. Some things work, most things work and if you look at how things have progressed things are far better organised now than they were in previous ages. Things are being perfected and this experience is becoming more attractive. So more are joining in. It is by no means perfect and we’ll carry on through what you might call the next few thousand years and maybe more as we slowly make the place a lot more enjoyable.

It wouldn’t be any good, would it, if everything was perfect because you would know it was perfect, you would know that there was nothing there that was going to be new, going to be different and it would all get rather boring. If you are sitting there with your puppet you want to keep devising new puppet shows and new activities for your puppets. You want to pit one against the other to see who is best at manipulating their puppets. So you devise games, let us see which one of our puppets can run fastest, let’s bet on these flies crawling up the window, because we don’t know who is going to win. A temporary bit of amusement.

With regard to your Alzheimer’s people you might ask “what has happened to the person that was there”? Nothing has happened to the person that was there. There is still a whole host of consciousnesses interested in being part of the physical. They are still eating, still talking, walking, seeing. They are getting a physical experience.

That’s right.

And they are not worried about anything either. Looked after, meals provided, no real sadness and so some see it as a nice little way to try out a physical experience. So, let’s keep this one going, it’s ticking along quite well, it’s mobile etc. etc. and it hasn’t got any worries so we don’t have to have these fearful thoughts and others coming through. In fact it’s quite blissful. Another reason why these instruments keep going because this is a fairly relaxed way for consciousnesses to experience.

Certainly a different way to look at it.

Are there limits to the information which can be accessed. 25th August 2017

It is apparent that you have more knowledge than you care to divulge regarding the relationship between the physical and non-physical. Are you not allowed to pass certain things on?

It is not a question of not being allowed to divulge the information it is more a question of not being thanked for volunteering further information as those that have decided to focus on the physical experience wish to be kept in ignorance of the non-reality of that focus as they have immersed themselves in their imagination and there is a mutual consensus that this is all there is.  When you focus deeply into a reality and you find yourself on the stage then to you that is your only reality. (If the majority of the gestalt consciousness is of that opinion then it is impossible for said information to be transmitted as it is automatically blocked.)

Now, as we have said before, when you are, let us call it, a puppet master, (suggest when reading this that you remember that puppet master is just a simplified way of describing the gestalt consciousness) then you know full well what is happening in the physical because you are guiding the ropes, shall we say, pushing and pulling to effect action within the physical. But you do have the opportunity to turn around and operate another instrument in another reality, or many realities if you wish, and so you are aware that you are capable of doing so. Of course you find that each reality, when you decide to operate in that reality, takes your full focus.

Let us say that you jump into a racing car and you are moving at high speed on a particular circuit then you leap out and jump into another race car on another circuit, again at high speed, and each time you are in the race with many people. Now, are you fully focusing each time on the race you are in with no thought of the other race and the other race track?

Yes.

Yes, because your continued existence in that race demands your full attention. The same applies. (Some gestalts simply want to enjoy their physical experiences in blissful ignorance much as when reading an exciting book if one is informed of the outcome the continuation of the reading experience loses its aura of mystery and suspense) You are fully focusing, e.g., on the pattern of the cheetah, as we described in a previous session. You are watching for the next pattern and recreating it in your imagination because you have already scanned all the information regarding all the cheetahs that ever were and are. This just comes, you might say, instinctively in that you just put that knowledge to work. You might, as we said, tweak it around a little if you feel that there is something else that can be achieved (the present design can be improved upon)…….

If you are the puppet master of the cheetah does not your action depend on what other puppet masters of other cheetahs are going to do? You could be operating a very peaceful cheetah that is happy to lay in the sun or whatever and another puppet master with a cheetah could come along and attack your cheetah therefore your actions , should that happen, will be different than if that puppet master had not operated their cheetah in that manner.

Wherein arises uncertainty and excitement. (The constantly reiterated reason for creating and experiencing physical reality)

Yes, yes.

The reference we just made was to the actual holding of (in) the imagination your idea of a cheetah, yes?

Yes, right.

And of course you are not holding that in isolation. You are holding that within the environment created for the cheetah to exist in and the cheetah will exist with other animals and other cheetahs, yes?

Yes.

So then your puppet master will take the appropriate action when faced with any event that arises, and that is part of the game, to react to the twists and turns, shall we say, of fate. In the same way the driver in the race is reacting to the twists and turns of the race track. But it still takes his full attention.